S-1/A
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 15, 2008
Registration No. 333-151559
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
Mistras Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
8711
|
|
22-3341267
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
195 Clarksville Road
Princeton Junction, New Jersey 08550
(609) 716-4000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos, Ph.D.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
195 Clarksville Road
Princeton Junction, New Jersey 08550
(609) 716-4000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
With copies to:
|
|
|
Andrew C. Freedman, Esq.
Sheldon G. Nussbaum, Esq.
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
666 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10103
Telephone (212) 318-3000
Fax (212) 318-3400
|
|
William J. Whelan, III, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10019
Telephone (212) 474-1000
Fax (212) 474-3700
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is
declared effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following box.
o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Offering Price(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
Registration Fee(3)
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
|
$
|
172,500,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee under Rule 457(o) of the Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares of common stock that may be purchased by the
underwriters to cover over-allotments, if any. |
|
(3) |
|
Previously paid by wire transfer on June 6, 2008. |
The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act or until this Registration Statement shall
become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant
to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO
COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 2008
Shares
Mistras
Group, Inc.
Common
Stock
Prior to this
offering, there has been no public market for our common stock.
The initial public offering price of the common stock is
expected to be between $ and
$ per share. We intend to apply to
list our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol MG.
We are
selling shares
of common stock and the selling stockholders are
selling shares
of common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from
the shares of common stock sold by the selling stockholders.
The underwriters
have an option to purchase a maximum of
and additional shares of common stock
from us and the selling stockholders, respectively, to cover
over-allotments of shares.
Investing in our
common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors on page 11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
|
Proceeds to
Mistras
|
|
|
Proceeds to
Selling
|
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Delivery of the
shares of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2008.
Neither the
Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Joint
Book-Running Managers
|
|
Robert
W. Baird & Co. |
Banc of America Securities LLC |
The date of this
prospectus
is ,
2008.
A world of ndt solutions software and products services international
A leading global provider of proprietary technology-enabled non-destructive testing (ndt) inspection solutions that
ensures the integrity of industrial and public infrastructure |
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Industry
and Market Data
This prospectus includes market and industry data and forecasts
that we obtained from internal research, publicly available
information and industry publications and surveys. Industry
publications and surveys generally state that the information
contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be
reliable. Unless otherwise noted, statements as to our market
position relative to our competitors are approximated and based
on the above-mentioned third-party data and internal analysis
and estimates as of the date of this prospectus. Although we
believe the industry and market data and statements as to market
position to be reliable as of the date of this prospectus, we
have not independently verified this information and it could
prove inaccurate. Industry and market data could be wrong
because of the method by which sources obtained their data and
because information cannot always be verified with certainty due
to the limits on the availability and reliability of raw data,
the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other
limitations and uncertainties. In addition, we do not know all
of the assumptions regarding general economic conditions or
growth that were used in preparing the forecasts from sources
cited herein.
Dealer
Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until ,
2008 (25 days after the commencement of the offering), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the
information that may be important to you. You should read this
entire prospectus carefully, including the risks discussed under
Risk Factors and the financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus before
making an investment decision. In this prospectus, our fiscal
years, which end on May 31, are identified according to the
calendar year in which they end (e.g., the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2008 is referred to as fiscal 2008),
and unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise
requires, Mistras, we, us
and our refer to Mistras Group, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries and their predecessors.
Our
Business
We are a leading global provider of proprietary,
technology-enabled non-destructive testing (NDT) solutions used
to evaluate the structural integrity of critical energy,
industrial and public infrastructure. We combine the skill and
experience of our certified technicians, engineers and
scientists with our advanced software and other proprietary
product offerings to deliver a comprehensive portfolio of
solutions, ranging from routine NDT inspections to complex,
plant-wide asset integrity assessment and management. These
solutions enhance our customers ability to extend the
useful life of their assets, increase productivity, minimize
repair costs, comply with governmental safety and environmental
regulations and, critically, avoid catastrophic disasters. Given
the role our services play in ensuring the safe and efficient
operation of infrastructure, we have historically provided a
majority of our services to our customers on a regular,
recurring basis. We serve a global customer base, including
companies in the oil and gas, fossil and nuclear power
generation and transmission, public infrastructure, chemicals,
aerospace and defense, transportation, primary metals and
metalworking, pharmaceuticals and food processing industries. As
of August 15, 2008, we had approximately
1,600 employees in 60 offices across 15 countries, through
which we have established long-term relationships as a critical
solutions provider to many leading companies, including Airbus,
Rio Tinto, American Electric Power, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bechtel,
BP, Dow Chemical, Duke Energy, DuPont, ExxonMobil, First Energy,
General Electric, Shell and Valero, and to various federal,
state and local governmental infrastructure and defense
authorities, including the departments of transportation of
several states. The following chart represents revenues we
generated in certain of our end markets as well as
representative customers in these end markets for fiscal 2008.
Mistras
Revenue and Representative Customers by End Market
(fiscal 2008)
1
NDT involves the examination of the structural integrity of
infrastructure assets in order to identify and quantify defects
and degradations and optimize safety and operating performance
without impacting the future usefulness or impairing the
integrity of these assets. The ability to inspect infrastructure
assets and not interfere with their operating performance makes
NDT a highly attractive alternative to many traditional
inspection techniques, which may require dismantling equipment
or plant shutdown. Infrastructure-intensive industries employ
NDT during the design, fabrication, maintenance, inspection and
retirement phases of the assets life.
As a global NDT leader, we provide a broad range of solutions
that include traditional outsourced NDT inspection services,
advanced NDT solutions, a proprietary portfolio of software
products for capturing and analyzing inspection data in
real-time, enterprise software and relational databases for
storing and analyzing inspection data and on-line monitoring
systems for remote asset inspection. Since inception, we have
increased our capabilities and the size of our customer base
through the development of applied technologies, organic growth
and the successful integration of acquired companies. Although
representing a small percentage of our revenue growth in the
periods presented, these acquisitions have provided us with
additional products, technologies and resources that have
enhanced our sustainable competitive advantages over our
competition.
We generated revenues of $152.3 million,
$122.2 million and $93.7 million and EBITDA of
$27.8 million, $18.8 million and $12.4 million
for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For fiscal 2008,
we generated 74.9% of our revenues from our Services segment,
9.5% from our Software and Products segment for sales to
external customers and 15.6% from our International segment.
Our
Industry
NDT is a large and rapidly growing market. NDT plays a crucial
role in assuring the operational and structural integrity of
critical infrastructure without compromising the usefulness of
the tested materials or equipment. The evolution of NDT
technology and its associated services, in combination with
broader industry trends, has made NDT an integral and
increasingly outsourced part of many asset-intensive industries.
Well-publicized industrial and public infrastructure failures
and accidents have also raised the level of awareness of
regulators, as well as owners and operators, of the benefits
that NDT can provide.
We believe the following represent key dynamics driving the
growth of the NDT industry:
|
|
|
|
|
Extending the Useful Life of Aging
Infrastructure. The prohibitive cost and
challenge of building new infrastructure has resulted in the
significant aging of existing infrastructure and led to a desire
by companies to extend the useful life of existing assets.
Because aging infrastructure requires relatively higher levels
of maintenance and repair, as well as more frequent, extensive
and ongoing testing requirements, companies and public
authorities are spending billions of dollars to ensure the
operational and structural integrity of this infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Outsourcing of Non-Core Activities and Technical Resource
Constraints. While some of our customers have
historically performed NDT services in-house, the increasing
sophistication and automation of NDT, together with a decreasing
supply of skilled professionals and stricter governmental
regulations, has led many of them to outsource NDT to providers
that have the necessary engineering skills, technical workforce,
technology and proven track-record of performance to effectively
meet their increasing requirements.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Capacity Utilization. Due to high
energy prices and the limited construction of new
infrastructure, existing infrastructure in some of our target
markets is being used at higher capacities, which accelerates
deterioration and limits downtime for repair or replacement. In
order to sustain high capacity utilization rates, customers are
increasingly using NDT solutions to ensure the integrity and
safety of their assets. NDT customers have also experienced
productivity enhancements for their infrastructure as a result
of reduced maintenance-related downtime.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Corrosion from Low-Quality
Inputs. High commodities prices and increasing
energy demands have led to the use of lower grade inputs, such
as low-grade coal or petroleum, in the refinery
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
and power generation processes. These lower grade inputs more
rapidly corrode the infrastructure they come into contact with,
which in turn increases the need for NDT solutions to identify
such corrosion and enable infrastructure owners to combat the
problems they cause.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increasing Use of Advanced Materials. NDT
customers in our target markets are increasingly utilizing
advanced materials and other unique technologies in the
manufacturing and construction of new infrastructure. As a
result, they require increasingly advanced testing, inspection
and maintenance technologies to protect these assets. We believe
that demand for NDT solutions will increase as companies and
public authorities continue to use NDT solutions, not only
during the maintenance lifecycle of their assets, but also
during the design and construction phases by incorporating NDT
technologies such as embedded sensors.
|
|
|
|
Meeting Safety Regulations. Owners and
operators of infrastructure assets increasingly face strict
government regulations and safety requirements. Failure to meet
these standards can result in significant financial liabilities,
increased scrutiny by the Occupational Safety & Health
Administration (OSHA) and other regulators, higher insurance
premiums and tarnished corporate brand value. As a result, these
owners and operators are seeking highly reliable NDT suppliers
with a proven track record of providing NDT products and
services to assist them in meeting these increasingly stringent
regulations.
|
|
|
|
Expanding Addressable End-Markets. Advances in
NDT sensor technologies and software solutions, and the
continued emergence of new technologies, are creating increased
demand for NDT solutions in applications where existing NDT
techniques were previously ineffective. Further, we expect
increased demand in relatively new markets with infrastructure
that is only now aging to a point where significant maintenance
of infrastructure is required, such as pharmaceuticals, food
processing and other industries.
|
|
|
|
Expanding Addressable Geographies. We believe
that a substantial driver of incremental demand will come from
international markets, as companies and governments in these
markets build and maintain infrastructure and applications that
require the use of advanced NDT solutions.
|
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths contribute to our
being a leading provider of NDT solutions and allow us to
further capitalize on growth opportunities in the NDT industry:
|
|
|
|
|
One-Stop Shop for NDT Solutions Worldwide. We
believe we are the only vendor with a comprehensive suite of
proprietary and integrated NDT services, software and products
worldwide, which positions us to be the leading single source
provider for a customers NDT requirements. In addition,
collaboration between our services teams and product design
engineers generates enhancements to our services, software and
products, which provides a source of competitive advantage
compared to companies that provide only NDT services or products
to their customers.
|
|
|
|
Trusted Provider to a Diversified and Growing Customer
Base. By providing critical and reliable NDT
services, software and products for more than 30 years, we
have become a trusted partner to a large and growing customer
base across numerous infrastructure-intensive industries. We
leverage our strong relationships to sell additional solutions
to our existing customers and attract new customers. As NDT
becomes an increasingly strategic asset for our customers, we
believe our reputation and history of successful execution will
differentiate us from our competitors. Seven of our top 10
customers by revenues in fiscal 2008 have used our solutions for
at least ten years.
|
|
|
|
Repository of Customer-Specific Inspection
Data. Our enterprise software solutions enable us
to capture and store our customers testing and inspection
data in a centralized database. As a result, we have accumulated
large amounts of proprietary information that allows us to
provide our customers with value-added services, such as
predictive maintenance, inspection scheduling, data analytics
and regulatory compliance. We believe our ability to provide
these customized products and services, along with the high cost
of switching to an alternative vendor, provide us with
significant competitive advantages.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products, Software and Technology
Packages. We have developed systems that have
become the cornerstone of several unique NDT applications. These
proprietary products allow us to efficiently and effectively
provide complex solutions to our customers, resulting in a
significant competitive advantage versus our competition. In
addition to the products we sell to our customers, we also
develop a range of proprietary sensors, instruments, systems and
software used exclusively by our Services group.
|
|
|
|
Deep Domain Knowledge and Extensive Industry
Experience. We are an industry leader in
developing advanced NDT solutions, including acoustic emission
(AE) testing for non-intrusive on-line inspection of storage
tanks and pressure vessels, portable corrosion mapping
ultrasonic testing (UT) systems, on-line plant asset integrity
management with sensor fusion, enterprise software solutions for
plant-wide inspection data archiving and management, advanced
and thick composites inspection and ultrasonic phased array
inspection of thick wall boilers. In addition, many of the
members of our team have been instrumental in developing the
testing standards followed by international standards-setting
bodies, such as the American Society of Non-Destructive Testing
and comparable associations in other countries.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating with Our Customers. Our NDT
solutions have historically been designed in response to our
customers unique performance specifications and are
supported by our proprietary technologies. Our sales and
engineering teams work closely with our customers research
and design staff during the design phase of our products in
order to incorporate our products into specified infrastructure
projects. As a result, we believe that our close, collaborative
relationships with our customers provide us a significant
competitive advantage.
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team. Our management
team has a track record of leadership in NDT, averaging
approximately 20 years experience in the industry. These
individuals also have extensive experience in growing businesses
organically and in acquiring and integrating companies, which we
believe is important to facilitate future growth in the
fragmented NDT industry.
|
Our
Growth Strategy
Our growth strategy emphasizes the following key elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to Develop Software-Enabled Services and
Products. We intend to maintain and enhance our
technological leadership by continuing to invest in the internal
development of new services, software and products while
opportunistically acquiring key technologies and solutions that
address the highly specialized needs of our target markets. We
intend to capitalize on our extensive proprietary technology to
develop customized solutions for markets that we expect will
significantly increase their use of NDT solutions in the future,
such as alternative energy and agriculture.
|
|
|
|
Increase Revenues from Our Existing
Customers. Many of our customers are global
corporations with NDT requirements from multiple divisions at
multiple locations across the globe. Currently, we capture a
relatively small portion of their overall expenditures on NDT.
We believe our superior services, software and other products,
combined with the trend of outsourcing NDT solutions to a small
number of trusted service providers, positions us to
significantly expand both the number of divisions and locations
that we serve as well as the types of solutions we provide.
|
|
|
|
Add New Customers in Existing Target
Markets. Our customer base, which we define as
the approximately 4,000 customers to which we have provided NDT
solutions during fiscal 2008, represents a small fraction of the
total number of companies in our target markets with NDT and
asset integrity management requirements. Our scale, scope of
products and services and expertise in creating
technology-enabled solutions have allowed us to build a
high-quality reputation and increase customer awareness about us
and our NDT solutions. We intend to continue to leverage our
competitive strengths to win new business as customers in our
existing target markets continue to seek a single source and
trusted provider of advanced NDT solutions.
|
|
|
|
Expand Our Customer Base into New End
Markets. We believe we have significant
opportunities to rapidly grow our customer base in relatively
new end markets, including the shipping, alternative
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
energy, natural gas transportation and healthcare industries and
the market for public infrastructure, such as highways and
bridges. The expansion of our addressable markets is being
driven by the increased recognition and adoption of NDT products
and services, new NDT technologies enabling further applications
to address additional end-market needs and the aging of
infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to Capitalize on Acquisitions. We
intend to continue employing a disciplined acquisition strategy
to broaden and enhance our product and service offerings, add
new customers and certified personnel, supplement our internal
development efforts and accelerate our expected growth. We
believe the market for NDT solutions is highly fragmented with a
large number of potential acquisition opportunities. We have a
proven ability to integrate complementary businesses, as
demonstrated by the success of our past acquisitions. We believe
we have improved the operational performance and profitability
of our acquired businesses by successfully integrating and
selling a comprehensive suite of solutions to the customers of
these acquired businesses.
|
Summary
Risks
Before you invest in our stock, you should carefully consider
all the information in this prospectus, including matters set
forth under the heading Risk Factors. We believe
that the following are some of the major risks and uncertainties
that may affect us:
|
|
|
|
|
our business currently depends on certain significant customers
and any reduction of business with these customers would harm
our future operating results;
|
|
|
|
an accident or incident involving our NDT solutions could expose
us to claims, harm our reputation and adversely affect our
ability to compete for business;
|
|
|
|
material weaknesses identified in our internal controls relating
to the lack of technical accounting and financial reporting
oversight in prior financial statements and an inadequate level
of accounting personnel in the past have resulted, and if not
properly remediated, could in the future result in material
misstatements of our financial statements;
|
|
|
|
an ability to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of
trained engineers, scientists and other highly skilled workers
as well as members of senior management;
|
|
|
|
strengths and actions of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
our current dependence on customers in the oil and gas industry;
|
|
|
|
the timing, size and integration success of potential future
acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
catastrophic events, including natural disasters, could disrupt
our business or the business of our customers, which could
significantly harm our operations, financial results and cash
flow.
|
Corporate
Information
We were founded by former AT&T Bell Laboratories
researchers in 1978 and operated as Physical Acoustics
Corporation until December 29, 1994, when we reorganized
and began operating as Mistras Holdings Corp., a Delaware
corporation. In February 2007, we changed our name to Mistras
Group, Inc. Since inception, we have increased our services,
software and products offerings through a combination of organic
growth and the successful integration of acquired companies.
Our principal executive offices are located at 195 Clarksville
Road, Princeton Junction, NJ 08550, and our telephone number at
that address is
(609) 716-4000.
Our website is located at www.mistrasgroup.com.
Information on, or accessible through, our website is not a part
of, and is not incorporated into, this prospectus.
Our trademarks include
Mistrastm,
CONAMtm,
Physical Acoustics
Corporationtm,
PCMStm
and Controlled Vibrations
Inc.tm
Other trademarks or service marks appearing in this prospectus
are the property of their respective holders.
5
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by
|
|
|
|
Us
|
|
shares
of common stock
|
|
Selling stockholders
|
|
shares
of common stock
|
|
Total
|
|
shares
of common stock
|
|
Over-allotment option
|
|
|
|
Us
|
|
shares
of common stock
|
|
Selling stockholders
|
|
shares
of common stock
|
|
Total
|
|
shares
of common stock
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding
after the offering
|
|
shares
of common stock
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We estimate that the net proceeds
to us from this offering will be approximately
$ . We plan to use these net
proceeds for general corporate purposes, including working
capital and possible acquisitions. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.
See Use of Proceeds.
|
|
Dividend policy
|
|
We currently have no plans to pay
dividends on our common stock.
|
|
Risk factors
|
|
You should carefully read and
consider the information set forth under Risk
Factors, together with all of the other information set
forth in this prospectus, before deciding to invest in shares of
our common stock.
|
|
|
|
Listing
|
|
We intend to apply to list our
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
MG.
|
Except as otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires,
throughout this prospectus the number of shares of common stock
shown to be outstanding after this offering and other
share-related information is based on the number of shares
outstanding as
of ,
and:
|
|
|
|
|
reflects
a -for-
stock split, effected
on ;
|
|
|
|
reflects the conversion of all outstanding shares of our
preferred stock into an aggregate
of shares
of common stock upon the completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option;
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
outstanding as
of ,
at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per share; and
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock reserved for future awards under the 2008
Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
The following table sets forth the number of shares of common
stock to be sold by the directors and executive officers who are
selling such shares in this offering. For more information on
persons selling shares of common stock in this offering, please
see Principal and Selling Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Being Sold
|
|
|
in this Offering
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
Mark F. Carlos
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Software and Products
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip T. Cole
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, International
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Lange
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Services, and Director
|
|
|
|
|
Our executive officers, directors and each person, or group of
affiliated persons, known by us to beneficially own more than
five percent of our voting securities, taken together as a
group, will own approximately % of
our outstanding common stock after this offering. For
information on the number of shares of common stock to be
received by these individuals or groups upon the conversion of
our preferred stock at the completion of this offering, please
see Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Conversion of All Preferred Stock upon
Completion of this Offering.
6
Summary
Historical Consolidated Financial Data
The following table sets forth our summary historical
consolidated financial information and other data. The
historical statement of operations and cash flow data for fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006 and the historical balance sheet data as of
May 31, 2008 are derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial statements
and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
The information contained in this table should also be read in
conjunction with Use of Proceeds,
Capitalization, Selected Historical
Consolidated Financial Information,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes thereto, all
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
$
|
93,741
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
90,990
|
|
|
|
75,702
|
|
|
|
55,908
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
6,847
|
|
|
|
4,666
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
54,431
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
34,820
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
32,463
|
|
|
|
26,408
|
|
|
|
24,748
|
|
Research and engineering expenses
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
16,358
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
5,247
|
|
Other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
(2,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
12,851
|
|
|
$
|
14,006
|
|
|
$
|
6,208
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(19,446
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,387
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
6,320
|
|
|
$
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,654
|
)
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
27,773
|
|
|
$
|
18,769
|
|
|
$
|
12,408
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted(3)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
119,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
$
|
48,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, including current portion
|
|
$
|
11,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock
|
|
$
|
63,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
(24,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per common share gives effect to the
assumed conversion of our preferred stock for all periods
presented. It is computed by dividing net income by the pro
forma number of weighted average shares outstanding used in the
calculation of diluted (loss) earnings per share, but after
assuming conversion of our preferred stock and exercise of any
dilutive stock options. The calculation for this, as well as our
basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share, follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Excludes certain stock options and preferred shares which
would be anti-dilutive
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
21,721
|
|
Common stock equivalents of conversion of preferred shares
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
503,829
|
|
|
|
420,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,542,874
|
|
|
|
1,511,632
|
|
|
|
1,418,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
EBITDA, a performance measure used by management, is defined in
this prospectus as net income plus: interest expense, provision
for income taxes and depreciation and amortization, as shown in
the table below. In this prospectus, EBITDA is not adjusted to
exclude the non-cash loss on extinguishment of long-term debt of
$0.5 million that we incurred in fiscal 2007. |
|
|
|
Our management uses EBITDA as a measure of operating performance
to assist in comparing performance from period to period on a
consistent basis, as a measure for planning and forecasting
overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against
such expectations, and as a performance evaluation metric off
which to base executive and employee incentive compensation
programs. |
|
|
|
We believe investors and other external users of our financial
statements benefit from the presentation of EBITDA in evaluating
our operating performance because it provides them with an
additional tool to compare our operating performance on a
consistent basis by removing the impact of certain items that
management believes do not directly reflect our core operations.
For instance, EBITDA generally excludes interest expense, taxes
and depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially
from company to company depending upon accounting methods and
the book value and age of assets, capital structure, capital
investment cycles and the method by which assets were acquired. |
|
|
|
Although EBITDA is widely used by investors and securities
analysts in their evaluations of companies, you should not
consider it either in isolation or as a substitute for analyzing
our results as reported under U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). EBITDA is generally limited as an
analytical tool because it excludes, among other things, the
statement of operations impact of depreciation and amortization,
interest expense and the provision for income taxes and
therefore does not necessarily represent an accurate measure of
profitability, particularly in situations where a company is
highly leveraged or has a disadvantageous tax structure. As a
result, EBITDA is of particularly limited value in evaluating
our operating performance because (i) we use a significant
amount of capital assets and depreciation and amortization
expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to
generate revenue; (ii) we have a significant amount of debt
and interest expense is a necessary element of our costs and
ability to generate revenue; and (iii) we generally incur
significant U.S. federal, state and foreign income taxes
each year and the provision for income taxes is a necessary
element of our costs. EBITDA also does not reflect historical
cash expenditures or future requirements for capital
expenditures or contractual commitments, changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs and all non-cash
income or expense items that are reflected in our statements of
cash flows. Furthermore, because EBITDA is not defined under
GAAP, our definition of EBITDA may differ from, and therefore
may not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by
other companies, thereby limiting its usefulness as a
comparative measure. |
|
|
|
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as
the primary measure of our operating performance or as a measure
of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of
our business. |
9
|
|
|
|
|
We strongly urge you to review the GAAP financial measures
included in this prospectus, our consolidated financial
statements, including the notes thereto, and the other financial
information contained in this prospectus, and not to rely on any
single financial measure to evaluate our business. |
|
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to
EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,423
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
|
|
7,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
27,773
|
|
|
$
|
18,769
|
|
|
$
|
12,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The as adjusted column is unaudited and gives effect to: |
|
|
|
|
|
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock
into shares of our common stock upon the completion of this
offering and a -for- stock split of
our common stock; and
|
|
|
|
the sale by us
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at the initial public
offering price of
$ per
share (the midpoint of the range shown on the cover page of this
prospectus), after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
10
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully read and consider the risks described
below, together with the other information contained in this
prospectus, including our financial statements and the notes
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, before
making an investment decision. If any of these risks actually
occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations
and future growth prospects may be adversely affected. As a
result, the trading price of our common stock would likely
decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results could be adversely affected by a reduction of
business with our significant customers.
We derive a significant amount of revenues from a few customers.
For instance, various divisions or business units of BP were
responsible for 16.7%, 16.5% and 9.5% of our revenues for fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Taken as a group, our top 10
customers were responsible for 35.2%, 38.6% and 31.1% of our
revenues for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Generally, our customers do not have an obligation to make
purchases from us and may stop ordering our products and
services at any time without financial penalty. The loss of any
of our significant customers, any substantial decline in sales
to these customers or any significant change in the timing or
volume of purchases by our customers could result in lower
revenues and could harm our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
An
accident or incident involving our NDT solutions could expose us
to claims, harm our reputation and adversely affect our ability
to compete for business and, as a result, harm our operating
performance.
We are exposed to liabilities arising out of the solutions we
provide. For instance, we furnish the results of our NDT
inspections for use by our customers in their assessment of
aspects of their assets, facilities, plants and other
structures. Such results may be incorrect or incomplete, whether
as a result of poorly designed inspections, malfunctioning
testing equipment or our employees failure to adequately
test or properly record data. For example, one of our clients
recently claimed one of our x-ray inspection crews had
improperly recorded inspection data about a portion of its
infrastructure, requiring us to provide a new team to inspect
that infrastructure over a period of three months at our
expense. Further, if an accident or incident involving a
structure we tested occurs and causes personal injuries or
property damage, such as the collapse of a bridge or explosion
in a plant or facility, and particularly if these injuries or
damage could have been prevented by our customers had we
provided them with correct or complete results, we may face
significant claims by injured persons or related parties and
claims relating to any property damage or loss. Even if our
results are correct and complete, we may face claims for such
injuries or damage simply because we tested the structure or
facility in question. An example of litigation arising out of
such an accident or incident is the lawsuits brought by private
parties and the Massachusetts Attorney General against our
wholly owned subsidiary, Conam Inspection and Engineering
Services, Inc. (Conam). Staveley Services North America, Inc.,
the company from which we acquired the Conam assets in 2003, had
performed tests on parts of the ceiling that collapsed in the
Boston Central Artery/Tunnel Project in 2006, which collapse
resulted in injuries, deaths and property damage. We believe
that we did not assume any liabilities for prior testing by
Staveley Services North America, Inc. when we purchased these
assets, and have been advised that Conam is not a current
defendant in the lawsuit brought by private parties and that the
Massachusetts Attorney General intends to dismiss its claim
against Conam. However, we have incurred expenses defending
these lawsuits. Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to
cover the damages from any such claims, forcing us to bear these
uninsured damages directly, which could harm our operating
results and may result in additional expenses and possible loss
of revenues. An accident or incident for which we are found
partially or fully responsible, even if fully insured, may also
result in negative publicity, which would harm our reputation
among our customers and the public, cause us to lose existing
and future contracts or make it more difficult for us to compete
effectively, thereby significantly harming our operating
performance. Such an accident or incident might also make it
more expensive or
11
impossible for us to insure against similar events in the
future. Even unsuccessful claims relating to accidents could
result in substantial costs to us and diversion of our
management resources.
We and
our independent registered public accounting firm identified two
material weaknesses in our internal controls, which in the past
have, and if not properly remediated, could in the future result
in material misstatements of our financial
statements.
In connection with our review of our financial results for
fiscal 2008 and 2007, we and our independent registered public
accounting firm reported to our Board of Directors two material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A
material weakness is defined by the standards issued by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as a significant
deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will
not be prevented or detected. These weaknesses related to our
lack of technical oversight in prior financial statements and an
inadequate level of accounting personnel. These material
weaknesses resulted in, or contributed to, adjustments to our
financial statements and, in certain cases, restatement of prior
financial statements. These adjustments related primarily to an
error in accounting for a capital lease entered into in 1997,
which resulted in an increase in net income of $180,000 for
fiscal 2006. We also corrected the effect of the adoption of
FIN 48, Uncertain Tax Positions, from our
original estimate. We have developed and are executing a plan to
remediate the material weaknesses by implementing additional
formal policies and procedures, increasing management review and
oversight over the financial statement close and reporting
processes and hiring additional accounting personnel. However,
if these measures fail to fully remediate the material
weaknesses or if additional material weaknesses in our internal
controls are discovered in the future, we may be unable to
provide required financial information in a timely and reliable
manner, or otherwise comply with the standards applicable to us
as a public company, and our management may not be able to
report that our internal control over financial reporting is
effective for fiscal 2010 or thereafter, when we are required to
comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
This may cause a loss of investor confidence in us and the
reliability of our financial statements and, as a result, harm
our business and the trading price of our common stock.
In addition, in August 2008, we began implementing an upgrade to
our accounting software system. We intend to transition selected
financial processes to the new system and expect to complete the
upgrade in fiscal 2009. If we do not effectively and timely
implement this system or if the system does not operate as
intended, it could adversely impact the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting.
If we
are unable to attract and retain a sufficient number of trained
engineers, scientists and other highly skilled workers at
competitive wages, our operational performance may be harmed and
our costs may increase.
We believe that our success depends, in part, upon our ability
to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of trained
engineers, scientists and other highly skilled employees at
competitive wages. The demand for such employees is currently
high, and we project that it may increase substantially in the
future. Accordingly, we have experienced increases in our labor
costs, particularly in our Services segment, but also, to a
lesser extent, in our International segment. Many of the
companies with which we compete for experienced personnel have
comparatively greater name recognition and resources. In
addition, in making employment decisions, job candidates often
consider the value of the stock options they are to receive in
connection with their employment. Volatility in the future
market price of our stock may, therefore, adversely affect our
ability to attract or retain key employees. Furthermore, the
relatively new requirement to expense stock options may
discourage us from granting the size or type of stock option
awards that job candidates require to join our company. The
markets for our products and services also require us to field
personnel trained and certified in accordance with standards set
by domestic or international standard-setting bodies, such as
the American Society of Non-Destructive Testing. Because of the
limited supply of these certified technicians, we expend
substantial resources maintaining in-house training and
certification programs. If we fail to attract sufficient new
personnel or fail to motivate and retain our current personnel,
our ability to perform under existing contracts and orders or to
pursue new business may be harmed, causing us to lose
12
customers and revenues, and the costs of performing such
contracts and orders may increase, which would likely reduce our
margins.
If we
lose members of our senior management team upon whom we are
dependent, we may not be able to manage our operations and
achieve our strategic objectives.
Our future success depends to a considerable degree upon the
availability, contributions, vision, skills, experience and
effort of our senior management team. We do not maintain
key person insurance on any of our employees other
than Dr. Sotirios Vahaviolos, our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer. We currently have no employment
agreements with members of our senior management team. Although
we anticipate entering into employment agreements with certain
executive officers in connection with this offering, these
agreements will likely not guarantee the services of the
individual for a specified period of time. All of the agreements
with members of our senior management team are expected to
provide that their employment is at-will and may be terminated
by either us or the employee at any time and without notice.
Although we do not have any reason to believe that we may lose
the services of any of these persons in the foreseeable future,
the loss of the services of any of these persons might impede
our operations or the achievement of our strategic and financial
objectives. The loss or interruption of the service of members
of our senior management team could harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations and could significantly
reduce our ability to manage our operations and implement our
strategy.
We
operate in highly competitive markets and if we are unable to
compete successfully, we could lose market share and
revenues.
We face strong competition from NDT solutions providers, both
larger and smaller than we are. Many of our competitors have
greater financial resources than we do. Our competitors could
focus their substantial financial resources to develop a
competing business model or develop products or services that
are more attractive to potential customers than what we offer.
Some of our competitors are business units of substantially
larger companies than us and have the ability to combine NDT
solutions into an integrated offering to customers who already
purchase other types of products or services from them. Our
competitors may offer NDT solutions at prices below or without
cost in order to improve their competitive positions. Any of
these competitive factors could make it more difficult for us to
attract and retain customers, cause us to lower our prices in
order to compete and reduce our market share and revenues, any
of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Due to
our dependency on customers in the oil and gas industry, we are
susceptible to prolonged negative trends relating to this
industry that could adversely affect our operating
results.
Our customers in the oil and gas industry (including the
petrochemical market) have accounted for a substantial portion
of our historical revenues. Specifically, they accounted for
approximately 50%, 52% and 49% of our revenues for fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. We continue to diversify our
customer base into industries other than the oil and gas
industry, but we may not be successful in doing so. If the oil
and gas industry were to suffer a prolonged or significant
downturn, our operating performance may be significantly harmed.
Our
growth strategy includes acquisitions. We may not be able to
identify suitable acquisition candidates or integrate acquired
businesses successfully, which may inhibit our rate of growth,
and any acquisitions that we do complete may expose us to a
number of unanticipated operational and financial
risks.
Our historical growth has depended, and our future growth is
likely to continue to depend, to a certain extent, on our
ability to make acquisitions and successfully integrate acquired
businesses. We intend to continue to seek additional acquisition
opportunities, both to expand into new markets and to enhance
our position in existing markets globally. We may not be able to
successfully identify suitable candidates, negotiate appropriate
acquisition terms, obtain necessary financing on acceptable
terms, complete proposed acquisitions, successfully integrate
acquired businesses into our current operations or expand into
new markets.
13
Once integrated, acquired operations may not achieve levels of
revenues, profitability or productivity comparable with those
achieved by our current operations, or otherwise perform as
expected.
Some of the risks associated with our acquisition strategy
include:
|
|
|
|
|
unexpected loss of key personnel and customers of the acquired
company;
|
|
|
|
making the acquired companys financial and accounting
standards consistent with our standards;
|
|
|
|
assumption of liability for risks and exposures (including
environmental-related costs), some of which we may not discover
during our due diligence; and
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management.
|
Our ability to undertake acquisitions is limited by covenants in
our credit agreement and our financial resources, including
available cash and borrowing capacity. Future acquisitions could
result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities,
the incurrence of substantial additional indebtedness and other
expenses, impairment expenses related to goodwill and impairment
or amortization expenses related to other intangible assets, any
of which could harm our financial condition. Although management
intends to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular
transaction, there are no assurances that we will properly
ascertain all such risks. Difficulties encountered with
acquisitions may harm our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Catastrophic
events, such as natural disasters, epidemics, war and acts of
terrorism, could disrupt our business or the business of our
customers, which could significantly harm our operations,
financial results and cash flow.
Our operations and those of our customers are susceptible to the
occurrence of catastrophic events outside our control, ranging
from severe weather conditions to acts of war and terrorism. Any
such events could cause a serious business disruption that
reduces our customers ability to or interest in purchasing
our NDT solutions, and have in the past resulted in order
cancellations and delays because customer equipment, facilities
or operations have been damaged, or are not operational or
available. For instance, order cancellations and delays due to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita adversely affected our revenues in
fiscal 2006. Additionally, such events have resulted and may in
the future result in substantial delays in the provision of
solutions to our customers and the loss of valuable equipment.
Any cancellations, delays or losses due to a catastrophic event
may significantly reduce our revenues and harm our operating
performance.
We
expect to continue expanding and investing in our sales and
marketing, operations, engineering, research and development
capabilities and financial and reporting systems, and as a
result, may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which
could disrupt our operations.
We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our
employees and the scope of our operations. To effectively manage
our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and
improve our managerial, operational, financial and reporting
systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train
additional qualified personnel. We expect that all of these
measures will require significant expenditures and will demand
the attention of management. We may not be able to effectively
manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and adequately
train additional qualified personnel. Failure to manage our
growth effectively could lead us to over-invest or under-invest
in technology and operations, result in weaknesses in our
infrastructure, systems or controls, give rise to operational
mistakes, loss of business opportunities, the loss of employees
and reduced productivity among remaining employees. Our expected
growth could require significant capital expenditures and may
divert financial resources from other projects, such as the
development of new solutions. If our management is unable to
effectively manage our expected growth, our expenses may
increase more than expected, our revenues could decline or may
grow more slowly than expected and we may be unable to implement
our business strategy.
14
The
success of our businesses depends, in part, on our ability to
develop new NDT solutions and increase the functionality of our
current offerings.
The market for NDT solutions is impacted by technological
change, uncertain product life cycles, shifts in customer
demands and evolving industry standards and regulations. We may
not be able to successfully develop and market new NDT solutions
that comply with present or emerging industry regulations and
technology standards. Also, new regulations or technology
standards could increase our cost of doing business.
From time to time, our customers have requested greater
functionality in our solutions. As part of our strategy to
enhance our NDT solutions and grow our business, we plan to
continue making substantial investments in the research and
development of new technologies. We believe our future success
will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to design new,
competitive NDT solutions, enhance our current NDT solutions and
provide new, value-added services. Developing new solutions will
require continued investment, and we may experience unforeseen
technological or operational challenges. In addition,
NDT-related software is complex and can be expensive to develop,
and new software and software enhancements can require long
development and testing periods. If we are unable to develop NDT
solutions or enhancements to our current NDT offerings, or if
the market does not accept such solutions, we will likely lose
opportunities to realize revenues and customers and our business
and results of operations will be adversely affected.
If our
software produces inaccurate information or is incompatible with
the systems used by our customers and makes us unable to
successfully provide our solutions, it could lead to a loss of
revenues and customers.
Our software is complex and, accordingly, may contain undetected
errors or failures. Software defects or inaccurate data may
cause incorrect recording, reporting or display of information
related to our NDT solutions. Any such failures, defects and
inaccurate data may prevent us from successfully providing our
NDT solutions, which would result in lost revenues. Software
defects or inaccurate data may lead to customer dissatisfaction
and our customers may seek to hold us liable for any damages
incurred. As a result, we could lose customers, our reputation
may be harmed and our financial condition and results of
operations would be materially adversely affected.
We currently serve a commercial, industrial and governmental
customer base that uses a wide variety of constantly changing
hardware, software solutions and operating systems. Our NDT
solutions need to interface with these non-standard systems in
order to gather and assess data. Our business depends on the
following factors, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate our technology with new and existing
hardware and software systems;
|
|
|
|
our ability to anticipate and support new standards, especially
Internet-based standards; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate additional software modules under
development with our existing technology and operational
processes.
|
If we are unable to adequately address any of these factors, our
results of operations and prospects for growth and profitability
would be harmed.
If we
fail to successfully educate current and potential customers
regarding the benefits of our NDT solutions or the market for
these solutions otherwise fails to develop, our ability to grow
our business could be adversely impacted.
Our future success depends on continued and growing commercial
acceptance of our NDT solutions and our ability to obtain
additional contracts. We anticipate that revenues related to our
NDT solutions will constitute a substantial portion of our
revenues for the foreseeable future. If we are unable to educate
our potential customers about the advantages our solutions have
over competing products and services, or our current customers
stop purchasing our NDT solutions, our operating results could
be significantly harmed. In addition, because the NDT solutions
sector is rapidly evolving, we could lose insight into trends
that may be emerging, which would further harm our competitive
position by making it difficult to predict and respond to
15
customer needs. If the market for our NDT solutions does not
continue to develop, our ability to grow our business would be
limited and we might not be able to maintain profitability.
Our
results of operations could be harmed if our operating expenses
do not correspond with the timing of our revenues.
Most of our operating expenses, such as employee compensation
and property rental expense, are relatively fixed over the
short-term. Moreover, our spending levels are based in part on
our expectations regarding future revenues. As a result, if
revenues for a particular quarter are below expectations, we
would not be able to proportionately reduce operating expenses
for that quarter without a substantial disruption to our
business. This shortfall in revenues could adversely affect our
operating results for that quarter and could cause the market
price of our common stock to decline substantially.
The
seasonal nature of our business reduces our revenues in our
first and third fiscal quarters.
Our business is seasonal. Our first and third fiscal quarter
revenues are typically lower than our revenues in the second and
fourth fiscal quarters because demand for our NDT services from
the oil and gas as well as the fossil and nuclear power
generation and transmission industries increases during their
non-peak production periods. For instance,
U.S. refineries non-peak periods are generally in our
second fiscal quarter, when they are retooling to produce more
heating oil for winter, and in our fourth fiscal quarter, when
they are retooling to produce more gasoline for summer. As a
result of these trends, we generally have reduced cash flows in
our second and fourth fiscal quarters, which may require us to
borrow under our credit agreement or otherwise, to discontinue
planned operations, or to curtail our operations. We expect that
the negative impact of seasonality on our first and third fiscal
quarter revenues and second and fourth fiscal quarter cash flows
will continue.
Growth
in revenues from our Services segment or traditional NDT
services relative to revenues from our Software and Products and
International segments, may reduce our overall gross profit
margin.
Our gross profit margin on revenues from our Services segment
has historically been lower than our gross profit margin on
revenues from our other segments because our services have
higher labor-related costs. For instance, the gross profit
margin in our Services segment for fiscal 2008 was 30.9%, while
our gross profit margin in our Software and Products segment and
in our International segment was 50.2% and 41.9%, respectively.
Our overall gross profit margin was 35.7% during the same
period. Moreover, our gross profit margin on traditional NDT
services has historically been lower than our gross profit
margin in our Services segment as a whole. As a result, we
expect our overall gross profit margin will be lower in periods
when revenues from our services, and particularly from
traditional NDT services, has increased as a percentage of total
revenues and will be higher in periods when revenues from our
International or Software and Products segments has increased as
a percentage of total revenues. Fluctuations in our gross profit
margin may affect our level of profitability in any period,
which may negatively affect the price of our common stock.
Our
business is currently subject to governmental regulation, and
may become subject to modified or new government regulation that
may negatively impact our ability to market our NDT
solutions.
We incur substantial costs in complying with various government
regulations and licensing requirements. For example, the
transportation and overnight storage of radioactive materials
used in providing certain of our NDT solutions is subject to
regulation under federal and state laws and licensing
requirements. Conam is currently licensed to handle radioactive
materials by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
and 15 state regulatory agencies. If we allegedly fail to
comply with these regulations, we may be investigated and incur
significant legal expenses associated with such investigations,
and if we are found to have violated these regulations, we may
be fined or lose one or more of our licenses to perform further
projects. While we are investigated, we may be required to
suspend work on the projects associated with our alleged
noncompliance, resulting in loss of profits or customers, and
damage to our reputation. For instance, in January, 2007, we
were investigated due to an incident involving radiation
exposure resulting from the misconduct of one of our employees.
As a result, our customer required us to briefly suspend work on
the associated project. We were found to have violated
regulations governing the handling of radioactive materials, and
as a result we incurred
16
significant legal expenses. A more serious violation could
result in lost profits and damage to our reputation. In the
future, federal, state, provincial or local governmental
agencies may seek to change current regulations or impose
additional regulations on our business. Any modified or new
government regulation applicable to our current or future NDT
solutions may negatively impact the marketing and provision of
those solutions and increase our costs and the price of our
solutions.
A
significant stockholder controls the direction of our business.
The concentrated ownership of our common stock may prevent you
and other stockholders from influencing significant corporate
decisions.
Dr. Sotirios J. Vahaviolos, our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer., will own
approximately % of our outstanding
common stock after this offering. As a result,
Dr. Vahaviolos will have the ability to exert substantial
influence over all matters requiring approval by our
stockholders, including the election and removal of directors,
amendments to our certificate of incorporation, and any proposed
merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our
assets and other corporate transactions. This concentration of
ownership could be disadvantageous to other stockholders with
differing interests from Dr. Vahaviolos.
An
inability to protect our intellectual property could negatively
affect our business and results of operations.
Our ability to compete effectively depends in part upon the
maintenance and protection of the intellectual property related
to our NDT solutions. Patent protection is unavailable for
certain aspects of the technology and operational processes
important to our business. Any patent held by us or to be issued
to us, or any of our pending patent applications, could be
unenforceable, challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Some of
our trademarks that are not in use may become available to
others. To date, we have relied principally on copyright,
trademark and trade secrecy laws, as well as confidentiality
agreements and licensing arrangements, to establish and protect
our intellectual property. However, we have not obtained
confidentiality agreements from all of our customers and
vendors, and although we have entered into confidentiality
agreements with all of our employees in our Software and
Products segment and certain of our other employees involved in
the development of our intellectual property, we cannot be
certain that these agreements will be honored or enforceable.
Some of our confidentiality agreements are not in writing, and
some customers are subject to laws and regulations that require
them to disclose information that we would otherwise seek to
keep confidential. Although we do not transfer ownership of some
of our more advanced NDT software or other products and,
instead, sell to our customers services using these products, in
part, in an effort to protect the intellectual property upon
which they are based, this strategy may not be successful and
our customers or third parties may reverse engineer or otherwise
derive this intellectual property and use it without our
authorization. Policing unauthorized use of our intellectual
property is difficult and expensive. The steps that we have
taken or may take might not prevent misappropriation of the
intellectual property on which we rely. In addition, effective
protection may be unavailable or limited in jurisdictions
outside the United States, as the intellectual property laws of
foreign countries sometimes offer less protection or have
onerous filing requirements. From time to time, third parties
may infringe our intellectual property rights. Litigation may be
necessary to enforce or protect our rights or to determine the
validity and scope of the rights of others. Any litigation could
be unsuccessful, cause us to incur substantial costs, divert
resources away from our daily operations and result in the
impairment of our intellectual property. Failure to adequately
enforce our rights could cause us to lose valuable rights in our
intellectual property and may negatively affect our business.
We may
be subject to damaging and disruptive intellectual property
litigation related to allegations that our NDT solutions
infringe on the intellectual property of others, which could
prevent us from offering those solutions.
Third-party patent applications and patents may be applicable to
our NDT solutions. As a result, third parties may in the future
make infringement and other allegations that could subject us to
intellectual property litigation relating to our solutions. Such
litigation would be time consuming and expensive, divert
attention and resources away from our daily operations, impede
or prevent delivery of our solutions and require us to pay
significant royalties, licensing fees and damages. In addition,
parties making infringement and other
17
claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to provide our
solutions and could cause us to pay substantial damages. In the
event of a successful claim of infringement, we may need to seek
one or more licenses from third parties in order to continue to
offer the related solution, which may not be available at a
reasonable cost, or at all. For example, in 2004 a competitor
brought a patent infringement lawsuit against us based on our
use of certain sensor technology in our inspection of a bridge.
We incurred approximately $629,000 in expenses to defend against
and settle this lawsuit, and to enter into a license to use this
technology. Under this license agreement, we have paid the
competitor immaterial amounts for fees and royalties for use of
the technology, which we no longer use in our business.
We may
require additional capital to support business growth, which
might not be available.
We intend to continue making investments to support our business
growth and may require additional funds to respond to business
challenges or opportunities, including the need to develop new,
or enhance our current, NDT solutions, enhance our operating
infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses and
technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or
debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise
additional funds through further issuances of equity or
convertible debt securities, our current stockholders, including
investors in this offering, could suffer significant dilution,
and any new equity securities we issue could have rights,
preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our
common stock. Any debt financing secured by us in the future
could involve restrictive covenants relating to our
capital-raising activities and other financial and operational
matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain
additional capital and to pursue business opportunities,
including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be
able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if
at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or
financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our
ability to continue to support our business growth and to
respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
Our
credit agreement contains financial and operating restrictions
that may limit our access to credit. If we fail to comply with
financial or other covenants in our credit agreement, we may be
required to repay indebtedness to our existing lenders, which
may harm our liquidity.
Provisions in our credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A.
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., impose restrictions on our
ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make investments;
|
|
|
|
incur more debt;
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate;
|
|
|
|
make dispositions of property;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and make distributions;
|
|
|
|
enter into a new line of business;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
enter into burdensome agreements.
|
Our credit agreement also contains financial covenants that
require us to maintain compliance with specified financial
ratios. We may not be able to comply with these covenants in the
future. Our failure to comply with these covenants may result in
the declaration of an event of default, which could prevent us
from borrowing under our credit agreement. In addition to
preventing additional borrowings under our credit agreement, an
event of default, if not cured or waived, may result in the
acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness outstanding under
the agreement, which would require us to pay all amounts
outstanding and, in addition, our lenders may require us to cash
collateralize letters of credit issued thereunder. If an event
of default occurs, we may not be able to cure it within any
applicable cure period, if at all. If the maturity of our
18
indebtedness is accelerated, we then may not have sufficient
funds available for repayment or the ability to borrow or obtain
sufficient funds to replace the accelerated indebtedness on
terms acceptable to us, or at all.
We may
become subject to commercial disputes or product liability
claims, that could harm our business by distracting our
management from the operation of our business, by increasing our
expenses and, if we do not prevail, by subjecting us to
potential monetary damages and other remedies.
We face potential liability for, among other things, contract,
negligence and product liability claims related to our provision
of NDT solutions. For instance, our customers may assert that we
have failed to perform under our agreements with them, or our
customers or third parties may claim damages arising out of
misuse of our products, the malfunctioning of our products due
to design or manufacturing flaws, or the use of our products
with components or systems not manufactured or sold by us. We
currently do not carry product liability insurance and we may
not have sufficient resources to satisfy any liability resulting
from product liability or other claims. Any of these claims or
disputes could result in monetary damages and equitable or other
remedies that could harm our financial position or operations.
Even if we prevail in or settle these claims or disputes, they
may distract our management from operating our business and the
cost of defending or settling them could harm our operating
results, financial position and cash flows.
We
rely on a limited number of suppliers to provide us
radioisotopes and a material interruption in supply could
prevent or limit our ability to fill orders for our
products.
We depend upon a limited number of third-party suppliers for the
radioisotopes we use to provide certain advanced NDT solutions.
Our principal suppliers are Industrial Nuclear Company, QSA
Global Inc. and Source Production & Equipment Co.,
Inc. We also utilize other commercial isotope manufacturers
located in the United States and overseas. To date, we have been
able to obtain the required radioisotopes for our NDT solutions
without any significant delays or interruptions. If we lose any
of these suppliers, we may be required to find and enter into
supply arrangements with one or more replacement suppliers.
Obtaining alternative sources of supply could involve
significant delays and other costs and these supply sources may
not be available to us on reasonable terms or at all. Any
disruption of supplies could delay delivery of our products that
use radioisotopes, which could adversely affect our business and
financial results and result in lost or deferred sales.
NDT
sales cycles can be lengthy, unpredictable and require
significant employee time and financial resources with no
assurances that we will realize revenues.
Our sales cycles are often long and unpredictable. Many of our
current and potential customers have extended budgeting and
procurement processes. We believe that they also tend to be risk
averse and follow industry trends rather than be the first to
purchase new products or services, which can extend the lead
time for or prevent acceptance of new products or services.
Accordingly, they may take longer to reach a decision to
purchase our solutions. This extended sales process, which often
lasts between three and six months, requires the dedication of
significant time and financial resources, with no certainty of
success or recovery of our related expenses. It is not unusual
for our current and potential customers to go through the entire
sales process and not make any purchases.
Any
real or perceived internal or external electronic security
breaches in connection with the use of our NDT solutions could
harm our reputation, inhibit market acceptance of our solutions
and cause us to lose customers.
We and our customers use our NDT solutions to compile and
analyze sensitive or confidential customer-related information.
In addition, some of our NDT solutions allow us to remotely
control equipment at commercial, institutional and industrial
locations. Our NDT solutions rely on the secure electronic
transmission of proprietary data over the Internet or other
networks. Well-publicized compromises of Internet security could
have the effect of substantially reducing confidence in the
Internet as a medium of data transmission. The occurrence or
perception of security breaches in connection with our NDT
solutions or our customers concerns about Internet
security or the security of our solutions, whether warranted or
not, would
19
likely harm our reputation or business, inhibit market
acceptance of our NDT solutions and cause us to lose customers,
any of which would harm our financial condition and results of
operations.
We may come into contact with sensitive consumer information or
data when we perform installation, maintenance or testing
functions for our customers. Even the perception that we have
improperly handled sensitive, confidential information would
have a negative effect on our business. If, in handling this
information, we fail to comply with privacy or security laws, we
could incur civil liability to government agencies, customers
and individuals whose privacy is compromised. In addition, third
parties may attempt to breach our security or inappropriately
harm our NDT solutions through computer viruses, electronic
break-ins and other disruptions. If a breach is successful,
confidential information may be improperly obtained, for which
we may be subject to lawsuits and other liabilities.
Our
international operations are subject to risks relating to
non-U.S.
operations.
In fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, we generated approximately 19.6%,
20.6% and 21.3%, respectively, of our revenues outside the
United States and we expect to increase our international
presence over time. Our primary operations outside the United
States are in Europe, Asia and South America. There are numerous
risks inherent in doing business in international markets,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates,
including the relatively weak position of the U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
varying regional and geopolitical business conditions and
demands;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable foreign regulations and licensing
requirements;
|
|
|
|
the cost and uncertainty of obtaining data and creating
solutions that are relevant to particular geographic markets;
|
|
|
|
the need to provide sufficient levels of technical support in
different locations;
|
|
|
|
the complexity of maintaining effective policies and procedures
in locations around the world;
|
|
|
|
the risks of divergent business expectations or difficulties in
establishing joint ventures with foreign partners;
|
|
|
|
political instability and civil unrest;
|
|
|
|
restrictions or limitations on outsourcing contracts or services
abroad;
|
|
|
|
restrictions or limitations on the repatriation of
funds; and
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences.
|
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. We are expanding our
sales and marketing efforts in certain emerging markets, such as
Brazil, Russia, India and China. Expanding our business into
emerging markets may present additional risks beyond those
associated with more developed international markets. For
example, in China and Russia, we may encounter risks associated
with the ongoing transition from state business ownership to
privatization. In any emerging market, we may face the risks of
working in cash-based economies, dealing with inconsistent
government policies and encountering sudden currency
revaluations.
We
rely on certification of our NDT solutions by industry
standards-setting bodies.
We currently have International Organization for Standardization
(ISO)
9001-2000
certifications for each of Conam, Physical Acoustics Corporation
(PAC) and Physical Acoustics Limited and we have ISO 14001:2004
certification for Conam. In addition, we currently have Nadcap
(formerly National Aerospace and Defense Contractors
Accreditation Program) certification for four of our locations
in Auburn, Massachusetts; Springfield, Massachusetts; Heath,
Ohio; and Kent, Washington. We continually review our NDT
solutions for compliance with the requirements of industry
specification standards and the Nadcap special processes quality
20
requirements. However, if we fail to maintain our ISO or Nadcap
certifications, our business may be harmed because our customers
generally require that we have ISO and Nadcap certification
before they purchase our NDT solutions.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock and this Offering
We
expect our quarterly revenues and operating results to
fluctuate. If we fail to meet the expectations of market
analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock
could decline substantially.
Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and
are expected to do so in the future. Accordingly, we believe
that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations
may be misleading. You should not rely upon the results of one
quarter as an indication of future performance. Our revenues and
operating results may fall below the expectations of securities
analysts or investors in any future period. Our failure to meet
these expectations would likely cause the market price of our
common stock to decline, perhaps substantially.
Our quarterly revenues and operating results may vary depending
on a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
revenue volume during the period;
|
|
|
|
demand for and acceptance of our NDT solutions;
|
|
|
|
delays in the implementation and delivery of our NDT solutions,
which may impact the timing of our recognition of revenues;
|
|
|
|
delays or reductions in spending for NDT solutions by our
customers and potential customers;
|
|
|
|
the long lead time associated with securing new customer
contracts;
|
|
|
|
the termination of existing customer contracts;
|
|
|
|
development of new relationships and maintenance and enhancement
of existing relationships with customers and strategic partners;
|
|
|
|
changes in pricing for NDT solutions;
|
|
|
|
effects of recent acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
changes in the price or availability of materials used in our
services; and
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures for sales and marketing, software
development and other corporate activities.
|
We
currently have no plans to pay dividends on our common
stock.
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock to date, and we do not anticipate declaring or paying any
dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We
currently intend to retain all available funds and any future
earnings for use in the development, operation and growth of our
business. In addition, our credit agreement prohibits us from
paying dividends and future loan agreements may also prohibit
the payment of dividends. Any future determination relating to
our dividend policy will be at the discretion of our board of
directors and will depend on our results of operations,
financial condition, capital requirements, business
opportunities, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed
relevant. To the extent we do not pay dividends on our common
stock, investors must look solely to stock appreciation for a
return on their investment.
21
There
is no existing market for our common stock, and a trading market
that will provide you with adequate liquidity may not develop.
The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor
interest will lead to the development of an active and liquid
trading market in our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange or otherwise. If an active and liquid trading market
does not develop, you may have difficulty selling any of our
common stock.
The initial public offering price for the shares will be
determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of
the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price
of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange after the
offering. The market price of our common stock may decline below
the initial public offering price. The market price of our
common stock may also be influenced by many factors, some of
which are beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in
our industry;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts
or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
|
|
|
|
general economic and stock market conditions;
|
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock
after this offering or changes in financial estimates by
analysts;
|
|
|
|
future sales of our common stock; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors described in this Risk Factors section.
|
The stock markets have generally experienced extreme price and
volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant
impact on the market price of securities issued by many
companies, including those in our industry. These changes
frequently appear to occur without regard to the operating
performance of these companies. The price of our common stock
could fluctuate for reasons that have little or nothing to do
with our company, and these fluctuations could materially reduce
our stock price.
In the past, some companies that have had volatile market prices
for their securities have been subject to class action or
derivative lawsuits. The filing of a lawsuit against us,
regardless of the outcome, could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations,
as it could result in substantial legal costs and a diversion of
our managements attention and resources.
Shares
eligible for future sale may cause the market price for our
common stock to decline even if our business is doing
well.
Future sales by us or by our existing stockholders of
substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or
the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the
market price of our common stock to decline. This could also
impair our ability to raise additional capital in the future
through the sale of our equity securities. Under our second
amended and restated certificate of incorporation that will be
in effect upon the completion of this offering, we are
authorized to issue up
to shares
of common stock, of
which shares
of common stock will be outstanding following this offering. Of
these shares, the shares of common stock sold in this offering
will be freely transferable without restriction or further
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(Securities Act), by persons other than affiliates,
as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities
Act. In
addition, shares
of common stock will become freely tradeable immediately upon
the termination of the
lock-up
agreements described below and an
additional shares
of common stock will become freely tradeable thereafter,
assuming no exercise of any outstanding warrants or options as
of .
Certain of our stockholders will be able to cause us to register
common stock that they own under the Securities Act pursuant to
registration rights that are described in Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Registration
Rights. We also intend to register all shares of common
stock that we may issue under our 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
22
Our executive officers and directors and certain of our
stockholders have entered into
lock-up
agreements described under the caption Underwriting,
pursuant to which they have agreed, subject to certain
exceptions and extensions, not to sell or transfer, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock for a period of
180 days from the date of this prospectus or to exercise
registration rights during such period with respect to such
shares. However, after the
lock-up
period expires, or if the
lock-up
restrictions are waived by the representatives, such persons
will be able to sell their shares and exercise registration
rights to cause them to be registered. We cannot predict the
size of future issuances of our common stock or the effect, if
any, that future sales and issuances of shares of our common
stock, or the perception of such sales or issuances, would have
on the market price of our common stock. See Shares
Eligible for Future Sale.
We
have not determined any specific use for a significant portion
of the proceeds from this offering and we may use the proceeds
in ways with which you may not agree.
Our management will have considerable discretion in the
application of the net proceeds received by us. You will not
have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to
assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. You
must rely on the judgment of our management regarding the
application of the net proceeds of this offering. The net
proceeds may be used for corporate purposes that may not improve
our financial condition and results of operations or increase
our stock price. See Use of Proceeds.
Purchasers
of common stock will experience immediate and substantial
dilution.
Based on the initial public offering price of
$ per share (the midpoint of the
price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus),
purchasers of our common stock in this offering will experience
an immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book
value per share of common stock of
$ per share from the offering
price. Investors purchasing common stock in this offering will
contribute approximately % of the
total amount invested by stockholders since inception, but will
only own approximately % of the
shares of common stock outstanding. In addition, following this
offering we will also have a significant number of outstanding
warrants and options to purchase our common stock, with the
options having exercise prices significantly below the initial
public offering price of our common stock. You will incur
further dilution if outstanding options or warrants to purchase
common stock are exercised. In addition, our second amended and
restated certificate of incorporation that will be in effect
upon the completion of this offering allows us to issue
significant numbers of additional shares, including shares that
may be issued under our 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which
could result in further dilution to purchasers of our common
stock in this offering.
Provisions
of our charter, bylaws and of Delaware law, as well as some of
our employment arrangements, could discourage, delay or prevent
a change of control of our company, which may adversely affect
the market price of our common stock.
Certain provisions of our second amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
that will be in effect upon the completion of this offering
could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition, or
other change of control that stockholders may consider
favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise
receive a premium for your shares. These provisions also could
limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the
future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the
market price of our common stock. Stockholders who wish to
participate in these transactions may not have the opportunity
to do so. Furthermore, these provisions could prevent or
frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our
management. These provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
allow the authorized number of directors to be changed only by
resolution of our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
require that vacancies on the board of directors, including
newly created directorships, be filled only by a majority vote
of directors then in office;
|
|
|
|
authorize our board of directors to issue, without stockholder
approval, preferred stock that, if issued, could operate as a
poison pill to dilute the stock ownership of a
potential hostile acquiror to prevent an acquisition that is not
approved by our board of directors;
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
require that stockholder actions must be effected at a duly
called stockholder meeting by prohibiting stockholder action by
written consent;
|
|
|
|
prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which
would otherwise allow holders of less than a plurality of stock
to elect some directors; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for stockholder
nominations to our board of directors or for stockholder
proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings and limit
the right to call special meetings of stockholders to the
Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the
board of directors acting pursuant to a resolution adopted by a
majority of directors or the Secretary upon the written request
of stockholders entitled to cast not less than 35% of all the
votes entitled to be cast at such meeting.
|
Some of our employment arrangements and stock option agreements
provide for severance payments and accelerated vesting of
benefits, including accelerated vesting of restricted stock and
options, upon a change of control. This offering will not
constitute a change of control under such agreements. These
provisions may discourage or prevent a change of control.
In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are
governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, which may, unless certain criteria are
met, prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15%
or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or
combining with us for a prescribed period of time.
Being
a public company will increase our administrative workload and
expenses.
As a public company with common stock listed on the New York
Stock Exchange, we will need to comply with new laws,
regulations and requirements, including certain provisions of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, related regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the requirements of
the New York Stock Exchange, which we are not required to comply
with as a private company. Complying with these statutes,
regulations and requirements will occupy a significant amount of
time of our board of directors and management. The hiring of
additional personnel to handle these responsibilities will
increase our operating costs. We expect we will need to:
|
|
|
|
|
institute a more comprehensive compliance function;
|
|
|
|
design, establish, evaluate and maintain a system of internal
control over financial reporting in compliance with the
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and the related rules and regulations of the SEC and the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;
|
|
|
|
prepare and distribute periodic public reports in compliance
with our obligations under the federal securities laws;
|
|
|
|
establish new internal policies, such as those relating to
disclosure controls and procedures and insider trading;
|
|
|
|
involve and retain to a greater degree outside counsel and
accountants in the above activities; and
|
|
|
|
establish and maintain an investor relations function, including
the provision of certain information on our website.
|
In addition, we expect that being a public company subject to
these rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us
to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may
be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially
higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make
it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified
executive officers and qualified members of our board of
directors, particularly to serve on our audit and compensation
committees.
24
Our
internal controls over financial reporting do not currently meet
the standards required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal
controls over financial reporting in accordance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material
adverse effect on our business and stock price.
Our internal controls over financial reporting do not currently
meet the standards required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, standards that we will be required to meet
in the course of preparing our 2010 annual report on
Form 10-K.
We do not currently have comprehensive documentation of our
internal controls, nor do we document or test our compliance
with these controls on a periodic basis in accordance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Furthermore, we have
not tested our internal controls in accordance with
Section 404 and, due to our lack of documentation, such a
test would not be possible to perform at this time.
We are in the early stages of addressing our internal controls
procedures to satisfy the requirements of Section 404,
which requires an annual management assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.
If, as a public company, we are not able to timely or adequately
implement the requirements of Section 404, our independent
registered public accounting firm may not be able to attest to
the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting.
If we are unable to maintain adequate internal controls over
financial reporting, we may be unable to report our financial
information on a timely basis, may suffer adverse regulatory
consequences or violations of applicable stock exchange listing
rules and may breach the covenants under our credit facilities.
There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets
due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability
of our financial statements.
In addition, we expect to incur incremental costs in order to
improve our internal controls over financial reporting and
comply with Section 404, including increased auditing and
legal fees and costs associated with hiring additional
accounting and administrative staff. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Overview.
25
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are
based on our managements beliefs and assumptions and on
information currently available to us. The forward-looking
statements are contained principally in the sections entitled
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Use of Proceeds, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Business. When used in this
prospectus, the words anticipate,
believe, could, estimate,
expect, intend, may,
plan, potential, predict,
project, should, would, and
similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations
reflected in any forward-looking statements are reasonable,
these plans, intentions or expectations are based on
assumptions, are subject to risks and uncertainties and may not
be achieved. Our actual results, performance or achievements
could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or
implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this
prospectus. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from our forward-looking statements are set
forth in this prospectus, including under the heading Risk
Factors. Given these uncertainties, you should not place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also,
forward-looking statements represent our managements
beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety
by the cautionary statements set forth in this prospectus. These
statements include, among other things, statements relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
our evaluation of the history and the dynamics supporting the
demand and growth in the NDT solutions market;
|
|
|
|
estimates of market sizes and anticipated uses of our NDT
solutions;
|
|
|
|
our business strategy and our underlying assumptions about data
and trends in the markets for NDT;
|
|
|
|
our ability to market, commercialize and achieve market
acceptance for our NDT solutions;
|
|
|
|
our estimates regarding future revenues, expenses, capital
requirements, liquidity, the sufficiency of our cash resources
and our needs for additional financing;
|
|
|
|
our anticipated use of the proceeds of this offering;
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our
business without infringing upon the intellectual property
rights of others; and
|
|
|
|
managements goals, expectations and objectives and other
similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical
facts.
|
Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from
our expectations due to a variety of factors. Although it is not
possible to identify all of these factors, they include, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
loss of or reduction in business with a significant customer;
|
|
|
|
an accident or incident involving our NDT solutions;
|
|
|
|
catastrophic events that cause disruptions to disrupt our
business or the business of our customers;
|
|
|
|
material weaknesses in our internal controls;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain trained engineers, scientists
and other highly skilled workers as well as members of senior
management;
|
|
|
|
actions of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on customers in the oil and gas industry; and
|
|
|
|
the timing, size and integration success of potential future
acquisitions.
|
Potential investors are urged to carefully consider these
factors and the other factors described under Risk
Factors in evaluating any forward-looking statements and
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
26
these forward-looking statements. Except as required by
applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update
any forward-looking statements or to update the reasons actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in any
forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes
available in the future.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of our common
stock in this offering, based on the initial public offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus),
will be approximately $ , or
$ if the underwriters exercise
their over-allotment option in full, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
We plan to use these net proceeds for general corporate
purposes, including working capital and possible acquisitions.
We have no present understandings, commitments or agreements to
acquire any businesses or technologies. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.
We have not yet determined the amount of our remaining net
proceeds to be used specifically for any of the foregoing
purposes. Accordingly, management will have flexibility in
applying our remaining net proceeds of this offering. Pending
their use, we intend to invest our net proceeds from this
offering in short-term, investment grade, interest-bearing
instruments.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any
future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our
business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in
the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay
dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors
and will depend on our financial condition, results of
operations, capital requirements and other factors that our
board of directors deems relevant. The terms of our current
credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. preclude us, and the terms of any future debt or
credit facility may also preclude us, from paying dividends.
27
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth (1) our cash and cash
equivalents and (2) our capitalization as of May 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis to reflect the conversion of all of our
outstanding preferred stock
into shares
of our common stock upon the completion of this offering, a
-for- stock split of our common
stock and the effectiveness of our second amended and restated
certificate of incorporation that will be effective upon
completion of this offering, as if such transactions occurred on
May 31, 2008; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to further reflect the sale
of shares
of common stock by us in this offering at the initial public
offering price of $ per share (the
midpoint of the price range shown on the cover page of this
prospectus).
|
For purposes of the pro forma as adjusted column of the
capitalization table below, we have assumed the net proceeds
from this offering will be
$ million after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
In addition, the table excludes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
outstanding as of May 31, 2008 at a weighted average
exercise price of $ per
share; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
of common stock reserved for future awards under the 2008
Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
This table should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto,
Use of Proceeds, Selected Historical
Consolidated Financial Information, and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, all included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of May 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
as Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
$
|
48,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, including current portion
|
|
|
11,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
60,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
63,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $0.01 par value per share (actual:
2,000,000 shares authorized and 1,000,000 shares
issued and outstanding; pro forma
: shares authorized
and shares issued and
outstanding; pro forma as adjusted
: shares authorized
and shares issued and
outstanding)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(25,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(24,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
99,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
to the extent of the difference between the initial public
offering price per share of our common stock and the net
tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately
after the completion of this offering. Dilution results from the
fact that the per share offering price of the common stock is
substantially in excess of the book value per share attributable
to the existing stockholders for the presently outstanding stock.
As of May 31, 2008, our net tangible book deficit was
approximately $64.7 million, or approximately
$ per share. Net tangible book
deficit per share represents the amount of total tangible assets
less our total liabilities, including our preferred stock,
divided by the number of shares outstanding. On a pro forma
basis, after giving effect to the conversion
of shares
of our preferred stock
into shares
of our common stock and a -for- stock
split of our common stock, and excluding proceeds from this
offering, our pro forma net tangible book value as of
May 31, 2008 would have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share.
On a pro forma as adjusted basis, after giving further effect to
the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at the initial public offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus)
and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value as of May 31, 2008 would
have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share. This represents an
immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value from
this offering of $ per share to
our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors
purchasing common stock in this offering.
The following table illustrates this dilution to new investors
on a per share basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as
of ,
2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share
attributable to investors purchasing shares in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to
investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes, as of May 31, 2008, the
differences between the number of shares of common stock owned
by existing stockholders and the number to be owned by new
public investors, the aggregate cash consideration paid to us
after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering
expenses payable by us and the average price per share paid by
our existing stockholders and to be paid by new public investors
purchasing shares of common stock in this offering at the
initial public offering price of $
per share (the midpoint of the price range shown on the cover
page of this prospectus).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
New public investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares disclosed for the existing stockholders
includes shares being sold by the selling stockholders in this
offering. The number of shares disclosed for the new investors
does not include the shares being purchased by the new investors
from the selling stockholders in this offering. |
The discussion and tables above assume no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. If the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option in full, the number of
shares of common stock held by new
29
investors will increase to
approximately shares,
or approximately % of the total
number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after
this offering, our existing stockholders would own
approximately % of the total number
of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this
offering, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per
share of common stock would be approximately
$ and the dilution in pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock to
new investors would be $ .
In addition, the above discussion and tables assume no exercise
of stock options.
As of May 31, 2008, we had outstanding options to purchase
a total
of shares
of common stock at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per share. If all of these
outstanding options had been exercised as of May 31, 2008,
our pro forma net tangible book value would have been
$ per share of common stock, pro
forma as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering
would be $ per share of common
stock and dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book
value to investors in this offering would be
$ per share of common stock.
In addition, if all of these outstanding options as of
May 31, 2008 were exercised, on an as adjusted basis after
deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses
payable by us, (i) existing stockholders would have
purchased shares
representing % of the total shares
for $ , or
approximately % of the total
consideration paid, with an average price per share of
$ and
(ii) shares
purchased by new stockholders in this offering would represent
approximately % of total shares for
approximately $ , or
approximately % of the total
consideration paid.
30
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following tables set forth our selected historical
consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. The
selected statement of operations and cash flow data for fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006 and the selected balance sheet data as of
May 31, 2008 and 2007 have been derived from our audited
financial statements and related notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The statement of operations and
cash flow data for fiscal 2005 and the selected balance sheet
data as of May 31, 2005 have been derived from our audited
financial statements not included in this prospectus. The
statement of operations and cash flow data for fiscal 2004 and
the selected balance sheet data as of May 31, 2004 have
been derived from our unaudited financial statements not
included in this prospectus.
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
audited and unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
$
|
93,741
|
|
|
$
|
80,813
|
|
|
$
|
65,271
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
90,990
|
|
|
|
75,702
|
|
|
|
55,908
|
|
|
|
51,426
|
|
|
|
32,466
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
6,847
|
|
|
|
4,666
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
54,431
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
34,820
|
|
|
|
26,440
|
|
|
|
31,211
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
32,463
|
|
|
|
26,408
|
|
|
|
24,748
|
|
|
|
20,994
|
|
|
|
24,031
|
|
Research and engineering expenses
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
3,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
16,358
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
5,247
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
|
|
4,589
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
and minority interest
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
(4,160
|
)
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
Provision for (benefits from) income taxes
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
(4,089
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
(4,073
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
(2,922
|
)
|
|
|
(2,062
|
)
|
|
|
(1,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
|
|
955,217
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
|
|
955,217
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
|
$
|
(6.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.74
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
|
$
|
(6.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.74
|
)
|
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
(3.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
12,851
|
|
|
$
|
14,006
|
|
|
$
|
6,208
|
|
|
$
|
3,024
|
|
|
$
|
(509
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(19,446
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,193
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,710
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
6,320
|
|
|
$
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
$
|
(183
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,596
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
27,773
|
|
|
$
|
18,769
|
|
|
$
|
12,408
|
|
|
$
|
7,380
|
|
|
$
|
7,664
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the End of Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
|
$
|
1,976
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
917
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
119,822
|
|
|
$
|
79,885
|
|
|
$
|
74,425
|
|
|
$
|
71,149
|
|
|
$
|
70,593
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
$
|
48,270
|
|
|
$
|
25,403
|
|
|
$
|
29,668
|
|
|
$
|
38,622
|
|
|
$
|
38,017
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, including current portion
|
|
$
|
11,842
|
|
|
$
|
9,970
|
|
|
$
|
8,275
|
|
|
$
|
7,283
|
|
|
$
|
3,004
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock
|
|
$
|
63,869
|
|
|
$
|
30,995
|
|
|
$
|
26,575
|
|
|
$
|
15,623
|
|
|
$
|
13,561
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
(24,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
$
|
6,967
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pro forma diluted (loss) earnings per common share gives effect
to the assumed conversion of our preferred stock for all periods
presented. It is computed by dividing net income by the pro
forma number of weighted average shares outstanding used in the
calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share, but after
assuming conversion of our preferred stock and exercise of any
diluted stock options. The calculation for this, as well as our
basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share, follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
|
|
955,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earning per common share:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
|
|
955,217
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
|
|
955,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Inclusion of certain stock options and conversion of preferred
shares would be anti-dilutive.
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
(4,073
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
|
|
955,217
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
21,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,450
|
|
Common stock equivalents of conversion of preferred shares
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
503,829
|
|
|
|
420,067
|
|
|
|
298,701
|
|
|
|
236,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,542,874
|
|
|
|
1,511,632
|
|
|
|
1,418,903
|
|
|
|
1,264,278
|
|
|
|
1,202,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
(3.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
EBITDA, a performance measure used by management, is defined in
this prospectus as net income plus: interest expense, provision
for income taxes and depreciation and amortization, as shown in
the table on page 10. In this prospectus, EBITDA is not
adjusted to exclude the non-cash loss on extinguishment of
long-term debt of $0.5 million that we incurred in fiscal
2007. |
Our management uses EBITDA as a measure of operating performance
to assist in comparing performance from period to period on a
consistent basis, as a measure for planning and forecasting
overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against
such expectations, and as a performance evaluation metric off
which to base executive and employee incentive compensation
programs.
We believe investors and other external users of our financial
statements benefit from the presentation of EBITDA in evaluating
our operating performance because it provides them with an
additional tool to compare our operating performance on a
consistent basis by removing the impact of certain items that
management believes do not directly reflect our core operations.
For instance, EBITDA generally excludes interest expense, taxes
and depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially
from company to company depending upon accounting methods and
the book value and age of assets, capital structure, capital
investment cycles and the method by which assets were acquired.
Although EBITDA is widely used by investors and securities
analysts in their evaluations of companies, you should not
consider it either in isolation or as a substitute for analyzing
our results as reported under U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). EBITDA is generally limited as an
analytical tool because it excludes, among other things, the
statement of operations impact of depreciation and amortization,
interest expense and the provision for income taxes and
therefore does not necessarily represent an accurate measure of
profitability, particularly in situations where a company is
highly leveraged or has a disadvantageous tax structure. As a
result, EBITDA is of particularly limited value in evaluating
our operating performance because (i) we use a significant
amount of capital assets and depreciation and amortization
expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to
generate revenue; (ii) we have a significant amount of debt
and interest expense is a necessary element of our costs and
ability to generate revenue; and (iii) we generally incur
significant U.S. federal, state, and foreign income taxes
each year and the provision for income taxes is a necessary
element of our costs. EBITDA also does not reflect historical
cash expenditures or future requirements for capital
expenditures or contractual commitments, changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs and all non-cash
income or expense items that are reflected in our statements of
cash flows. Furthermore, because EBITDA is not defined under
GAAP, our definition of EBITDA may differ from, and therefore
may not be comparable to,
33
similarly titled measures used by other companies, thereby
limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered as
the primary measure of our operating performance or as a measure
of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of
our business. We strongly urge you to review the GAAP financial
measures included in this prospectus, our consolidated financial
statements, including the notes thereto and the other financial
information contained in this prospectus, and not to rely on any
single financial measure to evaluate our business.
34
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion together with the
financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in
this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that are based on managements current
expectations, estimates and projections about our business and
operations. The cautionary statements made in this prospectus
should be read as applying to all related forward-looking
statements wherever they appear in this prospectus. Our actual
results may differ materially from those currently anticipated
and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of
a number of factors, including but not limited to those we
discuss under Risk Factors and Forward-Looking
Statements.
Overview
We are a leading global provider of proprietary,
technology-enabled, NDT solutions used to evaluate the
structural integrity of critical energy, industrial and public
infrastructure. We combine the skill and experience of our
certified technicians, engineers and scientists with our
advanced enterprise software and other proprietary product
offerings to deliver a comprehensive portfolio of solutions,
ranging from routine NDT inspections to complex, plant-wide
asset integrity assessment and management solutions. Our
enterprise software is at the core of this portfolio because it
enables us to integrate all of the NDT solutions we offer. These
solutions enhance our customers ability to extend the
useful life of their assets, increase productivity, minimize
repair costs, comply with governmental safety and environmental
regulations and, critically, avoid catastrophic disasters. Given
the role our services play in ensuring the safe and efficient
operation of infrastructure, we have historically provided a
majority of our services to our customers on a regular,
recurring basis. We serve a global customer base, including
companies in the oil and gas, fossil and nuclear power
generation and transmission, public infrastructure, chemicals,
aerospace and defense, transportation, primary metals and
metalworking, pharmaceuticals and food processing industries.
During fiscal 2008, we provided our NDT solutions to
approximately 4,000 customers. As of August 15, 2008, we
had approximately 1,600 employees in 60 offices across 15
countries, through which we have established long-term
relationships as a critical solutions provider to many of the
leading companies in our target markets. Our current principal
market is the oil and gas industry, which accounted for
approximately 50%, 52% and 49% of our revenues for fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
During the last three fiscal years, we have principally focused
on introducing our advanced NDT solutions to our customers using
proprietary, technology-enabled software and testing
instruments, including those developed by our Products group.
During this period, the demand for outsourced NDT solutions has,
in general, increased, creating demand from which our entire
industry has benefited. We have experienced compounded annual
revenue growth of 23.5% over the last three fiscal years,
including the impact of acquisitions. During the same period,
revenues from our customers in the oil and gas market,
historically our largest target market, had a compounded annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 26.7% and revenues from our customers in
the fossil and nuclear power generation and transmission market
had a CAGR of 41.8%, the highest growth rate of all our target
markets. All of our other target markets, which include
aerospace and infrastructure, collectively had a CAGR of 13.9%.
With a few exceptions, we believe further growth can be realized
in all of our target markets. Concurrent with this growth, we
have worked to build our infrastructure to profitably absorb
additional growth and have made a number of small acquisitions
in an effort to leverage our fixed costs, grow our base of
experienced personnel, expand our technical capabilities and
increase our geographical reach.
Since inception, we have increased our capabilities and the size
of our customer base through the development of applied
technologies, organic growth and the successful integration of
acquired companies. Although representing a small percentage of
our revenue growth in the periods presented, these acquisitions
have provided us with additional products, technologies and
resources that have allowed us to build sustainable competitive
advantages over our competition. We have accelerated our
acquisition activity in fiscal 2008, which we believe will
further add to our growth.
35
In connection with our review of our financial results for
fiscal 2008 and 2007, we and our independent registered public
accounting firm reported to our Board of Directors two material
weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. We
are executing a plan to remediate the material weaknesses by
implementing additional formal policies and procedures,
increasing management review and oversight over the financial
statement closing and reporting processes and hiring additional
accounting personnel. We believe we have made progress in
addressing these material weaknesses and expect to complete the
remediation in the next year. We do not expect the costs of
remediating the material weaknesses to be material.
Basis of
Presentation
Consolidated
Results of Operations
Segment
Definition
Although we often offer an integrated suite of NDT solutions
incorporating services, software and other products, our Chief
Executive Officer currently utilizes three segments to assess
the performance of our business. The three segments are:
|
|
|
|
|
Services. This segment provides our NDT
services in North and Central America with the largest
concentration in the United States.
|
|
|
|
Software and Products. This segment designs,
manufactures, sells, installs and services software and other
products, including equipment and instrumentation, predominantly
in the United States.
|
|
|
|
International. This segment offers services,
software and products similar to those of our other segments to
global markets, principally in Europe, the Middle East, Africa,
Asia and South America, but not to customers in China and South
Korea, which are served by our Software and Products segment.
|
We provide general corporate services, including accounting,
audit, contract management and human resources management, to
our segments, and report certain intersegment transactions as
corporate and eliminations. There is no allocation of corporate
general and administrative expenses to our segments.
Segment income from operations is determined based on internal
performance measures used by our Chief Executive Officer to
assess the performance of each business in a given period and to
make decisions as to resource allocations. In connection with
that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer may exclude matters
such as certain acquisition-related charges and balances,
certain gains and losses from dispositions, stock compensation
expense, litigation settlements or other charges.
Statement
of Operations Overview
The following describes certain line items in our statement of
operations and some of the factors that affect our operating
results.
Revenues
Our revenues are generated by sales of our services, software
and other products. The majority of our revenues are derived
under
time-and-materials
contracts for specified NDT services on a
project-by-project
basis. The duration of our projects vary depending on their
scope. Some of our projects last from a few weeks to a few
months, but the more significant projects can last for more than
a year and can require long-term deployment of substantial
personnel, equipment and resources. The start date of our
projects can be postponed or delayed and the duration of our
projects can be shortened or increased due to a variety of
factors beyond our control. In addition to the timing of these
projects and the seasonality of our business, the amount and
origination of our revenues often vary from period to period. A
percentage of our revenues is usually attributable to recurring
work from our existing customers. Although our top ten customers
are responsible for a large percentage of our revenues, we
generate our revenues from most of these customers by providing
NDT solutions to numerous of their business locations. We
believe decisions regarding the purchase of our solutions by
these customers are made on a
location-by-location
basis. Also included in our revenues are software license fees
and product sales, as well as an estimate for any sales returns
and customer allowances. Revenues under our
time-and-materials
services contracts are based on the hours of service we provide
our customers at
36
negotiated rates, plus any actual costs of materials and other
direct expenses that we incur on the project, with little or no
mark-up.
Because these expenses, such as travel and lodging or
subcontracted services, can change significantly from project to
project, changes in our revenues may not be indicative of
business trends.
Cost of
revenues
Our cost of revenues includes our direct compensation and
related benefits to support our sales, together with
reimbursable costs, materials consumed or used in manufacturing
our products and certain overhead costs, such as non-billable
time, equipment rentals, fringe benefits and repair and
maintenance.
Depreciation
included in gross profit
Our depreciation represents the expense charge for our
capitalized assets. Depending on the nature of the original item
capitalized, these depreciation expenses are reported in one of
two places in our statement of operations. Depreciation used in
determining gross profit is directly related to our revenues and
primarily relates to depreciation of the manufacturing portion
of our corporate headquarters and of equipment used for the
production of our NDT solutions. Other depreciation is included
in deriving our income from operations and is discussed below.
Gross
profit
Our gross profit equals our revenues less our cost of revenues
and attributed depreciation. Our gross profit, both in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of revenues, can vary based on our
volume, sales mix, actual manufacturing costs and our
utilization of labor. As a result, gross profit may vary from
quarter to quarter. For instance, our gross profit can decline
during holiday periods when we incur labor costs without any
corresponding revenues. Under our
time-and-materials
contracts, we negotiate hourly billing rates and charge our
clients based on the actual time that we expend on a project.
Our profit margins on
time-and-materials
contracts fluctuate based on actual labor and overhead costs
that we directly charge or allocate to contracts compared to
negotiated billing rates.
In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for NDT
solutions and a limited supply of certified technicians.
Accordingly, we have experienced increases in our cost of labor
in our Services segment. The customers of our Services segment
are aware of these supply constraints and generally have, to
some extent, accepted corresponding price increases for our NDT
services. We are uncertain whether our ability to increase
prices for our NDT services will continue. In our Software and
Products segment, our ability to increase prices for any NDT
software or product to offset associated cost increases is based
principally on the extent to which its incorporates our
proprietary technology. We believe our efforts to develop and
offer our customers value-added proprietary solutions instead of
commodity-type products help us, in part, to resist margin
erosion. Our International segment offers services, software and
products similar to those of our other segments, so our ability
to increase prices in this segment as costs increase is
determined by the same factors affecting the pricing of our
other segments, and the relative mix of services, software and
products it provides in the applicable period.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Our selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised
primarily of expenses of our sales and marketing operations,
field location administrative costs and our corporate
headquarters related to our executive, general management,
finance, accounting and administrative functions and legal fees
and expenses. These costs can vary based on our volume of
business or as expenses are incurred to support corporate
activities and initiatives such as training. The largest single
category is salaries and related costs. In the near term, we
expect these expenses to increase as we support the growth of
our business and expand our sales and marketing efforts, improve
our information processes and systems and implement the
financial reporting, compliance and other infrastructure
required for a public company. We also expect that our selling,
general and administrative expenses will decline as a percentage
of our revenues, particularly over the long term.
37
Research
and engineering
Research and engineering expense consists primarily of
engineering salaries and personnel-related costs and the cost of
products, materials and outside services used in our process and
product development activities primarily in our Software and
Products segment. Other research and development is conducted in
our Services segments by various billable personnel and our
management on a collaborative basis. These costs are not
separated and are included in cost of revenues. Specific
development costs on software are capitalized and amortized in
our depreciation and amortization included in our income from
operations. From time-to-time, we receive minor grants or
contracts for paid research which are recorded in our revenues
with the related costs included in cost of revenues. We expect
to continue our investment in research and engineering
activities and anticipate that our associated expense will
increase in absolute terms in the future as we hire additional
personnel and increase research and engineering activity.
However, as a percentage of revenues, we expect research and
engineering expense to decline over time.
Depreciation
and amortization included in income from operations
Our depreciation and amortization used in deriving our income
from operations represents the expense charge for our
capitalized assets, and primarily relates to buildings and
improvements, including our corporate headquarters, office
furniture, equipment, or intangibles acquired as part of our
acquisitions of other businesses. These intangible assets
include, but are not limited to, non-competition agreements,
customer lists and trade names. To the extent we ascribe value
to identifiable intangible assets that have finite lives, we
amortize those values over the estimated useful lives of those
assets. Such amortization expense, although non-cash in the
period expensed, directly impacts our results of operations. It
is difficult to predict with any precision the amount of expense
we may record relating to acquired intangible assets. Because
many of the intangible assets we acquire are short-lived
intangible assets, we would expect to see higher amortization
expense in the first 12 to 18 months after an acquisition
has been consummated.
Income
from operations
Our income from operations is our gross profit less our selling,
general and administrative expenses, research and engineering
and depreciation and amortization included in income from
operations. We refer to our income from operations as a
percentage of our revenues as our operating margin.
Interest
expense
Our interest expense consists primarily of interest paid to our
lenders under our credit agreement. Also included is the
interest incurred on our capital leases and on subordinated
notes issued as part of our acquisitions. We adjust the interest
differential on our interest rate swap quarterly to reflect the
difference from our current borrowing rate to the notional
amount of our interest rate swap contracts.
Income
taxes
Income tax expense varies as a function of income before income
tax expense and permanent non-tax deductible expenses, such as
certain amounts of meals and entertainment expense, valuation
allowance requirements and other permanent differences. Prior to
fiscal 2007, we had net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) for
federal and state purposes, but as a result of our pre-tax
income in fiscal 2007, we used a majority of these NOLs. As of
May 31, 2008 we had $2.3 million of NOLs available to
offset state taxable income in future years. These state NOLs
will expire, if not utilized, at varying dates beginning in 2011
depending on the laws of each state and we have provided a
valuation reserve of $0.2 million. Our effective income tax
rate will be subject to many variables, including the absolute
amount and future geographic distribution of our pre-tax income.
We also plan to continue our acquisition strategy, and, as such,
we anticipate that there will be variability in our effective
tax rate from quarter to quarter and year to year, especially to
the extent that our permanent differences increase or decrease.
As a result of any of these factors, our future effective income
tax rate may fluctuate significantly over the next few years.
38
Minority
interest, net of taxes
Our minority interest represented the minority interest of other
stockholders in our international subsidiaries, where 100%
ownership is not permitted or de minimis local ownership
is helpful for business purposes. For fiscal 2007 and 2006, this
amount primarily consisted of the net income of Envirocoustics
A.B.E.E., which we first consolidated in fiscal 2006. We
acquired this entity on April 25, 2007.
Consolidated
Results of Operations
Fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006
Our revenues, gross profit, income from operations and net
income for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
$
|
93,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
54,431
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
34,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin%
|
|
|
35.7
|
%
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
16,358
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin as percentage of revenues
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as percentage of revenues
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Fiscal
2008 compared to Fiscal 2007
Revenues. Revenues increased
$30.0 million, or 24.6%, for fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal
2007 as a result of growth in all our segments. In fiscal 2008,
the largest increase in our revenues was attributable to
customers in the oil and gas market, which accounted for nearly
44.5% of our revenue growth. The remainder of the growth in our
revenues was broadly distributed among customers in our other
target markets, with the largest increases attributable to
growth in revenues from customers in the fossil and nuclear
power generation and transmission and chemicals markets. In
fiscal 2008, we completed a significant number of projects for
existing customers in the public infrastructure market. However,
there was a small decrease in revenues from customers in this
market in fiscal 2008 because we completed a significant new
bridge project in fiscal 2007. The increase in fiscal 2008
revenues was largely driven by our Services segment, which
represented $24.7 million of the total increase, and
resulted primarily from an increase in the overall customer
demand for NDT services, and revenue contributed from acquired
businesses. We estimate that approximately 67% of our total
revenue growth and 60% of our Services segment growth in fiscal
2008 was organic.
Gross profit. Our gross profit for fiscal 2008
increased $12.6 million, or 30.0%, over fiscal 2007. As a
percentage of revenues, our gross profit was 35.7% and 34.3% in
fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively. In dollar terms, the
increase in our gross profit during our 2008 fiscal year was
primarily the result of increased revenues and our raising
prices to keep pace with escalating labor rates, partially
offset by increased
39
depreciation expense due to purchases of field test equipment
and additional fleet vehicles to support our revenue growth. Our
gross profit in fiscal 2008 also benefitted by 0.7% as the
Company reduced its estimated accrual for workers compensation
claims due to favorable claim experience for the recent year. As
a percentage of revenues, depreciation expense included in gross
profit for the years ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 were 4.5%
and 3.8%, respectively.
Income from operations. Our income from
operations of $16.4 million in fiscal 2008 increased
$5.6 million, or 52.4%, compared to fiscal 2007. As a
percentage of revenues, for fiscal 2008, our income from
operations was 10.7%, compared to 8.8% compared to fiscal 2007.
This increase was a result of increased revenues and gross
profit, offset by increases in selling, general and
administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization. Our
selling, general and administrative expenses included in the
determination of income from operations for fiscal 2008
increased $6.1 million, or 22.9%, over fiscal 2007 due to
additional infrastructure costs for several new locations
obtained through acquisitions, increases to our international
staff and increased audit costs. As a percentage of revenues,
our selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2008
were 21.3% compared to 21.6% in fiscal 2007.
Interest expense. Interest expense was
$3.5 million and $4.5 million during fiscal 2008 and
2007, respectively. In fiscal 2007, we paid $1.2 million of
conditional interest in connection with a bank refinancing,
which accounted for most of the $1.0 million decrease in
interest expense. The decrease in interest expense was also due
to lower market rates of interest in fiscal 2008, offset by the
additional expense for an adjustment to our interest rate swaps
during this period because the fixed rate on these swaps was
higher than market rates during the period. In the last quarter
of fiscal 2008 our interest also began to increase as a result
of financing our acquisitions.
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt. The
$0.5 million loss on the extinguishment of debt during
fiscal 2007 related to the write-off of certain capitalized
financing costs related to the refinancing of our debt through a
new credit arrangement.
Income taxes. Our effective income tax rate
was 41.9% for fiscal 2008. For fiscal 2007, we had an effective
rate of 3.6%. This increase was primarily as a result of
releasing the deferred tax valuation allowances during fiscal
2007 and the higher international tax rates on the income of
certain of our subsidiaries that we do not consolidate for tax
purposes.
Net income. Our net income for fiscal 2008 of
$7.4 million, or 4.9% of our revenues, was
$2.1 million greater than our net income for fiscal 2007,
which was $5.4 million, or 4.4% of revenues. This 38.1%
increase in net income was primarily as a result of the impact
of higher revenues net of higher cost of revenues and operating
costs on a percentage basis, lower interest expense and a higher
provision for income taxes.
Fiscal
2007 compared to Fiscal 2006
Revenues. Revenues increased
$28.5 million, or 30.4%, for fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal
2006, which resulted from growth in all of our segments. In
fiscal 2007, the largest increase in our revenues was
attributable to customers in the oil and gas market, which
accounted for approximately 63.5% percent of the growth, as a
result of our providing our existing oil and gas customers
different types of services, including our advanced NDT
solutions. The next highest increase in revenues was
attributable to customers in the fossil and nuclear power
generation and transmission market, which accounted for 17.8% of
the growth in our revenues. We also experienced strong growth in
revenues attributable to customers in several of our other
target markets, including the public infrastructure market. We
estimate that $11.7 million of the increase in revenues for
fiscal 2007 was attributable to orders from our largest
customer, though this resulted from our provision of NDT
solutions across numerous business locations of this customer
and we believe decisions regarding the purchase of our solutions
are made on a location-by-location basis. We experienced
significant organic growth in most of our domestic and
international locations, and estimate that organic growth
accounted for approximately 85% of our total growth in revenues
in fiscal 2007.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased
$7.1 million, or 20.3%, for fiscal 2007 as compared to
fiscal 2006, which was a direct result of our higher revenues.
As a percentage of revenues, our gross profit decreased to 34.3%
40
in fiscal 2007 from 37.1% in fiscal 2006 primarily as a result
of two factors. First, revenue growth in our Services segment
was greater than in our other segments. We generate lower
margins on revenues from our Services segment than our other
segments because of the relatively higher labor costs associated
with our NDT services. In addition, certain costs on very large
projects are passed on to customers at lower
mark-ups
above cost. In fiscal 2007, we also changed the estimated lives
of certain fixed assets, which resulted in an incremental
depreciation charge of $1.1 million, or 0.9% of revenues.
This change in estimate was based on our evaluation of the
actual useful lives of our equipment. Depreciation included in
determining gross profit during fiscal 2007 was
$4.7 million, or 3.8% of revenues, compared to
$3.0 million, or 3.2% of revenues, in fiscal 2006.
Income from operations. Our income from
operations increased $5.5 million for fiscal 2007 as
compared to fiscal 2006. As a percentage of revenues, our income
from operations increased from 5.6% in fiscal 2006 to 8.8% in
fiscal 2007. This increase over fiscal 2006 is primarily due to
the impact of operating leverage in our business model.
Specifically, our operating expenses increased by
$1.6 million in fiscal 2007 over fiscal 2006. However, as a
percentage of revenues, our operating expenses decreased from
31.5% in fiscal 2006 to 25.5% in fiscal 2007. As a percentage of
revenues, the selling, general and administrative expenses
included in our operating expenses were 21.6% and 26.4% for
fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. These expenses primarily
reflect our investments in a global network of physical branch
and field office locations, and centralized administrative and
customer support functions, which involve relatively fixed
costs. Moreover, the majority of the dollar increases in these
expenses in fiscal 2007 were the result of acquisitions made in
fiscal 2007 and the full year impact of one acquisition made
mid-year in fiscal 2006.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased
$0.3 million during fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006.
Our 2007 interest expense included $1.2 million of
conditional interest that was paid in connection with a
refinancing of our debt in November 2006. Our overall borrowing
levels and interest rates were both lower during 2007 compared
to the prior year.
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt. The
$0.5 million loss on the extinguishment of debt during
fiscal 2007 related to the write-off of certain capitalized
financing costs related to the refinancing of our debt through a
new banking arrangement.
Income taxes. Income taxes in fiscal 2007 were
at an effective rate of 3.6% compared to an effective tax rate
of 49.2% in fiscal 2006. The decrease was primarily due to the
release of our valuation allowance for deferred income taxes
based on our expected earnings and utilization of our federal
tax loss carryforwards in the fiscal 2007 period.
Net income. Primarily as a result of the above
factors, our net income for fiscal 2007 increased
$4.9 million over net income for fiscal 2006. As a
percentage of revenues, our net income was 4.4% and 0.5% in
fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Segment
Data
Selected consolidated financial information by segment for
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Revenue(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
114,074
|
|
|
$
|
89,385
|
|
|
$
|
63,972
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
18,396
|
|
|
|
16,174
|
|
|
|
14,797
|
|
International
|
|
|
23,727
|
|
|
|
20,935
|
|
|
|
17,678
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(3,929
|
)
|
|
|
(4,253
|
)
|
|
|
(2,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
$
|
93,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenue by operating segment includes intercompany transactions,
which are eliminated in corporate and eliminations. |
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
35,266
|
|
|
$
|
25,444
|
|
|
$
|
17,646
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
9,232
|
|
|
|
8,145
|
|
|
|
8,187
|
|
International
|
|
|
9,932
|
|
|
|
8,634
|
|
|
|
8,992
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,431
|
|
|
$
|
41,873
|
|
|
$
|
34,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
14,736
|
|
|
$
|
8,284
|
|
|
$
|
2,470
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
International
|
|
|
2,812
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(4,502
|
)
|
|
|
(2,988
|
)
|
|
|
(2,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,358
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
9,386
|
|
|
$
|
6,989
|
|
|
$
|
5,265
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
International
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,423
|
|
|
$
|
8,691
|
|
|
$
|
7,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
Results for Fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006
Segment discussions that follow provide supplemental information
regarding the significant factors contributing to the changes in
results for each of our business segments.
Services
Revenues. During the last three fiscal years,
revenues in our Services segment increased due to strong demand
in almost all our target markets, the addition of new customers
and a number of small acquisitions. Our segment revenues had a
CAGR of 27.5% during this period. Segment revenues from our
customers in the fossil and nuclear power generation and
transmission market had the highest CAGR of 48.6% during the
same period. Segment revenues from our customers in the oil and
gas and chemical markets also had strong CAGRs of 26.8% and
24.2%, respectively. We continue to increase our revenues by
providing existing customers different types of NDT solutions.
During the last three fiscal years, revenues in our Services
segment attributable to our customers in the oil and gas market
and the fossil and nuclear power generation and transmission end
market have averaged approximately 56% and 15%, respectively, of
our total segment revenues. The remaining segment revenues were
derived from customers in our other target markets, none of
which accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues in this
segment.
42
In fiscal 2008, our Services revenues increased
$24.7 million, or 27.6%, compared to fiscal 2007. The
increase was largely driven by an increase in the overall
customer demand for NDT services and to a lesser extent,
revenues from businesses we acquired. We estimate that
approximately 60% of our growth in segment revenues is organic
growth. Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 45.6%
of our segment revenues during fiscal 2008.
In fiscal 2007, our Services segment increased its revenues by
$25.4 million, or 39.7%, compared to fiscal 2006. This
increase was primarily due to continued overall growth in our
Services segment and incremental revenues from our largest
customer, to whom we provided increased services across multiple
geographies. We also experienced increased revenues from other
customers, especially new customers, and projects in the nuclear
and other power industries, some of which were customers from
our more recent acquisitions. We estimate that approximately 80%
of our growth in segment revenues during fiscal 2007 is organic
growth.
Gross profit. During this three-year period,
gross profit as a percentage of revenue in our Services segment
has increased to 30.9% in fiscal 2008 from 27.6% in fiscal 2006.
This overall increase has been achieved partly due to increases
in volume, a sales mix with a higher proportion of advanced NDT
services and better utilization of labor. This improvement has
been offset by rising labor rates and higher depreciation
charges.
In fiscal 2008, our gross profit in our Services segment
increased by $9.8 million to $35.3 million from
$25.4 million in the previous fiscal year. As a percentage
of segment revenues, our gross profit increased to 30.9% from
28.5% in fiscal 2007. Contributing to the increase were
increased revenues, higher sales prices and a reduction in
workers compensation costs due to favorable claim
experience for the recent year. The adjustment for our
workers compensation costs recorded in our fourth fiscal
quarter improved our fiscal 2008 segment gross profit by 1.0%.
The impact of these positive factors was reduced by increased
personnel costs, an unusually large mid-year project that
yielded minimal gross profit and additional depreciation.
Depreciation expense of $5.7 million, or 5.0%, of segment
revenues in fiscal 2008, increased from $3.7 million, or
4.1%, of segment revenues in fiscal 2007, due to continued
investment.
In fiscal 2007, our gross profit in the Services segment
increased to $25.4 million from $17.6 million in
fiscal 2006. As a percentage of segment revenues, our gross
profit was 28.5% in fiscal 2007 and 27.6% in fiscal 2006. This
improvement originated from providing our customers more
advanced NDT solutions, which generally have higher margins,
leveraging certain fixed expenses, and implementing improved
processes that enabled more efficient use of personnel and
better management of other expenses.
Depreciation expense used in determining our gross profit for
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $5.7 million, or 5.0% of
revenues, $3.7 million, or 4.1% of revenues, and
$2.0 million, or 3.1% of segment revenues, respectively.
The increased depreciation expense in fiscal 2008 over fiscal
2007 was primarily a full year charge for assets purchased in
2007 which incurred only a partial year depreciation expense in
2007. In addition, part of the increase was attributed to assets
acquired through our acquisitions. In fiscal 2007, as in prior
years, we continued to invest in additional field test equipment
and fleet vehicles to support our growth and reduce other
operating costs, such as repairs and maintenance.
The increase in depreciation expense in fiscal 2007 over fiscal
2006 was largely due to our change in the estimate of the useful
life of certain assets from seven to five years, resulting in an
incremental increase in depreciation of $1.1 million. In
addition, a portion of this expense was attributable to assets
acquired during the year.
Income from operations. Our Services segment
income from operations during these fiscal years also increased
as a result of higher revenues and improved operating results,
especially compared to our results shortly after our acquisition
of Conam. Before its acquisition by our company, the Conam
business had lower gross profit, offered few advanced NDT
services and required both improvement to its infrastructure and
cash for working capital. We made substantial investment of
capital and personnel to improve Conams operations, and
the improvement in income from operations reflects these
expenditures. Our segment income from
43
operations was $14.7 million, $8.3 million and
$2.5 million for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Services
segment for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were 14.7%, 15.5%, and
18.6% of segment revenues, respectively. Although declining as a
percentage of segment revenues, these expenses, which generally
have the largest impact on our income from operations, have been
increasing. In fiscal 2008, these expenses increased by
$3.0 million, or 21.6%. Over $2.4 million relate to
higher operating costs (primarily payroll expense) supporting
our acquisitions. The remainder included increased bonus
payments to our managers for improved performance. In fiscal
2007 these expenses similarly increased by $1.9 million, or
16.1%. The majority of the increase related to higher payroll
and benefits costs to support our growth from small acquisitions
and a corresponding increase in occupancy costs for rents and
utilities. As a percentage of segment revenues, our income from
operations was 12.9%, 9.3% and 3.9% in fiscal 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
Software
and Products
Revenues. Over the last three fiscal years,
revenues from our Software and Products segment have also
increased. Revenues were $18.4 million, $16.2 million
and $14.8 million for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. In fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the segment revenue
growth was 13.7%, 9.3% and 4.5%, respectively, and the segment
had a CAGR of 9.1% in the last three fiscal years. Since the
loss of a major customer and a decline in segment revenues from
the computer hard disk industry in fiscal 2006, this segment has
focused on developing new technologies and market opportunities
to facilitate future growth.
The $2.2 million increase in our fiscal 2008 segment
revenues resulted primarily from approximately $1.5 million
in sales from new product introductions, including a line of
handheld testing equipment and acoustic emission sensing
devices. The remainder of the increase was attributable to
$0.5 million in revenues from our Plant Condition
Management System enterprise software and approximately
$0.4 million in product sales to our international
customers.
Fiscal 2007 revenues from our Software and Products segment
increased $1.4 million, or 9.3%, compared to fiscal 2006.
This increase was primarily due to $1.2 million in
increased equipment and software sales in the Asia-Pacific
region that are not accounted for in our International segment
and $0.9 million in increased sales of our ultrasonic NDT
solutions and our hand-held testing products to original
equipment manufacturers. To a lesser extent, this increase was
due to increased cross-selling by our Services group. This
increase was partially offset by a decline in revenues from one
of our major customers in the electronics industry which
discontinued its purchase of our acoustic emission solutions
because it changed its manufacturing processes. In fiscal 2007,
we had insignificant revenues from this customer.
Gross profit. Our segment gross profit for
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $9.2 million, $8.1 million and
$8.2 million, respectively. Our segment gross profit as a
percentage of revenues for the same three years was 50.2%,
50.4%, and 55.3%, respectively. The declining trend reflects the
increased revenue and lower margins from our ultrasonic NDT
solutions, which required more product engineering.
In fiscal 2008, the decrease in our segment gross profit as a
percentage of revenues was partly due to a higher than average
cost of revenues associated with products sold to the customer
of our International segment, and the delay of a large order
while we continued to incur our fixed costs. In fiscal 2007, our
segment gross profit as a percentage of revenues decreased
because our acoustic emission solutions sold at lower margins
than in fiscal 2006.
Income from operations. Our segment income
from operations for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$3.3 million, $3.0 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
As a percentage of segment revenues, our operating income was
18.0%, 18.3% and 23.3% in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006. The trend
of lower income from operations in the last two fiscal years in
our Software and Products segment compared to 2006 was due to
the loss of more profitable business from the electronics
customer noted above. In 2008, as a percentage of revenues, our
income from operations also decreased because of items noted
above in the discussion of our gross profit.
44
Selling, general and administrative expenses which are the
largest determinant of our income from operations in fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006 were $4.6 million, or 24.9% of
revenues, $4.3 million, or 26.4% of revenues, and
$3.6 million, or 24.6% of revenues, respectively. The
largest increase in these costs, particularly in the last two
fiscal years, can be attributed to increases in our sales force
to better capture market opportunities in our target markets.
Due to the time required for technical training of new sales
personnel, we believe the financial benefit of these new hires
have not yet matched our investment. Similarly, our research and
engineering expenses have increased with new staff and were
$1.0 million, $0.7 million and $0.7 million in
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006. As a percentage of our Software and
Products segment sales, these costs have represented 5.6%, 4.3%
and 4.5%, for the three years, respectively.
International
Revenues. For the last three fiscal years, the
revenues in our International segment had a CAGR of 17.2% per
year, with annual increases of 13.3%, 18.4% and 19.9% during
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Revenues from
customers in the oil and gas and chemicals markets have
historically comprised over 50% of our segment revenues. Several
major oil refineries in Russia and Brazil have historically
accounted for approximately 33% of our annual revenues in this
segment. Revenues from industrial, manufacturing and other
testing companies and universities collectively account for
approximately 17% of our total revenues in this segment during
the last three fiscal years. During this same period, the
U.S. dollar has generally been weaker compared to most of
the currencies of countries in which our international
subsidiaries operate. As a result, the translation of the
amounts of non-dollar-denominated transactions into dollars has
resulted in increases to all line items in our statement of
operations, which account for a portion of the increases as
noted below.
In fiscal 2008, revenues in our International segment increased
$2.8 million, or 13.3%, over our segment revenues in fiscal
2007, primarily as a result of a $1.4 million increase in
revenues associated with our operations in the United Kingdom
and The Netherlands and a $1.4 million increase in revenues
from our South American operations. Approximately
$1.7 million of the increase in segment revenues in fiscal
2008 were attributable to the weaker U.S. dollar. The
non-currency increase was due in part to the sale of our new
sensor highway products in the United Kingdom and The
Netherlands as well as increased business in the oil and gas
markets in South America. We had minor decreases in revenues
attributable to customers in Russia and France, but these were
offset by translation gains caused by the exchange rate.
In fiscal 2007, our revenues increased $3.3 million, or
18.4%, in our International segment compared to fiscal 2006 as a
result of growth primarily from our locations in Europe and
Japan, and to a lesser extent the weakening of the
U.S. dollar during this period versus most of the
currencies in which our International segment operates.
Gross profit. Our segment gross profit has not
followed the trend of increasing segment revenues, and has
declined as a percentage of revenues from a high of 50.9% in
2006 to 41.9% and 41.2% in fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Generally, this trend has been a result of our sales mix and
cost increases incurred by several of our international
subsidiaries.
In fiscal 2008, the gross profit in our International segment
was $9.9 million, or 41.9% of revenues, compared to
$8.6 million, or 41.2% of revenues in fiscal 2007. Although
our gross profit in fiscal 2008 increased over fiscal 2007, the
amount of the increase was negatively impacted by
project-related delays and additional costs incurred to support
customization of new products. In addition, our overall gross
profit margin was impacted by the increase as a percentage of
total revenues of revenues attributable to customers in South
America where we performed traditional NDT services with a lower
gross profit margin.
In fiscal 2007, our gross profit in our International segment
declined as a percentage of revenues to 41.2% from 50.9% in
fiscal 2006, primarily because a significant portion of our
segment revenues in fiscal 2007 were from lower margin services
provided by our South American operation, and because a large
portion of our revenues in fiscal 2006 were from higher margin
products and services sold by our United Kingdom subsidiary.
45
Income from operations. Our income from
operations from our International segment for fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006 was $2.8 million, $2.5 million and
$2.2 million, respectively. As a percentage of segment
revenues, our income from operations has likewise been
relatively consistent at 11.9%, 11.8% and 12.6% in fiscal 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively. Our selling, general and
administrative expenses, the largest factor in determining
income from operations for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
$6.6 million, or 27.9% of segment revenues,
$5.8 million, or 27.5% of segment revenues, and
$6.4 million, or 36.1% of segment revenues, respectively.
Corporate
and Eliminations
The elimination in revenues and cost of revenues primarily
relates to the accounting elimination of revenues from sales of
our Software and Products segment to the International segment.
The other major item in the corporate and eliminations grouping
are the general and administrative costs not allocated to the
other segments. These costs primarily include those for
non-segment management, accounting and auditing and certain
training and other similar costs. As a percentage of our total
revenues, these costs have generally remained constant over the
last three fiscal years, consisting of 2.9%, 2.1% and 3.0% of
total revenues for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
increase in operating expenses in 2008 primarily related to
higher compensation, audit and accounting fees and other general
increases in expense at our corporate offices.
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly
statements of operations data and operations data as a percent
of revenues for the eight fiscal quarters ended May 31,
2008. The unaudited quarterly information, in our opinion,
reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal accruals,
necessary for a fair statement of the data for each of those
quarters. This data should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus. These quarterly operating results are not
necessarily indicative of our operating results for any future
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ending
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
February 29,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
February 28,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
48,023
|
|
|
$
|
37,167
|
|
|
$
|
37,218
|
|
|
$
|
29,860
|
|
|
$
|
35,337
|
|
|
$
|
29,574
|
|
|
$
|
32,695
|
|
|
$
|
24,635
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
26,985
|
|
|
|
24,627
|
|
|
|
22,017
|
|
|
|
17,361
|
|
|
|
21,201
|
|
|
|
18,530
|
|
|
|
21,204
|
|
|
|
14,767
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
18,930
|
|
|
|
10,879
|
|
|
|
13,632
|
|
|
|
10,990
|
|
|
|
12,662
|
|
|
|
9,941
|
|
|
|
10,410
|
|
|
|
8,860
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9,120
|
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
7,836
|
|
|
|
7,445
|
|
|
|
7,248
|
|
|
|
6,613
|
|
|
|
6,630
|
|
|
|
5,917
|
|
Research and engineering
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
8,040
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
2,631
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,291
|
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
$
|
1,934
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
3,508
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
$
|
785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2008, we adjusted our
estimate for losses and expenses under our workers
compensation policies as a result of favorable loss experience.
This adjustment resulted in a favorable impact on the
quarters gross profit and operating income of
approximately $1.0 million and represents 2.1% of revenues. |
46
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Overview
Since our acquisition of Conam in August 2003, we have primarily
funded our operations through the issuance of preferred stock in
a series of financings, bank borrowings, capital lease financing
transactions and cash provided from operations. We have used
these proceeds to fund our operations, develop our technology,
expand our sales and marketing efforts to new markets and
acquire small companies or assets, primarily to add certified
technicians and enhance our capabilities and geographic reach.
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, our
anticipated cash flows from operating activities, borrowings
under our credit agreement and the net proceeds from this
offering will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs
over the next 12 months.
Cash
Flows Table
The following table summarizes our cash flows for fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
12,851
|
|
|
$
|
14,006
|
|
|
$
|
6,208
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(19,446
|
)
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
(2,387
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(212
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,791
|
|
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
Cash provided by our operating activities primarily consists of
net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization, deferred taxes and bad debt
expense, and the effect of changes in working capital and other
activities.
Cash provided by our operating activities in fiscal 2008 was
$12.9 million and consisted of $7.5 million of net
income plus $13.0 million of non-cash items, consisting
primarily of depreciation and amortization of
$11.4 million, less $7.6 million of net cash used for
working capital purposes and other activities. Cash used for
working capital and other activities in fiscal 2008 primarily
reflected a $9.2 million increase in accounts receivable
and a $1.8 million increase in inventories attributable to
our seasonal increase in revenues and a $1.0 million
increase in other expenses related to the preparation and filing
of our S-1
registration statement in connection with this offering. These
increases were partially offset by a $2.2 million increase
in accounts payable and accrued expenses as our operations
continued to grow, and a $0.05 million increase in our
income taxes payable due to our increased profitability.
Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2007 was
$14.0 million and consisted of $5.4 million of net
income plus $8.9 million of non-cash items, consisting
primarily of $8.7 million of depreciation and amortization,
less $0.3 million of cash used to support changes in
operating assets and liabilities. In addition to depreciation
and amortization, the adjustments to cash included a non-cash
credit of $1.3 million due to the release of the deferred
tax valuation allowance. The $0.3 million in net cash used
to support operating assets and liabilities primarily reflected
a $2.3 million net increase in our accounts receivable
offset by increases in our accounts payable and accrued expenses
as our operations continued to grow. Cash was also provided by a
$1.2 million increase in income taxes payable due to our
improved profitability. A total of $0.9 million of cash was
used for a variety of items, including purchases of inventories
and other assets.
Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2006 was
$6.2 million and consisted of $0.5 million of net
income plus $8.6 million of non-cash adjustments, less
$2.9 million in net cash used for changes in operating
assets and liabilities or working capital. The non-cash
adjustments to net income consisted primarily of
47
$7.2 million of depreciation and amortization and
$1.2 million of provision for bad debts. The
$2.9 million of cash used to support changes in operating
assets or working capital was primarily due to a net increase in
our current assets of $4.6 million primarily representing
accounts receivable growth of $3.1 million and an
offsetting increase in our current liabilities of
$1.7 million. These changes in our working capital reflect
our overall revenue growth in fiscal 2006.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
For fiscal 2008, cash used in investing activities was
$19.5 million, of which $15.5 million was used to
acquire seven NDT services businesses and $3.7 million in
property and equipment. In connection with the acquisitions, we
also incurred $11.9 million of seller notes payable and
related obligations. In addition, $4.8 million of property
and equipment was acquired through capital lease obligations.
Cash used in investing activities was $4.3 million and
$2.4 million for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our
principal cash investments have related to purchases of field
test equipment, assets we manufacture for use in our business,
and acquisitions that are financed generally with cash and
subordinated seller notes. Cash purchases for property and
equipment for fiscal 2007 and 2006 were $2.6 million and
$2.7 million, respectively. Cash spent for acquisitions in
fiscal 2007 and 2006 was $2.0 million and
$0.1 million, respectively. All of these expenditures
support our growth or specific customer projects and
opportunities.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
For fiscal 2008, cash provided from financing activities was
$6.3 million compared to $8.1 million used in
financing activities in fiscal 2007. In fiscal 2008, we used our
revolving credit facility to borrow $13.1 million to
finance a portion of the purchase prices of the seven
acquisitions noted above. During fiscal 2008, we also paid
obligations under our capital leases and bank debt of
$3.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively.
Subsequent to year end, we amended our credit agreement to
provide for an additional $20 million term loan facility
from our lenders that we used to repay the borrowing under our
revolving credit facility.
Cash used in financing activities during fiscal 2007 and 2006
was $8.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Cash
flows used in financing activities in fiscal 2007 was
$8.1 million and consisted primarily of net repayments to
our banks and other note holders of $5.3 million and
another $2.4 million repayment of capital lease
obligations. On October 31, 2006, as subsequently amended
and restated on April 23, 2007 and further amended on
December 14, 2007, May 30, 2007 and July 1, 2008,
we entered into our credit agreement, which initially provided
for a $15.0 million revolving credit facility and a
$25.0 million term loan facility. The proceeds from the
senior credit facility were used to repay the outstanding
indebtedness under our prior credit and term loans.
Cash flows used in financing activities in fiscal 2006 were
$2.7 million. We made net payments to our banks and other
note holders of $8.5 million, including a $4.0 million
net reduction in our line of credit and another
$0.9 million toward our capital lease obligations. The
source of these payments was surplus operating cash plus
$6.8 million of net proceeds raised through sales of our
Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock in October
2005. This preferred stock will convert along with all of our
other preferred stock into our common stock upon completion of
this offering.
Effect
of Exchange Rate on Changes in Cash
For fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, exchange rate changes increased
our cash by $0.1 million, $0.2 million and
$0.1 million, respectively.
Cash
Balance and Credit Facility Borrowings
As of May 31, 2008 we had $3.6 million in cash. In
addition, we had $1.9 million available to us under our
secured revolving credit facility, as well as another
$5.0 million made available under a temporary arrangement
with our lenders, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. At May 31, 2008, our
48
credit agreement provided for a term loan and a secured
revolving credit facility and the aggregate principal amount
owed under the term loan facility and the revolving credit
facility was $22.5 million and $13.1 million,
respectively. Borrowings under our credit agreement currently
bear interest at the greater of a rate based on the prime rate
(5.00% at May 31, 2008) or the LIBOR rate (2.46% at
May 31, 2008), plus an applicable margin of 1.5% to 2.5% as
defined in the credit agreement. The outstanding principal and
accrued interest under the term matures on October 31,
2012. Borrowings made under the revolving credit facility are
payable at the same time. There is a provision in our credit
facility that requires us to repay 25% of the immediately
preceding fiscal years free cash flow if our
ratio of funded debt to EBITDA is less than a fixed
amount on or before October 1 each year. Free cash
flow means the sum of EBITDA minus all taxes paid or
payable in cash, minus cash interest paid, minus all capital
expenditures made in cash, minus all scheduled and non-scheduled
principal payments on funded debt made in the period, minus
acquisition costs and plus or minus changes in working capital.
Funded debt means all outstanding liabilities for
borrowed money and other interest-bearing liabilities. We do not
expect to be required to make payments under this provision.
In July 2008, we borrowed an additional $20.0 million under
a term loan facility from our existing lenders. We used the
proceeds to repay the amounts outstanding under the revolving
credit facility and to fund the $5.0 million aggregate cash
portion of the purchase prices for two businesses we acquired
subsequent to the end of fiscal 2008. As a result, on
August 15, 2008, the aggregate principal amount owed under
the term loan facility and revolving credit facility was
$41.9 million and $0.0 million, respectively.
Future
Sources of Cash
We expect our future sources of cash to include cash flow from
operations, cash borrowed under our revolving credit facility
and cash borrowed from leasing companies to purchase equipment
and fleet service vehicles. Our revolving credit facility is
available for cash advances required for working capital and
letters of credit to support our operations. To meet our short-
and long-term liquidity requirements, we expect primarily to
rely on cash generated from our operating activities. We are
currently funding our acquisitions through our available cash,
borrowings under our revolving credit facility and seller notes.
Future
Uses of Cash
We expect our future uses of cash will primarily be for
purchases or manufacture of field testing equipment, additional
investments in technology and software products and the
replacement of existing assets and equipment used in our
operations. We often make major purchases to support new sources
of revenue, particularly in our Services segment, but generally
only do so with a high degree of certainty about related
customer orders and pricing. In addition, we have a certain
amount of replacement equipment, including our fleet vehicles.
We plan to spend approximately 4 to 6% of our total revenues on
capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, and will fund this
through a combination of cash and lease financing. Our cash
capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, for fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006 were 2.4%, 2.1% and 2.9% of revenues, respectively.
We will also require capital for anticipated acquisitions. In
some cases, additional equipment will be needed to upgrade the
capabilities of these acquired companies. We believe that after
this offering, our future acquisition and capital spending will
increase as we aggressively pursue growth opportunities. Other
investments in infrastructure, training and software may also be
required to match our growth, but we plan to continue using a
disciplined approach to building our business. In addition, we
will use cash to fund our operating leases, capital leases and
long-term debt repayment and various other obligations,
including the commitments discussed in the table below, as they
arise.
We will also use cash to support our working capital
requirements for our operations, particularly in the event of
further growth and due to the impacts of seasonality on our
business. Our future working capital requirements will depend on
many factors, including the rate of our revenue growth, our
introduction of new solutions and enhancements to existing
solutions and our expansion of sales and marketing and product
development activities. To the extent that our cash and cash
equivalents, cash flows from operating activities
49
and net proceeds of this offering are insufficient to fund our
future activities, we may need to raise additional funds through
bank credit arrangements or public or private equity or debt
financings. We also may need to raise additional funds in the
event we determine in the future to effect one or more
acquisitions of businesses, technologies or products that will
complement our existing operations. In the event additional
funding is required, we may not be able to obtain bank credit
arrangements or effect an equity or debt financing on terms
acceptable to us or at all.
We may also use cash in connection with legal proceedings and
claims which arise in the ordinary course of business, although
no significant expenditures are expected in the next
12 months.
Contractual
Obligations
We generally do not enter into long-term minimum purchase
commitments. Our principal commitments, in addition to those
related to our long-term debt discussed below, consist of
obligations under facility leases for office space and equipment
leases.
The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual
obligations as of May 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Beyond
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
48,270
|
|
|
$
|
7,469
|
|
|
$
|
8,705
|
|
|
$
|
7,996
|
|
|
$
|
6,408
|
|
|
$
|
16,972
|
|
|
$
|
720
|
|
Capital lease obligations(1)
|
|
|
13,902
|
|
|
|
4,694
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
67,116
|
|
|
$
|
14,263
|
|
|
$
|
13,390
|
|
|
$
|
11,170
|
|
|
$
|
8,403
|
|
|
$
|
18,162
|
|
|
$
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes estimated cash interest to be paid over the remaining
terms of the leases. |
In addition to the above, we have certain contingent payments
possibly payable in connection with our acquisitions.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
During fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, we did not have any
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Effects
of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our results of operations and financial condition have not been
significantly affected by inflation and changing prices.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
We had cash and cash equivalents of $3.6 million at
May 31, 2008. These amounts are held for working capital
purposes and were invested primarily in deposits, money market
funds and short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade
securities. In addition, some of the net proceeds of this
offering may be invested in short-term, interest-bearing,
investment-grade securities pending their application. Due to
the short-term nature of these investments, we believe that we
do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value
of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in interest
rates. Declines in interest rates, however, will reduce future
investment income. If overall interest rates had fallen by 10%
in fiscal 2008, our interest income would not have been
materially affected.
50
We had $22.5 million of debt outstanding under our term
loan facility at May 31, 2008. Although the interest rate
on our term loan facility is variable and adjusts periodically,
it is currently based on the
30-day LIBOR
rate (2.46% at May 31, 2008). If the LIBOR rate fluctuated
by 10% for the year ending May 31, 2008, interest expense
in fiscal 2008 would have fluctuated by approximately $32,000.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our floating interest rate
exposure. In 2007, we entered into two interest rate swap
contracts whereby we would receive or pay an amount equal to the
difference between a fixed rate and the quoted
90-day LIBOR
rate on a quarterly basis. At May 31, 2008, the following
outlines the significant terms of the contracts and the amount
we will pay above our contractual rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Date
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
November 20, 2006
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
|
$
|
(321
|
)
|
November 20, 2006
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Risk
We have foreign currency exposure related to our operations in
foreign locations. This foreign currency exposure, particularly
the Euro, British Pound Sterling, Brazilian Real, Russian Ruble,
Japanese Yen and the Indian Rupee, arises primarily from the
translation of our foreign subsidiaries financial
statements into U.S. dollars. For example, a portion of our
annual sales and operating costs are denominated in GBP and we
have exposure related to sales and operating costs increasing or
decreasing based on changes in currency exchange rates. If the
U.S. dollar increases in value against these foreign
currencies, the value in U.S. dollars of the assets and
liabilities originally recorded in these foreign currencies will
decrease. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar decreases in value
against these foreign currencies, the value in U.S. dollars
of the assets and liabilities originally recorded in these
foreign currencies will increase. Thus, increases and decreases
in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to these foreign
currencies have a direct impact on the value in
U.S. dollars of our foreign currency denominated assets and
liabilities, even if the value of these items has not changed in
their original currency. We do not currently enter into forward
exchange contracts to hedge exposures denominated in foreign
currencies. A 10% change in the U.S. dollar exchange rates
in effect as of May 31, 2008 would cause a change in
consolidated operating income of approximately
$0.1 million. We may consider entering into hedging or
forward exchange contracts in the future.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
We do not have material exposure to market risk with respect to
investments, as our investments consist primarily of highly
liquid investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three
months or less. We do not use derivative financial instruments
for speculative or trading purposes; however, this does not
preclude our adoption of specific hedging strategies in the
future.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires that we make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Our more significant estimates include: the valuation of
goodwill and intangible assets; the impairment of long-lived
assets, allowances for doubtful accounts; foreign currency
translation; derivative financial instruments; and deferred
income tax valuation allowances. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable. We evaluate our estimates and
assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ
significantly from these estimates under different assumptions
or conditions. There have been no material changes to these
estimates for the periods presented in this prospectus.
51
We believe that of our significant accounting policies, which
are described below and in Note 2 to our audited
consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus,
the following accounting policies involve a greater degree of
judgment and complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we
believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and
evaluating our financial condition and results of operations.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts and sales allowances. Outstanding accounts receivable
balances are reviewed periodically, and allowances are provided
at such time as management believes it is probable that such
balances will not be collected within a reasonable period of
time. We extend credit to our customers based upon credit
evaluations in the normal course of business, primarily with
30-day
terms. Bad debts are provided on the allowance method based on
historical experience and managements evaluation of
outstanding accounts receivable. Accounts are written off when
they are deemed uncollectible.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The financial position and results of operations of our foreign
subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the
functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the foreign
subsidiaries are translated into the U.S. dollar at the
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and
expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the
year. Translation gains and losses not included in earnings are
reported in accumulated other comprehensive income within
stockholders equity. Foreign currency transaction gains
and losses are included in net income and have not been
significant historically.
Long-lived assets outside of the U.S. totaled
$3.0 million and $3.0 million as of May 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair market value of net assets of the acquired business at the
date of acquisition. We test for impairment annually in our
fiscal fourth quarter using a two-step process. The first step
identifies potential impairment by comparing the fair value of
our reporting units to their carrying value. If the fair value
is less than the carrying value, the second step measures the
amount of impairment, if any. The impairment loss is the amount
by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill. Intangible assets are recorded at
cost. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets on a
periodic basis in order to identify business conditions that may
indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential
impairment is based primarily on our ability to recover the
carrying value of our long-lived assets from expected future
undiscounted cash flows. If the total expected future
undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the
assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between fair
value (computed based upon the expected future discounted cash
flows) and the carrying value of the assets.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We recognize our derivatives as either assets or liabilities,
and measure those instruments at fair value and recognize the
changes in fair value of the derivative in net income or other
comprehensive income, as appropriate. We hedge a portion of our
variable rate interest payments on debt using interest rate swap
contracts to convert variable payments into fixed payments. We
do not apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swap
contracts. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are
reported as a component of interest expense.
52
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred income tax
assets will not be realized.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
FIN No. 48. In May 2007, the FASB
issued
FIN 48-1,
Definition of Settlement in FASB
Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48-1),
which provides guidance on how an enterprise should determine
whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of
recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. We adopted the
provisions of FIN 48 on June 1, 2007.
SFAS No. 141R. In December 2007, the
FASB issued FASB No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (FAS 141R) which
replaces FAS 141, Business Combinations
(FAS 141). FAS 141R applies to all
business combinations, including combinations among mutual
entities and combinations by contract alone. FAS 141R
requires that all business combinations will be accounted for by
applying the acquisition method. FAS 141R is effective for
business combinations consummated in periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. Early application is prohibited.
We will adopt FAS 141R on June 1, 2009. We do not
anticipate FAS 141R will have a material effect on our
results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
SFAS No. 157. In September 2006, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurement. Where
applicable, this statement simplifies and codifies fair value
related guidance previously issued within GAAP. FAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods
within those fiscal years. However, FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FAS 157 (FSP
FAS 157-2),
delays the effective date of FAS 157 for certain
nonfinancial assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. We do not anticipate FAS 157
will have a material effect on our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
SFAS No. 161. In March 2008, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(FAS 161). FAS 161 is intended to help
investors better understand how derivative instruments and
hedging activities affect an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows through enhanced disclosure
requirements. FAS 161 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption encouraged. We
expect to adopt FAS 161 on June 1, 2009.
FAS No. 142-3. In
April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. The objective of this FSP is to
improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of
expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset
under FAS 141(R), and other U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. This FSP applies to all intangible
assets, whether acquired in a business combination or otherwise
and shall be effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years and applied prospectively to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early
adoption is prohibited. The requirements of this FSP will be
effective for our 2009 fiscal year and are not expected to have
a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
53
BUSINESS
Our
Business
We are a leading global provider of proprietary,
technology-enabled NDT solutions used to evaluate the structural
integrity of critical energy, industrial and public
infrastructure. We combine the skill and experience of our
certified technicians, engineers and scientists with our
advanced enterprise software and other proprietary product
offerings to deliver a comprehensive portfolio of solutions,
ranging from routine NDT inspections to complex, plant-wide
asset integrity assessment and management solutions. Our
enterprise software is at the core of this portfolio because it
enables us to integrate all of the NDT solutions we offer. These
solutions enhance our customers ability to extend the
useful life of their assets, increase productivity, minimize
repair costs, comply with governmental safety and environmental
regulations and, critically, avoid catastrophic disasters. Given
the role our services play in ensuring the safe and efficient
operation of infrastructure, we have historically provided a
majority of our services to our customers on a regular,
recurring basis. We serve a global customer base, including
companies in the oil and gas, fossil and nuclear power
generation and transmission, public infrastructure, chemicals,
aerospace and defense, transportation, primary metals and
metalworking, pharmaceuticals and food processing industries. As
of August 15, 2008, we had approximately
1,600 employees in 60 offices across 15 countries, through
which we have established long-term relationships as a critical
solutions provider to many of the leading companies in our
target markets. The following chart represents revenues we
generated in certain of our end markets as well as
representative customers in these end markets for fiscal 2008.
Mistras
Revenue and Representative Customers by End Market
(fiscal 2008)
NDT involves the examination of the structural integrity of
infrastructure assets in order to identify and quantify defects
and degradations and optimize safety and operating performance
without impacting the future usefulness or impairing the
integrity of these assets. The ability to inspect infrastructure
assets and not interfere with their operating performance makes
NDT a highly attractive alternative to many traditional
inspection techniques, which may require dismantling equipment
or plant shutdown. Infrastructure-intensive industries employ
NDT during the design, fabrication, maintenance, inspection and
retirement phases of the assets life.
54
As a global NDT leader, our broad range of NDT solutions
includes:
|
|
|
|
|
traditional outsourced NDT inspection services conducted by our
technicians, such as mechanical integrity testing, above-ground
storage tank inspection and visual inspections;
|
|
|
|
advanced NDT solutions, in most cases involving our proprietary
AE, digital radiography, infrared, wireless
and/or
automated ultrasonic sensors, which are operated by our highly
trained technicians;
|
|
|
|
a proprietary, customized portfolio of software products for
testing and analyzing data captured in real-time by our
technicians and sensors, including advanced features such as
pattern recognition and neural networks;
|
|
|
|
enterprise software and relational databases to store and
analyze inspection data and develop asset integrity management
plans that specify an optimal schedule for the testing,
maintenance and retirement of assets based on test results, data
from prior operation and testing of similar assets, industrial
standards and specific risk conditions, such as use with highly
flammable or corrosive materials; and
|
|
|
|
on-line monitoring systems that provide for remote asset
inspection, real-time reports about and analysis of plant or
enterprise-wide structural integrity data, comparison of
integrity data to our library of historical inspection data and
analysis to better assess structural integrity and provide
alerts for and prioritize future inspections and maintenance.
|
We offer our customers either a customized package of services,
software and equipment or our enterprise software and other
niche products on a stand-alone basis. For example, customers
can purchase most of our sensors and accompanying software to
integrate with their own systems, or they can purchase a
complete turn-key solution, including our installation,
monitoring and assessment services. Importantly, however, we do
not sell certain of our advanced and proprietary software and
other products as stand-alone offerings; instead, we embed them
in our comprehensive service offerings to protect our investment
in intellectual property while providing a substantial source of
recurring revenues.
We generated revenues of $152.3 million,
$122.2 million and $93.7 million and EBITDA of
$27.8 million, $18.8 million and $12.4 million
for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For fiscal 2008,
we generated 74.9% of our revenues from our Services segment,
9.5% from our Software and Products segment for sales to
external customers and 15.6% from our International segment. Our
revenues are diversified, with our top 10 customers accounting
for less than 36%, 39% and 32% of our revenues during fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We provide our NDT solutions
to multiple divisions and business units of BP, which is our
largest customer, at multiple locations across the globe.
Revenues from BP accounted for 16.7% and 16.5% of our revenues
for fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. No other customer
accounted for more than 10% of our revenues during fiscal 2008
and 2007 and no single customer accounted for more than 10% of
our revenues during fiscal 2006.
NDT
Industry Overview
NDT is a large and rapidly growing market. NDT plays a crucial
role in assuring the operational and structural integrity of
critical infrastructure without compromising the usefulness of
the tested materials or equipment. The evolution of NDT
technology and its associated services, in combination with
broader industry trends, including increased asset utilization
and aging of infrastructure, the desire by companies to extend
the useful life of their existing infrastructure, new
construction projects, enhanced government regulation and the
shortage of certified NDT professionals have made NDT an
integral and increasingly outsourced part of many
asset-intensive industries. Well-publicized industrial and
public infrastructure failures and accidents have also raised
the level of awareness of regulators, as well as owners and
operators, of the benefits that NDT can provide.
Historically, NDT solutions predominantly used qualitative
testing methods aimed primarily at detecting defects in the
tested materials. This methodology, which we categorize as
traditional NDT, is typically labor intensive and,
as a result, considerably dependent upon the availability and
skill level of the engineers and scientists performing the
inspection services. The traditional NDT market is highly
fragmented, with a significant number of small vendors providing
inspection services to divisions of companies or local
governments situated in close proximity to the vendors
field inspection engineers and scientists. Today, we believe
that customers are increasingly looking for a single vendor
capable of providing a wider spectrum of
55
NDT solutions for their global infrastructure. This shift in
underlying demand, which began in the early 1990s, has
contributed to a transition from traditional NDT solutions to
more advanced NDT solutions that employ automated digital sensor
technologies and accompanying software, allowing for the
effective capture, storage, analysis and reporting of NDT
results electronically and in digital formats. These advanced
NDT techniques, taken together with advances in communication
and information technologies, have further enabled the
development of remote monitoring systems, asset-management and
predictive maintenance capabilities and other data analytics and
management. We believe that as advanced NDT solutions continue
to gain acceptance among asset-intensive organizations, only
those vendors offering broad, complete and integrated solutions,
scalable operations and a global footprint will have a distinct
competitive advantage. Moreover, we believe that NDT vendors
that are able to effectively deliver both advanced NDT solutions
and data analytics, by virtue of their ownership of
customers data, develop a significant barrier to entry for
competitors, and so develop the capability to create significant
recurring revenues.
We believe that the key dynamics supporting increasing demand
and growth within the NDT solutions market include:
|
|
|
|
|
Extending the Useful Life of Aging
Infrastructure. The prohibitive cost and
challenge of building new infrastructure has resulted in the
significant aging of existing infrastructure and led to a desire
by companies to extend the useful life of existing assets. For
example, due to the significant cost associated with
constructing new refineries, stringent environmental regulations
which have increased the costs of managing refineries and
difficulty in finding suitable locations on which to build
refineries, no new refineries have been constructed in the
United States since 1976. Because aging infrastructure requires
relatively higher levels of maintenance and repair in comparison
to new infrastructure, as well as more frequent, extensive and
ongoing testing requirements, companies and public authorities
are spending billions of dollars to ensure the operational and
structural integrity of this infrastructure. We believe that NDT
solutions are the most effective and least intrusive technology
for enabling these ongoing maintenance requirements.
|
|
|
|
Outsourcing of Non-Core Activities and Technical Resource
Constraints. While some of our customers have
historically performed NDT services in-house, the increasing
sophistication and automation of NDT, together with a decreasing
supply of skilled professionals and stricter governmental
regulations, has led many of them to outsource NDT to providers
that have the necessary engineering skills, technical workforce,
technology and proven track-record of performance, to
effectively meet their increasing requirements.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Capacity Utilization. Due to high
energy prices and the limited construction of new
infrastructure, existing infrastructure in some of our target
markets is being used at higher capacities, which accelerates
deterioration and limits downtime for repair or replacement. For
example, increasing demand for refined petroleum products,
combined with high plant utilization rates routinely in excess
of 85%, is driving refineries to upgrade facilities to make them
more efficient and expand capacity. In order to sustain high
capacity utilization rates, customers are increasingly using NDT
solutions to ensure the integrity and safety of their assets.
NDT customers have also experienced productivity enhancements
for their infrastructure as a result of reduced
maintenance-related downtime.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Corrosion from Low-Quality
Inputs. High commodities prices and increasing
energy demands have led to the use of lower grade inputs, such
as low-grade coal or petroleum, in the refinery and power
generation processes. These lower grade inputs more rapidly
corrode the infrastructure they come into contact with, which in
turn increases the need for NDT solutions to identify such
corrosion and enable infrastructure owners to combat the
problems they cause.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Use of Advanced Materials. NDT
customers in our target markets are increasingly utilizing
advanced materials (such as composites) and other unique
technologies in the manufacturing and construction of new
infrastructure. As a result, they require increasingly advanced
testing, inspection and maintenance technologies to protect
these assets, since many of these advanced materials cannot be
tested using traditional NDT techniques. We believe that demand
for NDT solutions will increase as companies and public
authorities continue to use them not only during the maintenance
lifecycle of
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
their assets, but also during the design and construction phases
by incorporating NDT technologies such as embedded sensors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Safety Regulations. Our customers
increasingly face strict government regulations and safety
requirements. Failure to meet these standards can result in
significant financial liabilities, increased OSHA scrutiny,
higher insurance premiums and tarnished corporate brand value.
The numerous failings in equipment, maintenance and inspection
that led to the Texas City refinery explosion in 2005 created
significant damage to the reputation of refineries and led OSHA
to strengthen process safety enforcement standards. As a result,
our customers are seeking highly reliable NDT suppliers with a
proven track record of providing NDT products and services to
assist them in meeting these increasingly stringent regulations.
|
|
|
|
Expanding Addressable End-Markets. We expect
that advances in NDT sensor technologies and software solutions,
and the continued emergence of new technologies, will create
increased demand for NDT solutions and applications where
existing NDT techniques were previously ineffective. Further, we
expect increased demand in relatively new markets with
infrastructure that is only now aging to a point where
significant maintenance and retirement of infrastructure is
required, such as pharmaceuticals, food processing and other
industries.
|
|
|
|
Expanding Addressable Geographies. We believe
that a substantial driver of incremental demand will come from
international markets, including Asia, Europe and Latin America.
Specifically, as companies and governments in these markets
build and maintain infrastructure and applications that require
the use of advanced NDT solutions, we believe demand for our NDT
solutions will increase.
|
We believe that the market available to us will continue to grow
rapidly as a result of macro-market trends, including aging
infrastructure, use of more advanced materials and the
increasing use of NDT outsourcing activities by companies who
historically performed these services using internal resources.
Our
Target Markets
We focus our sales, marketing and product development efforts on
a range of infrastructure-intensive industries and governmental
authorities. With our portfolio of NDT services, software and
other products, we can effectively serve our customer base
throughout the life-cycle of their assets, beginning at the
design stage, through the construction and maintenance phase
and, as necessary, through the decommissioning of their
infrastructure.
Our target markets include:
Oil
and Gas
According to the United States Energy Information Administration
(EIA), in 2007 there were 676 crude oil refineries in the world,
with 174 of them in North America. High energy prices are
driving consistently high utilization rates at these facilities.
With aging infrastructure and growing capacity constraints, NDT
continues to grow as an indispensable tool in maintenance
planning, quality control and prevention of catastrophic failure
in refineries and petrochemical plants. Recent high oil and
fossil fuel input prices have placed additional pressure on
industry participants to increase capacity, focus on production
efficiency and cost reductions and shorten shut-down time or
turnarounds. NDT solutions are used for both
off-stream inspections, meaning inspection when the tested
infrastructure is shut-down, and increasingly, on-stream
inspections, or inspection when the tested infrastructure is
operating at normal levels. We expect off-stream inspection of
vessels and piping during a plant shut-down or turnaround to
remain a routine practice by companies in these industries. We
expect the areas of greatest future growth to occur as a result
of on-stream inspections of facilities, such as offshore
platforms, transport systems and oil and gas transmission lines,
because of the substantial opportunity costs of shutting them
down. On-stream inspection enables companies to avoid the costs
associated with shutdowns during testing while enabling the
economic and safety advantages of advanced planning or
predictive maintenance.
Power
Generation and Transmission
NDT in the power industry has traditionally been associated with
the inspection of high-energy, critical steam piping, boilers,
rotating equipment, utility aerial man-lift devices, large
transformer testing and various
57
other applications for nuclear and other power plants. We
believe that in recent years the use of and potential
applications for NDT have grown rapidly in this industry due to
the aging of critical power generation and transmission
infrastructure. For instance, the average age of a nuclear power
plant in the United States is over 29 years. Furthermore,
global demand for power generation and transmission has grown
rapidly and is expected to continue, primarily as a result of
the energy needs of emerging economies such as China and India.
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear. For the year ended December 31,
2007, U.S. commercial nuclear reactors operated at a
capacity utilization rate of approximately 92%. We believe that
the need to sustain these high utilization rates, while also
maintaining a high degree of safety, will result in increased
spending on testing, on-line monitoring and maintenance of these
assets. Industrial Information Resources projected that
maintenance spending on the North American reactor fleet will
exceed $800 million in 2008.
|
Globally, there were 439 nuclear reactors in operation as of
December 31, 2007. 75% of these reactors are more than
20 years old and only 34 reactors were under construction
as of December 31, 2007. We believe it will be increasingly
important to provide NDT solutions to the global nuclear power
generation and transmission industry in order to prevent
potentially catastrophic events and help the nuclear industry
optimize availability of their assets.
|
|
|
|
|
Fossil. The fossil fuel power generation
market consists of facilities that burn coal, natural gas or oil
to produce electricity. These facilities operate at high
capacity levels and can incur productivity loss if a shutdown is
required. As a result, there is a significant demand for
continual testing and maintenance of these facilities and their
assets. In addition, to meet growing electricity demand, fossil
power generation companies are increasing capital spending for
capacity expansions and new facility construction. In 2006, the
EIA projected that over 400 fossil power stations could be added
by 2010.
|
Public
Infrastructure
We believe that high profile infrastructure catastrophes, such
as the collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, have caused
public authorities to more actively seek ways to prevent similar
events from occurring. Public authorities tasked with the
construction of new, and maintenance of existing, public
infrastructure, including bridges and highways, increasingly use
NDT solutions to test and inspect these assets. Importantly,
these authorities now employ NDT solutions throughout the life
of these assets, from their original design and construction,
with the use of embedded sensing devices to enable on-line
monitoring, through ongoing maintenance requirements.
Chemicals
As with oil and gas processing facilities, chemical processing
facilities require significant spending on maintenance and
monitoring. The average cost of plant construction for chemical
assets has increased substantially (plant construction costs for
processing of certain chemical assets, such as ammonia, have
doubled in the past 10 years), which we believe creates a
more concentrated focus on NDT solutions to limit further
capital costs. Additionally, growing chemical end-markets
continue to put strain on existing plants. Given their aging
infrastructure, growing capacity constraints and increasing
capital costs, we believe NDT continues to grow in importance in
maintenance planning, quality and cost control and prevention of
catastrophic failure in the chemicals industry.
Aerospace
and Defense
The operational safety, reliability, structural integrity and
maintenance of aircraft and associated products is critical to
the aerospace and defense industries. Industry participants
increasingly use NDT solutions to perform inspections upon
delivery, and also periodically employ NDT during the
operational service of aircraft, using advanced ultrasonic
immersion systems or digital radiography in order to precisely
detect structural defects. Industry participants also use NDT
for the inspection of advanced composites found in new classes
of aircraft, ultrasonic fatigue testing of complete aircraft
structures, corrosion detection and on-board monitoring of
landing gear and other critical components. We expect increased
demand for our solutions from the aerospace industry to result
from wider use of advanced composites and distributed on-line
sensor
58
networks and other embedded analytical applications built into
the structure of assets to enable real-time performance
monitoring and condition-based maintenance.
Transportation
The use of NDT services within the transportation industry is
primarily focused in the automotive and rail segments. Within
the automotive segment, manufacturers use NDT solutions
throughout the entire design and development process, including
the inspection of raw material inputs, during in-process
manufacturing and, finally, during end-product testing and
analysis. Although NDT technologies have been utilized in the
automobile industry for a number of decades, we believe growth
in the segment will accelerate as automobile manufacturers
increasingly outsource their NDT requirements and take advantage
of new technologies that enable them to more thoroughly inspect
their products throughout the manufacturing process. Within the
rail segment, NDT solutions are used primarily to test rails and
passenger and tank cars.
Primary
Metals and Metalworking
The market for NDT services for the primary ferrous and
nonferrous metal industries has grown rapidly in recent years.
The quality control requirements driven by the low defect
tolerance within automated, robotic intensive metalwork
industries, such as screw machining, serve as key drivers for
the recent growth of NDT technologies, such as ultrasonics and
radiography. We expect that increasingly stringent quality
control requirements and competitive forces will drive the
demand for more costly finishing and polishing which, in turn,
will promote greater use of NDT throughout the production
lifecycle.
Pharmaceuticals
and Food Processing
Although the pharmaceuticals and food processing industries have
historically not been large consumers of NDT solutions, we
believe that in the future these industries will increasingly
use NDT throughout their manufacturing and other processes.
Because these industries use equipment, structures, facilities
and other infrastructure similar to those of many of our other
target markets, and these assets have reached an age where
structural failures are becoming a significant risk, we expect
increasing demand from those companies looking to protect their
existing investments.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths contribute to our
market leading position and allow us to capitalize on growth
opportunities in the NDT industry:
|
|
|
|
|
One-Stop Shop for NDT Solutions Worldwide. We
believe we are the only vendor with a comprehensive suite of
proprietary and integrated NDT services, software and other
products worldwide, which positions us to be the leading single
source provider for all of our customers NDT requirements.
Through our network of 60 offices and independent
representatives in 15 countries around the world, we offer an
extensive portfolio of solutions that enables our customers to
consolidate all their inspection requirements and the associated
data storage and analytics on a single system that spans the
customers entire enterprise. This allows our customers to
more effectively manage their asset portfolio, plan asset
maintenance based on predictive analytics rather than simple
scheduled routines and track their assets globally, thereby
enhancing asset productivity and utilization while minimizing
the administrative costs of having multiple vendors.
Collaboration between our services teams and product design
engineers generates enhancements to our services, software and
products, which provides a source of competitive advantage
compared to companies that provide only NDT services or products
to their customers.
|
|
|
|
Trusted Provider to a Diversified and Growing Customer
Base. By providing critical and reliable NDT
services, software and products for more than 30 years, we
have become a trusted partner to a large and growing installed
base of customers across numerous infrastructure-intensive
industries. Our customers include some of the largest and most
well-recognized firms in the oil and gas, chemical, power
generation and transmission, aerospace and defense industries as
well as the largest public authorities. We believe our customers
frequently choose us based on our reputation and track record of
execution. We leverage our strong relationships to sell
additional solutions to our existing customers
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
and attract new customers. As NDT becomes an increasingly
strategic asset for our customers, we believe our reputation and
history of successful execution will differentiate us from our
competitors. Seven of our top 10 customers by revenues in fiscal
2008 have used our solutions for at least 10 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repository of Customer-Specific Inspection
Data. Our enterprise software solutions enable us
to capture and store our customers testing and inspection
data in a centralized database. As a result, we have accumulated
large amounts of proprietary information that allows us to
provide our customers with value-added services, such as
predictive maintenance, inspection scheduling, data analytics
and regulatory compliance. We believe our ability to provide
these customized products and services, along with the high
switching costs, provide us significant competitive advantages.
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products, Software and Technology
Packages. We have developed systems that have
become the cornerstone of several unique NDT applications, such
as those used for the testing of pressure vessels (the MONPAC
technology package) or above-ground storage tanks (the TANKPAC
technology package). These proprietary products allow us to
efficiently and effectively provide complex solutions to our
customers, resulting in a significant competitive advantage over
our competition. In addition to the proprietary software and
products that we sell to customers on a stand-alone basis, we
also develop a range of proprietary sensors, instruments,
systems and software used exclusively by our Services group.
|
|
|
|
Deep Domain Knowledge and Extensive Industry
Experience. Our research and development team
leads the industry in developing advanced NDT solutions such as
on-line AE products, high speed automated UT systems, advanced
UT technologies for thick composite testing, infrared systems
for industrial applications, and portable UT and AE systems for
two- or three-dimensional inspection. In addition, many of the
members of our team have been instrumental in developing the
testing standards followed by international standards-setting
bodies, such as the American Society of Non-Destructive Testing
and comparable associations in other countries. The scientists
and engineers on our research and development team developed
many of the advanced NDT technologies we use in our business,
including portable corrosion mapping UT systems, enterprise
software solutions for plant-wide inspection data archiving and
management, and non-intrusive above ground tank testing.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating with Our Customers. Our NDT
solutions have historically been designed in response to our
customers unique performance specifications and are
supported by our proprietary technologies. Our sales and
engineering teams work with our various customers research
and design staff during the design phase of our products in
order to incorporate our product into specified infrastructure
projects, as well as with facilities maintenance personnel to
ensure that we are able to provide the NDT solutions necessary
to meet these customers changing demands. As a result, we
believe that our close, collaborative relationships with our
customers provide us a significant competitive advantage.
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team. Our management
team has a track record of leadership in NDT averaging
approximately 20 years experience in the industry. They
have extensive experience in growing businesses organically and
in acquiring and integrating companies, which we believe is
important to facilitate future growth in the fragmented NDT
industry. In addition, our senior managers are supported by
highly experienced project managers who are responsible for
delivering our solutions to customers.
|
Our
Growth Strategy
Our growth strategy emphasizes the following key elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to Develop Software-Enabled Services and
Products. We intend to maintain and enhance our
technological leadership by continuing to invest in the internal
development of new services, software and other products while
opportunistically acquiring key technologies and solutions that
address the highly specialized needs of our target markets. We
believe that opportunities for significant growth from new
solutions sales exist in our existing target markets and intend
to capitalize on our extensive intellectual property to develop
customized solutions for markets that we believe will
significantly increase their use of NDT solutions in the future,
such as alternative energy and agriculture.
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
Increase Revenues from Our Existing
Customers. Many of our customers are global
corporations with NDT requirements from multiple divisions at
multiple locations across the globe. Currently, we capture a
relatively small portion of their overall expenditures on NDT,
either within a limited geography or within a subset of their
overall NDT strategy. We believe our superior services, software
and other products, combined with the trend of outsourcing NDT
solutions, position us to significantly expand both the number
of divisions and locations that we serve, and the types of
solutions we provide. We strive to be the preferred global NDT
partner for our customers and aim to become the single source
provider for their NDT solution requirements.
|
|
|
|
Add New Customers in Existing Target
Markets. Our customer base, which we define as
the approximately 4,000 customers to which we have provided NDT
solutions during fiscal 2008, represents a small fraction of the
total number of companies in our target markets with NDT and
asset integrity management requirements. Our scale, scope of
products and services and expertise in creating
technology-enabled solutions have allowed us to build a
high-quality reputation and increase customer awareness about us
and our NDT solutions. We intend to leverage our reputation and
solutions offerings to win new customers within our existing
target markets, especially as advanced NDT solutions are adopted
internationally. We intend to continue to leverage our
competitive strengths to win new business as customers in our
existing target markets continue to seek a single source and
trusted provider of advanced NDT solutions.
|
|
|
|
Expand Our Customer Base into Emerging End
Markets. We believe we have significant
opportunities to rapidly grow our customer base in emerging end
markets. The expansion of our addressable markets is being
driven by the increased recognition and adoption of NDT products
and services in industries such as shipping and alternative
energy, new NDT technologies enabling applications in industries
such as healthcare and compressed and liquefied natural gas
transportation, and the aging of infrastructure, such as
construction and loading cranes and ports, to the point where
visual inspection has proven inadequate and new NDT solutions
are required. We expect to continue to expand our global sales
organization, grow our inspection data management and data
mining services and find new high-value applications, such as
embedding our sensor technology in assembly lines for
electronics and distributed sensor networks for aerospace
applications. As companies in these emerging end markets realize
the benefits of our NDT solutions, we expect to expand our
leadership position by addressing customer needs and winning new
business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to Capitalize on Acquisitions. We
intend to continue employing a disciplined acquisition strategy
to broaden and enhance our product and service offerings, add
new customers, supplement our internal development efforts and
accelerate our expected growth. We believe the market for NDT
solutions is highly fragmented with a large number of potential
acquisition opportunities. We have a proven ability to integrate
complementary businesses as demonstrated by the success of our
past acquisitions, which have often contributed entirely new
products and services that have added significantly to our
revenues and profitability. In addition, we have begun to offer
and sell our advanced NDT solutions to customers of companies we
acquired that had previously relied on traditional NDT
solutions. Importantly, we have been able to improve the
operational performance and profitability of our acquired
businesses through strong integration and selling our advanced
NDT solutions to their customers.
|
Our
Solutions
We provide comprehensive NDT solutions to a diverse customer
base. We combine the strengths of our proprietary products,
industry expertise, a suite of software solutions and our highly
skilled and experienced technicians and engineers to deliver a
broad set of inspection, engineering and information technology
services that address the complex business challenges faced by
our customers. Depending on the requirements of our customers,
we can sell them our software and other products on a
stand-alone basis or as a complete end-to-end NDT solution
consisting of sensor products, services and software.
Importantly, as part of our solutions, we are increasingly
providing on-line asset monitoring and management software
enabling our customers to have real-time access to and assess
the structural health of their infrastructure.
61
Our
Services
We provide a range of testing and inspection services to a
diversified customer base across energy-related, industrial and
public infrastructure industries. We either deploy our services
directly at the customers location or through our own
network of field testing facilities. Our global footprint allows
us to provide NDT inspection services through local offices in
close proximity to our customers, permitting us to keep response
time to a minimum, while maximizing our ability to develop
meaningful, collaborative customer relationships. Examples of
our comprehensive portfolio of services include: testing
components of new construction as they are built or assembled,
providing corrosion monitoring data to help customers determine
whether to repair or retire infrastructure, providing material
analysis to ensure the integrity of infrastructure components
and supplying non-invasive on-stream techniques that enable our
customers to pinpoint potential problem areas prior to failure.
In addition, we also provide services to assist in the planning
and scheduling of resources for repairs and maintenance
activities. Our experienced inspection professionals perform
these services, which are supported by our advanced proprietary
software and hardware products.
Traditional
NDT Services
Our certified personnel provide a range of traditional
inspection services. For example, our visual inspectors provide
comprehensive assessments of the condition of our
customers plant equipment during capital construction
projects and maintenance shutdowns. Of the broad set of
traditional NDT techniques that we provide, several lend
themselves to integration with our other offerings and often
serve as the initial entry point to more advanced customer
engagements. Two such techniques include:
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanical Integrity Services. We provide a
broad range of mechanical integrity services that enable our
customers to meet stringent regulatory requirements. These
services increase plant safety, minimize unscheduled downtime
and allow our customers to plan for, repair and replace critical
components and systems before failure occurs. Our services are
designed to complement a comprehensive predictive, preventative
inspection and maintenance program that we can provide for our
customers in addition to the mechanical integrity services.
Customers of our mechanical integrity services have, in many
instances, recognized the benefits associated with our PCMS
software and implemented this solution to complement our
inspection services.
|
|
|
|
Tank Inspection. We provide a comprehensive
program for the inspection of above-ground storage tanks
designed to meet stringent industry standards for the
inspection, repair, alteration and reconstruction of oil and
petrochemical storage tanks. This program includes magnetic flux
exclusion for the rapid detection of floor plate corrosion,
advanced ultrasonic systems and leak detection of floor defects,
remote ultrasonic crawlers for shell and roof inspections and
trained, certified inspectors for visual inspection and
documentation.
|
Advanced
NDT Services
In addition to traditional NDT services, we offer a broad range
of proprietary advanced NDT services that we offer on a
stand-alone basis or in combination with software solutions such
as PCMS. We also provide on-line monitoring capabilities or
other solutions that enable the delivery of accurate and
real-time information to our customers. Our advanced NDT
services require more complex equipment and more skilled
inspection professionals to operate this equipment and interpret
test results. Some of the technologies they use include:
|
|
|
Automated ultrasonic testing
|
|
Wireless data acquisition
|
Guided ultrasonic long wave testing
|
|
On-line plant asset integrity monitoring
|
Infrared thermography
|
|
Risk-based inspection
|
Phased array ultrasonic testing
|
|
Digital radiography
|
Acoustic emission testing
|
|
Sensor fusion
|
Examples of our advanced NDT techniques include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Automated Ultrasonic Phased Array
Inspection. We primarily use this technique to
inspect welded areas during large capital construction and
maintenance projects to determine whether the welds can
withstand anticipated operating conditions, such as high
pressures or temperatures. This technique
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
employs an automated mobile scanner to obtain structural
ultrasonic inspection data from multiple angles and locations.
The principal competing technique is radiographic inspection,
which generally impedes or requires the construction or
maintenance work to be halted during the inspection. By using
ultrasonic phased array inspection, our customers can continue
to weld while our inspections are taking place, which shortens
downtime during maintenance projects and accelerates the
completion of construction projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guided Ultrasonic Long Wave Testing. We
typically use this technique to locate corrosion or metal loss
in large volumes of piping. It allows us to inspect a long
continuous section of piping from one location and follow up
with further inspections on problem areas, as compared to more
costly and time-intensive methods which require inspections at
multiple locations along the same section of pipe. It also
allows us to inspect the entire pipe body, enabling us to
identify a larger percentage of flaws as compared to traditional
techniques that inspect only a small portion of pipe walls.
|
|
|
|
Advanced Infrared Inspection. We generally
employ this technique in place of ultrasonic inspections of
large operating systems, such as boilers in industrial power
plants, which rely on scans of sample areas of the system to
test their integrity rather than a scan of the entire system.
Traditional infrared inspection locates unexpected temperature
differences to alert inspection personnel to potential problems
with insulation, process systems, electrical systems and proper
operating parameters. Our proprietary advanced infrared system
enables us to scan large areas using a robotic crawler and not
only examine temperature differences but also precisely measure
the thickness of objects or materials. Our proprietary infrared
scanning system examines the entirety of the tested structure to
supply more comprehensive inspection data to plant engineers,
providing them a higher level of confidence when deciding
whether to repair, replace or retire the structure.
|
Our
Software and Products
Our
Software
Our software solutions are designed to meet the demands of our
customers data analysis and asset integrity management
requirements. Some of our key software solutions include:
PCMS
Enterprise Software: Asset Protection and Reliability
Our PCMS application is an enterprise software system that
allows for the storage and analysis of data as captured by our
testing and inspection products and services. PCMS allows our
customers to design and develop asset integrity management plans
that include:
|
|
|
|
|
optimal systematic testing schedules for their infrastructure
based on real-time data captured by our sensors;
|
|
|
|
alerts that notify customers when to perform special testing
services on suspect areas, enabling them to identify and resolve
flaws on a timely basis; and
|
|
|
|
schedules for the maintenance and retirement of assets.
|
These plans are based on information stored in PCMS, which
include results based upon the rates of deterioration shown by
existing test results, information based on our past experiences
in the operation and testing of similar structures and standards
and recommended practices of numerous industrial
standards-setting bodies, such as the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, the American Petroleum Institute and the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Using PCMS allows
our customers to demonstrate compliance with these standards and
practices, which typically helps them reduce their insurance
premiums and assure asset, product and employee safety. We
believe that as a result of its superior functionality, PCMS is
one of the more widely used condition management software
systems in the world. We believe approximately 38% of
U.S. refineries currently use PCMS.
In addition, our risk-based inspection (RBI) application enables
PCMS users to test and analyze their assets operating
conditions and other factors, such as operating temperature
range and contact with highly flammable or corrosive products.
This allows customers to classify or rank each asset according
to the probability and consequences of its structural failure
and schedule the appropriate frequency and types of
63
testing for that asset. We believe our RBI program allows our
customers to appropriately test their infrastructure in a more
cost-effective manner while reducing their overall risk profile,
which typically allows them to reduce their insurance premiums.
Application-Based
Software
We provide a comprehensive portfolio of application-specific
software products, such as AE and automated UT and analysis. Our
product line covers a broad range of testing and analysis
methods, including neural networks, pattern recognition, wavelet
analysis and moment tensor analysis.
Some of the key software solutions we offer include:
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Data Analysis Pattern Recognition & Neural
Networks Software
(NOESIStm): An
advanced data analysis and pattern recognition software package
for AE applications. NOESIS enables our AE experts to develop
automated remote monitoring systems for our customers.
|
|
|
|
AE Software Platform
(AEwintm
and
AEwinPosttm): Windows-based
real time applications software for detection, processing and
analysis of AE data. This software locates the general location
of flaws on or in our customers structures.
|
|
|
|
Loose Parts Monitoring Software (LPMS): A
software program for monitoring, detecting and evaluating
metallic loose parts in nuclear reactor systems in accordance
with strict industry standards. LPMS alerts the operator on the
floor and control room about potential loose parts, provides a
user-friendly interface for operators to differentiate between
noise and loose parts and identifies the location of the problem.
|
|
|
|
Automated UT and Imaging Analysis Software
(UTwintmand
UTIAtm):
A complete software platform for analyzing
ultrasonic inspection data and visualizing and identifying the
location and size of potential flaws.
|
Technology
Packages
In order to address some of the more common problems faced by
our customers, we have developed a number of robust packaged
technology solutions. These packages generally allow more rapid
and effective testing of infrastructure because these packages
minimize the need for service professionals to customize and
integrate NDT solutions with the infrastructure and interpret
test results. These packaged solutions use specialized testing
procedures and hardware, advanced pattern recognition, neural
network software and databases to compare test results against
our prior testing data or national and international structural
integrity standards. Some of our widely used technology packages
in some of our target markets are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Package
|
|
Type
|
|
Description
|
|
Benefits
|
|
TANKPACtm
|
|
AE On-line Tank Floor Inspection
|
|
Tests to monitor for emissions resulting from active corrosion
of the tested infrastructure
|
|
Ability to perform tests on-stream
Non-intrusive testing
Quickly identify tanks that need inspection and resolve associated problems
Leave good tanks operational and save the shutdown and cleaning costs
|
MONPACtm
|
|
AE Pressure Vessel Testing
|
|
An AE expert system that evaluates the condition of
metal pressure systems and tanks
|
|
Ability to perform tests on-stream
Rapid inspection capability
Global monitoring (100% inspection, including welds, repairs, base metal)
Reduction in inspection costs
Reduction in downtime resulting from improved information about plant condition
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Package
|
|
Type
|
|
Description
|
|
Benefits
|
|
VPACtm
|
|
Loss Control for Valves in Process Plants
|
|
Estimates valve leakage based on measurements made using our
inspection products
|
|
Cost savings from detection of valve leaks
Cost savings are achieved in maintenance planning, troubleshooting plant operations and monitoring of losses for environmental purposes
|
POWERPACtm
|
|
AE On-line Power Transformer Monitoring
|
|
Through on-line monitoring, detects and locates partial
discharge in power transformers by utilizing AE
|
|
Non-intrusive testing
On-line testing identifies problems characterizing defects
Creates way to monitor problem transformers
|
Our Other
Products
AE
Products
We are a leader in the design and manufacture of AE sensors,
instruments and turn-key systems used for the monitoring and
testing of materials, pressure components, processes and
structures. Though we principally sell our products as a system,
which includes a combination of sensors, an amplifier, signal
processing electronics, knowledge-based software and decision
and feedback electronics, we can also sell these as individual
components to certain customers that have the in-house expertise
to perform their own services. Our sensors listen to
structures and materials to detect real-time AE activity and to
determine the presence of structural flaws in the inspected
materials. Such materials include pressure vessels, storage
tanks, heat exchangers, piping and reactors.
In addition, we provide leak monitoring and detection systems
used in diverse applications, including the detection and
location of both gaseous and liquid leaks in valves, vessels,
pipelines and tanks. AE leak monitoring and detection, when
applied in a systematic preventive maintenance program, has
proven to substantially reduce costs by eliminating the need for
visual valve inspection and unscheduled down-time. In addition,
EPA requirements regarding fugitive emissions helps drive the
market for this leak detection equipment.
Our complete AE product line includes:
|
|
|
|
|
AE Sensors: Over 200 different types of
proprietary sensors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-channel AE Systems: Multi-sensor
parallel processing systems capable of monitoring, detecting and
locating defects in large structures, such as vessels, pipelines
and platforms. These systems include our Sensor Highway II,
which is designed for on-line remote monitoring of bridges and
large transformers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hand-held Instruments: Portable AE systems
easily adaptable to OEM applications.
|
|
|
|
Wireless AE Systems: Our wireless sensors can
communicate with single base stations, or with base stations and
other sensors in geographically dispersed mesh
networks. Wireless capabilities are fully integrated into our
Sensor Highway II units.
|
|
|
|
Intrinsically Safe Products: Certified sensors
and AE systems to work in hazardous and potentially explosive
environments such as the petrochemical industry.
|
UT
Technology
We design, manufacture and market ultrasonic equipment under our
NDT Automation brand name. While AE technology detects flaws and
pinpoints their location, our UT technology has the ability to
size defects in three-dimensional geometric representations. We
manufacture a complete line of UT scanners with automated or
manual capabilities, and design and fabricate custom scanners as
requested by customers.
65
Vibration
Sensors and Systems
We design, manufacture and market a broad portfolio of vibration
sensing products under our
Vibra-Metricstm
brand name. These include accelerometers, on-line
condition-based management systems, data delivery systems and a
comprehensive assortment of ancillary support products. Our
patented Sensor
Highwaytm
monitoring systems offer fully automated, unattended remote data
acquisition and alarm reporting for mechanical equipment and
machines, which enable us to provide real-time predictive
maintenance data to our customers.
On-Line
Monitoring
Our on-line monitoring offerings combine all of our NDT
services, software and other products. We offer permanent or
continuous monitoring and temporary monitoring. Continuous
monitoring is used for long periods of time, for example, over
the entire life of a structure. Temporary monitoring is
typically used when there is a known defect or problem and the
condition needs to be monitored until repaired or new equipment
can be placed in service. Since 1988, we have provided these
solutions to over eighty projects for a variety of industries
and equipment applications, including bridges, transformers,
steam and gas turbines, nuclear reactors and offshore oil
platforms. Our monitoring systems can be accessed remotely and
use a variety of sensing devices, can interface with customer
data via the Internet or other proprietary networks and can
include alarm, customer notification and automatic shut-down
systems. By using different sensing devices such as sound,
vibration, temperature, strain or corrosion gauges, often
referred to as sensor fusion, we can monitor multiple factors
that can lead to failure or corrosion in a structure.
An example of a permanent or continuous monitoring engagement is
our monitoring of aging bridges for factors of degradation. Wire
breakage in suspension bridges is usually the result of
corrosion fatigue which slowly degrades the integrity of the
bridge. Since wire breakage events are occasional and
unpredictable, the most effective way to track the extent of
deterioration is by continuous monitoring. Another example is
offshore drilling platforms, which often develop slight flaws in
high stress locations that can quickly and unpredictably expand
into catastrophic failures. In many circumstances, such flaws
cannot be reliably detected using conventional inspection
techniques. Examples and prime candidates for our temporary
on-line monitoring solutions include pressure vessels, such as a
tank, where cracking is identified, but unless the crack grows
the vessel can safely be operated until a planned maintenance or
shutdown occurs.
Customers
During fiscal 2008, we provided our NDT solutions to
approximately 4,000 different customers. The following table
lists some of our larger customers by revenues for fiscal 2008,
in each of our target markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite and Part
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear and Fossil
|
|
Testing, Including
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
Power Generation and
|
|
Aerospace and
|
|
|
(Including Petrochemical)
|
|
Transmission
|
|
Electronics
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
BP(1)
|
|
American Electric Power
|
|
Airbus
|
|
Air Products
|
Conoco
|
|
Bechtel
|
|
Rio Tinto
|
|
Bayer
|
ExxonMobil
|
|
Duke Energy
|
|
Kaiser Aluminum
|
|
Dow Chemical
|
Basell
|
|
Exelon
|
|
Samsung
|
|
Dupont
|
Petrobras
|
|
First Energy
|
|
|
|
Ineos
|
Shell
|
|
Florida Power & Light
|
|
|
|
|
Sunoco
|
|
General Electric
|
|
|
|
|
Valero
|
|
PP&L
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary Metals
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Public
|
and Metalworking
|
|
Transportation
|
|
and Food Processing
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
Doncasters New England
|
|
Dana Corporation
|
|
AstraZeneca
|
|
Bechtel
|
Mid States Machine
|
|
Emergency One
|
|
Pfizer
|
|
Federal Highway Administration
|
Small Parts Incorporated
|
|
|
|
Pilgrims Pride
|
|
Parsons Engineering
|
66
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Various divisions or business units of BP were responsible for
16.7%, 16.5% and 9.5% of our revenues during fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Predominantly all of this revenue is
included in our Services segment. |
During the last three fiscal years, we derived our revenues from
providing our NDT solutions to customers in the United States
and over 60 countries around the world. Foreign countries where
we provided NDT solutions responsible for more than
approximately 1% of our revenues in fiscal 2008, listed in
descending order of revenues, were: Brazil, France, the United
Kingdom, China, Russia, Japan, The Netherlands, South Korea,
Canada, Malaysia, Norway, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Greece,
Italy, Australia, Trinidad and Tobago, India, Tunisia, Turkey,
the West Indies, Spain, Finland, Germany and Mexico.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive, but fragmented, market. Our
primary competitors are divisions of large companies, and many
of our other competitors are small companies, limited to a
specific product or technology and focused on a niche market or
geographic region. We believe that none of our competitors
currently provides the full range of NDT products, enterprise
software and the traditional and advanced NDT services solutions
that we offer. Our major competitors with respect to NDT
services include the Acuren division of Rockwood Service
Corporation, SGS Group, the TCM division of Team, Inc. and
APPLUS RTD, which is majority-owned by The Carlyle Group. Our
major competitor with respect to our PCMS software is UltraPIPE,
a division of Siemens, and to a lesser extent, Lloyds
Register Capstone, Inc. Our major competitors with respect to
our ultrasonic products are GE Inspection Technologies and
Olympus NDT. In the traditional NDT market, we believe the
principal competitive factors are price, reputation and quality.
In the advanced NDT market, reputation, quality and size are
more significant competitive factors than price. In light of
several characteristics of the NDT industry and obstacles facing
competitors, only a few of our existing competitors can compete
with us on a global basis, and we believe few new companies are
likely to enter the market. Some of the most significant of such
characteristics and obstacles include: (1) having to
acquire or develop advanced NDT services, software and other
product technologies, which in our case occurred over many years
of customer engagements and at significant internal research and
development expense, (2) complex regulations and safety
codes that require significant industry experience,
(3) license requirements and evolved quality and safety
programs, (4) costly and time consuming certification
processes, (5) capital requirements and (6) emphasis
by large customers on size and critical mass, length of
relationship and past service record.
Sales and
Marketing
We sell our NDT solutions through all of our 60 offices
worldwide. As of August 15, 2008, our world-wide sales and
marketing team consisted of 42 dedicated employees as well as
several members of our executive management team who are also
active in the sales process. Our direct sales and marketing
teams work closely with our customers research and design
personnel, reliability engineers and facilities maintenance
engineers to demonstrate the benefits and capabilities of our
NDT solutions, refine our NDT solutions based on changing
customer needs and identify potential sales opportunities. We
provide our NDT solutions under well known, industry-recognized
brand names including CONAM Inspection & Engineering
Services Inc., Physical Acoustics Corporation and Vibra-Metrics,
as well as lesser-known regional, local or product specific
brand names. Over time, we plan to promote the name Mistras
using the tag line of A World of NDT Solutions. We
divide our sales and marketing efforts into services sales,
software and other products sales and marketing.
Services
Sales
In addition to over 45 general and center of
excellence managers and executives, our dedicated services
sales group employs 14 regional and business development
managers and professionals, each of whom is responsible for
educating our existing and potential customers about our NDT
services offerings for a specific geographic region. The sales
cycle for our more significant services engagements is typically
three to six months. We generally provide our services under
one- to three-year contracts, but none of our services contracts
legally obligate our customers to purchase from us on a
going-forward basis. Historically, a majority
67
of our total services revenues have been recurring because of
the length of certain of our client relationships and the number
of our technicians who work for extended and predictable periods
at our customer locations.
Software
and Products Sales
Our software and products sales group employs 13 corporate level
sales managers and professionals, each of whom is responsible
for educating our existing and potential customers about our
diverse portfolio of NDT software and other products in a
geographic region. This team is supported by experts and
scientists who work globally to provide design, installation and
other sales support for more specialized niche applications, as
well as customer support after purchase. The sales cycle for our
software and other products is typically three to
12 months. We generally provide our software under one-year
renewable license agreements.
International
Sales
Our international sales group employs 12 sales managers and
professionals, each of whom is responsible for educating our
existing and potential customers about our NDT solutions in the
geographical areas outside the United States other than China
and South Korea. The sales cycle for our NDT solutions and the
agreements under which we provide them in these areas are
substantially similar to those of our other segments.
Marketing
Our marketing group consists of five employees, and focuses
primarily on supporting purchase decisions by our existing and
potential customers facilities managers, design engineers
and research and development personnel by providing them product
demonstrations, product testing, displays, marketing collateral
and training programs. In addition, we support our brands
through a range of print advertising and dedicated websites. Our
websites have been designed to be a readily available source of
information about our NDT solutions, assisting our sales,
marketing and customer service activities on a
24-hour
basis.
Manufacturing
Our hardware products are manufactured in our Princeton
Junction, New Jersey facility. This is a modern manufacturing
facility equipped with the latest surface mount manufacturing
equipment and automated test equipment. Our Princeton Junction
facility includes all the capabilities and personnel to fully
produce all of our AE products, NDT Automation ultrasonic
equipment and
Vibra-Metricstm
vibration sensing products.
Intellectual
Property
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and
protect our proprietary technology and to conduct our business
without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. We
utilize a combination of intellectual property safeguards,
including patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, as
well as employee and third-party confidentiality agreements, to
protect our intellectual property.
As of August 15, 2008, in the United States we held 21
patents, which will expire at various times between 2010 to
2023, and had no outstanding patent applications. Although we
believe our existing patents have significant value, we
currently do not principally rely on our patented technologies
to provide our NDT solutions. We periodically assess appropriate
circumstances for seeking patent protection for those aspects of
our technologies, designs, methodologies and processes that we
believe provide significant competitive advantages. We have also
licensed certain patent rights from third parties for new NDT
technologies involving thermography and a method to measure wall
thinning and geometric changes in boiler tubes. However, we do
not significantly rely upon these licensed technologies in
providing our NDT solutions and the royalties we pay for these
licenses are not material.
As of August 15, 2008, the primary trademarks and service
marks that we held in the United States included Mistras, CONAM
Inspection (CONAM), Physical Acoustics Corporation (PAC), and
Controlled Vibrations Inc. Other trademarks or service marks
that we utilize in localized markets or product advertising
include PCMS, MONPAC, PERFPAC, TANKPAC, Code Services, Quality
Services Laboratories Inc. (QSL), Caliber Inspection, PRI,
Universal and Alpha, NDT Automation, and Controlled Vibrations
Inc.
Many elements of our NDT solutions involve proprietary know-how,
technology or data that are not covered by patents or patent
applications because they are not patentable, or patents
covering them would be
68
difficult to enforce, including technical processes, equipment
designs, algorithms and procedures. We believe that this
proprietary know-how, technology and data is the most important
component of our intellectual property assets used in our NDT
solutions, and is a primary differentiator of our NDT solutions
from those of our competitors. We rely on various trade secret
protection techniques and agreements with our customers, service
providers and vendors to protect these assets. All of our
employees in our Software and Products segment and certain of
our other employees involved in the development of our
intellectual property have entered into confidentiality and
proprietary information agreements with us. These agreements
require our employees not to use or disclose our confidential
information, to assign to us all of the inventions, designs and
technologies they develop during the course of employment with
us, and otherwise address intellectual property protection
issues. We also seek confidentiality agreements from our
customers and business partners before we disclose any sensitive
aspects of our NDT solutions technology or business strategies.
We are not currently involved in any material intellectual
property claims.
Research
and Development
Our research and development is principally conducted by 28
engineers and scientists at our Princeton Junction, New Jersey
headquarters, and supplemented by other employees in the United
States and throughout the world, including France, Greece, Japan
and Russia, who have other primary responsibilities. Our total
professional staff includes 22 employees who hold Ph.D.s,
and 62 employees who hold Level III certification, or
the highest level of certification from the American Society of
Non-Destructive Testing.
We work with many of our customers on developing new products or
applications for our technology. Research and development
expenses are reflected on our consolidated statements of
operations as research and engineering expenses. Our
company-sponsored research and development expenses were
approximately $1.0 million, $0.7 million and
$0.7 million for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In addition, while we have in the past self-funded the majority
of our research and development expenditures, we also had
customer-sponsored research and development revenues of
approximately $0.6 million, $0.8 million and
$1.3 million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Employees
Providing our NDT solutions requires a highly skilled and
technically proficient employee base. As of August 15,
2008, we had approximately 1,600 employees worldwide and
approximately 1,300 of Mistras employees were based within
the United States, of which approximately 85% were hourly. Fewer
than twenty of our hourly employees in the United States are
unionized. We believe that we have good relations with our
employees.
Facilities
As of August 15, 2008, we operated 60 offices in 15
countries, with our corporate headquarters located in Princeton
Junction, New Jersey.
The locations of our operating properties are set forth below by
geographic region. As of August 15, 2008, we owned the
properties located in Olds, Alberta; Monroe, North Carolina;
Trainer, Pennsylvania; Houston and Pasadena, Texas; and
Gillette, Wyoming; and we occupied the other properties under
leases.
69
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Region
|
|
City and State or Country
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
Decatur, Alabama
|
|
Woodbridge, New Jersey
|
|
|
Theodore, Alabama
|
|
Bloomfield, New Mexico
|
|
|
Benicia (near San Francisco), California
|
|
Bohemia, New York
|
|
|
Long Beach, California
|
|
Monroe, North Carolina
|
|
|
Signal Hill (near Los Angeles), California
|
|
Heath, Ohio
|
|
|
Denver, Colorado
|
|
Independence, Ohio
|
|
|
East Granby, Connecticut
|
|
Lima, Ohio
|
|
|
Waterford, Connecticut
|
|
Carnegie, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
Chubbuck, Idaho
|
|
Manchester, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
Burr Ridge, Illinois
|
|
Trainer, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
Carol Stream, Illinois (inactive)
|
|
Roebuck, South Carolina
|
|
|
Edwardsville, Illinois
|
|
Granbury, Texas
|
|
|
South Holland, Illinois
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
|
Noblesville, Indiana
|
|
La Marque, Texas
|
|
|
Ashland, Kentucky
|
|
Pasadena, Texas
|
|
|
Louisville, Kentucky
|
|
North Salt Lake, Utah (3 locations)
|
|
|
Prairieville, Louisiana
|
|
Bellingham, Washington
|
|
|
Auburn, Massachusetts
|
|
Kent, Washington
|
|
|
Springfield, Massachusetts
|
|
Evanston, Wyoming
|
|
|
Old Bridge, New Jersey
|
|
Gillette, Wyoming
|
|
|
Princeton Junction, New Jersey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
Beijing, China
|
|
|
|
|
Navi Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
Grande Prairie, Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
Olds, Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
Red Deer, Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
Cambridge, England
|
|
|
|
|
Sucy-en-Brie (near Paris), France
|
|
|
|
|
Hamburg, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Athens, Greece
|
|
|
|
|
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
Moscow, Russia
|
|
|
|
|
Gothenburg, Sweden
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East
|
|
Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America
|
|
Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
|
|
|
|
Bahia, Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
São Paulo, Brazil
|
|
|
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to numerous environmental, legal and regulatory
requirements related to our operations worldwide. In the United
States, these laws and regulations include, among others: the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act, the
70
Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the
Toxic Substances Control Act, the Atomic Energy Act, the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, and applicable state
regulations.
In addition to the federal laws and regulations, states and
other countries where we do business often have numerous
environmental, legal and regulatory requirements by which we
must abide. We evaluate and address the environmental impact of
our operations by assessing properties in order to avoid future
liabilities and comply with environmental, legal and regulatory
requirements. Thus far, we are not involved in specific
environmental litigation and claims, including the remediation
of properties we own or have operated, as well as efforts to
meet or correct compliance-related matters. We do not expect
costs related to environmental matters to have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated cash flows, financial
position or results of operations.
Legal
Proceedings
We are subject to periodic lawsuits, investigations and claims
that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although we
cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of
lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, we do
not believe that any currently pending legal proceeding to which
we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition. The costs of defense and amounts that may be
recovered in such matters may be covered by insurance.
On September 25, 2007, two former employees, individually
and on behalf of a purported class consisting of all current and
former employees who work or worked as
on-site
construction workers, testing technicians and inspectors for
Conam in the State of California at any time from September 2003
through the date of judgment, if any, in this action, filed an
action against Conam in the United States District Court,
Northern District of California. The Complaint alleges, among
other things, that Conam violated the California Labor Code by
failing to pay required overtime compensation and provide meal
periods and accurate itemized wage statements. The Complaint
also alleges that Conam violated the California Business and
Professions Code by engaging in the unlawful business practices
of failing to compensate employees for missed meal periods and
requiring employees to work alternative workweek schedules,
which were improperly adopted and implemented. The relief sought
includes damages, penalties, interest, attorneys fees and
costs, injunctive relief, restitution and such other relief as
the court deems proper. Conam denies all these claims.
Plaintiffs putative class remains uncertified. The hearing
on Plaintiffs motion for class certification is currently
scheduled for October 3, 2008, but the parties have
stipulated to postpone the hearing until after a mediation,
which has been scheduled for October 13, 2008.
71
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
our executive officers, directors and director nominee as of
August 15, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos(1)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
Paul Peterik(1)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
Mark F. Carlos(1)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Software and Products
|
|
Phillip T. Cole(1)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, International
|
|
Michael J. Lange(1)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Services, and Director
|
|
Elizabeth Burgess(2)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Daniel M. Dickinson(3)(4)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
James J. Forese(2)
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Richard H. Glanton(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
|
Manuel N. Stamatakis(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Executive Officer |
|
(2) |
|
Member of audit committee |
|
(3) |
|
Member of compensation committee |
|
(4) |
|
Member of nominating and corporate governance committee |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Glanton will be nominated and elected as a director
effective upon completion of this offering. |
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos has served as our Chairman;
President and Chief Executive Officer since he founded Mistras
in 1978 under the name Physical Acoustics Corp. Prior to joining
Mistras, Dr. Vahaviolos worked at AT&T Bell
Laboratories. Dr. Vahaviolos received a BS in Electrical
Engineering and graduated first in his class from Fairleigh
Dickinson University and received a Master of Science (EE),
Masters in Philosophy and a Ph.D.(EE) from the Columbia
University School of Engineering. During
Dr. Vahaviolos career in NDT, he has been elected
Fellow of The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
a member of The American Society for Nondestructive Testing
(ASNT) where he served as its President from
1992-1993
and its Chairman from
1993-1994, a
member of Acoustic Emission Working Group (AEWG) and an honorary
life member of the International Committee for Nondestructive
Testing. Additionally, he was the recipient of ASNTs Gold
Medal in 2001 and AEWGs Gold Medal in 2005.
Paul Pete Peterik joined Mistras in May 2005
as our Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. Prior to joining
Mistras, Mr. Peterik was the Chief Financial Officer of
Integrated Leasing Corp., a leasing company serving the
electronic payment processing industry, from August 2003 until
the business was sold in January 2005. From November 2002 to
August 2003, Mr. Peterik operated his own financial
consulting business for
start-up and
mid-sized companies. From 1980 to 2002, Mr. Peterik was
employed as chief financial officer or chief operating officer
at various private and public companies. Mr. Peterik was
employed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for nine years from
1971 to 1980, where he attained the position of audit manager.
Mark F. Carlos is Group Executive Vice President
responsible for Software and Products. Mr. Carlos joined
Mistras at its founding in 1978. Prior to joining Mistras,
Mr. Carlos worked at AT&T Bell Laboratories.
Mr. Carlos received a Masters in Business Administration
from Rider University and a Masters in Electrical Engineering
from Columbia University. Mr. Carlos is an elected Fellow
of ASNT and AEWG, and currently serves as the Vice Chairman of
the American Society for Testing and Materials NDT
Standards Writing Committee
E-3 and was
the recipient of its prestigious Charles W. Briggs Award in 2007.
Phillip T. Cole is Group Executive Vice President,
International, and Managing Director of Physical Acoustics
Limited (PAL). Mr. Cole founded Dunegan UK in 1983, which
was acquired by PAL in 1986.
72
Mr. Cole obtained a masters degree in physics and
electronic engineering from Loughborough University.
Mr. Cole began his career at TI Research in the U.K. where
he focused on NDT electromagnetic-acoustic devices.
Michael J. Lange is Executive Vice President responsible
for Services. He joined Mistras when it acquired Quality
Services Laboratories in November 2000. He was elected a
Director in 2003. Mr. Lange is a well recognized authority
in Radiography and has held an ASNT Level III Certificate
for almost 20 years. Mr. Lange received an Associate
of Science degree in NDT from the Spartan School of Aeronautics
in 1979.
Elizabeth Burgess has served as a Director since October
2005. Ms. Burgess is a senior partner and co-founder of
Altus Capital Partners, a private equity fund launched in 2003,
and served as a Vice President of its predecessor fund, Max
Capital Partners, which she joined in 2000. She currently serves
on the board of directors for several private companies that are
part of the Altus Capital portfolio. Ms. Burgess received a
B.S. from the State University of New York at Plattsburgh and an
M.B.A. from Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
Daniel M. Dickinson has served as a Director since August
2003. Mr. Dickinson has been employed since 2001 by, and is
currently a Managing Partner of, Thayer | Hidden Creek, a
private investment firm located in Washington, D.C.
Mr. Dickinson serves as a director and a member of the
compensation committee of Caterpillar, Inc. and as a director
and a member of the governance and compensation committee of BFI
Canada Income Fund as well as a director of several private
companies. Mr. Dickinson received a J.D. and M.B.A. from
the University of Chicago and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering
and Materials Science from Duke University.
James J. Forese has served as a Director since August
2003. Mr. Forese joined Thayer | Hidden Creek in July 2003
and currently serves as an Operating Partner and Chief Operating
Officer. Prior to joining Thayer | Hidden Creek, Mr. Forese
worked at IKON Office Solutions, most recently as the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Forese serves as a
director, the audit committee chair and member of the
compensation committee of Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc.,
non-executive Chairman of Spherion Corporation, a director and
the audit committee chair of BFI Canada Income Fund and a
director of several private organizations. Mr. Forese
received a B.E.E. in Electrical Engineering from Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute and an M.B.A. from Massachusetts Institute
of Technology.
Richard H. Glanton will become a member of our board of
directors upon the completion of this offering. Mr. Glanton
is Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Philadelphia
Television Network, a privately-held media company. From May
2003 to May 2007, Mr. Glanton served as the Senior Vice
President of Corporate Development for Exelon Corporation. From
1986 to 2003 he was a partner in the law firm of Reed Smith LLP
in Philadelphia. Mr. Glanton currently is a director of
Aqua America, Inc. and The CEO Group, Inc. and is a member of
the Board of Trustees of Lincoln University. Mr. Glanton
received a BA in English from West Georgia College and a J.D.
from University of Virginia School of Law.
Manuel N. Stamatakis has served as a Director since 2002.
Mr. Stamatakis is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of Capital Management Enterprises, Inc., a financial services
and employee benefits consulting company headquartered in Valley
Forge, Pennsylvania. Mr. Stamatakis currently serves as
Chairman of the Board of Drexel University College of Medicine,
the Philadelphia Shipyard Development Corporation, and the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Investment Advisory Board.
Mr. Stamatakis received a Bachelors of Science in
Industrial Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University in
1969 and received an honorary Doctorate of Business
Administration from Drexel University.
Our executive officers are elected by, and serve at the
discretion of, our board of directors. There are no family
relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
Board of
Directors
Board
Composition
Our board of directors currently consists of seven members.
Under our second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation that will be in effect upon the completion of this
offering, the authorized number of directors may be changed only
by resolution of the board of directors. At each annual meeting
of
73
stockholders commencing with the meeting in 2009, the directors
will be elected to serve until the earlier of their death,
resignation or removal or until their successors have been
elected and qualified.
Director
Independence
In June 2008, our board of directors undertook a review of the
independence of the directors and considered whether any
director has a relationship with us that precludes a
determination of independence within the meaning of the rules of
the New York Stock Exchange. As a result of this review, our
board of directors determined that Ms. Burgess and
Messrs. Dickinson, Forese, Glanton and Stamatakis,
representing five of the seven directors we will have upon
completion of the offering, are independent
directors as defined under the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange, constituting a majority of independent directors of
our board of directors as required by the rules of the New York
Stock Exchange.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Upon the completion of this offering, we will have an audit
committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and
corporate governance committee with the composition and
responsibilities described below.
Audit
Committee
Our audit committee will be comprised of Messrs. Forese and
Stamatakis and Ms. Burgess, each of whom is a non-employee
member of our board of directors, with Mr. Forese serving
as the initial chairperson of our audit committee. Our board of
directors has determined that each member of our audit committee
meets the requirements for independence and financial literacy,
and that Mr. Forese qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert, under the applicable requirements of the New
York Stock Exchange and SEC rules and regulations. The audit
committee will be responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
selecting and hiring our independent auditors, and approving the
audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent
auditors;
|
|
|
|
evaluating the qualifications, performance and independence of
our independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate
to financial statements or accounting matters;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control
policies and procedures;
|
|
|
|
discussing the scope and results of the audit with the
independent auditors and reviewing with management and the
independent auditors our interim and year-end operating
results; and
|
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report that the SEC requires in
our annual proxy statement.
|
Compensation
Committee
Our compensation committee will be comprised of
Messrs. Dickinson, Glanton and Stamatakis, each of whom is
a non-employee member of our board of directors, with
Mr. Stamatakis serving as the initial chairperson of our
compensation committee. Our board of directors has determined
that each member of our compensation committee meets the
requirements for independence under the current requirements of
the New York Stock Exchange. The compensation committee will be
responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving for our executive officers: annual base
salaries, annual incentive bonuses, including the specific goals
and amount, equity compensation, employment agreements,
severance arrangements and change in control arrangements and
any other benefits, compensation or arrangements;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the succession planning for our executive officers;
|
|
|
|
overseeing compensation goals and bonus and stock compensation
criteria for our employees;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending compensation programs for outside
directors;
|
|
|
|
preparing the compensation discussion and analysis and
compensation committee report that the SEC requires in our
annual proxy statement; and
|
|
|
|
administering, reviewing and making recommendations with respect
to our equity compensation plans.
|
74
Nominating
and Governance Committee
Our nominating and governance committee will be comprised of
Messrs. Dickinson, Glanton and Stamatakis, each of whom is
a non-employee member of our board of directors, with
Mr. Glanton serving as the initial chairperson of our
nominating and governance committee. Our board of directors has
determined that each member of our nominating and governance
committee satisfies the requirements for independence under the
rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The nominating and
governance committee will be responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
assisting our board of directors in identifying prospective
director nominees and recommending nominees for each annual
meeting of stockholders to the board of directors;
|
|
|
|
reviewing developments in corporate governance practices and
developing and recommending governance principles applicable to
our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
overseeing the evaluation of our board of directors and
management;
|
|
|
|
recommending members for each board committee to our board of
directors; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and monitoring our code of ethics and actual and
potential conflicts of interest of members of our board of
directors and officers.
|
Code
of Ethics
In connection with this offering our board of directors will
adopt a code of ethics for our principal executive and senior
financial officers. The code will apply to our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions. Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement
of which this prospectus forms a part, the full text of our code
of ethics will be posted on our website at
www.mistrasgroup.com. We intend to disclose future
amendments to certain provisions of our code of ethics, or
waivers of such provisions, applicable to any principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions as required by law or regulation. The inclusion of our
website address in this prospectus does not include or
incorporate by reference the information on our website into
this prospectus.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our compensation committee is an officer
or employee of our company. None of our executive officers
currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of
the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity
that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of
directors or compensation committee.
Limitations
on Liability and Indemnification Matters
Our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws, each of which will be in effect
upon the completion of this offering, contain provisions that
limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our
directors will not be personally liable to us or our
stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary
duties as directors, except liability for:
|
|
|
|
|
any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any act or omission not in good faith or that involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law; or
|
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that we are
obligated to advance expenses incurred by a director or officer
in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding,
and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer,
director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out
of his or her actions in that capacity, regardless of whether we
would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under
75
the provisions of Delaware law. We have entered, and expect to
continue to enter, into agreements to indemnify our directors,
executive officers and other employees as determined by our
board of directors. With specified exceptions, these agreements
provide for indemnification for related expenses including,
among other things, attorneys fees, judgments, fines and
settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any
action or proceeding. We believe that these bylaw provisions and
indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain
qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain
directors and officers liability insurance.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from
bringing a lawsuit against our directors and officers for breach
of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the likelihood of
derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even
though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other
stockholders. Further, a stockholders investment may be
adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of
settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as
required by these indemnification provisions. At present, there
is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our
directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is
sought, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that
may result in claims for indemnification.
There is no currently pending material litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors or officers for which
indemnification is sought.
Director
Compensation
We reimburse each member of our board of directors who is not an
employee for reasonable travel and other expenses in connection
with attending meetings of the board of directors or committees
thereof. Our directors received no other compensation for their
services as such in fiscal 2008.
Executive
Compensation
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Our current compensation program for our named executive
officers (as defined under Summary
Compensation Table) was developed and implemented by our
board of directors while we were a private company. Therefore,
our current compensation program, and the process by which it
was developed, is less formal than that which we plan to follow
as a public company.
In connection with this offering, we will review our
compensation philosophy and expect to adopt compensation
policies and objectives that generally are more consistent with
those of a public, rather than private, company. To this end,
our compensation committee will undertake a review of director
and executive officer compensation trends at comparable
companies and provide recommendations to our board of directors
with respect to compensation arrangements following the
completion of this offering. We anticipate that individual
performance objectives will be identified in the future.
However, we cannot predict what the compensation
committees recommendations or such objectives will be.
We currently have no employment agreements with our named
executive officers. In connection with this offering, we
anticipate entering into employment agreements with our named
executive officers on terms to be agreed between us and the
executives. We have established the following primary objectives
in negotiating these employment agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
attracting, retaining and motivating executive officers with the
knowledge, skills and experience that are critical to our
success;
|
|
|
|
ensuring that executive compensation is aligned with our
corporate strategies and business objectives; and
|
|
|
|
promoting the achievement of key strategic and financial
performance measures by linking cash incentives to the
achievement of operating results.
|
After completion of this offering, our compensation committee
will oversee our executive compensation program. For more
information on our compensation committee after completion of
the offering, see Compensation Committee above.
Given the limited formal procedures we have employed as a
private
76
company, we expect that our approach to executive compensation
as a public company, as developed and implemented by our
compensation committee, will vary significantly from our
historical practice. We expect that the compensation committee
will meet periodically to make recommendations for base
salaries, bonuses, stock option awards, long-term incentive
awards and other compensation and benefits to be paid, granted
or provided to our named executive officers. In making these
recommendations, we expect that the compensation committee will
consider (1) our historical and expected performance,
(2) the alignment of individual performance with our
operational objectives, (3) the anticipated level of
difficulty in replacing our named executive officers with
persons of comparable experience, skill and knowledge, and
(4) the recommendations of any external advisors that it
may engage.
Components
of Executive Compensation for Fiscal 2008
The principal components of our current executive compensation
program are base salary and an annual performance bonus
principally based on our revenues and EBITDA (and in the case of
our named executive officers other than Dr. Vahaviolos and
Mr. Peterik, on the financial performance of the group for
which each such named executive officer is responsible). In
addition, we maintain certain benefits and perquisites for our
named executive officers, which are dependent, in part, on the
country in which the named executive officer is located.
Although each element of compensation described below is
considered separately, our existing compensation committee takes
into account the aggregate compensation package for each
individual in its determination of each individual component of
that package. The components of executive compensation have been
as follows:
Base salary. Base salary is a fixed
compensation amount paid during the course of the fiscal year.
Each named executive officers base salary is reviewed on
an annual basis by our existing compensation committee.
Historically, we have not applied specific formulas to set base
salary or to determine salary increases, nor have we sought to
formally benchmark base salary against similarly situated
companies. Generally, salary is determined by reference to the
scope of each named executive officers responsibilities
and is intended to provide a basic level of compensation for
performing the job expected of him. We believe that each named
executive officers base salary must be competitive in our
industry and with the market generally with respect to the
knowledge, skills and experience that are necessary for him to
meet the requirements of his position.
Annual cash incentives. Annual cash incentives
are intended to reward named executive officers for individual
performance. The named executive officers have the potential to
earn cash incentives up to a maximum of 100 percent of base
salary. In fiscal 2008, the cash incentives were principally
based on our revenues and EBITDA. We chose revenues as a metric
in order to incentivize and reward revenue growth and EBITDA
because we believe it is a useful measure of our profitability.
The targets set by our compensation committee for fiscal 2008
were revenues of $142 million (after intercompany
eliminations) and EBITDA of $23 million. In addition, the
cash incentives for our named executive officers were based in
part on other factors, such as new product introduction,
customer base growth, customer retention, completion of
acquisitions and successful integration of acquired companies or
assets and, solely with respect to our named executive officers
other than Dr. Vahaviolos and Mr. Peterik, on the
performance of the group for which each is responsible, although
we did not assign a target for any of these factors. Instead,
with respect to these factors, we used our own experience and
judgment to determine whether and to what extent each named
executive officers cash incentives should be adjusted as a
result of his or her performance with respect to such factors.
In fiscal 2008, we exceeded our targets with revenues of
approximately $152 million and EBITDA of approximately
$28 million. The cash incentives paid to our named
executive officers ranged from approximately 28.6% to 47.4% of
our named executive officers base salaries. We did not
adhere to a fixed formula for determining the aggregate cash
incentives once the applicable targets for revenues and EBITDA
were met; nor did we assign a fixed weight to the other metrics
on which such incentives were based.
Benefits and perquisites. Our named executive
officers are eligible to receive the same benefits that are
available to all employees. We provide a qualified matching
contribution to each employee, including our named executive
officers, who participate in our 401(k) plan. This matching
policy provides that we match half of the first 6% of
compensation that our named executive officers contributed to
the plan. We
77
also provide certain additional benefits to our named executive
officers located outside the United States, including health and
dental insurance and a car allowance, which we believe are
consistent with those offered by other companies and
specifically with those companies with which we compete for
these employees. We did not provide any other personal benefits
or pension, deferred compensation or other retirement benefits
to our named executive officers in fiscal 2008.
Employment
Agreements
We currently have no employment agreements with our named
executive officers. In connection with this offering, we
anticipate entering into employment agreements with our named
executive officers on terms to be agreed between us and the
executives.
Potential
Payments upon Termination of Employment or a Change of
Control
The named executive officers are not entitled to receive any
benefits that are not otherwise available to other employees in
connection with a termination of employment or a change in
control of us.
Summary
Compensation Table for Fiscal 2008(1)
The following table provides information regarding the
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and each of the next three most highly compensated
executive officers in fiscal 2008. We refer to these executive
officers as our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
316,241
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
34,384
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
500,625
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Pete Peterik
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
216,537
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
28,035
|
(3)
|
|
|
334,572
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Lange
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
185,452
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
28,897
|
(4)
|
|
|
299,350
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark F. Carlos
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
153,670
|
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
|
12,367
|
(5)
|
|
|
201,537
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Software and Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip T. Cole
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
196,446
|
|
|
|
56,206
|
|
|
|
34,552
|
(6)
|
|
|
287,204
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Columns disclosing compensation under the headings Stock
Awards, Option Awards, Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation, and Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Earnings are not included because no
compensation in these categories was awarded to, earned by or
paid to our named executive officers in fiscal 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan of $7,750
and vehicle allowances of $14,712. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan of $8,313
and vehicle allowances of $7,800. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan of $4,854
and vehicle allowances of $12,278. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan of $4,900
and vehicle allowances of $3,000. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes contributions for retirement and health care insurance
of $25,268 and vehicle allowances of $8,431. |
78
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2008 Fiscal-Year End
The following table provides information regarding equity awards
granted to our named executive officers that were outstanding as
of May 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
($/Share)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Pete Peterik(1)
|
|
|
6,250
|
(1)
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
05/25/2010
|
|
Mark F. Carlos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip T. Cole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Lange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This option grant was received upon joining Mistras in 2005 and
vests annually as to 25% of the shares of the underlying common
stock. |
Option
Exercises During Fiscal 2008
None of our named executive officers exercised stock options
during fiscal 2008.
Pension
Benefits and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in Fiscal
2008
We do not currently provide our named executive officers with
pension benefits or nonqualified defined contribution or other
nonqualified deferred compensation.
79
PRINCIPAL
AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock and the shares
beneficially owned by all selling stockholders as
of ,
2008, and as adjusted to reflect the sale of our common stock
offered by this prospectus by:
|
|
|
|
|
the executive officers named in the summary compensation table;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
|
all of our current directors and executive officers as a group;
|
|
|
|
each stockholder known by us to own beneficially more than five
percent of our common stock; and
|
|
|
|
all selling stockholders.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect
to the securities. Shares of common stock that may be acquired
by an individual or group within 60 days
of ,
2008, pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants, are
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of such individual or group, but are not
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person shown in the table.
Percentage of ownership is based
on shares
of common stock outstanding
on ,
2008 which assumes the conversion of all outstanding shares of
our Class A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock,
Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock into shares
of common stock
and shares
of common stock outstanding after the completion of this
offering.
Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, we believe that
the stockholders named in this table have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of common stock
shown to be beneficially owned by them, based on information
provided to us by such stockholders. The address for the
directors and executive officers set forth below is 195
Clarksville Road, Princeton Junction, NJ 08550.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After this Offering,
|
|
|
After this Offering,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
Being Sold
|
|
|
No Exercise of the
|
|
|
Full Exercise of the
|
|
|
|
Owned Prior to this
|
|
|
in this
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Peterik
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark F. Carlos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Software and Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip T. Cole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Lange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Services, and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth Burgess
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel M. Dickinson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After this Offering,
|
|
|
After this Offering,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
Being Sold
|
|
|
No Exercise of the
|
|
|
Full Exercise of the
|
|
|
|
Owned Prior to this
|
|
|
in this
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
James J. Forese
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard H. Glanton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manuel N. Stamatakis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Percent Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds affiliated with
Altus Capital Partners, Inc.(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Wright St., Suite 110
Westport, CT 06880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC NDT Holdings, LLC(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1455 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Selling Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Carroll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward Lowenhar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Finlayson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel Ternowchek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Feres Filho
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Claude Lenain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shigenori Yuyama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herman Schoorlemmer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Gynane
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athanasia T. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athanasios Anastasopoulos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles J. Schulz Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alain Proust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian A. Pollock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Etienne De La Tullaye
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the total
outstanding common stock. |
|
(1) |
|
Consists
of shares
of common stock
and shares
of Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists
of shares
of common stock Mr. Peterik has the right to acquire
pursuant to outstanding options which are or will be immediately
exercisable within 60 days
of ,
2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes shares
of Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock held by
Altus Capital Partners, SBIC, L.P.
and shares
of Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock held by
Altus-Mistras Co-Investment, LLC. The voting and disposition of
the shares held by Altus Capital Partners, SBIC, L.P. is
determined by an investment committee consisting of Russell
Greenberg, Gregory |
81
|
|
|
|
|
Greenberg and Elizabeth Burgess, a member of our board of
directors. The voting and disposition of the shares held by
Altus-Mistras Co-Investment, LLC is determined by Russell
Greenberg. Ms. Burgess disclaims beneficial ownership of
all of these shares except to the extent of her pecuniary
interest therein. |
|
(4) |
|
Consists
of shares
of Class A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
and shares
of Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. Daniel
M. Dickinson and James J. Forese, each a member of our board of
directors, share voting and dispositive power over the shares
held by TC NDT Holdings, LLC with seven other members of an
investment committee. Messrs. Dickinson and Forese disclaim
beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of
their pecuniary interest therein. |
82
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The following is a description of the transactions we have
engaged in since June 1, 2005 with our directors and
officers and beneficial owners of more than five percent of our
voting securities and their affiliates.
Sales of
Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
The following table summarizes our sales of Class B
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock to our founders,
officers, directors and security holders who beneficially own
more than five percent of any class of our voting securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
Five Percent Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC NDT Holdings, LLC(1)
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
14,292
|
|
|
$
|
614,560
|
|
|
|
10/27/05
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos(2)
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
14,495
|
|
|
$
|
623,289
|
|
|
|
10/27/05
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Daniel M. Dickinson, a member of our board of directors, is a
Managing Partner of Thayer Hidden Creek, an affiliate of TC NDT
Holdings, LLC. James J. Forese, a member of our board of
directors is an Operating Partner and Chief Operating Officer of
Thayer Hidden Creek, an affiliate of TC NDT Holdings, LLC. |
|
(2) |
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of our
board of directors. |
Conversion
of All Preferred Stock upon Completion of this
Offering
Each share of our Class A and Class B Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock is currently convertible into one
share of our common stock. The conversion rate for each series
of preferred stock is subject to (i) proportional
adjustments for, among other things, stock splits and dividends,
combinations, and recapitalizations, and
(ii) formula-weighted-average adjustments in the event that
we issue additional shares of common stock or securities
convertible into or exercisable for common stock at a purchase
price less than the price at which such series of preferred
stock was issued and sold by us, subject to certain customary
exceptions.
All shares of our Class A and Class B Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock will automatically convert into
shares of common stock upon completion of this offering. The
following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock
to be received by our officers, directors and security holders
who beneficially own more than five percent of any class of our
voting securities upon such conversion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Convertible
|
|
|
Class B Convertible
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Redeemable
|
|
|
Redeemable
|
|
|
Issuable Upon
|
|
Name
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds affiliated with Altus Capital Partners, Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC NDT Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
298,701
|
|
|
|
14,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
298,701
|
|
|
|
221,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration
Rights
In connection with our Class B Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock financing described above, we entered into an
amended and restated investor rights agreement with our
preferred stockholders, including Dr. Vahaviolos, our
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and entities
affiliated with Ms. Burgess, Mr. Dickinson and
Mr. Forese, our directors. Pursuant to this agreement, we
granted such stockholders certain registration rights with
respect to shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion
of the shares of the preferred stock held by them. For more
information regarding this agreement, please refer to the
section titled Description of Capital Stock
Registration Rights.
83
This is not a complete description of the amended and restated
investor rights agreement and is qualified by the full text of
the amended and restated investor rights agreement filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part.
Acquisition
of Envirocoustics A.B.E.E.
On April 25, 2007, our wholly owned subsidiary, Physical
Acoustics Ltd., acquired 99% of the outstanding shares of
Envirocoustics A.B.E.E., a company incorporated under the laws
of Greece, which was majority-owned by Dr. Vahaviolos, our
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. In
consideration for his shares of Envirocoustics A.B.E.E.,
Dr. Vahaviolos received approximately $400,000 in cash and
was issued 18,000 shares of our Class B Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock, which our board of directors
determined had an approximate fair market value of $50 per share.
On or about May 1, 2007, Envirocoustics A.B.E.E entered
into an employment agreement with the daughter of
Dr. Vahaviolos, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer., pursuant to which she serves as Vice President and
Managing Director of Envirocoustics A.B.E.E. The employment
agreement provides for a monthly salary in the amount of
approximately $8,900 and other compensation, including incentive
bonuses, plus travel and other expenses. During fiscal 2008,
Dr. Vahavioloss daughter received approximately
$130,000 in total compensation.
Leases
We lease our headquarters, located at 195 Clarksville Road,
Princeton Junction, New Jersey, from an entity majority owned by
Dr. Vahaviolos, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer. The lease currently provides for monthly payments of
$61,685 (which increases annually to a maximum of $71,882) and
terminates on October 31, 2019.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, Euro Physical Acoustics, leases
office space located at 27 Rue Magellan, Sucy-en-Brie, France,
which is partly owned by Dr. Vahaviolos, our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer. The lease provides for
monthly payments of $15,719 and terminates January 12, 2016.
Employment
and Indemnification Arrangements with Our Executive Officers and
Directors
We currently have no employment agreements with our named
executive officers, but we anticipate entering into employment
agreements with our named executive officers in connection with
this offering. In addition, we may also enter into
indemnification agreements with our directors and officers. The
indemnification agreements and our second amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
Policy
for Approval of Related Person Transactions
We have adopted a formal policy that our executive officers,
directors, and principal stockholders, including their immediate
family members and affiliates, are not permitted to enter into a
related party transaction with us without the prior consent of
our audit committee, or other independent members of our board
of directors in the case it is inappropriate for our audit
committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of
interest. Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an
executive officer, director, principal stockholder, or any of
such persons immediate family members or affiliates, in
which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, must first be
presented to our audit committee for review, consideration and
approval. All of our directors, executive officers and employees
are required to report to our audit committee any such related
party transaction. In approving or rejecting the proposed
agreement, our audit committee shall consider the relevant facts
and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the audit
committee, including, but not limited to, the risks, costs and
benefits to us, the terms of the transaction, the availability
of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if
applicable, the impact on a directors independence. Our
audit committee shall approve only those agreements that, in
light of known circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent
with, our best interests, as our audit committee determines in
the good faith exercise of its discretion. All of the
transactions described above were entered into prior to the
adoption of this policy. Upon completion of this offering, we
will post this related party transaction policy on our website.
84
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
Under our second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation that will be in effect upon the completion of this
offering, our authorized capital stock will consist
of shares
of common stock, $0.01 par value per share,
and shares
of authorized but undesignated preferred stock, $0.01 par
value per share. The following description summarizes the most
important terms of our capital stock. Because it is only a
summary, it does not contain all the information that may be
important to you. For a complete description you should refer to
our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws, effective upon completion of this
offering, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, and
to the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation
Law.
Common
Stock
As
of ,
2008, we
had shares
of common stock issued and outstanding, held
by
stockholders of record, and there were outstanding options to
purchase shares
of common stock.
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share
held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the
stockholders, and do not have cumulative voting rights. Subject
to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding shares
of preferred stock, holders of common stock are entitled to
receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from
time to time by our board of directors out of funds legally
available for dividend payments. All outstanding shares of
common stock are fully paid and nonassessable, and the shares of
common stock to be issued upon completion of this offering will
be fully paid and nonassessable. The holders of common stock
have no preferences or rights of conversion, exchange,
pre-emption or other subscription rights. There are no
redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common
stock. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of our affairs, holders of common stock will be entitled to
share ratably in our assets that are remaining after payment or
provision for payment of all of our debts and obligations and
after liquidation payments to holders of outstanding shares of
preferred stock, if any.
Preferred
Stock
After giving effect to this offering, we will have no shares of
preferred stock outstanding.
Preferred stock, if issued, would have priority over the common
stock with respect to dividends and other distributions,
including the distribution of assets upon liquidation. Our board
of directors has the authority, without further stockholder
authorization, to issue from time to time shares of preferred
stock in one or more series and to fix the terms, limitations,
relative rights and preferences, and variations of each series.
Although we have no present plans to issue any shares of
preferred stock, the issuance of shares of preferred stock, or
the issuance of rights to purchase such shares, could decrease
the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to
the holders of common stock, could adversely affect the rights
and powers, including voting rights, of the common stock, and
could have the effect of delaying, deterring, or preventing a
change of control of us or an unsolicited acquisition proposal.
Registration
Rights
The holders
of shares
of our common stock issued upon conversion of the preferred
stock outstanding prior to the completion of this offering, or
their permitted transferees, are entitled to rights with respect
to the registration of these shares under the Securities Act.
These rights are provided under the terms of an amended and
restated registration rights agreement between us and the
holders of these shares, and include demand registration rights,
short form registration rights and piggyback registration
rights. We are generally required to pay all expenses incurred
in connection with registrations effected in connection with the
following rights, including expenses of counsel to the
registering security holders up to $35,000. All underwriting
discounts and selling commissions will be borne by the holders
of the shares being registered.
85
Demand registration rights. Subject to
specified limitations, the holders a majority of these
registrable securities may require that we register all or a
portion of these securities for sale under the Securities Act,
if the anticipated gross receipts from the sale of such
securities are at least $2.5 million. Stockholders with
these registration rights who are not part of an initial
registration demand are entitled to notice and are entitled to
include their shares of common stock in the registration. We are
required to effect only two registrations pursuant to this
provision of the registration agreement. We are not required to
effect a demand registration prior to 90 days after the
completion of this offering.
Short form registration rights. If we become
eligible to file registration statements on
Form S-3,
subject to specified limitations, the holders of not less than
25% of these registrable securities can require us to register
all or a portion of its registrable securities on
Form S-3,
if the anticipated aggregate offering price of such securities
is at least $500,000. We may not be required to effect more than
two such registrations in any
12-month
period. Stockholders with these registration rights who are not
part of an initial registration demand are entitled to notice
and are entitled to include their shares of common stock in the
registration.
Piggyback registration rights. If at any time
we propose to register any of our equity securities under the
Securities Act, other than in connection with (i) a demand
registration described above, (ii) a registration relating
solely to our stock option plans or other employee benefit plans
or (iii) a registration relating solely to a business
combination or merger involving us, the holders of these
registrable securities are entitled to notice of such
registration and are entitled to include their shares of capital
stock in the registration. The underwriters, if any, may limit
the number of shares included in the underwritten offering if
they believe that including these shares would adversely affect
the offering. These piggyback registration rights are subject to
the limitations set forth in the
lock-up
agreements entered into by substantially all of the holders of
these registrable securities in connection with this offering,
as described below in the section entitled Shares Eligible
for Future Sale.
Compliance
with Governance Rules of the New York Stock Exchange
The New York Stock Exchange has adopted rules that provide that
listed companies of which more than 50% of the voting power is
held by a single person or a group of persons are not required
to comply with certain corporate governance rules and
requirements. In particular, such a controlled
company may elect to be exempt from certain rules that
require a majority of the board of directors of companies listed
on the New York Stock Exchange to be independent, as defined by
these rules, and which mandate independent director
representation on certain committees of the board of directors.
In addition, for listed companies other than controlled
companies, the New York Stock Exchange requires:
|
|
|
|
|
that a company listed on that market must have an audit
committee comprised of at least three members all of whom are
independent under the rules of the applicable exchange and that
is otherwise in compliance with the rules established for audit
committees of public companies under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended;
|
|
|
|
that director nominees must be selected, or recommended to the
board of directors for selection, by a majority of directors who
are independent under the rules of the applicable exchange, or a
nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors
with a written charter or board resolution addressing the
nomination process; and
|
|
|
|
that compensation for executive officers must be determined, or
recommended to the board of directors for determination, by a
majority of independent directors or a nominations committee
comprised solely of independent directors.
|
Upon the completion of this offering, we do not expect to avail
ourselves of the controlled company exceptions.
86
Anti-Takeover
Effects of Our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws and of Delaware Law
Certain provisions of Delaware law, our second amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain
provisions that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or
discouraging another party from acquiring control of us. These
provisions, which are summarized below, may have the effect of
discouraging coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover
bids. These provisions are also designed, in part, to encourage
persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with
our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of
increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with
an unfriendly or unsolicited acquiror outweigh the disadvantages
of discouraging a proposal to acquire us because negotiation of
these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Undesignated Preferred Stock. As discussed
above, our board of directors has the ability to issue preferred
stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could
impede the success of any attempt to change control of us. These
and other provisions may have the effect of deferring hostile
takeovers or delaying changes in control or management of our
company.
Inability of Stockholders to Act by Written
Consent. We have provided in our second amended
and restated certificate of incorporation that our stockholders
may not act by written consent. This limit on the ability of our
stockholders to act by written consent may lengthen the amount
of time required to take stockholder actions. As a result, a
holder controlling a majority of our capital stock would not be
able to amend our bylaws or remove directors without holding a
meeting of our stockholders called in accordance with our bylaws.
Calling of Special Meetings of
Stockholders. Our bylaws provide that special
meetings of the stockholders may be called by the Chairman of
the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or by the board of
directors acting pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority
of the members. Additionally, our bylaws provide that only
stockholders entitled to cast not less than 35% of all the votes
entitled to be cast at a special meeting of stockholders can
require the Secretary to call such a special meeting, subject to
the satisfaction of certain procedural and informational
requirements. These provisions may impair or prevent smaller
stockholders from forcing consideration of a proposal, including
the removal of directors.
Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder
Nominations and Proposals. Our bylaws establish
advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals
and the nomination of candidates for election as directors,
other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board
of directors or a committee of the board of directors. However,
our bylaws may have the effect of precluding the conduct of
certain business at a meeting if the proper procedures are not
followed. Any proposed business other than the nomination of
persons for election to our board of directors must constitute a
proper matter for stockholder action pursuant to the notice of
meeting delivered to us. For notice to be timely, it must be
received by our secretary not later than 90 nor earlier than 120
calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the previous
years annual meeting (or if the date of the annual meeting
is advanced more than 30 calendar days or delayed by more than
60 calendar days from such anniversary date, not later than 90
nor earlier than 120 calendar days prior to such meeting or the
10th calendar day after public disclosure of the date of
such meeting is first made). These provisions may also
discourage or deter a potential acquiror from conducting a
solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirors own slate
of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our
company.
Board Vacancies Filled Only by Majority of Directors Then in
Office. Vacancies and newly created seats on our
board may be filled only by our board of directors. Only our
board of directors may determine the number of directors on our
board. The inability of stockholders to determine the number of
directors or to fill vacancies or newly created seats on the
board makes it more difficult to change the composition of our
board of directors.
No Cumulative Voting. The Delaware General
Corporation Law provides that stockholders are not entitled to
the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless
our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation
provides otherwise. Our second amended and restated certificate
of incorporation expressly prohibits cumulative voting.
87
Directors Removed Only for Cause. Our second
amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that
directors may be removed by stockholders only for cause.
Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute. We are subject
to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law regulating corporate takeovers. In general,
Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation
from engaging, under certain circumstances, in a business
combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years following the date on which the person became an
interested stockholder unless:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of
the corporation approved either the business combination or the
transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder;
|
|
|
|
Upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced,
excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock
outstanding, but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the
interested stockholder, (1) shares owned by persons who are
directors and also officers and (2) shares owned by
employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have
the right to determine confidentially whether shares held
subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange
offer; or
|
|
|
|
On or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business
combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized
at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by
written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Generally, a business combination includes a merger, asset or
stock sale or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit
to the interested stockholder. An interested stockholder is a
person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns or,
within three years prior to the determination of interested
stockholder status, did own 15% or more of a corporations
outstanding voting stock. We expect the existence of this
provision to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to
transactions our board of directors does not approve in advance.
We also anticipate that Section 203 may also discourage
attempts that might result in a premium over the market price
for the shares of common stock held by stockholders.
The provisions of Delaware law, our second amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws
could have the effect of discouraging others from attempting
hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may also inhibit
temporary fluctuations in the market price of our common stock
that often result from actual or rumored hostile takeover
attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of
preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these
provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish
transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their
best interests.
Listing
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol MG.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company. The transfer
agents postal address is 59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level, New
York, NY 10038 and its telephone numbers for stockholder
services are
(800) 937-5449
and
(718) 921-8124.
The transfer agents website is located at
www.amstock.com.
88
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there was no market for our common
stock. We can make no predictions as to the effect, if any, that
sales of shares or the availability of shares for sale will have
on the market price prevailing from time to time. Nevertheless,
sales of significant amounts of our common stock in the public
market, or the perception that those sales may occur, could
adversely affect prevailing market prices and impair our future
ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity at a
time and price we deem appropriate.
Upon completion of this
offering, shares
of common stock will be outstanding, based
on shares
outstanding as of May 31, 2008 and the issuance
of shares
of common stock upon the automatic conversion of all of the
outstanding shares of our preferred stock upon the completion of
this offering. The number of shares of common stock to be
outstanding upon completion of this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
gives effect to
a -for- stock
split of our common stock, which will be effective immediately
prior to this offering;
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
outstanding as of August 15, 2008 at a weighted average
exercise price of $ per share;
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock reserved for future grants or awards from time
to time under our 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their option to
purchase up
to
additional shares of common stock from us.
|
Of these
shares, shares
(or in the event the underwriters option to purchase
additional shares is exercised in
full, shares)
of our common stock sold in this offering will be freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act, except
for any shares of our common stock purchased by our
affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act, which would be subject to the
limitations and restrictions described below. The
remaining shares
of our common stock outstanding upon completion of this offering
are deemed restricted securities, as that term is
defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act.
Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if
registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration
under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, which rules are
described below.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a
person, or persons whose shares must be aggregated, who is
deemed to be our affiliate under Rule 144 and who has
beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock for at
least six months (or one year if at such time 90 days or less
have passed since the date of this prospectus) is entitled to
sell within any three-month period a number of shares that does
not exceed the greater of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
one percent of the number of shares of common stock then
outstanding, which will equal
approximately shares
immediately after this offering, or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange during the four calendar weeks preceding the
date of filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the
sale.
|
Sales by our affiliates are also generally subject to certain
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
A person, or persons whose shares must be aggregated, who is not
deemed to be our affiliate under Rule 144 and who has
beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock for at
least six months (or one year if at such time 90 days or less
have passed since the date of this prospectus) is entitled to
sell an unlimited number of shares, subject to the availability
of current public information about us. A person who is not
deemed to be our affiliate and who has beneficially owned
restricted shares of our common stock for at least one year is
entitled to sell an unlimited number of shares without complying
with the current public information or any other requirements of
Rule 144.
89
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701 as currently in effect, any of
our employees, consultants or advisors who purchase shares from
us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or
other written agreement in a transaction before the effective
date of this offering that was completed in reliance on
Rule 701 and complied with the requirements of
Rule 701 will, subject to the
lock-up
restrictions described below, be eligible to resell such shares
90 days after the effective date of this offering in
reliance on Rule 144, but without compliance with certain
restrictions, including the holding period, contained in
Rule 144.
Lock-up
Agreements
Our officers and directors,
and ,
who will collectively hold after this
offering shares
of common stock, have agreed that they will not offer, sell,
contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have
the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other
arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the
economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether
any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our
common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or
publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge
or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or
other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written
consent of the representatives of the underwriters for a period
of 180 days after the date of this prospectus subject to
extension under certain circumstances.
Registration
of Shares in Connection with Equity Incentive Plans
We intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering shares of common stock to be
issued pursuant to our 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Based on
the number of shares reserved for issuance under these plans,
the registration statement would cover
approximately shares
in total. The registration statement will become effective upon
filing. Accordingly, shares of common stock registered under the
registration statement on
Form S-8
will be available for sale in the open market immediately,
subject to complying with Rule 144 volume limitations
applicable to affiliates, applicable
lock-up
agreements and the vesting requirements and restrictions on
transfer affecting any shares that are subject to restricted
stock awards.
90
CERTAIN
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR
NON-U.S.
HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK
Each prospective purchaser of common stock is advised to consult
a tax advisor with respect to current and possible future tax
consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our common
stock as well as any tax consequences that may arise under the
laws of any U.S. state, municipality or other taxing
jurisdiction.
The following discussion is a general summary of the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock applicable to
Non-U.S. Holders.
As used herein, a
Non-U.S. Holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is neither a
U.S. person nor a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, and that will hold shares of our common stock as
capital assets. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a
U.S. person includes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation (or other business entity treated as a corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized
in the United States or under the laws of the United States, any
state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is includible in gross income
regardless of source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust that (A) is subject to the primary supervision of a
court within the United States and the control of one or more
U.S. persons, or (B) otherwise has validly elected to
be treated as a U.S. domestic trust for U.S. federal
income tax purposes.
|
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our
common stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of each
partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership and the partner. Partnerships
acquiring our common stock, and partners in such partnerships,
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock.
This summary does not consider specific facts and circumstances
that may be relevant to a particular
Non-U.S. Holders
tax position and does not consider U.S. state and local or
non-U.S. tax
consequences. It also does not consider
Non-U.S. Holders
subject to special tax treatment under the U.S. federal
income tax laws (including partnerships or other pass-through
entities, banks and insurance companies, dealers in securities,
holders of our common stock held as part of a
straddle, hedge, conversion
transaction or other risk-reduction transaction,
controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment
companies, companies that accumulate earnings to avoid
U.S. federal income tax, foreign tax-exempt organizations,
former U.S. citizens or residents, persons who hold or
receive common stock as compensation and persons subject to the
alternative minimum tax). This summary is based on provisions of
the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), applicable final, temporary and proposed Treasury
regulations, administrative pronouncements of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and judicial decisions,
all as in effect on the date hereof, and all of which are
subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis, and
different interpretations.
This summary is included herein as general information only.
Accordingly, each prospective
Non-U.S. Holder
is urged to consult its own tax advisor with respect to the
U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. income,
estate and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of our
common stock.
U.S.
Trade or Business Income
For purposes of this discussion, dividend income and gain on the
sale or other taxable disposition of our common stock will be
considered to be U.S. trade or business income
if such income or gain is (i) effectively connected with
the conduct by a
Non-U.S. Holder
of a trade or business within the United States and (ii) in
the case of a
Non-U.S. Holder
that is eligible for the benefits of an income tax treaty with
the United States, attributable to a permanent establishment
(or, for an individual, a fixed base) maintained by the
Non-U.S. Holder
in the United States. Generally, U.S. trade or business
income is not subject to U.S. federal withholding tax
(provided the
Non-U.S. Holder
complies with applicable certification and
91
disclosure requirements); instead, U.S. trade or business
income is subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net
income basis at regular U.S. federal income tax rates in
the same manner as a U.S. person, unless an applicable
income tax treaty provides otherwise. Any U.S. trade or
business income received by a corporate
Non-U.S. holder
may be subject to an additional branch profits tax
at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty.
Dividends
Distributions of cash or property that we pay will constitute
dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the
extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits
(as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). A
Non-U.S. Holder
generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax
at a 30% rate, or, if the
Non-U.S. Holder
is eligible, at a reduced rate prescribed by an applicable
income tax treaty, on any dividends received in respect of our
common stock. If the amount of a distribution exceeds our
current and accumulated earnings and profits, such excess first
will be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of
the
Non-U.S. Holders
tax basis in our common stock (with a corresponding reduction in
such
Non-U.S. Holders
tax basis in our common stock), and thereafter will be treated
as capital gain. In order to obtain a reduced rate of
U.S. federal withholding tax under an applicable income tax
treaty, a
Non-U.S. Holder
will be required to provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
certifying under penalties of perjury its entitlement to
benefits under the treaty. Special certification requirements
and other requirements apply to certain
Non-U.S. Holders
that are entities rather than individuals. A
Non-U.S. Holder
of our common stock that is eligible for a reduced rate of
U.S. federal withholding tax under an income tax treaty may
obtain a refund or credit of any excess amounts withheld by
filing an appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS on a
timely basis. A
Non-U.S. Holder
should consult its own tax advisor regarding its possible
entitlement to benefits under an income tax treaty and the
filing of a U.S. tax return for claiming a refund of
U.S. federal withholding tax.
The U.S. federal withholding tax does not apply to
dividends that are U.S. trade or business income, as
defined and discussed above, of a
Non-U.S. Holder
who provides a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI,
certifying under penalties of perjury that the dividends are
effectively connected with the
Non-U.S. Holders
conduct of a trade or business within the United States.
Dispositions
of Our Common Stock
A
Non-U.S. Holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or
withholding tax in respect of any gain on a sale or other
disposition of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is U.S. trade or business income, as defined and
discussed above;
|
|
|
|
the
Non-U.S. Holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 or
more days in the taxable year of the disposition and meets other
conditions; or
|
|
|
|
we are or have been a U.S. real property holding
corporation (a USRPHC) under section 897
of the Code at any time during the shorter of the five-year
period ending on the date of disposition and the
Non-U.S. Holders
holding period for our common stock.
|
In general, a corporation is a USRPHC if the fair market value
of its U.S. real property interests (as defined
in the Code and applicable Treasury regulations) equals or
exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide
real property interests and its other assets used or held for
use in a trade or business. If we are determined to be a USRPHC,
the U.S. federal income and withholding taxes relating to
interests in USRPHCs nevertheless will not apply to gains
derived from the sale or other disposition of our common stock
by a
Non-U.S. Holder
whose shareholdings, actual and constructive, at all times
during the applicable period, amount to 5% or less of our common
stock, provided that our common stock is regularly traded on an
established securities market, within the meaning of the
applicable Treasury regulations. We are not currently a USRPHC,
and we do not anticipate becoming a USRPHC in the future.
However, no assurance can be given that we will not be a USRPHC,
or that our common stock will be considered regularly traded on
an established securities market, when a
Non-U.S. Holder
sells its shares of our common stock.
92
Federal
Estate Tax
If you are an individual, common stock held at the time of your
death will be included in your gross estate for
U.S. federal estate tax purposes, and may be subject to
U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable estate tax
treaty provides otherwise.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax
We must annually report to the IRS and to each
Non-U.S. Holder
any dividend income that is subject to U.S. federal
withholding tax, or that is exempt from such withholding tax
pursuant to an income tax treaty. Copies of these information
returns also may be made available under the provisions of a
specific treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the
country in which the
Non-U.S. Holder
resides. Under certain circumstances, the Code imposes a backup
withholding obligation (currently at a rate of 28%) on certain
reportable payments. Dividends paid to a
Non-U.S. Holder
of our common stock generally will be exempt from backup
withholding if the
Non-U.S. Holder
provides a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
or otherwise establishes an exemption.
The payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our common
stock to or through the U.S. office of any broker,
U.S. or foreign, will be subject to information reporting
and possible backup withholding unless the holder certifies as
to its
non-U.S. status
under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an
exemption, provided that the broker does not have actual
knowledge or reason to know that the holder is a
U.S. person or that the conditions of any other exemption
are not, in fact, satisfied. The payment of the proceeds from
the disposition of our common stock to or through a
non-U.S. office
of a
non-U.S. broker
is one that will not be subject to information reporting or
backup withholding unless the
non-U.S. broker
has certain types of relationships with the United States (a
U.S. related person). In the case of the
payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our common stock
to or through a non-U.S office of a broker that is either a
U.S. person or a U.S. related person, the Treasury
regulations require information reporting (but not backup
withholding) on the payment unless the broker has documentary
evidence in its files that the holder is a
Non-U.S. Holder
and the broker has no knowledge to the contrary.
Non-U.S. Holders
should consult their own tax advisors on the application of
information reporting and backup withholding to them in their
particular circumstances (including upon their disposition of
our common stock).
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
Non-U.S. Holder
will be refunded or credited against the
Non-U.S. Holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, if the
Non-U.S. Holder
provides the required information to the IRS on a timely basis.
Non-U.S. Holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the filing of a
U.S. tax return for claiming a refund of such backup
withholding.
93
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement
dated ,
2008, we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the
underwriters named below, for whom Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. are acting as
representatives, the following respective numbers of shares of
common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Baird & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in the
offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered
by the over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or the offering may be terminated.
We and the selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters
a 30-day
option to purchase on a pro rata basis up
to
additional shares from us and an aggregate
of
additional shares from the selling stockholders at the initial
public offering price less the underwriting discounts and
commissions. The option may be exercised only to cover any
over-allotments of common stock.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a
selling concession of $ per share.
The underwriters and selling group members may allow a discount
of $ per share on sales to other
broker/dealers. After the initial public offering, the
representatives may change the public offering price and
concession and discount to broker/dealers.
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated
expenses we and the selling stockholders will pay:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Expenses payable by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by selling
stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Expenses payable by the selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The representatives have informed us that they do not expect
sales to accounts over which they have discretionary authority
to exceed 5% of the shares of common stock being offered.
We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file
with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act
relating to, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to make
any offer, sale, pledge, disposition or filing, without the
prior written consent of the representatives for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus. However, in the
event that either (1) during the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in either case the expiration of the
lock-up
will be extended until the expiration of
94
the 18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless the representatives waive, in writing, such
an extension.
Our officers and directors and existing stockholders have agreed
that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or
otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our
common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or
exercisable for any shares of our common stock, enter into a
transaction that would have the same effect, or enter into any
swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in
part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our
common stock, whether any of these transactions are to be
settled by delivery of our common stock or other securities, in
cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the intention to make
any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any
transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement, without, in each
case, the prior written consent of the representatives for a
period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus.
However, in the event that either (1) during the last
17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in either case the expiration of the
lock-up
will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless the representatives waive, in writing, such
an extension.
The underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial public
offering price up
to shares
of common stock for employees, directors and other persons
associated with us who have expressed an interest in purchasing
common stock in the offering. The number of shares available for
sale to the general public in the offering will be reduced to
the extent these persons purchase the reserved shares. Any
reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the
underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the
other shares.
When determining whether to release any of our shares of common
stock from
lock-up
agreements or whether to consent to any waiver of transfer
restrictions, the representatives will consider, among other
factors, the holders reasons for requesting the waiver,
the number of shares of common stock for which the release is
being requested and market conditions at the time.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or
contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to
make in that respect.
We intend to apply to list the shares of common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange.
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates have
from time to time performed, and may in the future perform,
various financial advisory, commercial banking and investment
banking services for us and for our affiliates in the ordinary
course of business for which they have received and would
receive customary compensation. Bank of America, N.A., an
affiliate of Banc of America Securities LLC, is the
administrative agent, a lender and co-lead bookrunner under our
credit agreement and has received customary compensation in such
capacities. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., an affiliate of
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., is a lender and co-lead
bookrunner under our credit agreement and has received customary
compensation in such capacities.
Prior to the offering, there has been no market for our common
stock. The initial public offering price will be determined by
negotiation between us and the underwriters and will not
necessarily reflect the market price of the common stock
following the offering. The principal factors that will be
considered in determining the public offering price will include:
|
|
|
|
|
the information presented in this prospectus and otherwise
available to the underwriters;
|
|
|
|
the history of and the prospects for the industry in which we
will compete;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our management;
|
|
|
|
the prospects for our future earnings;
|
|
|
|
the present state of our development and our current financial
condition;
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
the recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly traded
common stock of generally comparable companies; and
|
|
|
|
the general condition of the securities markets at the time of
the offering.
|
We offer no assurances that the initial public offering price
will correspond to the price at which the common stock will
trade in the public market subsequent to this offering or that
an active trading market for the common stock will develop and
continue after the offering.
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with
Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act).
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short
position may be either a covered short position or a naked short
position. In a covered short position, the number of shares
over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number
of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option.
In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is
greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position by
either exercising their over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market.
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over-allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering.
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
websites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or
selling group members, if any, participating in this offering
and one or more of the underwriters participating in this
offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The
representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online
brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that
will make internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
European
Economic Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
Relevant Member State), with effect from and
including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is
implemented in that Relevant Member State (the Relevant
Implementation Date) an offer of the shares of common
stock to the public may not be made in that Relevant Member
State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to
the shares of common stock which has been approved by the
96
competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where
appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and
notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except
that an offer to the public in that Relevant Member State of any
shares of common stock may be made at any time under the
following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive if they have
been implemented in the Relevant Member State:
|
|
|
|
|
to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
|
|
|
|
to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000,
and (3) an annual net turnover of more than
50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or consolidated
accounts;
|
|
|
|
to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified
investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive) subject to
obtaining the prior consent of the manager for any such
offer; or
|
|
|
|
in any other circumstances which do not require the publication
by the Issuer of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
Prospectus Directive.
|
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of Shares to the public in relation to any
shares of the common stock in any Relevant Member State means
the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and the shares of common
stock to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to
purchase or subscribe the shares of common stock, as the same
may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing
the Prospectus Directive in that Member State, and the
expression Prospectus Directive means
Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing
measure in each Relevant Member State.
Notice to
Investors in the United Kingdom
Our shares of common stock may not be offered or sold and will
not be offered or sold to any persons in the United Kingdom
other than persons whose ordinary activities involve them in
acquiring, holding, managing or disposing of investments (as
principal or as agent) for the purposes of their businesses and
in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) with respect to
anything done in relation to our common stock in, from or
otherwise involving the United Kingdom.
In addition:
|
|
|
|
|
an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services
and Markets Act 20000) has only been communicated or caused
to be communicated and will only be communicated or caused to be
communicated in connection with the issue or sale of the shares
of common stock in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of
the FSMA does not apply to us; and
|
|
|
|
all applicable provisions of the FSMA have been complied with
and will be complied with, with respect to anything done in
relation to the shares of common stock in, from or otherwise
involving the United Kingdom.
|
Notice to
Residents of Germany
Each person who is in possession of this prospectus is aware of
the fact that no German sales prospectus (Verkaufsprospekt)
within the meaning of the Securities Sales Prospectus Act
(Wertpapier-Verkaufsprospektgesetz, the Act) of the
Federal Republic of Germany has been or will be published with
respect to our shares of common stock. In particular, each
underwriter has represented that it has not engaged and has
agreed that it will not engage in a public offering
(öffentliches Angebot) within the meaning of the Act with
respect to any of our shares of common stock otherwise than in
accordance with the Act and all other applicable legal and
regulatory requirements.
97
NOTICE TO
CANADIAN RESIDENTS
The distribution of the shares of common stock in Canada is
being made only on a private placement basis exempt from the
requirement that we and the selling stockholders prepare and
file a prospectus with the securities regulatory authorities in
each province where trades of the shares of common stock are
made. Any resale of the shares of common stock in Canada must be
made under applicable securities laws which will vary depending
on the relevant jurisdiction, and which may require resales to
be made under available statutory exemptions or under a
discretionary exemption granted by the applicable Canadian
securities regulatory authority. Purchasers are advised to seek
legal advice prior to any resale of the shares of common stock.
Representations
of Purchasers
By purchasing the shares of common stock in Canada and accepting
a purchase confirmation, a purchaser is representing to us and
the selling stockholders and the dealer from whom the purchase
confirmation is received that:
|
|
|
|
|
the purchaser is entitled under applicable provincial securities
laws to purchase the shares of common stock without the benefit
of a prospectus qualified under those securities laws,
|
|
|
|
|
|
where required by law, that the purchaser is purchasing as
principal and not as agent,
|
|
|
|
the purchaser has reviewed the text above under Resale
Restrictions, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the purchaser acknowledges and consents to the provision of
specified information concerning its purchase of the shares of
common stock to the regulatory authority that by law is entitled
to collect the information.
|
Further details concerning the legal authority for this
information is available on request.
Rights of
Action Ontario Purchasers Only
Under Ontario securities legislation, certain purchasers who
purchase a security offered by this prospectus during the period
of distribution will have a statutory right of action for
damages, or while still the owner of the shares of common stock,
for rescission against us and the selling stockholders in the
event that this prospectus contains a misrepresentation without
regard to whether the purchaser relied on the misrepresentation.
The right of action for damages is exercisable not later than
the earlier of 180 days from the date the purchaser first
had knowledge of the facts giving rise to the cause of action
and three years from the date on which payment is made for the
shares of common stock. The right of action for rescission is
exercisable not later than 180 days from the date on which
payment is made for the shares of common stock. If a purchaser
elects to exercise the right of action for rescission, the
purchaser will have no right of action for damages against us or
the selling stockholders. In no case will the amount recoverable
in any action exceed the price at which the shares of common
stock were offered to the purchaser and if the purchaser is
shown to have purchased the securities with knowledge of the
misrepresentation, we and the selling stockholders will have no
liability. In the case of an action for damages, we and the
selling stockholders will not be liable for all or any portion
of the damages that are proven to not represent the depreciation
in value of the shares of common stock as a result of the
misrepresentation relied upon. These rights are in addition to,
and without derogation from, any other rights or remedies
available at law to an Ontario purchaser. The foregoing is a
summary of the rights available to an Ontario purchaser. Ontario
purchasers should refer to the complete text of the relevant
statutory provisions.
Enforcement
of Legal Rights
All of our directors and officers as well as the experts named
herein and the selling stockholders may be located outside of
Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible for Canadian
purchasers to effect service of process within Canada upon us or
those persons. All or a substantial portion of our assets and
the assets of those persons may be located outside of Canada
and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy a judgment
98
against us or those persons in Canada or to enforce a judgment
obtained in Canadian courts against us or those persons outside
of Canada.
Taxation
and Eligibility for Investment
Canadian purchasers of the shares of common stock should consult
their own legal and tax advisors with respect to the tax
consequences of an investment in the shares of common stock in
their particular circumstances and about the eligibility of the
shares of common stock for investment by the purchaser under
relevant Canadian legislation.
99
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the issuance of the common stock to be sold in
this offering will be passed upon for us by
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., New York, New York. The
underwriters have been represented by Cravath,
Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, New York.
EXPERTS
The audited financial statements as of May 31, 2008 and
2007 and for the years then ended included in this prospectus
have been so included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of such firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of Mistras Group, Inc. for
the year ended May 31, 2006 appearing in this prospectus
and related registration statement have been audited by Amper,
Politziner & Mattia, P.C., independent registered
public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon
appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon
such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
CHANGE IN
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS
Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C. (Amper,
Politziner) was dismissed as the principal accountants for
Mistras on April 26, 2007, and our board of directors
approved the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as
our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our
financial statements of for fiscal 2007. On June 10, 2007,
PwC formally advised us that it was accepting the position as
our independent registered public accounting firm for the year
ending May 31, 2007.
In connection with the audit of the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2006, (i) there have been no disagreements
with Amper, Politziner on any matter of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or
procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to Amper,
Politziners satisfaction, would have caused Amper,
Politziner to make reference to the subject matter of the
disagreement(s) in connection with its reports for such year,
and (ii) there were no reportable events as
such term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
Amper, Politziners reports did not contain an adverse
opinion.
During the year ended May 31, 2006, PwC was not engaged as
an independent registered public accounting firm to audit either
the financial statements of Mistras or any of its subsidiaries,
nor has Mistras or anyone acting on its behalf consulted with
PwC regarding: (i) the application of accounting principles
to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the
type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Mistras
financial statements; or (ii) any matter that was the
subject of a disagreement or reportable event as set forth in
Item 304(a)(2)(ii) of
Regulation S-K.
We have provided Amper, Politziner with a copy of the foregoing
statements. Amper, Politziner has notified us that they do not
disagree with these statements.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act, with respect to the common stock
offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which is part of
the registration statement, omits certain information, exhibits,
schedules, and undertakings set forth in the registration
statement. For further information pertaining to us and our
common stock, reference is made to the registration statement
and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement.
Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents or
provisions of any documents referred to in this prospectus are
not necessarily complete, and in each instance where a copy of
the document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement, reference is made to the exhibit for a more complete
description of the matters involved.
100
You may read and copy all or any portion of the registration
statement without charge at the public reference room of the SEC
at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Copies of the registration statement may be obtained from the
SEC at prescribed rates from the public reference room of the
SEC at such address. You may obtain information regarding the
operation of the public reference room by calling
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, registration statements and certain other filings
made with the SEC electronically are publicly available through
the SECs website at www.sec.gov. The registration
statement, including all exhibits and amendments to the
registration statement, has been filed electronically with the
SEC.
Upon completion of this offering, we will become subject to the
information and periodic reporting requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act and, accordingly, will file annual
reports containing financial statements audited by an
independent public accounting firm, quarterly reports containing
unaudited financial data, current reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. You will be able to inspect and
copy such periodic reports, proxy statements, and other
information at the SECs public reference room, and the
website of the SEC referred to above.
101
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mistras Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Mistras Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
at May 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for uncertain tax positions beginning on June 1, 2007.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, NJ
August 25, 2008, except for the second paragraph of
Note 21, as to which the date is September 1, 2008.
F-2
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors
Mistras Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows
of Mistras Group, Inc. (formerly Mistras Holdings Corp.) and its
subsidiaries for the year ended May 31, 2006. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. An audit includes
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audit, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended May 31,
2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
/s/ Amper,
Politziner & Mattia, P.C.
Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.
June 5, 2008
Edison, New Jersey
F-3
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
As of
May 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
for share and per share
|
|
|
|
information)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
32,772
|
|
|
|
23,613
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
10,644
|
|
|
|
6,747
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
49,341
|
|
|
|
36,966
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
26,511
|
|
|
|
21,339
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11,552
|
|
|
|
5,736
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
28,627
|
|
|
|
14,704
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,791
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
119,822
|
|
|
$
|
79,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT)
EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
7,469
|
|
|
$
|
2,195
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
3,932
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
4,774
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
12,413
|
|
|
|
8,213
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
30,396
|
|
|
|
17,667
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
40,801
|
|
|
|
23,208
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,910
|
|
|
|
6,790
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
80,370
|
|
|
|
47,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 11, 13, 14 and 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized Class B
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value,
221,205 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
12,810
|
|
|
|
11,409
|
|
Class A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value, 298,701 shares, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
51,059
|
|
|
|
19,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock
|
|
|
63,869
|
|
|
|
30,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized, 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings
|
|
|
(25,728
|
)
|
|
|
269
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(24,475
|
)
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, preferred stock and stockholders
(deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
119,822
|
|
|
$
|
79,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
Years
Ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share information)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
132,204
|
|
|
$
|
105,763
|
|
|
$
|
77,964
|
|
Products
|
|
|
20,064
|
|
|
|
16,478
|
|
|
|
15,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
152,268
|
|
|
|
122,241
|
|
|
|
93,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services revenues
|
|
|
82,847
|
|
|
|
69,348
|
|
|
|
50,309
|
|
Cost of products revenues
|
|
|
8,143
|
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
5,599
|
|
Depreciation of services
|
|
|
5,996
|
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
Depreciation of products
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
97,837
|
|
|
|
80,368
|
|
|
|
58,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
54,431
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
34,820
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
32,463
|
|
|
|
26,408
|
|
|
|
24,748
|
|
Research and engineering
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
16,358
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
5,247
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
(2,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
(2.48
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
Years
Ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share information)
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2005
|
|
|
969,900
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
(222
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2006
|
|
|
978,500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
21,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
5,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of accounting pronouncement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
845
|
|
|
($
|
25,728
|
)
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
($
|
24,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Years
Ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,423
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
|
|
7,178
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets disposed
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash interest rate swap
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
acquisitions
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(9,226
|
)
|
|
|
(2,259
|
)
|
|
|
(3,050
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,802
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
(626
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,997
|
)
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(990
|
)
|
|
|
(1,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(1,438
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,138
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
3,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
12,851
|
|
|
|
14,006
|
|
|
|
6,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(3,718
|
)
|
|
|
(2,561
|
)
|
|
|
(2,749
|
)
|
Payment for purchase of intangible asset
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses
|
|
|
(15,535
|
)
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired in consolidation of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(19,446
|
)
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
(2,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(3,605
|
)
|
|
|
(2,381
|
)
|
|
|
(947
|
)
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(3,219
|
)
|
|
|
(23,374
|
)
|
|
|
(4,457
|
)
|
Net borrowings from (payments) revolver
|
|
|
13,144
|
|
|
|
(8,142
|
)
|
|
|
(4,048
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
Borrowings from long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
3,767
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
|
$
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
2,974
|
|
|
$
|
4,170
|
|
|
$
|
3,745
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Noncash investing and financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment acquired through capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
4,557
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
Issuance of notes payable and other debt obligations primarily
related to acquisitions
|
|
$
|
13,531
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock in acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of long-term debt to preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(in thousands, except share data)
1. Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
Description
of Business
Mistras Group, Inc. (formerly Mistras Holdings Corp.) and
subsidiaries (the Company) is a leading global
provider of proprietary, technology-enabled, non-destructive
testing (NDT) solutions used to evaluate the structural
integrity of critical energy, industrial and public
infrastructure. The Company serves a global customer base,
including companies in the oil and gas, power generation and
transmission, public infrastructure, chemicals, aerospace and
defense, transportation, primary metals and metalworking,
pharmaceuticals and food processing industries.
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Mistras Group, Inc. and its wholly or majority-owned
subsidiaries: Quality Service Laboratories, Inc., CONAM
Inspection & Engineering Services, Inc.
(Conam), Cismis Springfield Corp., Euro Physical
Acoustics, S.A., Nippon Physical Acoustics Ltd., Physical
Acoustics South America, Diapac Company, and Physical Acoustics
Ltd. and its wholly or majority-owned subsidiaries, Physical
Acoustics India Private Ltd., Physical Acoustics B.V. On
April 25, 2007, the Companys wholly owned subsidiary,
Physical Acoustics Ltd., acquired 99% of the outstanding shares
of Envirocoustics A.B.E.E. (Envac), a Greek company.
The Company adopted FIN 46R for fiscal
2006. Prior to the April 25, 2007 acquisition
and for the years ended May 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company
was the primary beneficiary of Envac, which qualified as an
implied variable interest entity under FIN 46R.
Accordingly, the assets and liabilities and revenues and
expenses of Envac have been included in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2007 and 2006.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. All foreign subsidiaries
reporting year ends are April 30, while Mistras Group and
the domestic subsidiaries year ends are May 31. The effect
of this difference in timing of reporting foreign operations on
the consolidated results of operations and consolidated
financial position is not significant.
Reclassification
Certain amounts previously reported for prior periods have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. Such
reclassifications had no effect on the results of operations as
previously reported.
2. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue recognition policies for the various sources of revenues
are as follows:
Services
The Company predominantly derives revenues by providing its
services on a time and material basis and recognizes revenues
when services are rendered. At the end of any reporting period,
there may be earned but unbilled revenues that are accrued.
Payments received in advance of revenue recognition are
reflected as deferred revenue.
F-8
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Software
Revenues from the sale of perpetual licenses are recognized upon
the delivery and acceptance of the software. Revenues from term
licenses are recognized ratably over the period of the license.
Revenues from maintenance, unspecified upgrades and technical
support are recognized ratably over the period such items are
delivered. For multiple-element arrangement software contracts
that include non-software elements, and where the software is
essential to the functionality of the nonsoftware elements
(collectively referred to as software multiple-element
arrangements), the Company applies the rules as noted below.
Products
Revenues from product sales are recognized when risk of loss and
title passes to the customer, which is generally upon product
delivery. The exceptions to this accounting treatment would be
for multiple-element arrangements (defined below) or those
situations where specialized installation or customer acceptance
is required. At May 31, 2008, a December 2007 shipment of
approximately $350 of the Companys products was pending
customer acceptance and therefore was not recognized as revenue.
At May 31, 2007, there were no such items. Revenues from
rentals and operating leases are recognized on a straight-line
basis over the period of the lease, generally twelve months.
Payments received in advance of revenue recognition are
reflected as deferred revenues.
Multiple-Element
Arrangements
The Company occasionally enters into transactions that represent
multiple-element arrangements, which may include any combination
of services, software, hardware and financing. Vendor-specific
objective evidence is utilized to determine whether they can be
separated into more than one unit of accounting. A
multiple-element arrangement is separated into more than one
unit of accounting if: (1) the delivered item has value on
a standalone basis; and (2) there is objective and reliable
evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items if the
delivery or performance of the undelivered items is probable and
in the control of the Company.
If these criteria are not met, then revenues are deferred until
such criteria are met or until the period(s) over which the last
undelivered element is delivered. If there is objective and
reliable evidence of fair value for all units of accounting in
an arrangement, the arrangement consideration is allocated to
the separate units of accounting based on each units
relative fair value.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. The more
significant estimates include valuation of goodwill and
intangible assets, useful lives of long-lived assets, allowances
for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, health benefits,
workers compensation and provision for income taxes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts and sales allowances. Outstanding accounts receivable
balances are reviewed periodically, and allowances are provided
at such time
F-9
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
that management believes it is probable that such balances will
not be collected within a reasonable period of time. The Company
extends credit to its customers based upon credit evaluations in
the normal course of business, primarily with
30-day
terms. Bad debts are provided on the allowance method based on
historical experience and managements evaluation of
outstanding accounts receivable. Accounts are written off when
they are deemed uncollectible.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, as determined by
using the
first-in,
first-out method, or market.
Software
Costs
Costs that are related to the conceptual formulation and design
of licensed programs are expensed as research and engineering.
For licensed programs, the Company capitalizes costs that are
incurred to produce the finished product after technological
feasibility has been established. The annual amortization of the
capitalized amounts is performed using the straight-line basis
over three years, which is the estimated life of the related
software. The Company performs periodic reviews to ensure that
unamortized program costs remain recoverable from future
revenue. Costs to support or service licensed programs are
expensed as the costs are incurred.
The Company capitalizes certain costs that are incurred to
purchase or to create and implement internal-use software, which
includes software coding, installation, testing and data
conversion. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line
basis over three years.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation
of property, plant and equipment is computed utilizing the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed
utilizing the straight-line method over the shorter of the
remaining lease term or estimated useful life. The cost and
accumulated depreciation and amortization applicable to assets
retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the asset
accounts and any gain or loss is included in the consolidated
statement of operations. Repairs and maintenance costs are
expensed as incurred.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair market value of net assets of the acquired business at the
date of acquisition. The Company tests for impairment annually,
in its fiscal fourth quarter, using a two-step process. The
first step identifies potential impairment by comparing the fair
value of the Companys reporting units to its carrying
value. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the
second step measures the amount of impairment, if any. The
impairment loss is the amount by which the carrying amount of
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill. There
was no impairment of goodwill for the years ended May 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006.
Intangible assets are recorded at cost. Intangible assets with
finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets
on a periodic basis in order to identify business conditions
which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for
potential impairment is based primarily on the Companys
ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets
from expected future undiscounted cash flows. If the total
expected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the
carrying
F-10
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
amount of the assets, a loss is recognized for the difference
between fair value (computed based upon the expected future
discounted cash flows) and the carrying value of the assets.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold.
Research
and Engineering
Research and product development costs are expensed as incurred.
Advertising,
Promotions and Marketing
The costs for advertising, promotion and marketing programs are
expensed as incurred and are included in general and
administrative expenses. Advertising expense was $307, $209 and
$158 for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of accounts receivable, accounts payable and
other current assets and liabilities approximate fair value
based on the short-term nature of the accounts. The carrying
value of the Companys debt obligations at May 31,
2008 approximate their fair value due to the variable interest
rates associated with the debt and the short duration of time
since the debt instruments were issued. Interest rate swap
contracts are carried at fair value.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The financial position and results of operations of the
Companys foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local
currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of
the foreign subsidiaries are translated into the
U.S. dollar at the exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date. Income and expenses are translated at the average
exchange rate during the year. Translation gains and losses are
not included in earnings and are reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income within stockholders equity. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are included in net income
(loss) and were not significant.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The Company recognizes its derivatives as either assets or
liabilities, measures those instruments at fair value and
recognizes the changes in fair value of the derivative in net
income or other comprehensive income, as appropriate. The
Company hedges a portion of the variable rate interest payments
on debt using interest rate swap contracts to convert variable
payments into fixed payments. The Company does not apply hedge
accounting to its interest rate swap contracts. Changes in the
fair value of these instruments are reported as a component of
interest expense.
Concentration
of Credit Risks
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and
accounts receivable. At times, cash deposits may exceed the
limits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
($100 per institution). The Company believes it is not exposed
to any significant credit risk or the nonperformance of the
financial institutions.
The Company sells primarily to large companies and extends
reasonably short collection terms and performs credit
evaluations. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit
losses. Such losses, in the aggregate, have not exceeded
managements expectations.
F-11
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company has one major customer with multiple business units
that accounted for 16.7% and 16.5% of revenues for fiscal 2008
and 2007, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer
were $3,183 and $3,560 at May 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of
revenues for the year ended May 31, 2006.
Self
Insurance
The Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Conam, is self
insured for certain losses relating to workers compensation and
health benefits claims. The Company maintains third-party excess
insurance coverage for all workers compensation claims in excess
of $250 and for its health benefit claims in excess of $150 to
reduce its exposure from such claims. Self-insured losses are
accrued when it is probable that an uninsured claim has been
incurred but not reported and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated at the balance sheet date. Management
monitors and reviews all claims and their related liabilities on
an ongoing basis.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective June 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, Shared-Based Payment
(FAS 123R). FAS 123R addresses the
accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an
enterprise receives employee services in exchange for
(a) equity instruments of the enterprise or
(b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the
enterprises equity instruments or that may be settled by
the issuance of such equity instruments. FAS 123R
eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation
transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and
instead generally requires that such transactions be accounted
for using a fair-value based method. The Company has elected the
prospective transition method as permitted by FAS 123R;
and, accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to
reflect the impact of FAS 123R. The prospective transition
method requires that stock-based compensation expense be
recorded for all new restricted stock and restricted stock units
that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is
rendered beginning on June 1, 2006. All unvested options
outstanding as of May 31, 2006 that had been previously
measured but unrecognized compensation expense will continue to
be accounted for under the provisions of APB 25 and related
interpretations until they are settled.
Prior to June 1, 2006, employee stock awards under the
Companys compensation plans were accounted for in
accordance with the provisions of APB 25, and related
interpretations. The Company provided the disclosure
requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(FAS 123), and related interpretations.
Stock-based awards to nonemployees were accounted for under the
provisions of FAS No. 123.
Under FAS No. 123, the fair value for the stock
options was estimated at the date of grant using the minimum
value method. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions. The Company used
41/2%
as the risk-free interest rate, zero dividend yield and an
expected life of three years for the valuation of stock options.
F-12
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The pro-forma effect on the net income of the Company had the
fair value recognition principles of FAS No. 123 been
utilized is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair
value method, net of income taxes
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma net income
|
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
|
$
|
5,180
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred income tax
asset will not be realized.
Effective June 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB No. 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
FIN 48 requires a determination of whether the uncertain
tax positions are more likely than not of being sustained upon
audit based on the technical merits of the tax position. For tax
positions that are more likely than not of being sustained upon
audit, the largest amount of the benefit that is more likely
than not of being sustained is recognized in the consolidated
financial statements. For tax positions that are not more likely
than not of being sustained upon audit, none of the benefit is
recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The
provisions of FIN 48 also provide guidance on
de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, and disclosure.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. with
federal and state jurisdictions as well as various foreign
jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company was not subject
to U.S. federal, state and local or
non-U.S. income
tax examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years prior to
fiscal year 2005.
The cumulative effect of the adoption of the recognition and
measurement provisions of FIN 48 resulted in a $564
reduction to the June 1, 2007 balance of stockholders
equity. Results of prior periods have not been restated. The
Companys policy for interest and penalties related to
income tax exposures was not impacted as a result of the
adoption of the recognition and measurement provisions of
FIN 48. Therefore, interest and penalties will continue to
be recognized as incurred within Income tax
provision in the consolidated statements of operations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
FIN No. 48. In May 2007, the
FASB issued
FIN 48-1,
Definition of Settlement in FASB
Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48-1),
which provides guidance on how an enterprise should determine
whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of
recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. The Company
adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on June 1, 2007.
SFAS No. 141R. In December
2007, the FASB issued FASB No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations
(FAS 141R) which replaces FAS 141,
Business Combinations
(FAS 141). FAS 141R
F-13
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
applies to all business combinations, including combinations
among mutual entities and combinations by contract alone.
FAS 141R requires that all business combinations will be
accounted for by applying the acquisition method. FAS 141R
is effective for business combinations consummated in periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early application
is prohibited. The Company will adopt FAS 141R on
June 1, 2009. The Company does not anticipate FAS 141R
will have a material effect on its results of operations,
financial position, or cash flows.
SFAS No. 157. In September
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value, and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value
measurement. Where applicable, this statement simplifies and
codifies fair value related guidance previously issued within
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim
periods within those fiscal years. However, FSP
FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FAS 157 (FSP
FAS 157-2),
delays the effective date of FAS 157 for certain
nonfinancial assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate
FAS 157 will have a material effect on its results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
SFAS No. 161. In March 2008,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(FAS 161). FAS 161 is intended to help
investors better understand how derivative instruments and
hedging activities affect an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows through enhanced disclosure
requirements. FAS 161 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption encouraged. The
Company expects to adopt FAS 161 on June 1, 2009.
FAS No. 142-3. In
April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. The objective of this FSP is to
improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of
expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset
under FAS 141(R), and other U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. This FSP applies to all intangible
assets, whether acquired in a business combination or otherwise
and shall be effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years and applied prospectively to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early
adoption is prohibited. The requirements of this FSP will be
effective for the Companys 2009 fiscal year and are not
expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
3. Earnings
Per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by
the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net
income by the sum of (1) the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the period, and
(2) the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of stock
options using the treasury stock method. There is no difference,
for any of the periods presented, in the amount of net income
(numerator) used in the computation of basic and diluted earning
per share. With respect to the number of weighted-average shares
outstanding (denominator), diluted shares reflects only the
exercise of options to acquire common stock to the extent that
the options exercise prices are less than the average
market price of common shares during the period.
F-14
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and
diluted (loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes certain stock options and preferred shares which would
be anti-dilutive. |
The following weighted-average common shares and equivalents
related to options outstanding under the Companys stock
option plans and the conversion of its outstanding preferred
stock conversion were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings (loss) per share as the effect would have been
anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,721
|
|
Common stock equivalents of conversion of preferred shares
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
503,829
|
|
|
|
420,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
542,874
|
|
|
|
503,829
|
|
|
|
441,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided against accounts
receivable for amounts management believes may be uncollectible.
Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are represented
by the following at May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
$
|
1,242
|
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
$
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable greater than 90 days old at
May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $2,895, $2,336 and $2,836,
respectively and represented 8.8%, 9.9% and 13.1% of the total
receivables.
F-15
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following at May 31, 2008 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
2,796
|
|
|
$
|
2,478
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
1,620
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
3,191
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,644
|
|
|
$
|
6,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are net of reserves for slow-moving and obsolete
inventory of $577 and $577 at May 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
6. Property,
Plant and Equipment, Net
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following at
May 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
865
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
Buildings and improvement
|
|
|
30-40
|
|
|
|
8,835
|
|
|
|
6,963
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
6-8
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
5-7
|
|
|
|
38,493
|
|
|
|
30,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,827
|
|
|
|
39,961
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,316
|
|
|
|
18,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,511
|
|
|
$
|
21,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense was $7,323, $5,066 and
$3,585 for the years ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
In 2007, the Company reduced its estimated useful lives on
certain equipment from seven years to five years, resulting in
an incremental charge to depreciation expense of $1,068. This
change in estimate was based on the Companys evaluation of
the actual useful lives of its equipment.
7. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, substantially
all of which relates to our Services segment (Note 20), for the
years ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
$
|
14,704
|
|
|
$
|
14,315
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the year
|
|
|
13,923
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
28,627
|
|
|
$
|
14,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Acquisitions
Acquisitions were accounted for in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (FAS),
Business Combinations, and the total purchase price was
allocated to the assets and
F-16
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
liabilities based on their fair values at the acquisition date.
The results of operations for each of the entities have been
included in the consolidated financial statements since the
respective dates of acquisition. All of the acquisitions were
for strategic market expansion. No pro forma information is
presented for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 because the pro forma
impact of acquisitions, both individually and in the aggregate,
during these periods was immaterial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Number of entities
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
$
|
15,077
|
|
|
$
|
2,031
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Subordinated notes issued
|
|
|
8,137
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
Other consideration, primarily obligations under covenants
not to compete
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (18,000 shares) issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,038
|
|
|
$
|
4,291
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets acquired
|
|
$
|
2,052
|
|
|
$
|
1,310
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Intangibles, primarily customer lists
|
|
|
8,842
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
13,775
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,038
|
|
|
$
|
4,291
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future conditional consideration at May 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The conditional consideration is contingent on the acquired
entity achieving certain revenue and profit targets. If earned,
the earliest this amount will be paid is December 31, 2009.
During fiscal 2008, the Company paid $148 of similar conditional
payments for acquisitions made in previous years. In addition,
the Company entered into certain finite at-will employment, or
consulting agreements with the owners or managers of these
companies.
In addition to the above, the Company acquired a patent in 2008
that will be used in developing new product sales, as well as be
used by the services segment. The purchase price for the patent
and certain related inventory and equipment was $712 with $300
paid in cash and the balance of $412 payable over time.
Quarterly payments of $37.5 are scheduled with the last payment
due November, 2010. In connection with this patent purchase, the
Company is obligated for royalty payments on sales generated by
the technology developed or licensed for six years until
November, 2013. No such payments were made in 2008.
F-17
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
9. Intangible
Assets
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of
intangible assets for the years ended May 31, 2008 and 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Life in
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Software
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4,874
|
|
|
$
|
3,661
|
|
|
$
|
1,213
|
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
2,991
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
Customers lists
|
|
|
5-7
|
|
|
|
16,225
|
|
|
|
10,232
|
|
|
|
5,993
|
|
|
|
10,600
|
|
|
|
7,941
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
3,181
|
|
|
|
2,966
|
|
|
|
3,082
|
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2-5
|
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,074
|
|
|
$
|
18,522
|
|
|
$
|
11,552
|
|
|
$
|
20,056
|
|
|
$
|
14,320
|
|
|
$
|
5,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the years ended May 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006 was $4,100, $3,625 and $3,593, respectively, including
amortization of software for the years ended May 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 of $660, $614 and $605, respectively.
The following is the approximate amount of amortization expense
in each of the years ending subsequent to May 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3,420
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
2013
|
|
|
883
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the
following as of May 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and related employee benefits
|
|
$
|
4,885
|
|
|
$
|
4,102
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
Accrued worker compensation and health benefits
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,413
|
|
|
$
|
8,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
11. Long-Term
Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following at May 31, 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolver
|
|
$
|
13,145
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
24,375
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
9,138
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,270
|
|
|
|
25,403
|
|
Less: Current maturities
|
|
|
7,469
|
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
$
|
40,801
|
|
|
$
|
23,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Credit Facility
On October 31, 2006, as subsequently amended and restated
April 23, 2007, and amended on December 14, 2007 and
May 30, 2008, the Company entered into a $40,000 Credit
Agreement (Credit Agreement) with Bank of America,
N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the Lenders).
The Credit Agreement provides for a $15,000 revolver
(Revolver) maturing on October 31, 2012 and
$25,000 Term Loans (Term Loans) requiring quarterly
principal payments of $313 commencing on January 31, 2007,
increasing to $625 on January 31, 2008. At May 31,
2008, the available additional borrowing capacity was $1,855.
There is a provision in the Credit Agreement that requires the
Company to repay 25% of the immediately preceding fiscal
years free cash flow if its ratio of
funded debt to EBITDA is less than a fixed amount on
or before October 1 each year. Free cash flow means
the sum of EBITDA minus all taxes paid or payable in cash, minus
cash interest paid, minus all capital expenditures made in cash,
minus all scheduled and non-scheduled principal payments on
funded debt made in the period, minus acquisition costs and plus
or minus changes in working capital. Funded debt
means all outstanding liabilities for borrowed money and other
interest-bearing liabilities. The Company does not expect to be
required to make payments under this provision. Interest rates
under the facility are based on either the prime rate (5.0% at
May 31, 2008) or 30 day LIBOR rate (2.46% at
May 31, 2008) plus an applicable margin of 1.5% to 2.5% as
defined in the Credit Agreement. All loans under the Credit
Agreement are collateralized by a security interest in all of
the assets of the Company.
The proceeds from the Senior Credit Facility were used to repay
the outstanding indebtedness under the Companys
(i) amended and restated revolving credit, term loan and
security agreement dated August 8, 2003, and (ii) Term
Loan Agreements with Gladstone Bank dated August 8, 2003.
The transaction resulted in a loss of $460 recognized in fiscal
2007.
The Credit Agreement contains financial and other covenants
limiting the Companys ability to, among other things,
create liens, make investments and certain capital expenditures,
incur more indebtedness, merge or consolidate, acquire other
companies, make dispositions of property, pay dividends and make
distributions to stockholders, enter into a new line of
business, enter into transactions with affiliates and enter into
burdensome agreements.
The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants that
require the Company to maintain compliance with specified
financial ratios. In addition, the Company is required to
furnish the agent for the Lenders, within specified time
periods, (i) after the end of each fiscal year, a
consolidated balance sheet as at the end of such fiscal year and
the related consolidated statements of income or operations,
shareholders equity and cash flows for such fiscal year,
to be audited and accompanied by a report and opinion of the
Companys
F-19
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
independent registered public accounting firm, (ii) after
the end of each fiscal quarter, a consolidated balance sheet as
at the end of such fiscal quarter and the related consolidated
statements of income or operations, shareholders equity
and cash flows for such fiscal quarter, and (iii) before
the end of each fiscal year, a forecast prepared by management
of the consolidated balance sheets and statements of income or
operations for the next fiscal year. On January 14, 2008
the bank waived several non-financial covenants in connection
with prior period financial statements. The Company was in
compliance with the financial and other covenants of the Credit
Agreement as of May 31, 2008.
Notes
Payable and Other
In connection with its acquisitions in 2008 and 2007, the
Company issued subordinated notes payable of $8,137 and $1,000,
respectively, to the sellers and assumed certain other notes
payable of $3,851 and $0, respectively. These notes mature
generally three years from the date of acquisition with interest
rate ranging from 4.8% to 7.3%. The Company has discounted these
obligations to reflect a 5.5% imputed interest. Payments under
these various acquisition obligations are made either monthly or
quarterly. In 2008, certain obligations of the Companys
international subsidiaries that were unscheduled as to payment
in 2007 were paid.
Scheduled principal payments due under all borrowing agreements
in each of the five years and thereafter subsequent to
May 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
7,469
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8,705
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7,996
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,408
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16,970
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
48,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Financial
Instruments
The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate
exposure. In 2007, the Company entered into two interest rate
swap contracts whereby the Company would receive or pay an
amount equal to the difference between a fixed rate and the
quoted
90-day LIBOR
rate on a quarterly basis. Amounts related to the derivatives
are recognized as quarterly payments become due. Credit loss
from counterparty nonperformance is not anticipated. All gains
and losses are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense
in the consolidated statement of operations and the combined
fair values are recorded in other liabilities and assets on the
consolidated balance sheets at May 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The following outlines the significant terms of
the contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
At May 31,
|
|
Contract Date
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
November 20, 2006
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
|
$
|
(321
|
)
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
November 30, 2006
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(555
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
13. Obligations
Under Capital Leases
The Company leases certain office space, including its
headquarters, and service equipment under capital leases,
requiring monthly payments ranging from $1 to $58, including
effective interest rates that range from 2.96% to 14.09%
expiring through May 2011. The net book value of assets under
capital lease obligations is $10,720 and $7,483 at May 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Scheduled future minimum lease payments subsequent to
May 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
4,694
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
2013
|
|
|
812
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
13,902
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
|
11,842
|
|
Less: Current portion of obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
3,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
7,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Commitments
and Contingencies
Operating
Leases
The Company is party to various noncancelable lease agreements,
primarily for its international and domestic office and lab
space. Monthly rent expense under these agreements is
approximately $200. Minimum future lease payments under
noncancelable operating leases in each of the five years
subsequent to May 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
2011
|
|
|
771
|
|
2012
|
|
|
467
|
|
2013
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense for the Company was $2,408, $1,453 and,
$1,255 for the years ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Litigation
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which
arise in the ordinary course of its business. The Company
records any liability in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies.
F-21
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
On September 25, 2007, two former employees, individually
and on behalf of a purported class consisting of all current and
former employees who work or worked as
on-site
construction workers, testing technicians and inspectors for
Conam in the State of California at any time from September 2003
through the date of judgment, if any, in this action, filed an
action against Conam in the United States District Court,
Northern District of California. The Complaint alleges, among
other things, that Conam violated the California Labor Code by
failing to pay required overtime compensation and provide meal
periods and accurate itemized wage statements. The Complaint
also alleges that Conam violated the California Business and
Professions Code by engaging in the unlawful business practices
of failing to compensate employees for missed meal periods and
requiring employees to work alternative workweek schedules,
which were improperly adopted and implemented. The relief sought
includes damages, penalties, interest, attorneys fees and
costs, injunctive relief, restitution and such other relief as
the court deems proper. Conam denies all these claims.
Plaintiffs putative class remains uncertified. The hearing
on Plaintiffs motion for class certification is currently
scheduled for October 3, 2008, but the parties have
stipulated to postpone the hearing until after a mediation,
which has been scheduled for October 13, 2008.
In accordance with FASB Statement No. 5, no liability for this
matter has been recorded.
Acquisition
Related
The Company is liable for contingent consideration in connection
with its acquisitions (See Note 8).
15. Employee
Benefit Plan
The Company provides a 401(k) salary savings plan for eligible
U.S. based employees. Employee contributions are
discretionary up to the IRS limits each year and catch up is
allowed. Under the 401(k) plan, employees become eligible to
participate on the 1st of the month after six months of
continuous service. Under this plan, the Company matches 50% of
the employees contributions up to the first 6% of the
employees contributions. There is a five-year vesting
schedule for the Company match. The Companys contribution
to the plan aggregated $758, $569 and $491 for the years ended
May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The Company participates with other employers in contributing to
a union plan, which covers certain U.S. based union
employees. The plan is not administered by the Company and
contributions are determined in accordance with provisions of a
collective bargaining agreement. The Companys
contributions to the plan aggregated $71, $75 and $45 for the
years ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
Company has benefit plans covering certain employees in selected
foreign countries. Amounts charged to expense under these plans
were not significant in any year.
16. Income
Taxes
Income before provision for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. operations
|
|
$
|
11,399
|
|
|
$
|
4,809
|
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
Foreign operations
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$
|
12,827
|
|
|
$
|
5,795
|
|
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
4,088
|
|
|
$
|
1,123
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
States and local
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Reserve for uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
States and local
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
(854
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
Net change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
5,380
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed
by applying the statutory federal tax rate to income tax as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Federal tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
(31.9
|
)%
|
Foreign tax at lower rates
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Deferred income tax attributes resulting from differences
between financial accounting amounts and income tax basis of
assets and liabilities at May 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
479
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
3,064
|
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Capital lease obligation
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
Other
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
6,317
|
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
5,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,629
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(2,003
|
)
|
|
|
(1,491
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
(5,196
|
)
|
|
|
(4,077
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
936
|
|
|
$
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At May 31, 2008, the Company has recorded a valuation
allowance against certain state deferred income tax assets based
on its assessment that the respective state deferred income tax
assets would not be realized as a result of losses incurred in
2008 and certain prior years. As of May 31, 2008, the
Company has available state net operating losses of $2,313,
expiring starting in 2011.
At May 31, 2006, the Company had recorded a valuation
allowance against its deferred income tax assets based on its
assessment that some or all of the deferred income tax assets
would not be realized as a result of losses incurred in 2005 and
certain prior years. During fiscal 2007, the Company eliminated
the valuation allowance due to its profitability in the current
year.
For the year ended May 31, 2008, the Company provided an
additional $75 reserve for uncertain tax positions related to
the current year. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending
amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded at June 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Adjustment to opening balance
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 1, 2007
|
|
|
564
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of May 31, 2008 and June 1, 2007, the
Companys unrecognized tax benefits were $639 and $564,
respectively. The material component of the balances related to
tax positions since 2004 that are highly certain but for which
there is uncertainty about the timing. Because of the impact of
deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the
disallowance of these positions would not affect the annual
effective tax rate
F-24
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
but would accelerate the payment of cash to the tax authority to
an earlier period. After recording its initial estimate, the
Company corrected the understatement of the initial balance
recorded at June 1, 2007 by $489.
As of May 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has available
research and experimentation credits of $133 and $224,
respectively, available to offset future state tax liabilities.
The credits expiration dates range from 2013 to 2018.
The Company has not recognized U.S. tax expense on its
undistributed international earnings of $1,044 and $773 as of
May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, since it intends to
reinvest the earnings outside the United States for the
foreseeable future. Any additional U.S. income taxes
incurred would be reduced by available foreign tax credits. If
the earnings of such foreign subsidiaries were not indefinitely
reinvested, a deferred tax liability would have been required.
17. Preferred
Stock
The Company has authorized 3,000,000 shares of capital
stock, comprised of 2,000,000 shares of common stock
(Common) and 1,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock (Preferred Stock), of which
298,701 shares have been designated as Class A
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
(Class A) and 221,205 shares have been
designated as Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred
Stock (Class B). All authorized shares of
Common and Preferred stock have a par value of $0.01 per share.
Dividends
Should the Company declare or pay dividends to the holders of
its capital stock, no dividends shall be declared or paid to the
holders of the Common shares or other securities ranking junior
to the Preferred shares unless equivalent dividends, on an
as-converted basis, are declared and paid concurrently to the
Preferred shareholders.
Voting
Rights
The Common and Preferred shareholders are entitled to one vote
per share for all matters subject to vote. The Preferred
shareholders are entitled to the number of votes equal to the
number of whole shares of Common into which the shares of
Preferred are convertible to at the time of the vote.
Conversion
of Preferred Stock
Holders of shares of preferred stock have the right to convert
their shares, at any time, into shares of common stock. The
current conversion rate for each series of preferred stock is
one for one. The conversion rate for each series of preferred
stock is subject (i) to proportional adjustments for stock
splits and dividends, combinations, recapitalizations, etc. and
(ii) to formula-weighted-average adjustments in the event
that the Company issues additional shares of common stock or
securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock at a
purchase price less than the applicable conversion price for
such series of preferred series of preferred stock then in
effect, subject to certain customary exceptions. All shares of
preferred stock will automatically be converted into shares of
common stock upon the closing of the sale of shares of our
common stock in a firm commitment underwritten public offering,
pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act of 1933, in which the gross proceeds to the
Company and the valuation of the Company immediately prior to
the offering based on the offering price exceed certain minimum
amounts. Each series of preferred stock also converts to common
stock at the election of the holders of a majority of the then
outstanding shares of such series of preferred stock.
F-25
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Class B
Redemption Rights
The majority holders of Class B preferred shares have the
right, but not the obligation, to require redemption of the
Class B shares upon the earlier occurrence of (i) an
Event of Noncompliance, as defined below,
(ii) August 12, 2009 or (iii) redemption of the
Class A shares. The Company has the right to redeem all the
Class B shares at any time after the fifth anniversary of
the Class B closing date (October 26, 2010).
The redemption price of the Class B shares shall be equal
to (i) prior to the third anniversary, the original
issuance price plus 15% per annum from the original issue date
to the redemption date (referred to as the Class B
IRR Amount), and (ii) on or after October 26,
2008, the greater of (a) the Class B IRR Amount or
(b) the fair market value of Class B shares. Accretion
has been based on the Class B IRR Amount through
May 31, 2008. In connection with the closing of the initial
public offering of the Companys common stock, the
Class B shares will convert into common stock at a ratio of
1-to-1 (subject to (i) proportional adjustments for stock
splits and dividends, combinations, recapitalizations and
similar events and (ii) formula-weighted-average
adjustments in the event that the Registrant issues additional
shares of common stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for common stock at a purchase price less than the
price at which such series of preferred stock was originally
issued and sold, subject to certain customary exceptions) and
all accretion recorded through this redemption price formula
will be credited to the Companys retained earnings.
Class A
Redemption Rights
The majority holders of Class A preferred shares have the
right, but not the obligation, to require redemption of the
Class A shares upon the earlier occurrence of (i) an
Event of Noncompliance, (ii) August 12, 2009, or
(iii) redemption of the Class B shares. The Company
has the right to redeem all the Class A shares at any time
after August 1, 2008.
The redemption price of the Class A shares shall be equal
to (i) prior to August 11, 2007, the original issuance
price plus 15% per annum from the original issue date to the
redemption date (referred to as the Class A IRR
Amount), and (ii) on or after August 11, 2007,
the greater of (a) the Class A IRR Amount or
(b) the fair market value of Class A shares. Accretion
has been based on the Class A IRR Amount through August 11,
2007 and the fair market value of Class A shares
thereafter. The fair market value of the Class A shares was
determined by the Board of Directors by reference to the
valuation of comparable companies using several methods. In
connection with the closing of the initial public offering of
the Companys common stock, the Class A shares will
convert into common stock at a ratio of 1-to-1 (subject to
(i) proportional adjustments for stock splits and
dividends, combinations, recapitalizations and similar events
and (ii) formula-weighted-average adjustments in the event that
the Registrant issues additional shares of common stock or
securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock at a
purchase price less than the price at which such series of
preferred stock was originally issued and sold, subject to
certain customary exceptions) and all accretion recorded through
this redemption price formula will be credited to the
Companys retained earnings.
Preferred
Stock Accretion
The accretion for the preferred stock was determined in
accordance with the Companys amended and restated
certificate of incorporation, which provides as follows:
Class A. 15% through August 11, 2007 and the higher of
15% or fair market value thereafter. Because the accretion based
on fair market value was greater than 15%, accretion was based
on FMV for periods beginning on August 12, 2007 and later
periods.
Class B. 15% through October 26, 2008 and the higher
of 15% or fair market value thereafter. Because the financial
statements only include for fiscal 2008, the Company is not yet
required to accrete the Class B preferred stock using fair
market value. Accordingly, the accretion was based on 15% for
all periods through May 31, 2008.
F-26
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Event
of Noncompliance
An Event of Noncompliance is defined as:
|
|
|
|
|
a sale of the Company or any of its material subsidiaries or any
other change of control of the Company (including without
limitation (i) the merger, reorganization or consolidation
of the Company into or with another corporation or other similar
transaction or series of related transactions in which 50% or
more of the voting power of the Company is disposed of or in
which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such
merger, reorganization or consolidation own less than 50% of the
Companys or its successors voting power immediately
after; or (ii) the sale of all or substantially all the
assets of the Company in one or a series of transactions),
|
|
|
|
|
|
a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar event affecting the Company
or any of its material subsidiaries,
|
|
|
|
|
|
a departure from the Company of Dr. Vahaviolos, the
Companys Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and
a member of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction in the role of Dr. Vahaviolos with the Company
to less than full-time employment for a period of 90 consecutive
days or more than 120 days during any twelve month period,
|
|
|
|
|
|
a default under any loan, credit or financing agreement of the
Company that is not cured within the applicable cure period
provided for in said agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the removal, hiring or promoting of any person for or to the job
or duties of Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating
Officer or Chief Financial Officer of the Company without the
consent of the holders of at least a majority of the then
outstanding shares of preferred stock of the Company, consenting
or voting, as the case may be, separately by series, or
|
|
|
|
|
|
a violation of any material right of any holder of shares of
preferred stock contained in the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation of the Company or in any agreement
among the Company and any holder of shares of preferred stock
(which violation, if reasonably curable within 30 days
after the Company knew or should have known of such occurrence,
is not so cured within 30 days after the Company knew or
should have known of such occurrence) or the taking of, or
agreement to take, any action which requires the approval of the
holders of shares of a series of or all preferred stock under
the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of the
Company or such agreements without such written consent.
|
Liquidation
Preferences
In the event of liquidation, all Common and Class A
shareholders shall rank junior to the Class B shareholders.
The payment of the liquidation preferences is as follows:
(i) the Class B shareholders are entitled to receive
an amount per share equal to the original purchase price,
provided remaining assets are available; (ii) the
Class A shareholders are entitled to receive an amount per
share equal to the sum of the original purchase price plus an
annual rate of return equal to fifteen percent 15% per
annum (15% IRR) from the original issue date through
the date of the first sale of the Class B shares; provided
remaining assets are available; (iii) the Class A
holders are entitled to receive an amount per share equal to the
greater of (a) 15% IRR for the period between the
Class B closing date and the date of liquidation or
(b) the Class A net fair market value as of the date
of liquidation; provided remaining assets are available;
(iv) the Class B holders are entitled to receive
amount per share equal to the greater of (a) 15% IRR from
the original purchase date through the date of liquidation or
(b) the Class B net fair value as of the date of
liquidation; and (v) provided assets are remaining, the
remainder shall be distributed to all the Common and other
Preferred shareholders on an as-if converted basis.
F-27
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Since both Class A and B preferred shareholders have the
right but not the obligation to require redemption, the Company
has classified Class A and B preferred stock to temporary
equity.
18. Stock
Options
In April 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a
Mistras Group, Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan (the
Plan) terminating the further use of the 1995
Incentive Stock Plan except for the 19,000 options outstanding
at May 31, 2008. The Companys Chairman and majority
shareholder was also delegated the discretion to grant and
execute new options for up to 56,974 shares pursuant to the
2007 Plan, with an option exercise price equal to the fair
market value of the underlying shares at the date of grant.
Under the 2007 Plan, options were granted for periods not
exceeding 10 years and exercisable four years after the
date of grant at an exercise price of not less than 100% of the
fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The
fair market value of the common stock was determined by the
Companys board of directors. (The prior plans
options granted had five-year terms and vest and become fully
exercisable over a four-year period.)
The Companys stock option compensation expense consists of
options granted during fiscal 2008 that are still outstanding
and are currently vesting. For stock options the Company
determine the fair value of each option at the grant date using
a Black-Scholes model, with the following average assumptions
used for grants made during the year ending May 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Volatility factor of the expected market price of the
Companys common stock
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield percentage
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted average expected life
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Average vesting period
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
For the year ended May 31, 2008, the Company recognized
share-based compensation expense for options granted of $318.
Unamortized share-based compensation with respect to unvested
stock options at May 31, 2008 that vest over a four-year
period from the date of grant amounted to $629.
F-28
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of the Companys common stock option activity,
and related information for the years ended May 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Price
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2005
|
|
|
30,100
|
|
|
|
29,750
|
|
|
$
|
.73
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(8,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.63
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(26,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2006
|
|
|
40,500
|
|
|
|
21,150
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(21,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2007 (prior plan)
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84.88
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2008
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
16,313
|
|
|
$
|
44.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options
outstanding at May 31, 2008 was approximately eight years.
The intrinsic weighted-average value of the options granted
during the year ended May 31, 2008 was $84.88 per share.
Subsequent to May 31, 2008, the Companys Chairman and
majority shareholder, subject to the Boards approval, has
granted 2,500 additional options to employees.
19. Related
Party Transactions
The Company leases its headquarters under a capital lease
(Note 13) from a shareholder and officer of the
Company requiring monthly payments through October 2019. The
current payment is $62 which increases annually to a maximum of
$72.
The Company leases office space located in France, which is
partly owned by a shareholder and officer. The lease provides
for monthly payments of $16 and terminates January 12, 2016.
20. Segment
Disclosure
The Companys three segments are:
|
|
|
|
|
Services. This segment provides NDT services
in North and Central America with the largest concentration in
the United States.
|
|
|
|
Software and Products. This segment designs,
manufactures, sells, installs and services software and other
products, including equipment and instrumentation, predominantly
in the United States.
|
|
|
|
International. This segment offers services,
software and products similar to those of our other segments to
global markets, principally in Europe, the Middle East, Africa,
Asia and South America, but not to customers in China and South
Korea, which are served by our Software and Products segment.
|
F-29
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
General corporate services, including accounting, audit,
contract management, and human resources management are provided
to the segments which are reported as intersegment transactions
within corporate and eliminations. Sales to the International
segment from the products group and subsequent sales by the
International segment of the same items are recorded and
reflected in the operating performance of both segments, but one
set of such sales and related costs are offset or eliminated in
corporate and eliminations.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same
as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies in Note 2. Segment income from operations is
determined based on internal performance measures used by the
Chief Executive Officer, the chief operating decision maker, to
assess the performance of each business in a given period and to
make decisions as to resource allocations. In connection with
that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer may exclude matters
such as charges for stock-based compensation and certain other
acquisition-related charges and balances, technology and product
development costs, certain gains and losses from dispositions,
and litigation settlements or other charges. There is no
allocation of corporate general and administrative expenses.
Segment income from operations also excludes interest and other
financial charges and income taxes. Corporate and other assets
are comprised principally of cash, deposits, property, plant and
equipment, domestic deferred taxes, deferred charges and other
assets. Corporate loss from operations consists of depreciation
on the corporate office facilities and equipment, administrative
charges related to corporate personnel and other charges that
cannot be readily identified for allocation to a particular
segment.
Selected consolidated financial information by segment for the
periods shown was as follows:
Revenue by operating segment includes intercompany transactions,
which are eliminated in corporate and eliminations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
114,074
|
|
|
$
|
89,385
|
|
|
$
|
63,972
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
18,396
|
|
|
|
16,174
|
|
|
|
14,797
|
|
International
|
|
|
23,727
|
|
|
|
20,935
|
|
|
|
17,678
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(3,929
|
)
|
|
|
(4,253
|
)
|
|
|
(2,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
$
|
93,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income by operating segment includes intercompany
transactions, which are eliminated in corporate and eliminations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
14,736
|
|
|
$
|
8,284
|
|
|
$
|
2,470
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
International
|
|
|
2,812
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(4,502
|
)
|
|
|
(2,988
|
)
|
|
|
(2,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,358
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
$
|
5,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
9,498
|
|
|
$
|
4,188
|
|
|
$
|
6,972
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
International
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,552
|
|
|
$
|
5,736
|
|
|
$
|
8,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
28,841
|
|
|
$
|
14,918
|
|
|
$
|
14,529
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,627
|
|
|
$
|
14,704
|
|
|
$
|
14,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Long-lived Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
60,442
|
|
|
$
|
35,279
|
|
|
$
|
34,927
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
5,143
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
International
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,481
|
|
|
$
|
42,919
|
|
|
$
|
43,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
9,386
|
|
|
$
|
6,989
|
|
|
$
|
5,265
|
|
Software and Products
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
International
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,423
|
|
|
$
|
8,691
|
|
|
$
|
7,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
Mistras
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Results
by Geographic Area
Net revenues by geographic area for the fiscal years ended
May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
122,392
|
|
|
$
|
97,110
|
|
|
$
|
73,753
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
7,221
|
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
3,872
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
12,206
|
|
|
|
10,717
|
|
|
|
8,469
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
10,449
|
|
|
|
8,794
|
|
|
|
7,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
$
|
93,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21. Subsequent
Event
Acquisitions
In July 2008, the Company acquired two unrelated entities
to continue its strategic efforts in market expansion. The total
cost of the acquisitions was $11,000 of which $5,000 was paid in
cash and the balance by the issuance of subordinated seller
notes of $5,500 and other liabilities of $500. The notes are
payable over three and five years in the principal amount of
$3,000 and $2,500, respectively, and bear interest at 4%. In
addition, these acquisitions have an additional contingent
purchase price of another $4,500. These contingent payments are
based on the acquired entities achieving certain revenue and
profitability thresholds, with $4,000 contingently payable over
the next three years and $500 contingently added to notes
payable at December 31, 2008. The preliminary aggregate
amount of goodwill arising in the transactions before accounting
for any conditional payments is $4,300, which is expected to be
fully deductible for income tax purposes. In connection with the
acquisitions, the Company has also entered into finite at-will
consulting and employment agreements with certain sellers.
On September 1, 2008, the Company acquired an unrelated entity
to continue its strategic efforts in market expansion. The total
cost of the acquisition was $2,690 of which $2,395 was paid in
cash and the balance of $295 will be payable beginning on
December 31, 2008. The preliminary aggregate amount of
goodwill arising in the transactions before accounting for any
conditional payments is approximately $1,600, which is expected
to be fully deductible for income tax purposes.
These acquisitions were not, individually or in the aggregate,
significant.
Credit
Agreement
In order to fund the above acquisitions and repay its working
capital line, the Company amended its credit agreements with the
banks on July 1, 2008 and obtained a new $20,000 term loan.
The interest rate and general terms are consistent on this new
term loan with the Companys existing loans described in
Note 10. Starting July 27, 2008 until October 31,
2012, monthly principal payments will be $278.
F-32
Examples
of Customer Solutions that Use Advanced NDT
Technologies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry
|
|
Technologies Used
|
|
Situation or What We Did
|
|
Customer Benefit
|
|
Fossil Power Utility
|
|
Ultrasonic Phased Array and Digital Radiography
|
|
New concept endorsed by an insurance
company and the Electric Power Research Institute
Minimized radiation exclusion zones,
allowing for increased construction activity
Examined 150 boiler header welds and
14,000 boiler tube welds
|
|
Shortened their normal maintenance period by 15 full days at a
total cost savings of nearly $15 million.
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
Guided Wave Ultrasonic Long Range Inspection
|
|
Used advanced technology that:
rapidly inspects 100% of large sections
of piping with minimal insulation removal
identifies localized damage
inspects previously inaccessible areas
where consequences and likelihood of failure are high
|
|
Obtained reliability correlation factor of 99% and customer can
accelerate its testing of miles of pipeline.
|
Refineries and Petrochemical
|
|
Touch Point
Corrosiontm
Inspection
|
|
Our Services group together with our Products Group developed an
inspection methodology that quickly determines the integrity of
a piping system by paying special attention to concerns when a
pipe rests on a metal or wooden object resulting in the
potential creation of a corrosion cell.
|
|
Customers now have a way to test these inaccessible areas
without lifting the pipe and can avoid other problems such as
dislodging environmentally sensitive materials or potentially
causing additional damage to the piping system.
|
Ammonia Processing Tank
|
|
AE Sensors
|
|
96 sensors were placed under the insulation and cabled to a
connection box. The vessel was filled and we evaluated the data.
|
|
Customer removed the vessel from service and repaired over
2,000 feet of weld that was defective from the original
manufacture.
|
A-1
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The following table sets forth the various expenses, other than
underwriting discounts and commissions, payable by the
registrant in connection with the sale of common stock being
registered. All of the amounts shown are estimated except the
SEC registration fee, the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (FINRA) filing fee and the New York Stock Exchange
listing fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount to
|
|
|
|
be Paid
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
6,780
|
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
|
17,750
|
|
New York Stock Exchange listing fee*
|
|
|
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses*
|
|
|
|
|
Legal fees and expenses*
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses*
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees*
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous fees and expenses*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total*
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be completed by amendment. |
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Section 145(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law
(DGCL) provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any
person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party
to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the
corporation) by reason of the fact that the person is or was a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is
or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise,
against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by the person in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the
person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal
action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the
persons conduct was unlawful.
Section 145(b) of the DGCL provides that a Delaware
corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation
to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that
such person acted in any of the capacities set forth above,
against expenses (including attorneys fees) actually and
reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit if the person acted under
standards similar to those discussed above, except that no
indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or
matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be
liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the
court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine
that despite the adjudication of liability, such person is
fairly and reasonably entitled to be indemnified for such
expenses which the court shall deem proper.
Section 145 further provides that to the extent a director
or officer of a corporation has been successful in the defense
of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in
subsections (a) and (b) or in the defense of any
claim, issue or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified
against expenses (including attorneys fees) actually and
reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith; that
indemnification provided for by Section 145 shall not be
deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the indemnified
party may be entitled;
II-1
and that the corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on
behalf of a director or officer of the corporation against any
liability asserted against such person or incurred by such
person in any such capacity or arising out of such persons
status as such whether or not the corporation would have the
power to indemnify such person against such liabilities under
Section 145.
The registrants amended and restated bylaws provide that
the registrant shall indemnify any director or officer of the
corporation, and may indemnify any other person, who
(a) was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party
to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the
corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was
serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines, and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in
good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe his conduct was unlawful, and (b) was or
is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the
right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by
reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer,
employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at
the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee
or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture,
trust or other enterprise against expenses (including
attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit
if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed
to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation
and except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of
any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have
been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to
the extent that the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in
which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon
application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in
view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly
and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the
Delaware Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a certificate
of incorporation may contain a provision eliminating or limiting
the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director, provided that such provision shall not eliminate
or limit the liability of a director: (i) for any breach of
the directors duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith
or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation
of law; (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL; or
(iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit.
The registrants second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by
the DGCL, as the same exists or hereafter may be amended, a
director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to
the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for the
breach of any fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability
(i) for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty
to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or
omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under
Section 174 of the DGCL, as the same exists or hereafter
may be amended, or (iv) for any transaction from which the
director derived an improper personal benefit.
In addition, the registrant has entered into indemnification
agreements, in the forms attached as Exhibits 10.3 and 10.4
hereto, with its directors and executive officers which require
the registrant, among other things, to indemnify them against
certain liabilities which may arise by reason of their status.
The registrant maintains directors and officers
liability insurance for its officers and directors.
The underwriting agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this
Registration Statement contains provisions indemnifying officers
and directors of the registrant against liabilities arising
under the Securities Act or otherwise.
II-2
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities.
|
In the three years preceding the filing of this registration
statement, the registrant has issued the following securities
that were not registered under the Securities Act:
From January 31, 2005 through January 31, 2008, the
registrant issued and sold an aggregate of 44,750 shares of
common stock upon the exercise of options issued to certain
employees, directors and officers under the registrants
1995 Stock Plan at exercise prices ranging from $0.50 to $1.50
per share, for an aggregate consideration of $34,300.
On October 27, 2005, the registrant issued and sold
203,205 shares of its Class B Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock to accredited investors for an aggregate
purchase price of $8.7 million. This transaction did not
involve any underwriter or a public offering.
On April 25, 2007, the registrant issued 18,000 shares
of its Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock to
Dr. Vahaviolos in connection with the purchase from him of
substantially all of the capital stock of Envirocoustics ABEE, a
Metamorhosi, Attica Greece corporation by one of our
subsidiaries, Physical Acoustics Limited, an English limited
company. This transaction did not involve any underwriter or a
public offering.
The issuance of securities described above were deemed to be
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in
reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Regulation D promulgated thereunder as transactions by an
issuer not involving any public offering. The recipients of
securities in each such transaction represented their intention
to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a
view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof
and appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates
and other instruments issued in such transactions. The sales of
these securities were made without general solicitation or
advertising.
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
|
|
3
|
.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws.
|
|
4
|
.1*
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate.
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers.
|
|
10
|
.2**
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 23,
2007.
|
|
10
|
.3**
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of December 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.4**
|
|
Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of May 30, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.5**
|
|
Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of July 1, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
2008
Long-Term
Incentive Plan.
|
|
21
|
.1**
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. (included in
Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP.
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (on signature page).
|
|
99
|
.1**
|
|
Consent of Richard H. Glanton.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed. |
(b) Financial statement schedules.
II-3
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are
inapplicable, not required or the information is indicated
elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or the notes
thereto.
A. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under
the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers, and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the provisions described above in Item 14, or otherwise,
the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted against the registrant by such director,
officer or controlling person in connection with the securities
being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of
its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the
question of whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed
by the final adjudication of such issue.
B. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide
to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
C. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
1. For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or
(4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to
be part of this registration statement as of the time it was
declared effective.
2. For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-4
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Princeton Junction,
New Jersey, on September 15, 2008.
MISTRAS GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) and Director
|
|
September 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul
Peterik
Paul
Peterik
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) and Secretary
|
|
September 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Elizabeth
Burgess
Elizabeth
Burgess
|
|
Director
|
|
September 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel
M. Dickinson
Daniel
M. Dickinson
|
|
Director
|
|
September 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
J. Forese
James
J. Forese
|
|
Director
|
|
September 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
J. Lange
Michael
J. Lange
|
|
Director
|
|
September 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Manuel
N. Stamatakis
Manuel
N. Stamatakis
|
|
Director
|
|
September 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
As Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
II-6
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
|
|
3
|
.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws.
|
|
4
|
.1*
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate.
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers.
|
|
10
|
.2**
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 23,
2007.
|
|
10
|
.3**
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of December 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.4**
|
|
Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of May 30, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.5**
|
|
Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of July 1, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
21
|
.1**
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. (included in
Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP.
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (on signature page).
|
|
99
|
.1**
|
|
Consent of Richard H. Glanton.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed. |
EX-23.2
Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the use in this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated
August 22, 2008, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Mistras Group,
Inc. which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under
the headings Experts and Selected Financial Data in such Registration Statement.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, NJ
September 12, 2008
EX-23.3
Exhibit 23.3
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mistras Group, Inc.
We hereby consent to the use in this Prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement
on Form S-1 of Mistras Group, Inc. of our report dated June 5, 2008, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Mistras Group, Inc. which appears in such Prospectus.
We also consent to the reference to us under the headings Experts in such Prospectus.
Amper, Politziner & Mattia LLP
(formerly Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.)
September 12, 2008
Edison, New Jersey
COVER
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
A Registered Limited Liability Partnership
666 Fifth Avenue, 31st Floor
New York, New York 10103-3198
www.fulbright.com
|
|
|
jdaniels@fulbright.com
direct dial: (212) 318-3322
|
|
telephone: (212) 318-3000
facsimile: (212) 318-3400 |
September 15, 2008
VIA EDGAR AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
Ms. Jennifer Hardy
Branch Chief
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Mail Stop 7010
Washington, D.C. 20549-3561
Re: |
|
Mistras Group, Inc.
Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed June 10, 2008
File No. 333-151559 |
Dear Ms. Hardy:
On behalf of Mistras Group, Inc. (the Registrant), we hereby submit to you Amendment No. 2
(Amendment No. 2) to the Registrants above-referenced Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the
Registration Statement), reflecting changes made in response to the comments of the staff (the
Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) contained in the letter of
Jennifer Hardy dated September 5, 2008 to Sotirios J. Vahaviolos, Ph.D., pertaining to Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement.
All responses to the Staffs comments set forth in this letter are submitted on behalf of the
Registrant at its request. All responses to the accounting comments were prepared by the
Registrant in consultation with its independent auditors. To facilitate your review, we have set
forth in this letter each of the Staffs comments with the Registrants corresponding response
below. We have marked the enclosed Amendment No. 2 to show changes and all references to page
numbers below pertain to the page numbers in the marked version of Amendment No. 2 submitted
herewith.
Summary, page 1
1. |
|
We note your response to prior comment 5. In the event that executive officers and directors
do take part in the resale, please disclose that and identify them in this section. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant has further
revised the disclosure in accordance with the Staffs comment.
Please see page 6 of Amendment No. 2.
|
Austin · Beijing · Dallas · Denver · Dubai · Hong Kong · Houston · London · Los Angeles · Minneapolis
Munich · New York · Riyadh · San Antonio · St. Louis · Washington DC
Ms. Jennifer Hardy
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 15, 2008
Page 2
Consolidated Results of Operations, page 39
2. |
|
We note your updated disclosures in response to our prior comment 15; however, there
continues to be discussions where you cite multiple factors for changes in your results but do
not quantify those individual factors. For instance, within your Software and Products
segment discussion on page 44 you indicate that segment revenue increased due to increased
sales of your Plant Condition Management System enterprise software, product sales to your
international segment for resale and sales of your new products but you do not quantify each
of these factors. Additionally, within your International segment discussion of revenues on
page 45 you indicate that the increase in revenues results from various factors which both
increased and offset those increases, but you do not quantify the impact of each of those
factors. Please further enhance your disclosures to quantify the impact of each factor you
have identified. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant has further revised the disclosure in accordance with the
Staffs comment. Please see pages 39, 43, 44 and 45 of Amendment No. 2. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Balance and Credit Facility Borrowings, page 46
3. |
|
We note that you will fax to us the information that you indicated would provided under a
separate cover. Upon our review of that information we may have further comments. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant respectfully refers the Staff to our letter, dated
September 4, 2008, containing the information we indicated would be provided under separate
cover. |
Business, page 54
4. |
|
Please identify any customers who accounted for 10% or more of your revenues pursuant to Item
101(c)(1)(vii) of Regulation S-K. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant respectfully
advises the Staff that the only customer who accounted for an
aggregate amount equal to 10% or more of the Registrants
revenues during each of the last three fiscal years was the various
divisions or business units of BP when taken together as a single
customer. The Registrant discloses the percentages of its revenues
attributable to various divisions or business units of BP during each of such fiscal years
in the Risk Factors section and the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations section on
page 11 and 67 of
Amendment No. 2,
respectively. The Registrant has revised its disclosure on
page 55 of Amendment No. 2
in order to clarify that no other customer accounted for an amount equal to 10% or more of
the Registrants revenues during any of the Registrants last three fiscal years. |
- 2 -
Ms. Jennifer Hardy
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 15, 2008
Page 3
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 76
5. |
|
Please disclose and quantify what financial performance of the respective groups the bonuses
of named executive officers other than Dr. Vahaviolos and Mr. Peterik were based upon.
Currently, it is not clear what the bonuses for these other officers are based on. Please
also disclose any targets for customer base growth, customer retention and acquisitions.
Otherwise, please disclose how you evaluate this information in connection with bonuses. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant has revised the disclosure in accordance with the Staffs
comment. Please see page 77 of Amendment No. 2. |
Acquisition of Envirocoustics A.B.E.E., page 83
6. |
|
We note your response to prior comment 22 from our letter dated July 9, 2008. Please more
clearly demonstrate to us how you determined that the effect of the adjustments to properly
account for the transaction of entities under common control is immaterial. Specifically
address why the effect is to increase property plant and equipment, goodwill and the value of
the preferred shares. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant supplementally advises the Staff that at the time of the acquisition of
Envirocoustics A.B.E.E. (Envirocoustics), the book value of the net assets acquired exceeded the
purchase price by $241,000. The Registrant reviewed the fair values of the assets on a held for
use basis and determined that the assets were not impaired. In accordance with SFAS 141,
paragraphs 44 through 46, the Registrant reduced the carrying value of the acquired property, plant
and equipment for this excess of $241,000.
The acquisition of Envirocoustics was negotiated and approved by the Registrants board of
directors in December 2006. However, because of certain legal requirements in Greece, the
transaction did not close until April 2007. Because the valuations of Envirocoustics and the
class B preferred stock issued by the Registrant in the acquisition were carefully determined by
its board of directors (including at least 3 persons highly qualified to value companies and
preferred shares), it accounted for the acquisition by reducing the carrying value of
Envirocoustics noncurrent assets. If the Registrant had instead recorded a capital contribution
for the excess value received by the Registrant, property, plant and equipment and preferred
stock would have been $241,000 higher as of May 31, 2007. Also, depreciation expense would have
been $48,000 higher for the year ended May 31, 2008. The Registrant has determined that, if it had
instead recorded a capital contribution for the excess value, any required adjustments would not
have been material.
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Revenue Recognition, page F-9
7. |
|
With reference to your last statement under the caption, Software, please clarify what you
mean by ...the Company applies the rules as noted above. We assume you are referring to your
accounting for multiple-element arrangements as discussed below your current discussion.
Please revise to clarify. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant has revised the disclosure in accordance with the Staffs
comment. Please see page F-9 of Amendment No. 2. |
8. |
|
We note your revised disclosure under the caption, Products, which indicates that product
sales are recognized when risk of loss and title pass to the customer, which is generally upon
delivery. Please identify the situations in which you recognize revenue other than at
delivery and quantify the related amount of revenue recognized for each period presented. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant has revised the disclosure in accordance with the Staffs
comment. Please see page F-9 of Amendment No. 2. |
8. Acquisitions, page F-16
9. |
|
Please provide the pro forma financial information required
by paragraph 54 of SFAS 141 or clarify for readers that the pro
forma impact is not material. |
- 3 -
Ms. Jennifer Hardy
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 15, 2008
Page 4
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant has revised the disclosure in accordance with the Staffs
comment. Please see page F-17 of Amendment No. 2. |
14. Commitments and Contingencies Litigation, page F-22
10. |
|
We note your disclosures on pages 11 and 16 that certain Conam incidents have resulted in
material legal fees and will likely result in certain fines. Please discuss these incidents
herein in the context of SFAS 5, including providing the disclosures required by paragraphs 9
and 10 of SFAS 5. |
|
|
Response: The Registrant has further
revised the disclosure to reflect that: (a) it has been advised
Conam is not a current defendant in the lawsuit brought by private
parties, (b) the Massachusetts Attorney General has advised that
it intends to dismiss its lawsuit
against Conam, and (c) the Registrant was not required to pay a fine in connection with the
radiation exposure incident investigated in January 2007. Please
see page F-11 and F-16 of Amendment No. 2. Accordingly, the Registrant believes that no change is required
to the litigation disclosure under Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies Litigation.
|
17. Preferred Stock, page F-25
11. |
|
We note your updated disclosure on page F-26 indicating that Class B preferred share
redemption price was based on the Class B IRR Amount through May 31, 2007 and the Class A
preferred share redemption price based on the Class A IRR Amount through May 31, 2007. Please
expand your disclosures to clearly indicate how the redemption price was determined subsequent
to May 31, 2007. In this regard, we assume that redemption price subsequent to May 31, 2007
was based on fair value. Accordingly, please also expand your disclosures to indicate how you
determined the fair value of each class of preferred stock and address why there appears to be
such a significant difference in the fair values of the Class A and Class B preferred shares
as of May 31, 2008. Your discussion of fair value should address the fact that both the Class
A and Class B preferred shares are convertible into common stock on a one for one basis and
will be converted upon your IPO. |
|
|
|
Response: The Registrant has revised the disclosure in accordance with the Staffs
comment. Please see page F-26 of Amendment No. 2. |
- 4 -
Ms. Jennifer Hardy
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 15, 2008
Page 5
If you have any comments or questions to the foregoing responses or referenced revisions,
please feel free to contact Sheldon Nussbaum at (212) 318-3254 or the undersigned at (212)
318-3322.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Joseph F. Daniels
Joseph F. Daniels
Enclosure
cc: |
|
Melinda Hooker, Staff Accountant
Craig Slivka, Staff Attorney
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos, Mistras Group, Inc.
Pete Peterik, Mistras Group, Inc.
Andrew C. Freedman
Sheldon G. Nussbaum
Donald G. Ainscow
|
- 5 -