sv1za
As filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 24, 2009
Registration
No. 333-151559
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
Mistras Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
8711
|
|
22-3341267
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
195 Clarksville Road
Princeton Junction, New Jersey
08550
(609) 716-4000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Sotirios J.
Vahaviolos, Ph.D.
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
195 Clarksville Road
Princeton Junction, New Jersey
08550
(609) 716-4000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
With copies to:
|
|
|
Andrew C. Freedman, Esq.
Sheldon G. Nussbaum, Esq.
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
666 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10103
Telephone
(212) 318-3000
Fax
(212) 318-3400
|
|
William J. Whelan, III, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10019
Telephone (212) 474-1000
Fax (212) 474-3700
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement is declared effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION
FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering Price(1) (2)
|
|
|
Registration Fee(3)
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
|
$
|
172,500,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,625.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee under Rule 457(o) of the
Securities Act.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes shares of common stock
that may be purchased by the underwriters to cover
over-allotments, if any.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
$6,780 previously paid by wire
transfer on June 6, 2008.
|
The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act or until this Registration Statement shall
become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant
to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We and the selling stockholders may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not
soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where
the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO
COMPLETION, DATED AUGUST 24, 2009
Shares
Mistras Group, Inc.
Common Stock
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price of the common
stock is expected to be between $
and $ per share. We intend to
apply to list our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol MG.
We are
selling shares
of common stock and the selling stockholders are
selling shares
of common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from
the shares of common stock sold by the selling stockholders.
The underwriters have an option to purchase a maximum
of
and
additional shares of common stock from us and the selling
stockholders, respectively, to cover over-allotments of shares.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors on page 14.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
|
Proceeds to Mistras
|
|
|
Proceeds to Selling
|
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
Group, Inc.
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2009.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Joint Book-Running Managers
|
|
|
J.P.
Morgan |
Credit Suisse |
BofA Merrill Lynch |
Robert W. Baird &
Co.
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2009.
A world of ndt solutions software and products services international
A leading global provider of proprietary technology-enabled non-destructive testing (ndt) inspection solutions that
ensures the integrity of industrial and public infrastructure |
Table of
contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Industry and
market data
This prospectus includes market and industry data and forecasts
that we obtained from internal research, publicly available
information and industry publications and surveys. Industry
publications and surveys generally state that the information
contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be
reliable. Unless otherwise noted, statements as to our market
position relative to our competitors are approximated and based
on the above-mentioned third-party data and internal analysis
and estimates as of the date of this prospectus. Although we
believe the industry and market data and statements as to market
position to be reliable as of the date of this prospectus, we
have not independently verified this information and it could
prove inaccurate. Industry and market data could be wrong
because of the method by which sources obtained their data and
because information cannot always be verified with certainty due
to the limits on the availability and reliability of raw data,
the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other
limitations and uncertainties. In addition, we do not know all
of the assumptions regarding general economic conditions or
growth that were used in preparing the forecasts from sources
cited herein.
Dealer prospectus
delivery obligation
Until ,
2009 (25 days after the commencement of the offering), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
Prospectus
summary
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the
information that may be important to you. You should read this
entire prospectus carefully, including the risks discussed under
Risk Factors and the financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus before
making an investment decision. In this prospectus, our fiscal
years, which end on May 31, are identified according to the
calendar year in which they end (e.g., the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2009 is referred to as fiscal 2009),
and unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise
requires, Mistras, we, us
and our refer to Mistras Group, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries and their predecessors.
Our
business
We are a leading global provider of technology-enabled asset
protection solutions used to evaluate the structural integrity
of critical energy, industrial and public infrastructure. We
combine industry-leading products and technologies, expertise in
mechanical integrity (MI) and non-destructive testing (NDT)
services and proprietary data analysis software to deliver a
comprehensive portfolio of customized solutions, ranging from
routine inspections to complex, plant-wide asset integrity
assessments and management. These mission critical solutions
enhance our customers ability to extend the useful life of
their assets, increase productivity, minimize repair costs,
comply with governmental safety and environmental regulations,
manage risk and avoid catastrophic disasters. Given the role our
services play in ensuring the safe and efficient operation of
infrastructure, we have historically provided a majority of our
services to our customers on a regular, recurring basis. We
serve a global customer base of companies with asset-intensive
infrastructure, including companies in the oil and gas, fossil
and nuclear power, public infrastructure, chemicals, aerospace
and defense, transportation, primary metals and metalworking,
pharmaceuticals and food processing industries. As of
August 1, 2009, we had approximately 2,000 employees,
including 29 Ph.D.s and more than 100 other degreed
engineers and highly-skilled, certified technicians, in 68
offices across 15 countries. We have established long-term
relationships as a critical solutions provider to many leading
companies, including American Electric Power, Bayer, Bechtel,
BP, Chevron, Dow Chemical, Duke Energy, DuPont, Embraer,
ExxonMobil, First Energy, General Electric, Pfizer, Rio Tinto
Alcan, Rolls Royce, Shell, The Boeing Company and Valero, and to
various federal, state and local governmental infrastructure and
defense authorities, including the departments of transportation
of several states. The following chart represents revenues we
generated in certain of our end markets for fiscal 2009.
1
Mistras revenues
by end market
(fiscal 2009)
Our asset protection solutions have evolved over time as we have
combined the disciplines of NDT, MI services and data analysis
software to provide value to our customers. The foundation of
our business is NDT, which is the examination of assets without
impacting the future usefulness or impairing the integrity of
these assets. The ability to inspect infrastructure assets and
not interfere with their operating performance makes NDT a
highly attractive alternative to many traditional intrusive
inspection techniques, which may require dismantling equipment
or shutting down a plant, refinery, mill or site. Our MI
services are a systematic engineering-based approach to
developing best practices for ensuring the on-going integrity
and safety of equipment and industrial facilities. MI services
involve conducting an inventory of infrastructure assets,
developing and implementing inspection and maintenance
procedures, training personnel in executing these procedures and
managing inspections, testing and assessments of customer
assets. By assisting customers in implementing MI programs we
enable them to identify gaps between existing and desired
practices, find and track deficiencies and degradations to be
corrected and establish quality assurance standards for
fabrication, engineering and installation of infrastructure
assets. We believe our MI services improve plant safety and
reliability and regulatory compliance, and in so doing reduce
maintenance costs. Our solutions also incorporate comprehensive
data analysis from our proprietary asset protection software to
provide customers with detailed, integrated and cost-effective
solutions that rate the risks of alternative maintenance
approaches and recommend actions in accordance with consensus
industry codes and standards.
As a global asset protection leader, we provide a comprehensive
range of solutions that includes traditional outsourced NDT
inspection services, advanced asset protection solutions, such
as MI services, and a proprietary portfolio of both hardware and
software products and systems for capturing and analyzing
inspection data in real-time. Our solutions are targeted to
optimize the safety and operational performance of
infrastructure-intensive industries during the design,
fabrication, maintenance, inspection and retirement phases of
the assets life. Since inception,
2
we have increased our capabilities and the size of our customer
base through the development of applied technologies and managed
support services, organic growth and the successful and seamless
integration of acquired companies. These acquisitions have
provided us with additional products, technologies, resources
and customers that have enhanced our sustainable competitive
advantages over our competition.
We generated revenues of $209.1 million,
$152.3 million and $122.2 million and adjusted EBITDA
of $31.1 million, $28.1 million and $19.2 million
for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For fiscal 2009,
we generated over 80% of our revenues from our Services segment.
Our
industry
Asset protection is a large and rapidly growing industry that
consists of NDT inspection, MI services and inspection data
warehousing and analysis. NDT plays a crucial role in assuring
the operational and structural integrity of critical
infrastructure without compromising the usefulness of the tested
materials or equipment. The evolution of NDT services, in
combination with broader industry trends and regulatory
requirements, has made NDT an integral and increasingly
outsourced part of many asset-intensive industries.
Well-publicized industrial and public infrastructure failures
and accidents have also raised the level of awareness of
regulators, as well as owners and operators, of the benefits
that asset protection can provide.
We believe the following key dynamics drive the growth of the
asset protection industry:
|
|
|
Extending the Useful Life of Aging
Infrastructure. The prohibitive cost and challenge of
building new infrastructure has resulted in the significant
aging of existing infrastructure and caused companies to seek
ways to extend the useful life of existing assets. Because aging
infrastructure requires relatively higher levels of maintenance
and repair, as well as more frequent, extensive and ongoing
testing, companies and public authorities are increasing
spending to ensure the operational and structural integrity of
existing infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Outsourcing of Non-Core Activities and Technical Resource
Constraints. While some of our customers have
historically performed NDT services in-house, the increasing
sophistication and automation of NDT programs, together with a
decreasing supply of skilled professionals and stricter
governmental regulations, has led many companies and public
authorities to outsource NDT to providers that have the
necessary technical product portfolio, engineering expertise,
technical workforce and proven track record of results-oriented
performance to effectively meet their increasing requirements.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Asset and Capacity Utilization. Due to
high energy prices, high repair and replacement costs and the
limited construction of new infrastructure, existing
infrastructure in some of our target markets is being used at
higher capacities, causing increased stress and fatigue that
accelerate deterioration. In order to sustain high capacity
utilization rates, customers are increasingly using asset
protection solutions to efficiently ensure the integrity and
safety of their assets. Implementation of asset protection
solutions can lead to increased productivity as a result of
reduced maintenance-related downtime.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Corrosion from Low-Quality Inputs. High
commodities prices and increasing energy demands have led to the
use of lower grade inputs and feedstock, such as low-grade coal
or petroleum, in the refinery and power generation processes.
These lower grade inputs can rapidly corrode the infrastructure
they come into contact with, which in turn increases the
|
3
|
|
|
need for asset protection solutions to identify such corrosion
and enable infrastructure owners to proactively combat the
problems caused by such corrosion.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Use of Advanced Materials. Customers in
our target markets are increasingly utilizing advanced materials
and other unique technologies in the manufacturing and
construction of new infrastructure and aerospace applications.
As a result, they require advanced testing, assessment and
maintenance technologies to protect these assets. We believe
that demand for NDT solutions will increase as companies and
public authorities continue to use these advanced materials, not
only during the operating phase of the lifecycle of their
assets, but also during the design and construction phases by
incorporating technologies such as embedded sensors.
|
|
|
|
Meeting Safety Regulations. Owners and operators of
infrastructure assets increasingly face strict government
regulations and safety requirements. Failure to meet these
standards can result in significant financial liabilities,
increased scrutiny by the Occupational Safety & Health
Administration (OSHA) and other regulators, higher insurance
premiums and tarnished corporate brand value. As a result, these
owners and operators are seeking highly reliable asset
protection suppliers with a proven track record of providing
asset protection services, products and systems to assist them
in meeting these increasingly stringent regulations.
|
|
|
|
Expanding Addressable End-Markets. Advances in NDT
sensor technology and asset protection software systems, and the
continued emergence of new technologies, are creating increased
demand for asset protection solutions in applications where
existing techniques were previously ineffective. Further, we
expect increased demand in relatively new markets, such as the
pharmaceutical and food processing industries, where
infrastructure is only now aging to a point where significant
maintenance is required.
|
|
|
|
Expanding Addressable Geographies. We believe that a
substantial driver of incremental demand will come from
international markets, as companies and governments in these
markets build and maintain infrastructure and applications that
require the use of asset protection solutions.
|
Our competitive
strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths contribute to our
being a leading provider of asset protection solutions and will
allow us to further capitalize on growth opportunities in our
industry:
|
|
|
Single Source Provider for Asset Protection Solutions
Worldwide. We believe we are the only company with a
comprehensive portfolio of proprietary and integrated asset
protection solutions, including services, products and systems
worldwide, which positions us to be the leading single source
provider for a customers asset protection requirements. In
addition, collaboration between our services teams and product
design engineers generates enhancements to our services,
products and systems, which provide a source of competitive
advantage compared to companies that provide only NDT services
or NDT products.
|
|
|
|
Long-Standing Trusted Provider to a Diversified and Growing
Customer Base. By providing critical and reliable NDT
services, products and systems for more than 30 years and
expanding our asset protection solutions, we have become a
trusted partner to a large and growing customer base across
numerous infrastructure-intensive industries globally. Seven of
our top 10 customers by fiscal 2009 revenues have used our
solutions for at least 10 years. We leverage
|
4
|
|
|
our strong relationships to sell additional solutions to our
existing customers while also attracting new customers. As asset
protection is increasingly recognized by our customers as a
strategic advantage, we believe our reputation and history of
successful execution are key competitive differentiators.
|
|
|
|
Repository of Customer-Specific Inspection Data. Our
enterprise software solutions enable us to capture and store our
customers testing and inspection data in a centralized
database. As a result, we have accumulated large amounts of
proprietary information that allows us to provide our customers
with value-added services, such as benchmarking, predictive
maintenance, inspection scheduling, data analytics and
regulatory compliance. We believe our ability to provide these
customized products and services, along with the high cost of
switching to an alternative vendor, provide us with significant
competitive advantages.
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products, Software and Technology
Packages. We have developed systems that have
become the cornerstone of several unique NDT applications. These
proprietary products allow us to efficiently and effectively
provide unique solutions to our customers complex
applications, resulting in a significant competitive advantage.
In addition to the proprietary products and systems that we sell
to customers on a stand-alone basis, we also develop a range of
proprietary sensors, instruments, systems and software used
exclusively by our Services segment.
|
|
|
|
Deep Domain Knowledge and Extensive Industry
Experience. We are an industry leader in developing
advanced asset protection solutions, including acoustic emission
(AE) testing for non-intrusive on-line monitoring of storage
tanks and pressure vessels, bridges and transformers, portable
corrosion mapping, ultrasonic testing (UT) systems, on-line
plant asset integrity management with sensor fusion, enterprise
software solutions for plant-wide and fleet-wide inspection data
archiving and management, advanced and thick composites
inspection and ultrasonic phased array inspection of thick wall
boilers. In addition, many of the members of our team have been
instrumental in developing the testing standards followed by
international standards-setting bodies, such as the American
Society of Non-Destructive Testing and comparable associations
in other countries.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating with Our Customers. Our asset
protection solutions have historically been designed in response
to our customers unique performance specifications and are
supported by our proprietary technologies. Our sales and
engineering teams work closely with our customers research
and design staff during the design phase of our products in
order to incorporate our products into specified infrastructure
projects. As a result, we believe that our close, collaborative
relationships with our customers provide us a significant
competitive advantage.
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team. Our management team has
a track record of leadership in NDT, averaging over
20 years experience in the industry. These individuals also
have extensive experience in growing businesses organically and
in acquiring and integrating companies, which we believe is
important to facilitate future growth in the fragmented asset
protection industry.
|
5
Our growth
strategy
Our growth strategy emphasizes the following key elements:
|
|
|
Continue to Develop Technology-Enabled Asset Protection
Services, Products and Systems. We intend to maintain
and enhance our technological leadership by continuing to invest
in the internal development of new services, products and
systems. Our highly trained team of Ph.D.s, engineers and
highly-skilled, certified technicians have been instrumental in
developing numerous significant NDT standards, and we believe
their knowledge base will enable us to innovate a wide range of
new asset protection solutions more rapidly than our competition.
|
|
|
|
Increase Revenues from Our Existing Customers. Many
of our customers are multinational corporations with asset
protection requirements from multiple divisions at multiple
locations across the globe. Currently, we capture a relatively
small portion of their overall expenditures on these solutions.
We believe our superior services, products and systems, combined
with the trend of outsourcing asset protection solutions to a
small number of trusted service providers, positions us to
significantly expand both the number of divisions and locations
that we serve as well as the types of solutions we provide.
|
|
|
|
Add New Customers in Existing Target Markets. Our
current customer base represents a small fraction of the total
number of companies in our target markets. Our scale, scope of
products and services and expertise in creating
technology-enabled solutions have allowed us to build a
reputation for high quality and has increased customer awareness
about us and our asset protection solutions. We intend to
continue to leverage our competitive strengths to win new
business as customers in our existing target markets continue to
seek a single source and trusted provider of advanced asset
protection solutions.
|
|
|
|
Expand Our Customer Base into New End Markets. We
believe we have significant opportunities to rapidly expand our
customer base in relatively new end markets, including the
maritime shipping, wind turbine and other alternative energy and
natural gas transportation industries and the market for public
infrastructure, such as highways and bridges. The expansion of
our addressable markets is being driven by the increased
recognition and adoption of asset protection services, products
and systems and new NDT technologies enabling further
applications to address additional end-market needs and aging
infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Continue to Capitalize on Acquisitions. We intend to
continue employing a disciplined acquisition strategy to
broaden, complement and enhance our product and service
offerings, add new customers and certified personnel, expand our
sales channels, supplement our internal development efforts and
accelerate our expected growth. We believe the market for asset
protection solutions is highly fragmented with a large number of
potential acquisition opportunities. We have a proven ability to
integrate complementary businesses, as demonstrated by the
success of our past acquisitions. We believe we have improved
the operational performance and profitability of our acquired
businesses by successfully integrating and selling our suite of
comprehensive asset protection solutions to the customers of
these acquired businesses.
|
6
Summary
risks
Before you invest in our stock, you should carefully consider
all the information in this prospectus, including matters set
forth under the heading Risk Factors. We believe
that the following are some of the major risks and uncertainties
that may affect us:
|
|
|
our business currently depends on certain significant customers
and any reduction in business with these customers would harm
our future operating results;
|
|
|
|
an accident or incident involving our asset protection solutions
could expose us to claims, harm our reputation and adversely
affect our ability to compete for business;
|
|
|
|
an ability to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of
trained engineers, scientists and other highly skilled workers
as well as members of senior management;
|
|
|
|
strengths and actions of our competitors;
|
|
|
our current dependence on customers in the oil and gas industry;
|
|
|
|
the timing, size and integration success of potential future
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
catastrophic events, including natural disasters that could
disrupt our business or the business of our customers, which
could significantly harm our operations, financial results and
cash flow; and
|
|
|
|
the current economic downturn.
|
Corporate
information
We were founded by former AT&T Bell Laboratories
researchers in 1978 and operated as Physical Acoustics
Corporation until December 29, 1994, when we reorganized
and began operating as Mistras Holdings Corp., a Delaware
corporation. In February 2007, we changed our name to Mistras
Group, Inc. Since inception, we have increased our asset
protection services, products and systems offerings through a
combination of organic growth and the successful integration of
acquired companies.
Our principal executive offices are located at 195 Clarksville
Road, Princeton Junction, NJ 08550, and our telephone number at
that address is
(609) 716-4000.
Our website is located at www.mistrasgroup.com.
Information on, or accessible through, our website is not a
part of, and is not incorporated into, this prospectus.
Our trademarks include
Mistrastm,
Physical Acoustics
Corporation®,
PCMS®,
Controlled Vibrations
Inc.tm,
NOESIStm,
AEwintm,
AEwinPosttm,
UTwintm,
UTIAtm,
LSTtm,
Vibra-Metricstm,
TANKPACtm,
MONPACtm,
VPACtm,
POWERPACtm
and Sensor
Highwaytm.
Other trademarks or service marks appearing in this prospectus
are the property of their respective holders.
7
The
offering
|
|
|
Us |
|
shares
of common stock |
|
Selling stockholders |
|
shares
of common stock |
|
Total |
|
shares
of common stock |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
|
|
Us |
|
shares
of common stock |
|
Selling stockholders |
|
shares
of common stock |
|
Total |
|
shares
of common stock |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering |
|
shares
of common stock |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will
be approximately $ . We plan to use
these net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including
working capital and possible acquisitions. We will not receive
any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling
stockholders. See Use of Proceeds. |
|
Dividend policy |
|
We currently have no plans to pay dividends on our common stock. |
|
Risk factors |
|
You should carefully read and consider the information set forth
under Risk Factors, together with all of the other
information set forth in this prospectus, before deciding to
invest in shares of our common stock. |
|
|
|
Listing |
|
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol MG. |
Except as otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires,
throughout this prospectus the number of shares of common stock
shown to be outstanding after this offering and other
share-related information is based on the number of shares
outstanding as
of ,
and:
|
|
|
reflects
a -for-
stock split, effected
on ;
|
|
|
reflects the conversion of all outstanding shares of our
preferred stock into an aggregate
of shares
of common stock upon the completion of this offering;
|
|
|
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option;
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
outstanding as
of ,
at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per share; and
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock reserved for future awards under the 2009
Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
8
The following table sets forth the number of shares of common
stock to be sold by the directors and executive officers who are
selling such shares in this offering. For more information on
persons selling shares of common stock in this offering, please
see Principal and Selling Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares being sold
|
|
|
|
in this offering
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
Mark F. Carlos
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Products and Systems
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip T. Cole
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, International
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Lange
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Services, and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our executive officers, directors and each person, or group of
affiliated persons, known by us to beneficially own more than
five percent of our voting securities, taken together as a
group, will own approximately % of
our outstanding common stock after this offering. For
information on the number of shares of common stock to be
received by these individuals or groups upon the conversion of
our preferred stock at the completion of this offering, please
see Certain Relationships and Related
TransactionsConversion of All Preferred Stock upon
Completion of this Offering.
9
Summary
historical consolidated financial data
The following table sets forth our summary historical
consolidated financial information and other data. The
historical statement of operations and cash flow data for fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007 and the historical balance sheet data as of
May 31, 2009 are derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial statements
and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
The information contained in this table should also be read in
conjunction with Use of Proceeds,
Capitalization, Selected Historical
Consolidated Financial Information,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes thereto, all
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(in thousands, except share and
per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
209,133
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
131,167
|
|
|
|
90,590
|
|
|
|
75,702
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
8,700
|
|
|
|
6,847
|
|
|
|
4,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
69,266
|
|
|
|
54,831
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
47,150
|
|
|
|
32,943
|
|
|
|
26,408
|
|
Research and engineering expenses
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
14,825
|
|
|
|
16,358
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
Other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
10,211
|
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,466
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(27,114
|
)
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per common share(1)
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
4.81
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
12,661
|
|
|
$
|
12,851
|
|
|
$
|
14,006
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(15,888
|
)
|
|
|
(19,446
|
)
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
(8,122
|
)
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
27,274
|
|
|
|
27,773
|
|
|
|
18,769
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
31,122
|
|
|
|
28,091
|
|
|
|
19,229
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As adjusted(3)
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
151,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
66,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, including current portion
|
|
|
14,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
90,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(47,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per
common share gives effect to the assumed conversion of our
preferred stock for all periods presented. It is computed by
dividing net income by the pro forma number of weighted average
shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted (loss)
earnings per share, but after assuming conversion of our
preferred stock and exercise of any dilutive stock options. The
calculation for this, as well as our basic and diluted (loss)
earnings per common share, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(in thousands, except share and
per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,466
|
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
42,755
|
|
|
|
26,520
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
Common stock equivalents of conversion of preferred shares
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
503,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,562,661
|
|
|
|
1,546,426
|
|
|
|
1,511,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
|
$
|
4.81
|
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(in thousands, except share and
per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
* Excludes certain stock options and preferred shares which
would be anti-dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are
performance measures used by management that are not calculated
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). EBITDA is defined in this prospectus as net income plus:
interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation
and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined in this prospectus
as net income plus: interest expense, provision for income
taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation
expense and certain one-time and generally non-recurring items
(which items are described in the next paragraph and the
reconciliation table below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our management uses EBITDA and
adjusted EBITDA as measures of operating performance to assist
in comparing performance from period to period on a consistent
basis, as measures for planning and forecasting overall
expectations and for evaluating actual results against such
expectations and as performance evaluation metrics off which to
base executive and employee incentive compensation programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe investors and other
external users of our financial statements benefit from the
presentation of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA in evaluating our
operating performance because they provide an additional tool to
compare our operating performance on a consistent basis by
removing the impact of certain items that management believes do
not directly reflect our core operations. For instance, EBITDA
and adjusted EBITDA generally exclude interest expense, taxes
and depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock compensation,
which can vary substantially from company to company depending
upon accounting methods and the book value and age of assets,
capital structure, capital investment cycles and the method by
which assets were acquired. Similarly, our adjusted EBITDA (and
not our EBITDA) for fiscal 2009 excludes the impact of a
one-time payment we made to settle a lawsuit and the writeoff of
$1.6 million in accounts receivable we expected to collect
from a customer that declared bankruptcy in fiscal 2009. These
items were excluded because management believes these events
were highly unique to us in fiscal 2009. Our adjusted EBITDA for
fiscal 2009 and 2008 also excludes the impact of stock
compensation expenses, which is a non-cash expense that
management does not use in assessing operational performance
because it does not affect our ability to generate free cash
flow or invest in our business. In addition, some of the
financial covenants in our credit agreement require us to
maintain financial ratios calculated based upon a measure with
adjustments to EBITDA of a type substantially similar to the
adjustments incorporated into adjusted EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA
are widely used by investors and securities analysts in their
evaluations of companies, you should not consider them either in
isolation or as a substitute for analyzing our results as
reported under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are generally
limited as analytical tools because they
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
exclude, among other things, the
statement of operations impact of depreciation and amortization,
interest expense and the provision for income taxes and
therefore do not necessarily represent an accurate measure of
profitability, particularly in situations where a company is
highly leveraged or has a disadvantageous tax structure. As a
result, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are of limited value in
evaluating our operating performance because (i) we use a
significant amount of capital assets and depreciation and
amortization expense is a necessary element of our costs and
ability to generate revenues; (ii) we have a significant
amount of debt and interest expense is a necessary element of
our costs and ability to generate revenues; and (iii) we
generally incur significant U.S. federal, state and foreign
income taxes each year and the provision for income taxes is a
necessary element of our costs. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA also
do not reflect historical cash expenditures or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual
commitments, changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital needs and all non-cash income or expense items that are
reflected in our statements of cash flows. Our adjusted EBITDA
for fiscal 2009 excludes the impact of an actual cash
expenditure for the settlement of a lawsuit and an amount we
were unable to collect in fiscal 2009 due to the bankruptcy of a
customer, and our adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2009 and 2008
excludes the impact of stock compensation expenses that reduced
our net income under GAAP. Furthermore, because EBITDA and
adjusted EBITDA are not defined under GAAP, our definitions of
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA may differ from, and therefore may
not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other
companies, thereby limiting their usefulness as comparative
measures. Because of these limitations, neither EBITDA nor
adjusted EBITDA should be considered as the primary measure of
our operating performance or as a measure of discretionary cash
available to us to invest in the growth of our business. We
strongly urge you to review the GAAP financial measures included
in this prospectus, our consolidated financial statements,
including the notes thereto, and the other financial information
contained in this prospectus, and not to rely on any single
financial measure to evaluate our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a
reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,466
|
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12,636
|
|
|
|
11,423
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
27,274
|
|
|
$
|
27,773
|
|
|
$
|
18,769
|
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large customer bankruptcy
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
31,122
|
|
|
$
|
28,091
|
|
|
$
|
19,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The As Adjusted column is unaudited
and gives effect to:
|
|
|
|
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock
into shares of our common stock upon the completion of this
offering and
a -for-
stock split of our common stock; and
|
|
|
the sale by us
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at the initial public
offering price of $ per share (the
midpoint of the range shown on the cover page of this
prospectus), after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
13
Risk
factors
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully read and consider the risks described
below, together with the other information contained in this
prospectus, including our financial statements and the notes
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, before
making an investment decision. If any of these risks actually
occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations
and future growth prospects may be adversely affected. As a
result, the trading price of our common stock would likely
decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks related to
our business
Our operating
results could be adversely affected by a reduction in business
with our significant customers.
We derive a significant amount of revenues from a few customers.
For instance, various divisions or business units of one of our
customers were responsible for 17.1%, 16.8% and 16.5% of our
revenues for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Taken as
a group, our top 10 customers were responsible for 35.8%, 35.2%
and 38.6% of our revenues for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Generally, our customers do not have an obligation
to make purchases from us and may stop ordering our products and
services at any time without financial penalty. The loss of any
of our significant customers, any substantial decline in sales
to these customers or any significant change in the timing or
volume of purchases by our customers could result in lower
revenues and could harm our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
An accident or
incident involving our asset protection solutions could expose
us to claims, harm our reputation and adversely affect our
ability to compete for business and, as a result, harm our
operating performance.
We are exposed to liabilities arising out of the solutions we
provide. For instance, we furnish the results of our testing and
inspections for use by our customers in their assessment of
their assets, facilities, plants and other structures. Such
results may be incorrect or incomplete, whether as a result of
poorly designed inspections, malfunctioning testing equipment or
our employees failure to adequately test or properly
record data. For example, one of our clients claimed one of our
x-ray inspection crews had improperly recorded inspection data
about a portion of its infrastructure, requiring us to provide a
new team to inspect that infrastructure over a period of three
months at our expense. Further, if an accident or incident
involving a structure we are testing or have tested occurs and
causes personal injuries to our personnel or third parties, or
property damage, such as the collapse of a bridge or an
explosion in a plant or facility, and particularly if these
injuries or damages could have been prevented by our customers
had we provided them with correct or complete results, we may
face significant claims by injured persons or related parties
and claims relating to any property damage or loss. Even if our
results are correct and complete, we may face claims for such
injuries or damage simply because we tested the structure or
facility in question. For instance, we recently inspected a
subset of welds made in a liquid storage tank farm under
construction for a customer in order to determine if the welds
were being made in accordance with applicable regulations. The
welds we tested were specified by the contractor that made them.
Weeks after our inspections were completed a weld in a tank
cracked, resulting in the spill of hazardous material. The
14
customer made a claim on its insurer, which in turn made claims
against us, among others, for the
clean-up
costs, which in this case are not significant. Though we believe
we did not test the weld that failed, if we are unable to prove
this fact we may decide to or be compelled by a court to pay
some of the
clean-up
costs. Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover the
damages from any such claims, forcing us to bear these uninsured
damages directly, which could harm our operating results and may
result in additional expenses and possible loss of revenues. An
accident or incident for which we are found partially or fully
responsible, even if fully insured, may also result in negative
publicity, which would harm our reputation among our customers
and the public, cause us to lose existing and future contracts
or make it more difficult for us to compete effectively, thereby
significantly harming our operating performance. Such an
accident or incident might also make it more expensive or
impossible for us to insure against similar events in the
future. Even unsuccessful claims relating to accidents could
result in substantial costs, including litigation expenses, and
diversion of our management resources.
If we are
unable to attract and retain a sufficient number of trained
engineers, scientists and other highly-skilled technicians at
competitive wages, our operational performance may be harmed and
our costs may increase.
We believe that our success depends, in part, upon our ability
to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of trained
engineers, scientists and other highly-skilled, certified
technicians at competitive wages. The demand for such employees
is currently high, and we project that it may increase
substantially in the future. Accordingly, we have experienced
increases in our labor costs, particularly in our Services
segment, but also, to a lesser extent, in our International
segment. Many of the companies with which we compete for
experienced personnel have comparatively greater name
recognition and resources. In addition, in making employment
decisions, job candidates often consider the value of the stock
options they are to receive in connection with their employment.
Volatility in the future market price of our stock may,
therefore, adversely affect our ability to attract or retain key
employees. Furthermore, the requirement to expense stock options
may discourage us from granting the size or type of stock option
awards that job candidates require to join our company. The
markets for our products and services also require us to field
personnel trained and certified in accordance with standards set
by domestic or international standard-setting bodies, such as
the American Society of Non-Destructive Testing. Because of the
limited supply of these certified technicians, we expend
substantial resources maintaining in-house training and
certification programs. If we fail to attract sufficient new
personnel or fail to motivate and retain our current personnel,
our ability to perform under existing contracts and orders or to
pursue new business may be harmed, causing us to lose customers
and revenues, and the costs of performing such contracts and
orders may increase, which would likely reduce our margins.
If we lose
members of our senior management team upon whom we are
dependent, we may not be able to manage our operations and
achieve our strategic objectives.
Our future success depends to a considerable degree upon the
availability, contributions, vision, skills, experience and
effort of our senior management team. We do not maintain
key person insurance on any of our employees other
than Dr. Sotirios Vahaviolos, our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer. We currently have no employment
agreements with members of our senior management team. Although
we anticipate entering into employment agreements with certain
executive officers in connection with this offering, these
agreements will likely not guarantee the services of the
individual for a specified period of time. All of the agreements
15
with members of our senior management team are expected to
provide that their employment is at-will and may be terminated
by either us or the employee at any time and without notice.
Although we do not have any reason to believe that we may lose
the services of any of these persons in the foreseeable future,
the loss of the services of any of these persons might impede
our operations or the achievement of our strategic and financial
objectives. The loss or interruption of the service of members
of our senior management team could harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations and could significantly
reduce our ability to manage our operations and implement our
strategy.
We operate in
highly competitive markets and if we are unable to compete
successfully, we could lose market share and
revenues.
We face strong competition from NDT and a variety of niche asset
protection providers, both larger and smaller than we are. Many
of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do
and could focus their substantial financial resources to develop
a competing business model or develop products or services that
are more attractive to potential customers than what we offer.
Some of our competitors are business units of companies
substantially larger than us and have the ability to combine
asset protection solutions into an integrated offering to
customers who already purchase other types of products or
services from them. Our competitors may offer asset protection
solutions at prices below or without cost in order to improve
their competitive positions. Any of these competitive factors
could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain
customers, cause us to lower our prices in order to compete and
reduce our market share and revenues, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
Due to our
dependency on customers in the oil and gas industry, we are
susceptible to prolonged negative trends relating to this
industry that could adversely affect our operating
results.
Our customers in the oil and gas industry (including the
petrochemical market) have accounted for a substantial portion
of our historical revenues. Specifically, they accounted for
approximately 58%, 50% and 52% of our revenues for fiscal 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. We continue to diversify our
customer base into industries other than the oil and gas
industry, but we may not be successful in doing so. If the oil
and gas industry were to suffer a prolonged or significant
downturn, our operating performance may be significantly harmed.
Our growth
strategy includes acquisitions. We may not be able to identify
suitable acquisition candidates or integrate acquired businesses
successfully, which may inhibit our rate of growth, and any
acquisitions that we do complete may expose us to a number of
unanticipated operational and financial risks.
Our historical growth has depended, and our future growth is
likely to continue to depend, to a certain extent, on our
ability to make acquisitions and successfully integrate acquired
businesses. We intend to continue to seek additional acquisition
opportunities, both to expand into new markets and to enhance
our position in existing markets globally. We may not be able to
successfully identify suitable candidates, negotiate appropriate
acquisition terms, obtain necessary financing on acceptable
terms, complete proposed acquisitions, successfully integrate
acquired businesses into our current operations or expand into
new markets. Once integrated,
16
acquired operations may not achieve levels of revenues,
profitability or productivity comparable with those achieved by
our current operations, or otherwise perform as expected.
Some of the risks associated with our acquisition strategy
include:
|
|
|
unexpected loss of key personnel and customers of the acquired
company;
|
|
|
making the acquired companys financial and accounting
standards consistent with our standards;
|
|
|
assumption of liability for risks and exposures (including
environmental-related costs), some of which we may not discover
during our due diligence; and
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management.
|
Our ability to undertake acquisitions is limited by covenants in
our credit agreement and our financial resources, including
available cash and borrowing capacity. Future acquisitions could
result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities,
the incurrence of substantial additional indebtedness and other
expenses, impairment expenses related to goodwill and impairment
or amortization expenses related to other intangible assets, any
of which could harm our financial condition and results of
operations. Although management intends to evaluate the risks
inherent in any particular transaction, there are no assurances
that we will properly ascertain all such risks. Difficulties
encountered with acquisitions may harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Catastrophic
events, such as natural disasters, epidemics, war and acts of
terrorism, could disrupt our business or the business of our
customers, which could significantly harm our operations,
financial results and cash flow.
Our operations and those of our customers are susceptible to the
occurrence of catastrophic events outside our control, ranging
from severe weather conditions to acts of war and terrorism. Any
such events could cause a serious business disruption that
reduces our customers ability to or interest in purchasing
our asset protection solutions, and have in the past resulted in
order cancellations and delays because customer equipment,
facilities or operations have been damaged, or are not
operational or available. For instance, order cancellations and
delays due to Hurricane Ike adversely affected our revenues in
fiscal 2009. Additionally, such events have resulted and may in
the future result in substantial delays in the provision of
solutions to our customers and the loss of valuable equipment.
Any cancellations, delays or losses due to a catastrophic event
may significantly reduce our revenues and harm our operating
performance.
We face risks
related to the current economic downturn.
The global economy is currently in a pronounced economic
downturn. Global financial markets are continuing to experience
disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit
availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in
economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, volatility in
interest and currency exchange rates and overall uncertainty
about economic stability. There may be further deterioration and
volatility in the global economy, the global financial markets
and consumer confidence. We are unable to predict the likely
duration and severity of the current global economic downturn or
disruptions in the financial markets. The downturn has already
resulted in some of our customers canceling and delaying orders
for our solutions, as well as some customers delaying payment
for items billed, which reduced our
17
gross margins and operating income in fiscal 2009. Some of our
customers have also recently requested price concessions. In
addition, current economic conditions have resulted in the
reduced creditworthiness, inability to obtain sufficient
financing, and bankruptcies of certain customers, increasing our
exposure to bad debt. For instance, in fiscal 2009, one of our
larger customers filed for bankruptcy due to a downturn in the
chemical industry combined with its own highly leveraged
position. If economic conditions deteriorate further, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
significantly harmed. Although we believe we have adequate
liquidity and capital resources to fund our operations as
planned, in light of current market conditions, our inability to
access the capital markets on favorable terms, or at all, may
harm our financial performance. The inability to obtain adequate
financing from debt or capital sources could force us to
self-fund strategic initiatives or even forgo certain
opportunities, which in turn could potentially harm our
performance.
We expect to
continue expanding and investing in our sales and marketing,
operations, engineering, research and development capabilities
and financial and reporting systems and, as a result, may
encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could
disrupt our operations.
We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our
employees and the scope of our operations. To effectively manage
our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and
improve our managerial, operational, financial and reporting
systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train
additional qualified personnel. We expect that all of these
measures will require significant expenditures and will demand
the attention of management. We may not be able to effectively
manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and adequately
train additional qualified personnel. Failure to manage our
growth effectively could lead us to over or under-invest in
technology and operations, result in weaknesses in our
infrastructure, systems or controls, give rise to operational
mistakes, loss of business opportunities, the loss of employees
and reduced productivity among remaining employees. Our expected
growth could require significant capital expenditures and may
divert financial resources from other projects, such as the
development of new solutions. If our management is unable to
effectively manage our expected growth, our expenses may
increase more than expected, our revenues could decline or may
grow more slowly than expected and we may be unable to implement
our business strategy.
The success of
our businesses depends, in part, on our ability to develop new
asset protection solutions and increase the functionality of our
current offerings.
The market for asset protection solutions is impacted by
technological change, uncertain product lifecycles, shifts in
customer demands and evolving industry standards and
regulations. We may not be able to successfully develop and
market new asset protection solutions that comply with present
or emerging industry regulations and technology standards. Also,
new regulations or technology standards could increase our cost
of doing business.
From time to time, our customers have requested greater
functionality in our solutions. As part of our strategy to
enhance our asset protection solutions and grow our business, we
plan to continue making substantial investments in the research
and development of new technologies. We believe our future
success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to
design new, competitive asset protection solutions, enhance our
current solutions and provide new, value-added services.
Developing new solutions will require continued investment, and
we may experience unforeseen technological or operational
challenges. In addition, our asset protection
18
software is complex and can be expensive to develop, and new
software and software enhancements can require long development
and testing periods. If we are unable to develop new asset
protection solutions or enhancements to our current offerings,
or if the market does not accept such solutions, we will likely
lose opportunities to realize revenues and customers and our
business and results of operations will be adversely affected.
If our
software produces inaccurate information or is incompatible with
the systems used by our customers and makes us unable to
successfully provide our solutions, it could lead to a loss of
revenues and customers.
Our software is complex and, accordingly, may contain undetected
errors or failures. Software defects or inaccurate data may
cause incorrect recording, reporting or display of information
related to our asset protection solutions. Any such failures,
defects and inaccurate data may prevent us from successfully
providing our asset protection solutions, which would result in
lost revenues. Software defects or inaccurate data may lead to
customer dissatisfaction and our customers may seek to hold us
liable for any damages incurred. As a result, we could lose
customers, our reputation may be harmed and our financial
condition and results of operations would be materially
adversely affected.
We currently serve a commercial, industrial and governmental
customer base that uses a wide variety of constantly changing
hardware, software solutions and operating systems. Our asset
protection solutions need to interface with these non-standard
systems in order to gather and assess data. Our business depends
on the following factors, among others:
|
|
|
our ability to integrate our technology with new and existing
hardware and software systems;
|
|
|
our ability to anticipate and support new standards, especially
Internet-based standards; and
|
|
|
our ability to integrate additional software modules under
development with our existing technology and operational
processes.
|
If we are unable to adequately address any of these factors, our
results of operations and prospects for growth and profitability
would be harmed.
If we fail to
successfully educate current and potential customers regarding
the benefits of our asset protection solutions or the market for
these solutions otherwise fails to develop, our ability to grow
our business could be adversely impacted.
Our future success depends on continued and growing commercial
acceptance of our asset protection solutions and our ability to
obtain additional contracts. We anticipate that revenues related
to our asset protection solutions will constitute a substantial
portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. If we are
unable to educate our potential customers about the advantages
our solutions have over competing products and services, or our
current customers stop purchasing our asset protection
solutions, our operating results could be significantly harmed.
In addition, because the asset protection solutions industry is
rapidly evolving, we could lose insight into trends that may be
emerging, which would further harm our competitive position by
making it difficult to predict and respond to customer needs. If
the market for our asset protection solutions does not continue
to develop, our ability to grow our business would be limited
and we might not be able to maintain profitability.
19
Our results of
operations could be harmed if our operating expenses do not
correspond with the timing of our revenues.
Most of our operating expenses, such as employee compensation
and property rental expense, are relatively fixed over the
short-term. Moreover, our spending levels are based in part on
our expectations regarding future revenues. As a result, if
revenues for a particular quarter are below expectations, we
would not be able to proportionately reduce operating expenses
for that quarter without a substantial disruption to our
business. This shortfall in revenues could adversely affect our
operating results for that quarter and could cause the market
price of our common stock to decline substantially.
The seasonal
nature of our business reduces our revenues in our first and
third fiscal quarters.
Our business is seasonal. Our first and third fiscal quarter
revenues are typically lower than our revenues in the second and
fourth fiscal quarters because demand for our asset protection
solutions from the oil and gas as well as the fossil and nuclear
power industries increases during their non-peak production
periods. For instance, U.S. refineries non-peak
periods are generally in our second fiscal quarter, when they
are retooling to produce more heating oil for winter, and in our
fourth fiscal quarter, when they are retooling to produce more
gasoline for summer. As a result of these trends, we generally
have reduced cash flows in our second and fourth fiscal
quarters, which may require us to borrow under our credit
agreement or otherwise, to discontinue planned operations, or to
curtail our operations. We expect that the negative impact of
seasonality on our first and third fiscal quarter revenues and
second and fourth fiscal quarter cash flows will continue.
Growth in
revenues from our Services segment or traditional NDT services
relative to revenues from our Products and Systems and
International segments, may reduce our overall gross profit
margin.
Our gross profit margin on revenues from our Services segment
has historically been lower than our gross profit margin on
revenues from our other segments because our services have
higher labor-related costs. For instance, the gross profit
margin in our Services segment for fiscal 2009 was 28.9%, while
our gross profit margin in our Products and Systems segment and
in our International segment was 49.0% and 43.2%, respectively.
Our overall gross profit margin was 33.1% during the same
period. Moreover, our gross profit margin on traditional NDT
services has historically been lower than our gross profit
margin in our Services segment as a whole. As a result, we
expect our overall gross profit margin will be lower in periods
when revenues from our services, and particularly from
traditional NDT services, has increased as a percentage of total
revenues and will be higher in periods when revenues from our
International or Products and Systems segments has increased as
a percentage of total revenues. Fluctuations in our gross profit
margin may affect our level of profitability in any period,
which may negatively affect the price of our common stock.
We have
identified two significant deficiencies in our internal controls
over financial reporting.
In connection with the audit of our financial results for fiscal
2009, we and our independent registered accounting firm reported
to our audit committee two significant deficiencies concerning
the substantial number of our internal control processes that
are still being formalized or are manual in nature and the
design of certain controls related to the financial statement
closing process. These processes, at times, require significant
effort to execute and, therefore,
20
generally may not provide a sustainable platform for an
effective and efficient financial statement closing process. A
significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that
is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to
merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the
registrants financial reporting. If we are unable to
remedy these significant deficiencies, or if we discover other
significant deficiencies in the future, then we may not be able
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our
financial statements, which could have an adverse effect on our
business or operating results.
Our business
is currently subject to governmental regulation, and may become
subject to modified or new government regulation that may
negatively impact our ability to market our asset protection
solutions.
We incur substantial costs in complying with various government
regulations and licensing requirements. For example, the
transportation and overnight storage of radioactive materials
used in providing certain of our asset protection solutions is
subject to regulation under federal and state laws and licensing
requirements. Our Services segment is currently licensed to
handle radioactive materials by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) and 18 state regulatory agencies. If we
allegedly fail to comply with these regulations, we may be
investigated and incur significant legal expenses associated
with such investigations, and if we are found to have violated
these regulations, we may be fined or lose one or more of our
licenses to perform further projects. While we are investigated,
we may be required to suspend work on the projects associated
with our alleged noncompliance, resulting in loss of profits or
customers, and damage to our reputation. For instance, in
January, 2007, we were investigated due to an incident involving
radiation exposure resulting from the misconduct of one of our
employees. As a result, our customer required us to briefly
suspend work on the associated project. We were found to have
violated regulations governing the handling of radioactive
materials, and as a result we incurred significant legal
expenses. A more serious violation could result in lost profits
and damage to our reputation. Many of our customers have strict
requirements concerning safety or loss time occurrences. In the
future, federal, state, provincial or local governmental
agencies may seek to change current regulations or impose
additional regulations on our business. Any modified or new
government regulation applicable to our current or future asset
protection solutions may negatively impact the marketing and
provision of those solutions and increase our costs and the
price of our solutions.
A significant
stockholder controls the direction of our business. The
concentrated ownership of our common stock may prevent you and
other stockholders from influencing significant corporate
decisions.
Dr. Sotirios J. Vahaviolos, our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, will own
approximately % of our outstanding
common stock after this offering. As a result,
Dr. Vahaviolos will have the ability to exert substantial
influence over all matters requiring approval by our
stockholders, including the election and removal of directors,
amendments to our certificate of incorporation, and any proposed
merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our
assets and other corporate transactions. This concentration of
ownership could be disadvantageous to other stockholders with
differing interests from Dr. Vahaviolos.
21
An inability
to protect our intellectual property could negatively affect our
business and results of operations.
Our ability to compete effectively depends in part upon the
maintenance and protection of the intellectual property related
to our asset protection solutions. Patent protection is
unavailable for certain aspects of the technology and
operational processes important to our business. Any patent held
by us or to be issued to us, or any of our pending patent
applications, could be unenforceable, challenged, invalidated or
circumvented. Some of our trademarks that are not in use may
become available to others. To date, we have relied principally
on copyright, trademark and trade secrecy laws, as well as
confidentiality agreements and licensing arrangements, to
establish and protect our intellectual property. However, we
have not obtained confidentiality agreements from all of our
customers and vendors, and although we have entered into
confidentiality agreements with all of our employees in our
Products and Systems segment and certain of our other employees
involved in the development of our intellectual property, we
cannot be certain that these agreements will be honored or
enforceable. Some of our confidentiality agreements are not in
writing, and some customers are subject to laws and regulations
that require them to disclose information that we would
otherwise seek to keep confidential. Although we do not transfer
ownership of some of our more advanced asset protection products
and systems and, instead, sell to our customers services using
these products and systems, in part, in an effort to protect the
intellectual property upon which they are based, this strategy
may not be successful and our customers or third parties may
reverse engineer or otherwise derive this intellectual property
and use it without our authorization. Policing unauthorized use
of our intellectual property is difficult and expensive. The
steps that we have taken or may take might not prevent
misappropriation of the intellectual property on which we rely.
In addition, effective protection may be unavailable or limited
in jurisdictions outside the United States, as the intellectual
property laws of foreign countries sometimes offer less
protection or have onerous filing requirements. From time to
time, third parties may infringe our intellectual property
rights. Litigation may be necessary to enforce or protect our
rights or to determine the validity and scope of the rights of
others. Any litigation could be unsuccessful, cause us to incur
substantial costs, divert resources away from our daily
operations and result in the impairment of our intellectual
property. Failure to adequately enforce our rights could cause
us to lose valuable rights in our intellectual property and may
negatively affect our business.
We may be
subject to damaging and disruptive intellectual property
litigation related to allegations that our asset protection
solutions infringe on the intellectual property of others, which
could prevent us from offering those solutions.
Third-party patent applications and patents may be applicable to
our asset protection solutions. As a result, third parties may
in the future make infringement and other allegations that could
subject us to intellectual property litigation relating to our
solutions. Such litigation would be time consuming and
expensive, divert attention and resources away from our daily
operations, impede or prevent delivery of our solutions and
require us to pay significant royalties, licensing fees and
damages. In addition, parties making infringement and other
claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to provide our
solutions and could cause us to pay substantial damages. In the
event of a successful claim of infringement, we may need to seek
one or more licenses from third parties in order to continue to
offer the related solution, which may not be available at a
reasonable cost, or at all. For example, in 2004 a competitor
brought a patent infringement lawsuit against us based on our
use of certain sensor technology in our inspection of a bridge.
We incurred approximately $0.6
22
million in expenses to defend against and settle this lawsuit,
and to enter into a license to use this technology. Under this
license agreement, we have paid the competitor immaterial
amounts for fees and royalties for use of the technology, which
we no longer use in our business.
We may require
additional capital to support business growth, which might not
be available.
We intend to continue making investments to support our business
growth and may require additional funds to respond to business
challenges or opportunities, including the need to develop new,
or enhance our current, asset protection solutions, enhance our
operating infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses and
technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or
debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise
additional funds through further issuances of equity or
convertible debt securities, our current stockholders, including
investors in this offering, could suffer significant dilution,
and any new equity securities we issue could have rights,
preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our
common stock. Any debt financing secured by us in the future
could involve restrictive covenants relating to our
capital-raising activities and other financial and operational
matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain
additional capital and to pursue business opportunities,
including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be
able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if
at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or
financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our
ability to continue to support our business growth and to
respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
Our credit
agreement contains financial and operating restrictions that may
limit our access to credit. If we fail to comply with financial
or other covenants in our credit agreement, we may be required
to repay indebtedness to our existing lenders, which may harm
our liquidity.
Provisions in our credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A.,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., TD Bank, N.A. and Capital One, N.A.
impose restrictions on our ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
make investments;
|
|
incur more debt;
|
|
merge or consolidate;
|
|
make dispositions of property;
|
|
pay dividends and make distributions;
|
|
enter into a new line of business;
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
enter into burdensome agreements.
|
Our credit agreement also contains financial covenants that
require us to maintain compliance with specified financial
ratios. We may not be able to comply with these covenants in the
future. Our failure to comply with these covenants may result in
the declaration of an event of default, which could prevent us
from borrowing under our credit agreement. In addition to
preventing additional borrowings under our credit agreement, an
event of default, if not cured or waived, may result in the
acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness outstanding under
the agreement, which would require us to pay all amounts
outstanding and, in addition, our lenders may require us to cash
collateralize letters of credit issued thereunder. If an event
of default occurs, we may not be able to cure it within any
applicable cure period, if at all. If the maturity of our
indebtedness is accelerated, we then may not have sufficient
funds available for
23
repayment or the ability to borrow or obtain sufficient funds to
replace the accelerated indebtedness on terms acceptable to us,
or at all.
We may become
subject to commercial disputes or product liability claims, that
could harm our business by distracting our management from the
operation of our business, by increasing our expenses and, if we
do not prevail, by subjecting us to potential monetary damages
and other remedies.
We face potential liability for, among other things, contract,
negligence and product liability claims related to our provision
of asset protection solutions. For instance, our customers may
assert that we have failed to perform under our agreements with
them, or our customers or third parties may claim damages
arising out of misuse of our products, the malfunctioning of our
products due to design or manufacturing flaws, or the use of our
products with components or systems not manufactured or sold by
us. We currently do not carry product liability insurance and we
may not have sufficient resources to satisfy any liability
resulting from product liability or other claims. Any of these
claims or disputes could result in monetary damages and
equitable or other remedies that could harm our financial
position or operations. Even if we prevail in or settle these
claims or disputes, they may distract our management from
operating our business and the cost of defending or settling
them could harm our operating results, financial position and
cash flows.
We rely on a
limited number of suppliers to provide us radioisotopes and a
material interruption in supply could prevent or limit our
ability to fill orders for our products.
We depend upon a limited number of third-party suppliers for the
radioisotopes we use to provide certain advanced asset
protection solutions. Our principal suppliers are Industrial
Nuclear Company, QSA Global Inc. and Source
Production & Equipment Co., Inc. We also utilize other
commercial isotope manufacturers located in the United States
and overseas. To date, we have been able to obtain the required
radioisotopes for our asset protection solutions without any
significant delays or interruptions. If we lose any of these
suppliers, we may be required to find and enter into supply
arrangements with one or more replacement suppliers. Obtaining
alternative sources of supply could involve significant delays
and other costs and these supply sources may not be available to
us on reasonable terms or at all. Any disruption of supplies
could delay delivery of our products that use radioisotopes,
which could adversely affect our business and financial results
and result in lost or deferred sales.
Our sales
cycles can be lengthy, unpredictable and require significant
employee time and financial resources with no assurances that we
will realize revenues.
Our sales cycles are often long and unpredictable. Many of our
current and potential customers have extended budgeting and
procurement processes. We believe that they also tend to be risk
averse and follow industry trends rather than be the first to
purchase new products or services, which can extend the lead
time for or prevent acceptance of new products or services.
Accordingly, they may take longer to reach a decision to
purchase our solutions. This extended sales process, which often
lasts between three and six months, requires the dedication of
significant time and financial resources, with no certainty of
success or recovery of our related expenses. It is not unusual
for our current and potential customers to go through the entire
sales process and not make any purchases.
24
Any real or
perceived internal or external electronic security breaches in
connection with the use of our asset protection solutions could
harm our reputation, inhibit market acceptance of our solutions
and cause us to lose customers.
We and our customers use our asset protection solutions to
compile and analyze sensitive or confidential customer-related
information. In addition, some of our asset protection solutions
allow us to remotely control equipment at commercial,
institutional and industrial locations. Our asset protection
solutions rely on the secure electronic transmission of
proprietary data over the Internet or other networks.
Well-publicized compromises of Internet security could have the
effect of substantially reducing confidence in the Internet as a
medium of data transmission. The occurrence or perception of
security breaches in connection with our asset protection
solutions or our customers concerns about Internet
security or the security of our solutions, whether warranted or
not, would likely harm our reputation or business, inhibit
market acceptance of our asset protection solutions and cause us
to lose customers, any of which would harm our financial
condition and results of operations.
We may come into contact with sensitive consumer information or
data when we perform installation, maintenance or testing
functions for our customers. Even the perception that we have
improperly handled sensitive, confidential information would
have a negative effect on our business. If, in handling this
information, we fail to comply with privacy or security laws, we
could incur civil liability to government agencies, customers
and individuals whose privacy is compromised. In addition, third
parties may attempt to breach our security or inappropriately
harm our asset protection solutions through computer viruses,
electronic break-ins and other disruptions. If a breach is
successful, confidential information may be improperly obtained,
for which we may be subject to lawsuits and other liabilities.
Our
international operations are subject to risks relating to
non-U.S.
operations.
In fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, we generated approximately 22%,
22% and 25% respectively, of our revenues outside the United
States and we expect to increase our international presence over
time. Our primary operations outside the United States are in
Europe, Asia, Canada and South America. There are numerous risks
inherent in doing business in international markets, including:
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates,
including the relatively weak position of the U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
varying regional and geopolitical business conditions and
demands;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable foreign regulations and licensing
requirements, and U.S. regulation with respect to our
business in other countries;
|
|
|
|
the cost and uncertainty of obtaining data and creating
solutions that are relevant to particular geographic markets;
|
|
|
the need to provide sufficient levels of technical support in
different locations;
|
|
|
the complexity of maintaining effective policies and procedures
in locations around the world;
|
|
|
the risks of divergent business expectations or difficulties in
establishing joint ventures with foreign partners;
|
25
|
|
|
political instability and civil unrest;
|
|
|
restrictions or limitations on outsourcing contracts or services
abroad;
|
|
|
restrictions or limitations on the repatriation of
funds; and
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences.
|
We are expanding our sales and marketing efforts in certain
emerging markets, such as Brazil, Russia, India and China.
Expanding our business into emerging markets may present
additional risks beyond those associated with more developed
international markets. For example, in China and Russia, we may
encounter risks associated with the ongoing transition from
state business ownership to privatization. In any emerging
market, we may face the risks of working in cash-based
economies, dealing with inconsistent government policies and
encountering sudden currency revaluations.
We rely on
certification of our NDT solutions by industry standards-setting
bodies.
We currently have International Organization for Standardization
(ISO)
9001-2000
certifications for each of Mistras Services, Physical Acoustics
Corporation (PAC), Physical Acoustics Limited, and
Envirocoustics S.A. and we have ISO 14001:2004 certification for
Mistras Services and Physical Acoustics South America.
Envirocoustics S.A. also has ISO/IEC 17025 certification for its
testing laboratory and Physical Acoustics South America has a
OHSAS 18001 certification. In addition, we currently have Nadcap
(formerly National Aerospace and Defense Contractors
Accreditation Program) certification for four of our locations
in Auburn, Massachusetts; Springfield, Massachusetts; Heath,
Ohio; and Kent, Washington. We continually review our NDT
solutions for compliance with the requirements of industry
specification standards and the Nadcap special processes quality
requirements. However, if we fail to maintain our ISO or Nadcap
certifications, our business may be harmed because our customers
generally require that we have ISO and Nadcap certification
before they purchase our NDT solutions.
Risks related to
our common stock and this offering
We expect our
quarterly revenues and operating results to fluctuate. If we
fail to meet the expectations of market analysts or investors,
the market price of our common stock could decline
substantially.
Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and
are expected to do so in the future. Accordingly, we believe
that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations
may be misleading. You should not rely upon the results of one
quarter as an indication of future performance. Our revenues and
operating results may fall below the expectations of securities
analysts or investors in any future period. Our failure to meet
these expectations would likely cause the market price of our
common stock to decline, perhaps substantially.
Our quarterly revenues and operating results may vary depending
on a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
revenue volume during the period;
|
|
|
|
demand for and acceptance of our asset protection solutions;
|
26
|
|
|
delays in the implementation and delivery of our asset
protection solutions, which may impact the timing of our
recognition of revenues;
|
|
|
|
delays or reductions in spending for asset protection solutions
by our customers and potential customers;
|
|
|
|
the long lead time associated with securing new customer
contracts;
|
|
|
the termination of existing customer contracts;
|
|
|
development of new relationships and maintenance and enhancement
of existing relationships with customers and strategic partners;
|
|
|
|
changes in pricing for asset protection solutions;
|
|
|
|
effects of recent acquisitions;
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
changes in the price or availability of materials used in our
services; and
|
|
|
increased expenditures for sales and marketing, software
development and other corporate activities.
|
We currently
have no plans to pay dividends on our common
stock.
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock to date, and we do not anticipate declaring or paying any
dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We
currently intend to retain all available funds and any future
earnings for use in the development, operation and growth of our
business. In addition, our credit agreement prohibits us from
paying dividends and future loan agreements may also prohibit
the payment of dividends. Any future determination relating to
our dividend policy will be at the discretion of our board of
directors and will depend on our results of operations,
financial condition, capital requirements, business
opportunities, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed
relevant. To the extent we do not pay dividends on our common
stock, investors must look solely to stock appreciation for a
return on their investment.
There is no
existing market for our common stock, and a trading market that
will provide you with adequate liquidity may not develop. The
price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and you
could lose all or part of your investment.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor
interest will lead to the development of an active and liquid
trading market in our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange or otherwise. If an active and liquid trading market
does not develop, you may have difficulty selling any of our
common stock.
The initial public offering price for the shares will be
determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of
the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price
of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange after the
offering. The market price of our common stock may decline below
the initial public offering price. The market price of our
27
common stock may also be influenced by many factors, some of
which are beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in
our industry;
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts
or acquisitions;
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
|
|
|
general economic and stock market conditions;
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock
after this offering or changes in financial estimates by
analysts;
|
|
|
future sales of our common stock; and
|
|
|
the other factors described in this Risk Factors section.
|
The stock markets have generally experienced extreme price and
volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant
impact on the market price of securities issued by many
companies, including those in our industry. These changes
frequently appear to occur without regard to the operating
performance of these companies. The price of our common stock
could fluctuate for reasons that have little or nothing to do
with our company, and these fluctuations could materially reduce
our stock price.
In the past, some companies that have had volatile market prices
for their securities have been subject to class action or
derivative lawsuits. The filing of a lawsuit against us,
regardless of the outcome, could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations,
as it could result in substantial legal costs and a diversion of
our managements attention and resources.
Shares
eligible for future sale may cause the market price for our
common stock to decline even if our business is doing
well.
Future sales by us or by our existing stockholders of
substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or
the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the
market price of our common stock to decline. This could also
impair our ability to raise additional capital in the future
through the sale of our equity securities. Under our second
amended and restated certificate of incorporation that will be
in effect upon the completion of this offering, we are
authorized to issue up
to shares
of common stock, of
which shares
of common stock will be outstanding following this offering. Of
these shares, the shares of common stock sold in this offering
will be freely transferable without restriction or further
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(Securities Act), by persons other than affiliates,
as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities
Act. In
addition, shares
of common stock will become freely tradeable immediately upon
the termination of the
lock-up
agreements described below and an
additional shares
of common stock will become freely tradeable thereafter,
assuming no exercise of any outstanding warrants or options as
of .
Certain of our stockholders will be able to cause us to register
common stock that they own under the Securities Act pursuant to
registration rights that are described in Certain
Relationships and Related TransactionsRegistration
Rights. We also intend to register all shares of common
stock that we may issue under our 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
28
Our executive officers and directors and certain of our
stockholders have entered into
lock-up
agreements described under the caption Underwriting,
pursuant to which they have agreed, subject to certain
exceptions and extensions, not to sell or transfer, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock for a period of
180 days from the date of this prospectus or to exercise
registration rights during such period with respect to such
shares. However, after the
lock-up
period expires, or if the
lock-up
restrictions are waived by the representatives, such persons
will be able to sell their shares and exercise registration
rights to cause them to be registered. We cannot predict the
size of future issuances of our common stock or the effect, if
any, that future sales and issuances of shares of our common
stock, or the perception of such sales or issuances, would have
on the market price of our common stock.
We have not
determined any specific use for a significant portion of the
proceeds from this offering and we may use the proceeds in ways
with which you may not agree.
Our management will have considerable discretion in the
application of the net proceeds received by us. You will not
have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to
assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. You
must rely on the judgment of our management regarding the
application of the net proceeds of this offering. The net
proceeds may be used for corporate purposes that may not improve
our financial condition and results of operations or increase
our stock price.
Purchasers of
common stock will experience immediate and substantial
dilution.
Based on the initial public offering price of
$ per share (the midpoint of the
price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus),
purchasers of our common stock in this offering will experience
an immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book
value per share of common stock of
$ per share from the offering
price. Investors purchasing common stock in this offering will
contribute approximately % of the
total amount invested by stockholders since inception, but will
only own approximately % of the
shares of common stock outstanding. In addition, following this
offering we will also have a significant number of outstanding
warrants and options to purchase our common stock, with the
options having exercise prices significantly below the initial
public offering price of our common stock. You will incur
further dilution if outstanding options or warrants to purchase
common stock are exercised. In addition, our second amended and
restated certificate of incorporation that will be in effect
upon the completion of this offering allows us to issue
significant numbers of additional shares, including shares that
may be issued under our 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which
could result in further dilution to purchasers of our common
stock in this offering.
Provisions of
our charter, bylaws and of Delaware law, as well as some of our
employment arrangements, could discourage, delay or prevent a
change of control of our company, which may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
Certain provisions of our second amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
that will be in effect upon the completion of this offering
could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition, or
other change of control that stockholders may consider
favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise
receive a premium for your shares. These provisions also could
limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the
future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the
market price of our common stock. Stockholders who wish to
participate in these transactions may not have the
29
opportunity to do so. Furthermore, these provisions could
prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or
remove our management. These provisions:
|
|
|
allow the authorized number of directors to be changed only by
resolution of our board of directors;
|
|
|
require that vacancies on the board of directors, including
newly created directorships, be filled only by a majority vote
of directors then in office;
|
|
|
authorize our board of directors to issue, without stockholder
approval, preferred stock that, if issued, could operate as a
poison pill to dilute the stock ownership of a
potential hostile acquiror to prevent an acquisition that is not
approved by our board of directors;
|
|
|
require that stockholder actions must be effected at a duly
called stockholder meeting by prohibiting stockholder action by
written consent;
|
|
|
prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which
would otherwise allow holders of less than a plurality of stock
to elect some directors; and
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for stockholder
nominations to our board of directors or for stockholder
proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings and limit
the right to call special meetings of stockholders to the
Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the board of
directors acting pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority
of directors or the Secretary upon the written request of
stockholders entitled to cast not less than 35% of all the votes
entitled to be cast at such meeting.
|
Some of our employment arrangements and stock option agreements
provide for severance payments and accelerated vesting of
benefits, including accelerated vesting of restricted stock and
options, upon a change of control. This offering will not
constitute a change of control under such agreements. These
provisions may discourage or prevent a change of control.
In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are
governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, which may, unless certain criteria are
met, prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15%
or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or
combining with us for a prescribed period of time.
Being a public
company will increase our administrative workload and
expenses.
As a public company with common stock listed on the New York
Stock Exchange, we will need to comply with new laws,
regulations and requirements, including certain provisions of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, related regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the requirements of
the New York Stock Exchange, which we are not required to comply
with as a private company. Complying with these statutes,
regulations and requirements will occupy a significant amount of
time of our board of directors and management. The hiring of
additional personnel to handle these responsibilities will
increase our operating costs. We expect we will need to:
|
|
|
institute a more comprehensive compliance function;
|
|
|
design, establish, evaluate and maintain a system of internal
control over financial reporting in compliance with the
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and the related rules and regulations of the SEC and the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;
|
30
|
|
|
prepare and distribute periodic public reports in compliance
with our obligations under the federal securities laws;
|
|
|
establish new internal policies, such as those relating to
disclosure controls and procedures and insider trading;
|
|
|
involve and retain to a greater degree outside counsel and
accountants in the above activities; and
|
|
|
establish and maintain an investor relations function, including
the provision of certain information on our website.
|
In addition, we expect that being a public company subject to
these rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us
to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may
be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially
higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make
it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified
executive officers and qualified members of our board of
directors, particularly to serve on our audit and compensation
committees.
Our internal
controls over financial reporting do not currently meet the
standards required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal
controls over financial reporting in accordance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material
adverse effect on our business and stock price.
Our internal controls over financial reporting do not currently
meet the standards required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, standards that we will be required to meet
in the course of preparing our 2011 annual report on
Form 10-K.
We do not currently have comprehensive documentation of our
internal controls, nor do we document or test our compliance
with these controls on a periodic basis in accordance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Furthermore, we have
not tested our internal controls in accordance with
Section 404 and, due to our lack of documentation, such a
test would not be possible to perform at this time.
We are in the early stages of addressing our internal controls
procedures to satisfy the requirements of Section 404,
which requires an annual management assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.
If, as a public company, we are not able to timely or adequately
implement the requirements of Section 404, our independent
registered public accounting firm may not be able to attest to
the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting.
If we are unable to maintain adequate internal controls over
financial reporting, we may be unable to report our financial
information in a timely and reliable manner, may suffer adverse
regulatory consequences or violations of applicable stock
exchange listing rules and may breach the covenants under our
credit facilities. There could also be a negative reaction in
the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us
and the reliability of our financial statements, which could
significantly harm our business.
In addition, we expect to incur incremental costs in order to
improve our internal controls over financial reporting and
comply with Section 404, including increased audit and
legal fees and costs associated with hiring additional
accounting and administrative staff.
31
Forward-looking
statements
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are
based on our managements beliefs and assumptions and on
information currently available to us. The forward-looking
statements are contained principally in the sections entitled
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Use of Proceeds, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Business. When used in this
prospectus, the words anticipate,
believe, could, estimate,
expect, intend, may,
plan, potential, predict,
project, should, would, and
similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations
reflected in any forward-looking statements are reasonable,
these plans, intentions or expectations are based on
assumptions, are subject to risks and uncertainties and may not
be achieved. Our actual results, performance or achievements
could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or
implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this
prospectus. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from our forward-looking statements are set
forth in this prospectus, including under the heading Risk
Factors. Given these uncertainties, you should not place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also,
forward-looking statements represent our managements
beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety
by the cautionary statements set forth in this prospectus. These
statements include, among other things, statements relating to:
|
|
|
our evaluation of the history and the dynamics supporting the
demand and growth in the asset protection solutions market;
|
|
|
|
estimates of market sizes and anticipated uses of our asset
protection solutions;
|
|
|
|
our business strategy and our underlying assumptions about data
and trends in the markets for asset protection solutions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to market, commercialize and achieve market
acceptance for our asset protection solutions;
|
|
|
|
our estimates regarding future revenues, expenses, capital
requirements, liquidity, the sufficiency of our cash resources
and our needs for additional financing;
|
|
|
our anticipated use of the proceeds of this offering;
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our
business without infringing upon the intellectual property
rights of others; and
|
|
|
managements goals, expectations and objectives and other
similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical
facts.
|
Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from
our expectations due to a variety of factors. Although it is not
possible to identify all of these factors, they include, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
loss of or reduction in business with a significant customer;
|
|
|
|
an accident or incident involving our asset protection solutions;
|
32
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain trained engineers, scientists
and other highly skilled workers as well as members of senior
management;
|
|
|
|
strengths and actions of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
our current dependence on customers in the oil and gas industry;
|
|
|
|
the timing, size and integration success of potential future
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
catastrophic events that cause disruptions to our business or
the business of our customers; and
|
|
|
|
the current economic downturn.
|
Potential investors are urged to carefully consider these
factors and the other factors described under Risk
Factors in evaluating any forward-looking statements and
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable
law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any
forward-looking statements or to update the reasons actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in any
forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes
available in the future.
33
Use of
proceeds
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of our common
stock in this offering, based on the initial public offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus),
will be approximately $ , or
$ if the underwriters exercise
their over-allotment option in full, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
We plan to use these net proceeds for general corporate
purposes, including working capital and possible acquisitions.
We have no present understandings, commitments or agreements to
acquire any businesses or technologies. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.
We have not yet determined the amount of our remaining net
proceeds to be used specifically for any of the foregoing
purposes. Accordingly, management will have flexibility in
applying our remaining net proceeds of this offering. Pending
their use, we intend to invest our net proceeds from this
offering in short-term, investment grade, interest-bearing
instruments.
Dividend
policy
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any
future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our
business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in
the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay
dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors
and will depend on our financial condition, results of
operations, capital requirements and other factors that our
board of directors deems relevant. The terms of our current
credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., TD Bank, N.A. and Capital One, N.A, preclude us, and
the terms of any future debt or credit facility may also
preclude us, from paying cash dividends.
34
Capitalization
The following table sets forth (1) our cash and cash
equivalents and (2) our capitalization as of May 31,
2009:
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis to reflect the conversion of all of our
outstanding preferred stock
into shares
of our common stock upon the completion of this offering,
a -for-
stock split of our common stock and the effectiveness of our
second amended and restated certificate of incorporation that
will be effective upon completion of this offering, as if such
transactions occurred on May 31, 2009; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to further reflect the sale of
shares of common stock by us in this offering at the initial
public offering price of $ per
share (the midpoint of the price range shown on the cover page
of this prospectus).
|
For purposes of the pro forma as adjusted column of the
capitalization table below, we have assumed the net proceeds
from this offering will be
$ million after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
In addition, the table excludes the following:
|
|
|
shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding as of
May 31, 2009 at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per share; and
|
|
|
|
shares of common stock
reserved for future awards under the 2009 Long-Term Incentive
Plan.
|
This table should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto,
Use of Proceeds, Selected Historical
Consolidated Financial Information, and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, all included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
$
|
66,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, including current portion
|
|
|
14,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
80,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
90,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $0.01 par value per share (actual:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 shares authorized and 1,000,000 shares
issued and outstanding; pro
forma: shares
authorized and shares
issued and outstanding; pro forma as
adjusted: shares
authorized and shares issued
and outstanding)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(47,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(1,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(47,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
123,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Dilution
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
to the extent of the difference between the initial public
offering price per share of our common stock and the net
tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately
after the completion of this offering. Dilution results from the
fact that the per share offering price of the common stock is
substantially in excess of the book value per share attributable
to the existing stockholders for the presently outstanding stock.
As of May 31, 2009, our net tangible book deficit was
approximately $98.5 million, or approximately
$ per share. Net tangible book
deficit per share represents the amount of total tangible assets
less our total liabilities, including our preferred stock,
divided by the number of shares outstanding. On a pro forma
basis, after giving effect to the conversion
of shares of our
preferred stock
into shares
of our common stock and
a -for-
stock split of our common stock, and excluding proceeds from
this offering, our pro forma net tangible book value as of
May 31, 2009 would have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share.
On a pro forma as adjusted basis, after giving further effect to
the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at the initial public offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus)
and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value as of May 31, 2009 would
have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share. This represents an
immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value from
this offering of $ per share to
our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors
purchasing common stock in this offering.
The following table illustrates this dilution to new investors
on a per share basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as
of ,
2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share
attributable to investors purchasing shares in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to
investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes, as of May 31, 2009, the
differences between the number of shares of common stock owned
by existing stockholders and the number to be owned by new
public investors, the aggregate cash consideration paid to us
after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering
expenses payable by us and the average price per share paid by
our existing stockholders and to be paid by new public investors
purchasing shares of
37
common stock in this offering at the initial public offering
price of $ per share (the midpoint
of the price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased(1)
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
|
Average price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
|
|
Existing stockholders(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
New public investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The number of shares disclosed for
the existing stockholders includes shares being sold by the
selling stockholders in this offering and includes the preferred
shares converted to common stock at the time of the offering.
The number of shares disclosed for the new investors does not
include the shares being purchased by the new investors from the
selling stockholders in this offering.
|
The discussion and tables above assume no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. If the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option in full, the number of
shares of common stock held by new investors will increase to
approximately shares,
or approximately % of the total
number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after
this offering, our existing stockholders would own
approximately % of the total number
of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this
offering, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per
share of common stock would be approximately
$ and the dilution in pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock to
new investors would be
$ .
In addition, the above discussion and tables assume no exercise
of stock options.
As of May 31, 2009, we had outstanding options to purchase
a total of shares of
common stock at a weighted average exercise price of
$ per share. If all of these
outstanding options had been exercised as of May 31, 2009,
our pro forma net tangible book value would have been
$ per share of common stock, pro
forma as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering
would be $ per share of common
stock and dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book
value to investors in this offering would be
$ per share of common stock.
In addition, if all of these outstanding options as of
May 31, 2009 were exercised, on an as adjusted basis after
deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses
payable by us, (i) existing stockholders would have
purchased shares
representing % of the total shares
for $ , or
approximately % of the total
consideration paid, with an average price per share of
$ and
(ii) shares
purchased by new stockholders in this offering would represent
approximately % of total shares for
approximately $ , or
approximately % of the total
consideration paid.
38
Selected
historical consolidated financial information
The following tables set forth our selected historical
consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. The
selected statement of operations and cash flow data for fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007 and the selected balance sheet data as of
May 31, 2009 and 2008 have been derived from our audited
financial statements and related notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The statement of operations and
cash flow data for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 and the selected
balance sheet data as of May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 have
been derived from our audited financial statements not included
in this prospectus. The information presented below should be
read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the audited and unaudited financial statements and the notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
209,133
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
$
|
93,741
|
|
|
$
|
80,813
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
131,167
|
|
|
|
90,590
|
|
|
|
75,702
|
|
|
|
55,908
|
|
|
|
51,426
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
8,700
|
|
|
|
6,847
|
|
|
|
4,666
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
69,266
|
|
|
|
54,831
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
34,820
|
|
|
|
26,440
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
47,150
|
|
|
|
32,943
|
|
|
|
26,408
|
|
|
|
24,748
|
|
|
|
20,994
|
|
Research and engineering expenses
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
14,825
|
|
|
|
16,358
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
5,247
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
|
|
4,589
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
and minority interest
|
|
|
10,211
|
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
(4,160
|
)
|
Provision for (benefits from) income taxes
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
(4,089
|
)
|
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
5,466
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
(4,073
|
)
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(27,114
|
)
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
(2,922
|
)
|
|
|
(2,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
|
$
|
(6.35
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
(6.35
|
)
|
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share(1)
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
4.81
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
(3.22
|
)
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
12,661
|
|
|
$
|
12,851
|
|
|
$
|
14,006
|
|
|
$
|
6,208
|
|
|
$
|
3,024
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(15,888
|
)
|
|
|
(19,446
|
)
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
(2,387
|
)
|
|
|
(3,193
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
27,274
|
|
|
|
27,773
|
|
|
|
18,769
|
|
|
|
12,408
|
|
|
|
7,380
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
31,122
|
|
|
|
28,091
|
|
|
|
19,229
|
|
|
|
12,408
|
|
|
|
7,380
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the end of fiscal
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,668
|
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
|
$
|
1,976
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
151,274
|
|
|
|
119,822
|
|
|
|
79,885
|
|
|
|
74,425
|
|
|
|
71,149
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
66,251
|
|
|
|
48,270
|
|
|
|
25,403
|
|
|
|
29,668
|
|
|
|
38,622
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, including current portion
|
|
|
14,525
|
|
|
|
11,842
|
|
|
|
9,970
|
|
|
|
8,275
|
|
|
|
7,283
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
90,983
|
|
|
|
63,869
|
|
|
|
30,995
|
|
|
|
26,575
|
|
|
|
15,623
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(47,912
|
)
|
|
|
(24,475
|
)
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Pro forma diluted (loss) earnings
per common share gives effect to the assumed conversion of our
preferred stock for all periods presented. It is computed by
dividing net income by the pro forma number of weighted average
shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted earnings
(loss) per share, but after assuming conversion of our preferred
stock and exercise of any diluted stock options. The calculation
for this, as well as our basic and diluted (loss) earnings per
common share, follows.
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(in thousands, except share and
per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per
common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earning per
common share:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(2,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
(2.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.35
|
)
|
|
|
*Inclusion of certain stock options and conversion of preferred
shares would be anti-dilutive.
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(in thousands, except share and
per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,466
|
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
(4,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
977,115
|
|
|
|
965,577
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
42,755
|
|
|
|
26,520
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
21,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock equivalents of conversion of preferred shares
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
503,829
|
|
|
|
420,067
|
|
|
|
298,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,562,661
|
|
|
|
1,546,426
|
|
|
|
1,511,632
|
|
|
|
1,418,903
|
|
|
|
1,264,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
|
$
|
4.81
|
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
(3.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are
performance measures used by management that are not calculated
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). EBITDA is defined in this prospectus as net income plus:
interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation
and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined in this prospectus
as net income plus: interest expense, provision for income
taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation
expense and certain one-time and generally non-recurring items
(which items are described in the next paragraph and the
reconciliation table below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our management uses EBITDA and
adjusted EBITDA as measures of operating performance to assist
in comparing performance from period to period on a consistent
basis, as measures for planning and forecasting overall
expectations and for evaluating actual results against such
expectations and as performance evaluation metrics off which to
base executive and employee incentive compensation programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe investors and other
external users of our financial statements benefit from the
presentation of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA in evaluating our
operating performance because they provide an additional tool to
compare our operating performance on a consistent basis by
removing the impact of certain items that management believes do
not directly reflect our core operations. For instance, EBITDA
and adjusted EBITDA generally exclude interest expense, taxes
and depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially
from company to company depending upon accounting methods and
the book value and age of assets, capital structure, capital
investment cycles and the method by which assets were acquired.
Similarly, our adjusted EBITDA (and not our EBITDA) for fiscal
2009 excludes the impact of a one-time payment we made to settle
a lawsuit and the writeoff of $1.6 million in accounts
receivable we expected to collect from a customer that declared
bankruptcy in fiscal 2009. These items were excluded because
management believes these events were highly unique to us in
fiscal 2009. Our adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2009 and 2008
excludes the impact of stock compensation expenses, which is a
non-cash expense that management does not use in assessing
operational performance because it does not affect our ability
to generate free cash flow or invest in our business. In
addition, some of the financial covenants in our credit
agreement require us to maintain financial ratios calculated
based upon a measure with adjustments to EBITDA of a type
substantially similar to the adjustments incorporated into
adjusted EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA
are widely used by investors and securities analysts in their
evaluations of companies, you should not consider them either in
isolation or as a substitute for analyzing our results as
reported under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are generally
limited as analytical tools because they exclude, among other
things, the statement of operations impact of depreciation and
amortization, interest expense and the provision for income
taxes and therefore do not necessarily represent an accurate
measure of profitability, particularly in situations where a
company is highly leveraged or has a disadvantageous tax
structure. As a result, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are of
limited value in evaluating our operating performance because
(i) we use a significant amount of capital
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
assets and depreciation and
amortization expense is a necessary element of our costs and
ability to generate revenues; (ii) we have a significant
amount of debt and interest expense is a necessary element of
our costs and ability to generate revenues; and (iii) we
generally incur significant U.S. federal, state and foreign
income taxes each year and the provision for income taxes is a
necessary element of our costs. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA also
do not reflect historical cash expenditures or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual
commitments, changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital needs and all non-cash income or expense items that are
reflected in our statements of cash flows. Our adjusted EBITDA
for fiscal 2009 excludes the impact of an actual cash
expenditure for the settlement of a lawsuit and an amount we
were unable to collect in fiscal 2009 due to the bankruptcy of a
customer, and our adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2009 and 2008
excludes the impact of stock compensation expenses that reduced
our net income under GAAP. Furthermore, because EBITDA and
adjusted EBITDA are not defined under GAAP, our definitions of
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA may differ from, and therefore may
not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other
companies, thereby limiting their usefulness as comparative
measures. Because of these limitations, neither EBITDA nor
adjusted EBITDA should be considered as the primary measure of
our operating performance or as a measure of discretionary cash
available to us to invest in the growth of our business. We
strongly urge you to review the GAAP financial measures included
in this prospectus, our consolidated financial statements,
including the notes thereto, and the other financial information
contained in this prospectus, and not to rely on any single
financial measure to evaluate our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a
reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,466
|
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
(4,073
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
|
|
4,589
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12,636
|
|
|
|
11,423
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
|
|
7,178
|
|
|
|
6,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
27,274
|
|
|
$
|
27,773
|
|
|
$
|
18,769
|
|
|
$
|
12,408
|
|
|
$
|
7,380
|
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large customer bankruptcy
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
31,122
|
|
|
$
|
28,091
|
|
|
$
|
19,229
|
|
|
$
|
12,408
|
|
|
$
|
7,380
|
|
|
|
43
Managements
discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
You should read the following discussion together with the
financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in
this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that are based on managements current
expectations, estimates and projections about our business and
operations. The cautionary statements made in this prospectus
should be read as applying to all related forward-looking
statements wherever they appear in this prospectus. Our actual
results may differ materially from those currently anticipated
and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of
a number of factors, including but not limited to those we
discuss under Risk Factors and Forward-Looking
Statements.
Overview
We are a leading global provider of technology-enabled asset
protection solutions used to evaluate the structural integrity
of critical energy, industrial and public infrastructure. We
combine industry-leading products and technologies, expertise in
mechanical integrity (MI) and non-destructive testing (NDT)
services and proprietary data analysis software to deliver a
comprehensive portfolio of customized solutions, ranging from
routine inspections to complex, plant-wide asset integrity
assessments and management. These mission critical solutions
enhance our customers ability to extend the useful life of
their assets, increase productivity, minimize repair costs,
comply with governmental safety and environmental regulations,
manage risk and avoid catastrophic disasters. Given the role our
services play in ensuring the safe and efficient operation of
infrastructure, we have historically provided a majority of our
services to our customers on a regular, recurring basis. We
serve a global customer base of companies with asset-intensive
infrastructure, including companies in the oil and gas, fossil
and nuclear power, public infrastructure, chemicals, aerospace
and defense, transportation, primary metals and metalworking,
pharmaceuticals and food processing industries. During fiscal
2009, we provided our asset protection solutions to
approximately 4,500 customers. As of August 1, 2009, we had
approximately 2,000 employees, including 29 Ph.D.s
and more than 100 other degreed engineers and highly-skilled,
certified technicians, in 68 offices across 15 countries. We
have established long-term relationships as a critical solutions
provider to many leading companies in our target markets. Our
current principal market is the oil and gas industry, which
accounted for approximately 58%, 50% and 52% of our revenues for
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
During the last three fiscal years, we have focused on
introducing our advanced asset protection solutions to our
customers using proprietary, technology-enabled software and
testing instruments, including those developed by our Products
and Systems segment. During this period, the demand for
outsourced asset protection solutions has, in general,
increased, creating demand from which our entire industry has
benefited. We have experienced compounded annual revenue growth
(CAGR) of 30.7% over the last three fiscal years, including the
impact of acquisitions and currency fluctuations. During the
same period, revenues from our customers in the oil and gas
market, historically our largest target market, had a CAGR of
39.0%. All of our other target markets, collectively, had a CAGR
of 22.0%. We believe further growth can be realized in all of
our target markets. Concurrent with this growth, we have worked
to build our infrastructure to profitably absorb additional
growth and have made a number of small acquisitions in an effort
to leverage our fixed costs, grow our base of experienced
personnel, expand our technical capabilities and increase our
geographical reach.
44
Since inception, we have increased our capabilities and the size
of our customer base through the development of applied
technologies and managed support services, organic growth and
the successful and seamless integration of acquired companies.
These acquisitions have provided us with additional products,
technologies, resources and customers that have enhanced our
sustainable competitive advantages over our competition.
The global economy is currently in a pronounced economic
downturn. Global financial markets are continuing to experience
disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit
availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in
economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, volatility in
interest and currency exchange rates and overall uncertainty
about economic stability. There may be further deterioration and
volatility in the global economy and the global financial
markets. Although this economic downturn has negatively impacted
our revenues and profitability in fiscal 2009, we believe it has
allowed us to make new hires and acquire and develop new
technology in order to aggressively expand our proprietary
portfolio of customized solutions and make acquisitions of
complementary businesses at reasonable valuations. We believe
these strategic investments will provide us improved
capabilities and technologies to help ensure the integrity and
extend the useful lives of our customers assets. Also,
although some of our customers have delayed turnaround projects
and other large-scale inspection projects, they have
historically seldom postponed such projects indefinitely, so we
expect our revenues may be increased in future periods when our
customers request that we complete these projects.
Basis of
presentation
Consolidated
results of operations
The Companys three segments are:
|
|
|
Services. This segment provides asset protection
solutions in North and Central America with the largest
concentration in the United States.
|
|
|
|
Products and Systems. This segment designs,
manufactures, sells, installs and services our asset protection
products and systems, including equipment and instrumentation,
predominantly in the United States.
|
|
|
|
International. This segment offers services,
products and systems similar to those of our other segments to
global markets, principally in Europe, the Middle East, Africa,
Asia and South America, but not to customers in China and South
Korea, which are served by our Products and Systems segment.
|
General corporate services, including accounting, audit and
contract management, are provided to the segments and are
reported as intersegment transactions within corporate and
eliminations. Sales to the International segment from the
Products and Systems segment and subsequent sales by the
International segment of the same items are recorded and
reflected in the operating performance of both segments.
Additionally, engineering charges and royalty fees charged to
the Services and International segments by the Products and
Systems segment are reflected in the operating performance of
each segment. All such intersegment transactions are eliminated
in corporate and eliminations.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same
as those described in the summary of our significant accounting
policies in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Segment income
from operations is
45
determined based on internal performance measures used by the
Chief Executive Officer, the chief operating decision maker, to
assess the performance of each business in a given period and to
make decisions as to resource allocations. In connection with
that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer may exclude items
such as charges for stock-based compensation and certain other
acquisition-related charges and balances, technology and product
development costs, certain gains and losses from dispositions,
and litigation settlements or other charges. Certain general and
administrative costs such as human resources, information
technology and training are allocated to the segments. Segment
income from operations also excludes interest and other
financial charges and income taxes. Corporate and other assets
are comprised principally of cash, deposits, property, plant and
equipment, domestic deferred taxes, deferred charges and other
assets. Corporate loss from operations consists of depreciation
on the corporate office facilities and equipment, administrative
charges related to corporate personnel and other charges that
cannot be readily identified for allocation to a particular
segment.
Statement of
operations overview
The following describes certain line items in our statement of
operations and some of the factors that affect our operating
results.
Revenues
Our revenues are generated by sales of our services, products
and systems. The majority of our revenues are derived under
time-and-materials
contracts for specified asset protection services on a
project-by-project
basis. The duration of our projects vary depending on their
scope. Some of our projects last from a few weeks to a few
months, but the more significant projects can last for more than
a year and can require long-term deployment of substantial
personnel, equipment and resources. The start date of our
projects can be postponed or delayed and the duration of our
projects can be shortened or increased due to a variety of
factors beyond our control. In addition to the timing of these
projects and the seasonality of our business, the amount and
origination of our revenues often vary from period to period. A
percentage of our revenues are usually attributable to recurring
work from our existing customers. Although our top ten customers
are responsible for a large percentage of our revenues, we
generate our revenues from most of these customers by providing
asset protection solutions to a number of their business
locations. We believe decisions regarding the purchase of our
solutions by these customers are made on a
location-by-location
basis. Also included in our revenues are software license fees
and product sales, as well as an estimate for any sales returns
and customer allowances. Revenues under our
time-and-materials
services contracts are based on the hours of service we provide
our customers at negotiated rates, plus any actual costs of
materials and other direct expenses that we incur on the
project, with little or no
mark-up.
Because these expenses, such as travel and lodging or
subcontracted services, can change significantly from project to
project, changes in our revenues may not be indicative of
business trends.
Cost of
revenues
Our cost of revenues includes our direct compensation and
related benefits to support our sales, together with
reimbursable costs, materials consumed or used in manufacturing
our products and certain overhead costs, such as non-billable
time, equipment rentals, fringe benefits and repair and
maintenance.
46
Depreciation
included in gross profit
Our depreciation represents the expense charge for our
capitalized assets. Depending on the nature of the original item
capitalized, these depreciation expenses are reported in one of
two places in our statement of operations. Depreciation used in
determining gross profit is directly related to our revenues and
primarily relates to depreciation of equipment used for the
delivery of our asset protection solutions and to a lesser
extent depreciation of manufacturing equipment. We also have
other depreciation primarily related to our corporate
headquarters which is included in deriving our income from
operations as discussed below.
Gross
profit
Our gross profit equals our revenues less our cost of revenues
and attributed depreciation. Our gross profit, both in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of revenues, can vary based on our
volume, sales mix, actual manufacturing costs and our
utilization of labor. As a result, gross profit may vary from
quarter to quarter. For instance, our gross profit can decline
during holiday periods when we incur labor costs without any
corresponding revenues. Under our
time-and-materials
contracts, we negotiate hourly billing rates and charge our
clients based on the actual time that we expend on a project.
Our profit margins on
time-and-materials
contracts fluctuate based on actual labor and overhead costs
that we directly charge or allocate to contracts compared to
negotiated billing rates.
In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for asset
protection solutions and, until recently, a limited supply of
certified technicians. Accordingly, we have experienced
increases in our cost of labor in our Services segment. The
customers of our Services segment are aware of these supply
constraints and generally have, to some extent, accepted
corresponding price increases for our services. In the current
economic environment, we are uncertain whether our ability to
increase prices for our services will continue. In our Products
and Systems segment, our ability to increase prices for any
product or system to offset associated cost increases is based
principally on the extent to which its incorporates our
proprietary technology. We believe our efforts to develop and
offer our customers value-added proprietary solutions instead of
commodity-type products help us, in part, to resist margin
erosion. Our International segment offers services, products and
systems similar to those of our other segments, so our ability
to increase prices in this segment as costs increase is
determined by the same factors affecting the pricing of our
other segments, and the relative mix of services, products and
systems it provides in the applicable period.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Our selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised
primarily of expenses of our sales and marketing operations,
field location administrative costs and our corporate
headquarters related to our executive, general management,
finance, accounting and administrative functions and legal fees
and expenses. These costs can vary based on our volume of
business or as expenses are incurred to support corporate
activities and initiatives such as training. The largest single
category is salaries and related costs. In the near term, we
expect these expenses to increase as we support the growth of
our business and expand our sales and marketing efforts, improve
our information processes and systems and implement the
financial reporting, compliance and other infrastructure
required for a public company. We also expect that our selling,
general and administrative expenses will decline as a percentage
of our revenues, particularly over the long term.
47
Research and
engineering
Research and engineering expense consists primarily of
engineering salaries and personnel-related costs and the cost of
products, materials and outside services used in our process and
product development activities primarily in our Products and
Systems segment. Other research and development is conducted in
our Services segment by various billable personnel and our
management on a collaborative basis. These costs are not
separated and are included in cost of revenues. Specific
development costs on software are capitalized and amortized in
our depreciation and amortization included in our income from
operations. From time-to-time, we receive minor grants or
contracts for paid research which are recorded in our revenues
with the related costs included in cost of revenues. We expect
to continue our investment in research and engineering
activities and anticipate that our associated expense will
increase in absolute terms in the future as we hire additional
personnel and increase research and engineering activity.
However, as a percentage of revenues, we expect research and
engineering expense to decline over time.
Depreciation
and amortization included in income from
operations
Our depreciation and amortization used in deriving our income
from operations represents the expense charge for our
capitalized assets, and primarily relates to buildings and
improvements, including our corporate headquarters, office
furniture, equipment, and intangibles acquired as part of our
acquisitions of other businesses. These intangible assets
include, but are not limited to, non-competition agreements,
customer lists and trade names. To the extent we ascribe value
to identifiable intangible assets that have finite lives, we
amortize those values over the estimated useful lives of those
assets. Such amortization expense, although non-cash in the
period expensed, directly impacts our results of operations. It
is difficult to predict with any precision the amount of expense
we may record relating to acquired intangible assets. Because
many of the intangible assets we acquire are short-lived
intangible assets, we would expect to see higher amortization
expense in the first 12 to 18 months after an acquisition
has been consummated.
Income from
operations
Our income from operations is our gross profit less our selling,
general and administrative expenses, research and engineering
and depreciation and amortization included in income from
operations. We refer to our income from operations as a
percentage of our revenues as our operating margin.
Interest
expense
Our interest expense consists primarily of interest paid to our
lenders under our credit agreement. Also included is the
interest incurred on our capital leases and on subordinated
notes issued as part of our acquisitions. We adjust the interest
differential on our interest rate swap quarterly to reflect the
difference from our current borrowing rate to the notional
amount of our interest rate swap contracts.
Income
taxes
Income tax expense varies as a function of income before income
tax expense and permanent non-tax deductible expenses, such as
certain amounts of meals and entertainment expense,
48
valuation allowance requirements and other permanent
differences. Prior to fiscal 2007, we had net operating loss
carryforwards (NOLs) for federal and state purposes, but as a
result of our pre-tax income in fiscal 2007, we used a majority
of these NOLs. As of May 31, 2009 we had $2.6 million
of NOLs available to offset state taxable income in future
years. These state NOLs will expire, if not utilized, at varying
dates beginning in 2011 depending on the laws of each state and
we have provided a valuation allowance of $0.2 million. Our
effective income tax rate will be subject to many variables,
including the absolute amount and future geographic distribution
of our pre-tax income. We also plan to continue our acquisition
strategy, and, as such, we anticipate that there will be
variability in our effective tax rate from quarter to quarter
and year to year, especially to the extent that our permanent
differences increase or decrease. As a result of any of these
factors, our future effective income tax rate may fluctuate
significantly over the next few years.
Minority
interest, net of taxes
The minority interest represents the ownership interests of
other stockholders in our international subsidiaries, where 100%
ownership is not permitted or de minimis local ownership is
helpful for business purposes. For fiscal 2007, this amount
primarily consisted of the net income of Envirocoustics
A.B.E.E., which we first consolidated in fiscal 2006. We
acquired this entity on April 25, 2007.
49
Consolidated
results of operations
Fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007
Our revenues, gross profit, income from operations and net
income for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
209,133
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
69,266
|
|
|
|
54,831
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin %
|
|
|
33.1%
|
|
|
|
36.0%
|
|
|
|
34.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
14,825
|
|
|
$
|
16,358
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin as percentage of revenues
|
|
|
7.1%
|
|
|
|
10.7%
|
|
|
|
8.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
10,211
|
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,466
|
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as percentage of revenues
|
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
|
4.9%
|
|
|
|
4.4%
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
compared to fiscal 2008
Revenues. Revenues increased $56.9 million, or
37.3%, for fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 as a result of
growth in all our segments. For fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, we
estimate that our organic, as compared to acquisition-driven,
growth rate was approximately 16% and 17%, respectively. In
fiscal 2009, we estimate that all of our segments had organic
growth, and that the Services and International segments had
double digit organic growth rates. This organic growth was the
result of continued demand for our asset protection solutions,
including growth from new and existing customers, and did not
result from any unusually large one-time projects. In fiscal
2009, we estimate that growth from acquisitions was
approximately 23% compared to 6% in fiscal 2008, primarily
because we acquired 5 NDT companies in fiscal 2009 and
7 NDT companies in 2008, increasing our capabilities and
adding to our base of qualified technicians.
In the second half of fiscal 2009 we believe the economic
downturn resulted in greater than usual reductions or delays in
capital spending by our customers. Several anticipated regular
maintenance projects as well as projects requiring intensive
work during a temporary asset shutdown, or
turnaround projects, were either reduced in scope or
have been delayed until fiscal 2010 or later.
50
Despite the economic downturn, we experienced growth in many of
our target markets in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008.
The largest dollar increase was attributable to customers in the
oil and gas market, which accounted for approximately 58% of our
total revenues. This growth was achieved globally on several new
and existing projects. Overall this market provided 57.6% and
49.8% of our total revenues for fiscal 2009 and 2008,
respectively. As of May 31, 2009, we serviced approximately
20% of the U.S. refineries and 36% of refineries producing
50,000-100,000 barrels per day. The remainder of the growth
in our revenues was broadly distributed among customers in our
other target markets, with the largest increases in this period
attributable to customers in the chemical market, where we
obtained a new long-term service contract, and in the industrial
and manufacturing sector where we obtained new customers through
our acquisitions. The most significant decrease in fiscal 2009
was in the electronics and transportation industries, but these
industries together accounted for less than 3.0% of our total
revenues in fiscal 2009. Our top ten customers represented 35.8%
of our revenues for fiscal 2009 compared to 25.5% in fiscal
2008. One of these top ten customers filed for bankruptcy in
January 2009. Our revenues from this customer were
$6.4 million for fiscal 2009. Although we have increased
our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable attributable to
this long-term customer by approximately $1.6 million as a
result of this bankruptcy, we continue to work for this customer
under the protection of the bankruptcy court.
Gross profit. Our gross profit increased
$14.4 million, or 26.3%, in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal
2008. As a percentage of revenues, our gross profit was 33.1%
and 36.0% in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. The
non-depreciation portion of our cost of revenues as a percentage
of revenues increased to 62.7% in fiscal 2009 from 59.5% in
fiscal 2008. Depreciation expense included in determining gross
profit for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 was $8.7 million, or
4.2% of revenues, and $6.8 million, or 4.5% of revenues,
respectively.
Despite the 37.3% increase in our fiscal 2009 revenues, our
gross profit as a percentage of revenues declined to 33.1% in
fiscal 2009 from 36.0% in fiscal 2008. Some of this decline
resulted from our sales mix, since our Services segment
generated the largest portion of the revenue increase and our
gross margins on revenues from our Services segment are
generally lower than that of our other segments. A large portion
of this cost can be attributed to the economic downturn, because
when our customers delay or reschedule projects, this delays our
recognition of revenues from those projects while we continue to
incur labor expenses. We also incurred the cost to hire and
train employees in order to develop several new specialties
within our asset protection solutions, or centers of
excellence, including centers for industrial tube and
off-shore oil rig platform riser inspections and new pipeline
construction. In addition, our business was disrupted during
September 2008 by Hurricane Ike and in our third fiscal quarter
by strikes threatened by employees of several of our customers,
which were subsequently resolved. As we anticipated, several of
our recently acquired businesses had lower margins than we
normally achieve and we would expect that these margins will
improve as we fully integrate these acquired businesses into our
business model. Our payroll costs, including workers
compensation insurance, also increased during fiscal 2009, but
unlike in fiscal 2008, we did not benefit from a
$1.0 million adjustment, resulting from favorable claims
experienced.
Income from operations. Our income from operations
of $14.8 million for fiscal 2009 decreased
$1.5 million, or 9.4%, compared to fiscal 2008. As a
percentage of revenues, our income from operations was 7.1% in
fiscal 2009, compared to 10.7% in fiscal 2008. In fiscal 2009,
we increased our allowance for doubtful accounts by
approximately $1.6 million to provide for estimated losses
in connection with a large customer bankruptcy and incurred
$2.1 million in
51
expenses in connection with a lawsuit settlement. Without these
charges, our fiscal 2009 income from operations would have been
approximately 9% of revenues.
The percentage of total operating income for fiscal 2009
contributed by our segments was Services: 92.3%; Products and
Systems: 11.2%; International: 27.6%; and Corporate and
Eliminations: (31.1%). For fiscal 2008, the operating income
contributed by our segments was: Services: 89.6%; Products and
Systems: 16.6%; International: 14.7%; and Corporate and
Eliminations: (20.9%).
As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative
expenses for fiscal 2009 were 22.5% compared to 21.6% for fiscal
2008. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for
fiscal 2009 increased $14.2 million, or 43.1%, over fiscal
2008, primarily due to the cost of additional infrastructure to
support our growth, including several new locations obtained
through our acquisitions. Our recent acquisitions accounted for
approximately $6.0 million of this increase. In addition,
the $1.6 million increase in our allowance for doubtful
accounts due to the bankruptcy of our customer was included in
this expense category. Other increases in our selling, general
and administrative expenses included higher compensation and
benefit expenses over the previous year attributed to normal
salary increases as well as our investment in additional
management and corporate staff. A significant portion of these
increases (as well as other increases in cost of revenues)
supported our development of additional centers of excellence.
Our professional fees were also higher as we incurred more
expense in connection with the preparations necessary to operate
as a publicly traded company. Depreciation and amortization
included in the determination of income from operations for
fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $3.9 million, or 1.9% of
revenues, and $4.6 million, or 3.0% of revenues,
respectively.
Interest expense. Interest expense was
$4.6 million and $3.5 million for fiscal 2009 and
fiscal 2008, respectively. The $1.1 million increase in
fiscal 2009 interest expense was primarily due to increased
borrowing for our acquisitions and purchases of equipment, as
well as working capital requirements. For both years, we
incurred additional expense related to the market rate
adjustments to our interest rate swaps, as the fixed rate on
these swaps was higher than market rates during both annual
periods. The total interest expense adjustments for these swap
arrangements for fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was approximately
$0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively. On
July 1, 2008, we borrowed $20.0 million to replenish
our revolving line of credit and finance several acquisitions
and on January 7, 2009, we increased our revolver by
$5.0 million for a total of $20.0 million.
Minority Interest, net of taxes. The increase in
fiscal 2009 of $0.2 million in the minority interest is
related to the increased profit, primarily from Diapac, our
subsidiary in Russia. For fiscal 2007, this amount primarily
consisted of the net income of Envirocoustics A.B.E.E., which we
first consolidated in fiscal 2006. We acquired this entity on
April 25, 2007.
Income taxes. Our effective income tax rate was
44.6% for fiscal 2009 compared to 41.9% for fiscal 2008. The
increase was primarily due to the impact of higher state taxes
and US taxes on our foreign profits, net of other adjustments.
Net income. Our net income for fiscal 2009 of
$5.5 million, or 2.6% of our revenues, was
$2.0 million lower than our net income for fiscal 2008,
which was $7.4 million, or 4.9% of revenues. This decrease
in net income was primarily the result of the combination of
higher revenues and higher costs of revenues as a percentage of
revenues, and other operating costs such as the additional
$1.6 million allowance for doubtful accounts and higher
interest expense, depreciation and provision for income taxes.
The $1.6 million increase in our allowance for
52
doubtful accounts and $2.1 million incurred in connection
with the lawsuit settlement, both of which we consider generally
non-recurring or unusual, caused our net income to be lower by
approximately 1% on an after-tax basis. Our net income in fiscal
2008 also benefited from a $1.0 million pre-tax adjustment.
Fiscal 2008
compared to fiscal 2007
Revenues. Revenues increased $30.0 million, or
24.6%, for fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 as a result of
growth in all our segments. In fiscal 2008, the largest increase
in our revenues was attributable to customers in the oil and gas
market, which accounted for approximately 50% of our total
revenues. The remainder of the growth in our revenues was
broadly distributed among customers in our other target markets,
with the largest increases attributable to growth in revenues
from customers in the fossil and nuclear power and chemicals
markets and other process industries. In fiscal 2008, we
completed a significant number of projects for existing
customers in the public infrastructure market. However, there
was a small decrease in revenues from customers in this market
in fiscal 2008 because we completed a significant new bridge
project in fiscal 2007. The increase in fiscal 2008 revenues was
largely driven by our Services segment, which represented
$25.2 million of the total increase, and resulted primarily
from an increase in the overall customer demand for asset
protection solutions, and revenues contributed from acquired
businesses.
Gross profit. Our gross profit for fiscal 2008
increased $13.0 million, or 30.9%, over fiscal 2007. As a
percentage of revenues, our gross profit was 36.0% and 34.3% in
fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively. In dollar terms, the
increase in our gross profit during our 2008 fiscal year was
primarily the result of increased revenues and our raising
prices to keep pace with escalating labor rates, partially
offset by increased depreciation expense due to purchases of
field test equipment and additional fleet vehicles to support
our revenue growth. Our gross profit in fiscal 2008 also
benefitted by 0.7% as the Company reduced its estimated accrual
for workers compensation claims due to favorable claim
experience. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation expense
included in gross profit for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 was
4.5% and 3.8%, respectively.
Income from operations. Our income from operations
of $16.4 million in fiscal 2008 increased
$5.6 million, or 52.4%, compared to fiscal 2007. As a
percentage of revenues, for fiscal 2008, our income from
operations was 10.7%, compared to 8.8% for fiscal 2007. This
increase was a result of increased revenues and gross profit,
offset by increases in selling, general and administrative
expenses and depreciation and amortization. Our selling, general
and administrative expenses included in the determination of
income from operations for fiscal 2008 increased
$6.5 million, or 24.7%, over fiscal 2007 due to additional
infrastructure costs for several new locations obtained through
acquisitions, increases to our international staff and increased
audit costs. As a percentage of revenues, our selling, general
and administrative expenses in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 were
21.6%.
Interest expense. Interest expense was
$3.5 million and $4.5 million during fiscal 2008 and
2007, respectively. In fiscal 2007, we paid $1.2 million of
conditional interest in connection with a bank refinancing,
which accounted for most of the $1.0 million decrease in
interest expense. The decrease in interest expense was also due
to lower market rates of interest in fiscal 2008, offset by the
additional expense for an adjustment to our interest rate swaps
during this period because the fixed rate on these swaps was
higher than market rates during the period. In the
53
last quarter of fiscal 2008 our interest also began to increase
as a result of financing our acquisitions.
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt. The
$0.5 million loss on the extinguishment of debt during
fiscal 2007 related to the write-off of certain capitalized
financing costs related to the refinancing of our debt through a
new credit arrangement.
Income taxes. Our effective income tax rate was
41.9% for fiscal 2008. For fiscal 2007, we had an effective rate
of 3.6%. This increase was primarily as a result of releasing
the deferred tax valuation allowances during fiscal 2007 and the
higher international tax rates on the income of certain of our
subsidiaries that we do not consolidate for tax purposes.
Net income. Our net income for fiscal 2008 of
$7.4 million, or 4.9% of our revenues, was
$2.1 million greater than our net income for fiscal 2007,
which was $5.4 million, or 4.4% of revenues. This 38.1%
increase in net income was primarily as a result of the impact
of higher revenues net of higher cost of revenues and operating
costs on a percentage basis, lower interest expense and a higher
provision for income taxes.
Segment
data
Selected consolidated financial information by segment for
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
167,543
|
|
|
$
|
116,027
|
|
|
$
|
90,867
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
17,310
|
|
|
|
16,675
|
|
|
|
14,916
|
|
International
|
|
|
29,165
|
|
|
|
23,727
|
|
|
|
20,935
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(4,885
|
)
|
|
|
(4,161
|
)
|
|
|
(4,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,133
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Revenues by operating segment
includes intercompany transactions, which are eliminated in
corporate and eliminations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
48,480
|
|
|
$
|
36,301
|
|
|
$
|
26,436
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
8,476
|
|
|
|
8,829
|
|
|
|
7,377
|
|
International
|
|
|
12,602
|
|
|
|
9,932
|
|
|
|
8,634
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,266
|
|
|
$
|
54,831
|
|
|
$
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
13,681
|
|
|
$
|
14,649
|
|
|
$
|
8,299
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
International
|
|
|
4,091
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(4,611
|
)
|
|
|
(3,422
|
)
|
|
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,825
|
|
|
$
|
16,358
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
10,603
|
|
|
$
|
9,529
|
|
|
$
|
7,101
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
International
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,636
|
|
|
$
|
11,423
|
|
|
$
|
8,691
|
|
|
|
Segment
results for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007
Segment discussions that follow provide supplemental information
regarding the significant factors contributing to the changes in
results for each of our business segments.
Services
segment
Revenues. Over the last three years, the largest
increase in our total revenues was from our Services segment.
Our segment revenues had a CAGR of 36.9% during this period with
annual increases in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 of $51.5, $25.2
and $25.4 million, respectively. As a percentage of prior
year segment revenues, these increases represent 44.4%, 27.7%
and 38.9%. Our organic growth in this segment has averaged
approximately 22% a year over this three-year period. In fiscal
2009, the organic growth in our Services segment was estimated
to be approximately 16%. On average, over the past three fiscal
years, customers in the oil and gas industry accounted for 58.9%
of the business of our Services segment and in fiscal 2009
customers in the oil and gas industry accounted for 62.2% of the
segment revenues, primarily due to a new project that we
obtained with an existing customer. The three-year CAGR from
this target market has been 41.1%. We also have double digit
CAGRs in most of our other target markets due to strong demand,
the addition of new customers and revenues from existing
customers. We continue to increase our revenues by providing
existing customers different types of asset protection solutions.
In fiscal 2009, our Services revenues increased
$51.5 million, or 44.4%, compared to fiscal 2008. We
estimate $33.6 million of these revenues are from
acquisitions compared to $7.3 million in the prior year.
The balance of the growth came from several new projects as well
as from other overall growth in the segment. We did experience
some slowing in our revenue growth because
55
of the economic downturn, especially in our third and fourth
fiscal quarters. We attribute this to an uncertain economy, a
customer bankruptcy, and threatened strikes by employees of
several customer refineries that were subsequently resolved. In
addition, many of our customers postponed holiday turnaround
projects and other large-scale projects until later this
calendar year or next; therefore, unlike most prior years, we
did not have many large scale turnarounds in fiscal 2009. Our
customers have historically seldom postponed these types of
projects indefinitely, so we expect our revenues may be
increased in future periods when our customers ask us to
complete projects that they postponed in fiscal 2009. In
addition, in September 2008 our operations in the Gulf Coast
region were disrupted by Hurricane Ike.
In fiscal 2008, our Services revenues increased
$25.2 million, or 27.7%, compared to fiscal 2007. The
increase was largely driven by an increase in the overall
customer demand for our asset protection solutions, including a
large project, and to a lesser extent, revenues from businesses
we acquired. We estimate that our organic growth rate in our
Services segment revenues in fiscal 2008 was approximately 20%.
Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 44%, 45% and
50% of our Services segment revenues during fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. As previously noted, one of our top ten
customers in this segment had filed for bankruptcy in January
2009. Revenues from this customer represented 3.8% of revenues
in our Services segment for fiscal 2009, and we believe our
relationship with this customer will continue.
Gross profit. During this three-year period, gross
profit as a percentage of revenues in our Services segment has
been 28.9%, 31.3% and 29.1% for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Cost of our Services has been 66.7%, 63.7% and
66.8% during the same periods. Depreciation included in the
determination of gross profit has been 4.3%, 5.0% and 4.1%. We
continued to invest in additional field test equipment and fleet
vehicles, which generate depreciation expense, to support our
growth and reduce other operating costs, such as repairs and
maintenance.
Our gross profit for fiscal 2009 was $48.5 million, or
$12.2 million greater than the prior year. The percentage
decrease in gross profit in fiscal 2009 was caused by higher
amounts of non-billable time that represented either development
of new centers of excellence and training or represented lost
billing opportunities related to the economic downturn. Several
of our customers extended holiday shut-downs or delayed
scheduled work, requiring us to pay our employees without any
corresponding revenues. As we expected, several of our recently
acquired businesses that are highly seasonal had lower margins
than those normally achieved under our business model. Finally,
Hurricane Ike negatively impacted our margins in the Gulf Coast
as we lost revenues and incurred higher costs related to
non-productive labor. In fiscal 2009, our depreciation increased
$1.4 million or 24.8% and represents both new assets
acquired and increased depreciation from our acquired businesses.
In fiscal 2008, our gross profit in our Services segment
increased by $9.9 million to $36.3 million from
$26.4 million in the previous fiscal year. As a percentage
of segment revenues, our gross profit increased to 31.3% from
29.1% in fiscal 2007. Contributing to the increase were
increased revenues, higher sales prices and a reduction in
workers compensation costs due to favorable claim
experience. The adjustment for our workers compensation
costs recorded in our fourth fiscal quarter improved our fiscal
2008 segment gross profit by 1.0%. The impact of these positive
factors was reduced by increased personnel costs, an unusually
large mid-year project that yielded minimal gross profit and
additional depreciation. Depreciation expense of
56
$5.8 million, or 5.0%, of segment revenues in fiscal 2008,
increased from $3.8 million, or 4.1%, of segment revenues
in fiscal 2007, due to continued investment.
The increased depreciation expense in fiscal 2008 over fiscal
2007 of $2.0 million was primarily a full year charge for
assets purchased in 2007 which incurred only a partial year
depreciation expense in 2007. In addition, part of the increase
was attributed to assets acquired through our acquisitions.
Income from operations. As a percentage of segment
revenues, our income from operations was 8.2%, 12.6% and 9.1% in
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Our segment income from operations was $13.7 million,
$14.6 million and $8.3 million for fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Selling, general and administrative
expenses in our Services segment for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007
were 17.5%, 15.5% and 16.3% of segment revenues, respectively.
In fiscal 2009, our higher cost of revenues, along with the
additional $1.6 million allowance for doubtful accounts for
a customer bankruptcy and a $2.1 million legal settlement,
were the primary causes of the decrease in operating margin.
Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Services
segment for fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 increased
$11.4 million, or 63.6%. In addition to a $2.0 million
increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts, major increases
in these expenses included approximately $6.0 million
related to higher operating costs (primarily payroll expense and
a corresponding increase in occupancy costs for rents and
utilities) supporting our acquisitions. In addition, we hired
new management and other personnel, and invested in new
training, safety and quality programs to support new customer
offerings and infrastructure, and we estimate this additional
compensation and other expense accounted for another
$1.5 million of the increase. Other expense increases for
travel, lab support, supplies and other miscellaneous increases
comprised the balance or $1.9 million of the net increase.
Depreciation and amortization expense used in determining income
from operations was $3.3 million, or 2.0% of revenues and
$3.7 million, or 3.2% of revenues for fiscal 2009 and
fiscal 2008, respectively.
In fiscal 2008, these expenses increased by $3.1 million,
or 21.2%. Over $2.4 million related to higher operating
costs (primarily payroll expense) supporting our acquisitions.
The remainder included increased bonus payments to our managers
for improved performance.
Products and
Systems segment
Revenues. The Products and Systems segment also
experienced growth in their revenues in the last three years.
Revenues were $17.3 million, $16.7 million and
$14.9 million for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, the segment revenue growth was
3.8%, 11.8% and 11.9%, respectively, a CAGR of 9.1% overall. The
largest customer for this segment is our International segment,
which remarkets our products, or, to a lesser extent, uses the
products in their field testing and engineering services. Other
larger markets representing
20-29% of
segment revenues have been other test and research laboratories
and industrial companies, including aerospace companies. In
addition, our oil and gas and fossil and nuclear power markets
account for a similar amount of business on an annual basis.
In fiscal 2009, our Products and Systems revenues increased
$0.6 million compared to fiscal 2008 due to increases
across many of our product lines, including our acoustic
emission and vibration systems, as well as on-line monitoring
systems. In addition, shipments to our North America, or
57
NAFTA, customers international subsidiaries increased
$1.6 million compared to the same period last year because
of increased demand, primarily for our AE products and systems.
Offsetting these increases in revenues was a $1.1 million
decrease in revenues from direct sales to third-party
international customers as compared to fiscal 2008, when the
segment had a large system sale to such a customer. In this
segment we had no concentration risk from any single customer
since our largest customer represents less than 4.0% of our
segment revenues.
The $1.8 million increase in our fiscal 2008 segment
revenues resulted primarily from approximately $1.4 million
in sales from new product introductions, including a line of
handheld testing equipment and acoustic emission sensing
devices. The remainder of the increase was attributable to
approximately $0.4 million in product sales to our
international customers.
Gross profit. Our segment gross profit for fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007 was $8.5 million, $8.8 million and
$7.4 million, respectively. Our segment gross profit as a
percentage of revenues for the same three years was 49.0%, 52.9%
and 49.5%, respectively. Depreciation expense used in
determining gross profit for fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal
2007 was $0.8 million, or 4.9% of revenues,
$0.7 million, or 4.3% of revenues, and $0.7 million,
or 4.8% of revenues, respectively. The gross profit in this
segment can fluctuate depending on volume and product mix. For
example, our ultrasonic NDT solutions require more product
engineering and large components are fabricated at a lower
margin.
For the majority of fiscal 2009, our segment gross margin was
higher than the previous year. However, segment revenues in the
fourth quarter of the year were 11.6% below the same quarter in
fiscal 2008 due to the economic downturn, which reduced our
margins for all of fiscal 2009. This was primarily due to our
customers delaying or canceling sales orders, though requests
for proposals from our customers remained at reasonable levels
throughout the quarter.
In fiscal 2008, our gross margin in this segment benefited from
engineering billed to our international subsidiary required on
our sensor highway systems, which was a new product introduced
that year on a large infrastructure project. This increase was
partly offset due to a higher than average cost of revenues
associated with the delay of a large order while we continued to
incur our fixed costs.
Income from operations. Our segment income from
operations for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $1.7 million,
$2.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively. As a
percentage of segment revenues, our operating income was 9.6%,
16.3% and 17.7% in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In
fiscal 2009, as a percentage of segment revenues, our segment
income from operations decreased because of the items noted
above in the discussion of our segment gross profit for fiscal
2009. We believe that with the recent addition of our Executive
Vice President of Sales and Marketing and other hires, as well
as new opportunities in public infrastructure and on-line
monitoring, this trend will improve.
Segment selling, general and administrative expenses, which
after gross profit, are the largest determinant of our income
from operations in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, were
$5.4 million, or 31.0% of revenues, $4.8 million, or
29.0% of revenues, and $3.8 million, or 25.7% of revenues,
respectively. The largest increase in these costs, particularly
in the last two fiscal years, can be attributed to increases in
our sales force to better capture market opportunities in our
target markets. Due to the time required for technical training
of new sales personnel, we believe the financial benefit of
these new hires have not yet matched our investment. Similarly,
our research and engineering expenses have increased as a result
of new hires, and were $1.3 million,
58
$0.9 million and $0.7 million in fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. As a percentage of our Products and
Systems segment sales, these costs have represented 7.3%, 5.7%
and 4.7% for the three years, respectively.
International
segment
Revenues. Our International segment revenues for
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 have been $29.2 million,
$23.7 million and $20.9 million, respectively, and are
subject to currency fluctuations. For the last three fiscal
years, the segment revenues, including currency fluctuations,
had a CAGR of 18.2%, with annual increases of 22.9%, 13.3% and
18.4% during fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We
estimate the organic segment growth during the past three years
to be approximately 27% (2009), 6% (2008) and 11% (2007).
Revenues from customers in the oil and gas and chemicals markets
have historically comprised over 50% of our segment revenues.
Most of this business is centered in major oil refineries in
Russia and Brazil. Other revenues are more widely distributed
including industrial, manufacturing and other testing companies,
research centers and universities.
Our International segment contributed $5.4 million to our
revenue growth for fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. For
fiscal 2009, we estimate the organic segment growth was
approximately 27% and acquisition segment growth was
approximately 9%. Currency fluctuations compared to fiscal year
2008 resulted in 12.1% less segment revenues. The overall
decrease caused by the strengthening of the dollar was
$2.9 million, most of this variance occurring in the last
half of the year. As with our other segments, we estimate that
our organic segment growth slowed in the third and fourth fiscal
quarters, but was still approximately 7% in our fourth fiscal
quarter. $2.2 million of our growth was from a new project
for a refinery in Russia and $1.2 million was from the
United Kingdom and The Netherlands, where a portion of the
growth was attributable to an acquisition of a company
specializing in tank inspections. All of our other foreign
locations in this segment also had positive growth of revenues.
During fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, the U.S. dollar was
generally weaker compared to most of the currencies of countries
in which our international subsidiaries operate. As a result,
the translation of the amounts of non-dollar-denominated
transactions into dollars resulted in increases to all line
items in our statement of operations, which account for a
portion of the increases as noted below.
In fiscal 2008, revenues in our International segment increased
$2.8 million, or 13.3%, over our segment revenues in fiscal
2007, primarily as a result of a $1.4 million increase in
revenues associated with our operations in the United Kingdom
and The Netherlands and a $1.4 million increase in revenues
from our South American operations. Approximately
$1.6 million of the increase in segment revenues in fiscal
2008 were attributable to the weaker U.S. dollar. The
remainder of the increase was due in part to the sale of our new
sensor highway products in the United Kingdom and The
Netherlands as well as increased business in the oil and gas
markets in South America. We had minor decreases in segment
revenues attributable to customers in Russia and France, but
these were offset by translation gains caused by the exchange
rate.
Gross profit. Our segment gross profit margin was
43.2%, 41.9% and 41.2% in fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal
2007, respectively. Although fairly consistent on an annual
basis, quarterly results can vary based on sales mix,
seasonality, currency and other factors. In the second half of
fiscal
59
2009, our segment gross margin was 37.3%, which included a 2.4%
customer sales allowance. For the entire year, our gross profit
in this segment was $12.6 million.
In fiscal 2008, the gross profit in our International segment
was $9.9 million, or 41.9% of segment revenues, compared to
$8.6 million, or 41.2% of segment revenues, in fiscal 2007.
Although our segment gross profit in fiscal 2008 increased over
fiscal 2007, the amount of the increase was offset by additional
costs related to project delays incurred to support
customization of new products introduced for a bridge monitoring
project. In addition, our overall gross profit margin was
impacted by the increase as a percentage of total revenues of
revenues attributable to customers in South America where we
performed traditional NDT services with a lower gross profit
margin.
Income from operations. Our income from operations
from our International segment for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007
was $4.1 million, $2.4 million and $2.1 million,
respectively. As a percentage of segment revenues, our income
from operations was 14.0%, 10.1% and 10.3% in fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Our segment selling, general and
administrative expenses, the largest factor in determining
income from operations for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 were
$8.0 million, or 27.6% of segment revenues,
$6.8 million, or 28.6% of segment revenues, and
$5.9 million, or 28.0% of segment revenues, respectively.
In fiscal 2009, currency fluctuation was more impactful than in
previous years because our segment expenses were approximately
$1.0 million lower than the local currency equivalent. The
overall increase from fiscal 2008 is attributable to new segment
expenses related to an acquisition made in Holland and
additional hires and training costs in our South American
operation. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses
included in income from operations were $0.2 million in
fiscal 2009 and were not significant in fiscal 2008.
Corporate and
eliminations
The elimination in revenues and cost of revenues primarily
relates to the accounting elimination of revenues from sales of
our Products and Systems segment to the International segment.
The other major item in the corporate and eliminations grouping
are the general and administrative costs not allocated to the
other segments. These costs primarily include those for
non-segment management, accounting and auditing, acquisition
transactional costs and stock compensation expense and certain
other costs. As a percentage of our total revenues, these costs
have generally remained constant over the last three fiscal
years, consisting of 2.1%, 2.2% and 1.6% of total revenues for
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in
operating expenses in 2009 and 2008 primarily related to higher
compensation and additional staff, audit and accounting fees and
other general increases in expense at our corporate offices.
60
Quarterly results
of operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly
statements of operations data and operations data as a percent
of revenues for the eight fiscal quarters ended May 31,
2009. The unaudited quarterly information, in our opinion,
reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal accruals,
necessary for a fair statement of the data for each of those
quarters. This data should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus. These quarterly operating results are not
necessarily indicative of our operating results for any future
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal quarter ending
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
February 28,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
February 29,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008(3)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
55,860
|
|
|
$
|
47,001
|
|
|
$
|
59,275
|
|
|
$
|
46,997
|
|
|
$
|
48,023
|
|
|
$
|
37,167
|
|
|
$
|
37,218
|
|
|
$
|
29,860
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
35,358
|
|
|
|
31,607
|
|
|
|
35,676
|
|
|
|
28,526
|
|
|
|
26,885
|
|
|
|
24,527
|
|
|
|
21,917
|
|
|
|
17,261
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
18,012
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
21,538
|
|
|
|
16,612
|
|
|
|
19,030
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
13,732
|
|
|
|
11,090
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,640
|
|
|
|
12,110
|
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
|
|
11,075
|
|
|
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
8,182
|
|
|
|
7,956
|
|
|
|
7,565
|
|
Research and engineering
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
7,191
|
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
|
|
8,040
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,502
|
|
|
$
|
(788
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,235
|
|
|
$
|
1,517
|
|
|
$
|
4,291
|
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
$
|
1,934
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In the fiscal quarters ended
February 28, 2009 and May 31, 2009, we estimated the
bad debt expense related to a large customer who filed
bankruptcy. The expense provision made was $1.2 million and
$0.4 million in these quarters, respectively. There is
another $0.7 million which we believe will be collectible.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
In the fiscal quarter ended
November 30, 2008, we first estimated the legal expense
associated with a class action lawsuit. This item has been
settled and payments made to the class in June 2009.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
In the fiscal quarter ended
May 31, 2008, we adjusted our estimate for losses and
expenses under our workers compensation policies as a
result of favorable loss experience. This adjustment resulted in
a favorable impact on the quarters gross profit and
operating income of approximately $1.0 million and
represents 2.1% of revenues.
|
Liquidity and
capital resources
Overview
We have primarily funded our operations through the issuance of
preferred stock in a series of financings, bank borrowings,
capital lease financing transactions and cash provided from
operations. We have used these proceeds to fund our operations,
develop our technology, expand our sales and marketing efforts
to new markets and acquire small companies or assets, primarily
to add certified technicians and enhance our capabilities and
geographic reach. We believe that our existing cash and cash
equivalents, our anticipated cash flows from operating
activities, borrowings under our credit agreement and the net
proceeds from this offering will be sufficient to meet our
anticipated cash needs over the next 12 months.
61
Cash flows
table
The following table summarizes our cash flows for fiscal 2009,
2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
12,661
|
|
|
$
|
12,851
|
|
|
$
|
14,006
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(15,888
|
)
|
|
|
(19,446
|
)
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
(8,122
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,113
|
|
|
$
|
(212
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
operating activities
Cash provided by our operating activities primarily consists of
net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization, deferred taxes and bad debt
expense and the effect of changes in working capital and other
activities.
Cash provided by our operating activities in fiscal 2009 was
$12.7 million and consisted of $5.5 million of net
income plus $15.4 million of non-cash items, consisting
primarily of depreciation and amortization of $12.6 million
and provision for doubtful accounts of $2.1 million, less
$8.2 million of net cash used for working capital purposes
and other activities. Cash used for working capital and other
activities in fiscal 2009 primarily reflected a
$8.8 million increase in accounts receivable attributable
to our increase in revenues, a $1.1 million increase in
prepaid expenses and other current assets due to an increase in
estimated tax payments and a decrease in accounts payable of
$2.2 million due primarily to the timing of payments to
vendors. These were partially offset by a $6.0 million
increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities due
to a $2.1 million accrual in connection with our fiscal
2009 legal settlement and the overall growth in our operations.
Cash provided by our operating activities in fiscal 2008 was
$12.9 million and consisted of $7.4 million of net
income plus $13.0 million of non-cash items, consisting
primarily of depreciation and amortization of
$11.4 million, less $7.6 million of net cash used for
working capital purposes and other activities. Cash used for
working capital and other activities in fiscal 2008 primarily
reflected a $9.2 million increase in accounts receivable
and a $1.8 million increase in inventories attributable to
our seasonal increase in revenues and a $1.0 million
increase in other expenses related to the preparation and filing
of our S-1
registration statement in connection with this offering. These
increases were partially offset by a $6.3 million increase
in accounts payable and accrued expenses as our operations
continued to grow, and a $0.1 million increase in our
income taxes payable due to our increased profitability.
Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2007 was
$14.0 million and consisted of $5.4 million of net
income plus $8.9 million of non-cash items, consisting
primarily of $8.7 million of depreciation and amortization,
less $0.3 million of cash used to support changes in
operating assets and liabilities. In addition to depreciation
and amortization, the adjustments to cash included a non-cash
credit of $1.3 million due to the release of the deferred
tax valuation allowance. The $0.3 million in net cash used
to support operating assets and liabilities primarily reflected
a $2.3 million net increase in our accounts receivable
offset by increases in our
62
accounts payable and accrued expenses as our operations
continued to grow. Cash was also provided by a $1.2 million
increase in income taxes payable due to our improved
profitability. A total of $0.9 million of cash was used for
a variety of items, including purchases of inventories and other
assets.
Cash flows from
investing activities
Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2009 was
$15.9 million of which $10.5 million was used to
acquire four services businesses and one international business.
In connection with the acquisitions, we also incurred
$9.3 million of seller notes payable and related
obligations. Additionally, in fiscal 2009 we acquired
$12.9 million in property and equipment, of which
$5.4 million were cash purchases and $7.5 million were
acquired through capital leases.
For fiscal 2008, cash used in investing activities was
$19.4 million, of which $15.5 million was used to
acquire seven services businesses and $3.7 million in
property and equipment. In connection with the acquisitions, we
also incurred $12.9 million of seller notes payable and
related obligations. In addition, $5.0 million of property
and equipment was acquired through capital lease obligations.
Cash used in investing activities was $4.3 million for
fiscal 2007. Cash purchases for property and equipment for
fiscal 2007 was $2.6 million. Cash spent for acquisitions
in fiscal 2007 was $2.0 million. All of these expenditures
support our growth or specific customer projects and
opportunities.
Cash flows from
financing activities
For fiscal 2009, cash provided from financing activities was
$4.9 million, which included $20.0 million in
borrowings from long-term debt to finance five acquisitions and
net borrowings of $2.4 million from our revolving credit
facility to fund operations. During fiscal 2009 we made
$12.3 million and $4.8 million in principal repayments
on our long-term debt and capital leases, respectively. During
fiscal 2009, we refinanced our existing term loan and revolver
with a new credit facility comprised of a $25.0 million
term loan and $55.0 million revolver, a portion of which
($2.0 million U.S. dollar equivalent) will be
available to be borrowed in Canadian dollars. The proceeds were
used to repay the outstanding indebtedness of our prior credit
agreement and to fund two acquisitions that closed after the end
of fiscal 2009.
For fiscal 2008 cash provided from financing activities was
$6.3 million. In fiscal 2008, we used our revolving credit
facility to borrow $13.1 million to finance a portion of
the purchase prices of the seven acquisitions noted above.
During fiscal 2008, we also paid obligations under our capital
leases and bank debt of $3.6 million and $3.2 million,
respectively. Subsequent to year end, we amended our credit
agreement to provide for an additional $20.0 million term
loan facility from our lenders that we used to repay the
borrowing under our revolving credit facility.
Cash flows used in financing activities in fiscal 2007 were
$8.1 million and consisted primarily of net repayments to
our banks and other note holders of $5.3 million and
another $2.4 million repayment of capital lease
obligations. On October 31, 2006, as subsequently amended
and restated on April 23, 2007 and further amended on
December 14, 2007, May 30, 2007 and July 1, 2008,
we entered into our credit agreement, which initially provided
for a $15.0 million revolving credit facility and a
$25.0 million term loan facility. The proceeds from the
senior credit facility were used to repay the outstanding
indebtedness under our prior credit and term loans.
63
Effect of
exchange rate on changes in cash
For fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, exchange rate changes increased
our cash by $0.4 million, $0.1 million and
$0.2 million, respectively.
Cash balance and
credit facility borrowings
As of May 31, 2009 we had $5.7 million in cash and
$4.5 million available to us under our secured revolving
credit facility. At May 31, 2009, our credit agreement
provided for two term loans in the amount of $25.0 million
(2007 term loan) and $20.0 million (2008
term loan) and a $20 million secured revolving credit
facility (revolver). The aggregate principal amount
owed under the term loans and the revolving credit facility was
$36.3 million and $15.5 million, respectively, as of
May 31, 2009. Borrowings under our credit agreement bear
interest at either the prime rate (3.25% at May 31,
2009) or the LIBOR rate (0.32% at May 31, 2009), plus
an applicable margin of 1.5% to 2.3% as defined in the credit
agreement. The outstanding principal and accrued interest under
the 2007 term loan and the revolver mature on October 31,
2012. The 2008 term loan matures on June 27, 2014. There is
a provision in our credit facility that requires us to repay 25%
of the immediately preceding fiscal years free cash
flow if our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA is
less than a fixed amount on or before October 1 each year.
Free cash flow means the sum of EBITDA minus all
taxes paid or payable in cash, minus cash interest paid, minus
all capital expenditures made in cash, minus all scheduled and
non-scheduled principal payments on funded debt made in the
period, minus acquisition costs and plus or minus changes in
working capital. Funded debt means all outstanding
liabilities for borrowed money and other interest-bearing
liabilities.
Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2009, two covenants in our
credit agreement were amended retroactive to prior periods. The
debt service coverage ratio, as defined, was amended as of
May 31, 2009 and permitted additional indebtedness, as
defined, was amended for all reporting periods after
August 31, 2007. In July 2008, we borrowed an additional
$20.0 million under a term loan facility from our existing
lenders. We used the proceeds to repay the amounts outstanding
under the revolving credit facility and to fund the
$5.0 million aggregate cash portion of the purchase prices
for two businesses we acquired subsequent to the end of fiscal
2008.
On July 22, 2009, in connection with the refinancing of our
prior credit facility, we entered into our existing credit
agreement with Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
TD Bank, N.A. and Capital One, N.A., which provided for a
$25.0 million term loan and a $55.0 million secured
revolving credit facility. Borrowings under our credit agreement
currently bear interest at the LIBOR or base rate, at our
option, plus an applicable margin ranging from 0% to 3.25% and
a market disruption increase of between 0.0% and 1.0%, if the
lenders determine it applicable. The outstanding principal and
accrued interest under the term loan matures on July 21,
2012. Borrowings made under the revolving credit facility are
payable at the same time. There is a provision in our credit
facility that requires us to repay 25% of the immediately
preceding fiscal years free cash flow if our
ratio of funded debt to EBITDA, as defined in our
credit agreement, is less than a fixed amount on or before
October 1 each year. Free cash flow means the sum of
EBITDA, as defined in our credit agreement, minus all taxes paid
or payable in cash, minus cash interest paid, minus all capital
expenditures made in cash, minus all scheduled and non-scheduled
principal payments on funded debt made in the period and plus or
minus changes in working capital. Funded debt means
all outstanding liabilities for
64
borrowed money and other interest-bearing liabilities. We do
not expect to be required to make payments under this provision.
Future sources of
cash
We expect our future sources of cash to include cash flow from
operations, cash borrowed under our revolving credit facility
and cash borrowed from leasing companies to purchase equipment
and fleet service vehicles. Our revolving credit facility is
available for cash advances required for working capital and
letters of credit to support our operations. To meet our short-
and long-term liquidity requirements, we expect primarily to
rely on cash generated from our operating activities. We are
currently funding our acquisitions through our available cash,
borrowings under our revolving credit facility and seller notes.
Future uses of
cash
We expect our future uses of cash will primarily be for
acquisitions, international expansion, purchases or manufacture
of field testing equipment to support growth, additional
investments in technology and software products and the
replacement of existing assets and equipment used in our
operations. We often make purchases to support new sources of
revenues, particularly in our Services segment, but generally
only do so with a high degree of certainty about related
customer orders and pricing. In addition, we have a certain
amount of replacement equipment, including our fleet vehicles.
We historically spend approximately 5% to 6% of our total
revenues on capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, and
will fund this through a combination of cash and lease
financing. Our cash capital expenditures, excluding
acquisitions, for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 were 2.6%, 2.4% and
2.1% of revenues, respectively.
Our anticipated acquisitions may also require capital. In some
cases, additional equipment will be needed to upgrade the
capabilities of these acquired companies. We believe that after
this offering, our future acquisition and capital spending will
increase as we aggressively pursue growth opportunities. Other
investments in infrastructure, training and software may also be
required to match our growth, but we plan to continue using a
disciplined approach to building our business. In addition, we
will use cash to fund our operating leases, capital leases and
long-term debt repayment and various other obligations,
including the commitments discussed in the table below, as they
arise.
We will also use cash to support our working capital
requirements for our operations, particularly in the event of
further growth and due to the impacts of seasonality on our
business. Our future working capital requirements will depend on
many factors, including the rate of our revenue growth, our
introduction of new solutions and enhancements to existing
solutions and our expansion of sales and marketing and product
development activities. To the extent that our cash and cash
equivalents, cash flows from operating activities and net
proceeds of this offering are insufficient to fund our future
activities, we may need to raise additional funds through bank
credit arrangements or public or private equity or debt
financings. We also may need to raise additional funds in the
event we determine in the future to effect one or more
acquisitions of businesses, technologies or products that will
complement our existing operations. In the event additional
funding is required, we may not be able to obtain bank credit
arrangements or effect an equity or debt financing on terms
acceptable to us or at all.
65
We may also use cash in connection with legal proceedings and
claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. We paid
approximately $1.8 million in fiscal 2010 related to our
fiscal 2009 legal settlement.
Contractual
obligations
We generally do not enter into long-term minimum purchase
commitments. Our principal commitments, in addition to those
related to our long-term debt discussed below, consist of
obligations under facility leases for office space and equipment
leases.
The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual
obligations as of May 31, 2009 and has been adjusted to
reflect the revised principal payments under our new debt
facility entered into on July 22, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Beyond
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
fiscal 2015
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
66,251
|
|
|
$
|
11,181
|
|
|
$
|
12,288
|
|
|
$
|
11,501
|
|
|
$
|
30,425
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
672
|
|
Capital lease obligations(1)
|
|
|
16,269
|
|
|
|
5,773
|
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
6,736
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
89,256
|
|
|
$
|
19,067
|
|
|
$
|
18,554
|
|
|
$
|
15,732
|
|
|
$
|
32,878
|
|
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
|
$
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes estimated cash interest to
be paid over the remaining terms of the leases.
|
In addition to the above, we have certain contingent payments
possibly payable in connection with our acquisitions.
Off-balance sheet
arrangements
During fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, we did not have any
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Effects of
inflation and changing prices
Our results of operations and financial condition have not been
significantly affected by inflation and changing prices.
Quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk
Interest rate
sensitivity
We had cash and cash equivalents of $5.7 million at
May 31, 2009. These amounts are held for working capital
purposes and were invested primarily in deposits, money market
funds and short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade
securities. In addition, some of the net proceeds
66
of this offering may be invested in short-term,
interest-bearing, investment-grade securities pending their
application. Due to the short-term nature of these investments,
we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes
in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of
changes in interest rates. Declines in interest rates, however,
will reduce future investment income. If overall interest rates
had fallen by 10% in fiscal 2009, our interest income would not
have been materially affected.
We had $36.3 million of debt outstanding under our term
loan facility at May 31, 2009. Although the interest rate
on our term loan facility is variable and adjusts periodically,
it is currently based on the
30-day LIBOR
rate (0.32% at May 31, 2009). If the LIBOR rate fluctuated
by 10% for the year ending May 31, 2009, interest expense
in fiscal 2009 would have fluctuated by approximately $38,000.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our floating interest rate
exposure. In 2007, we entered into two interest rate swap
contracts whereby we would receive or pay an amount equal to the
difference between a fixed rate and the quoted
90-day LIBOR
rate on a quarterly basis. At May 31, 2009, the following
outlines the significant terms of the contracts and the amount
we will pay above our contractual rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
Contract date
|
|
Term
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
November 20, 2006
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
5.17%
|
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
$
|
(321
|
)
|
November 30, 2006
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
5.05%
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(716
|
)
|
|
$
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
Foreign currency
risk
We have foreign currency exposure related to our operations in
foreign locations. This foreign currency exposure, particularly
the Euro, British Pound Sterling, Brazilian Real, Russian Ruble,
Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar and the Indian Rupee, arises
primarily from the translation of our foreign subsidiaries
financial statements into U.S. dollars. For example, a
portion of our annual sales and operating costs are denominated
in British pound sterling and we have exposure related to sales
and operating costs increasing or decreasing based on changes in
currency exchange rates. If the U.S. dollar increases in
value against these foreign currencies, the value in
U.S. dollars of the assets and liabilities originally
recorded in these foreign currencies will decrease. Conversely,
if the U.S. dollar decreases in value against these foreign
currencies, the value in U.S. dollars of the assets and
liabilities originally recorded in these foreign currencies will
increase. Thus, increases and decreases in the value of the
U.S. dollar relative to these foreign currencies have a
direct impact on the value in U.S. dollars of our foreign
currency denominated assets and liabilities, even if the value
of these items has not changed in their original currency. We do
not currently enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge
exposures denominated in foreign currencies. A 10% change in the
average U.S. dollar exchange rates for fiscal 2009 would
cause a change in consolidated operating income of approximately
$0.4 million. We may consider entering into hedging or
forward exchange contracts in the future.
67
Fair value of
financial instruments
We do not have material exposure to market risk with respect to
investments, as our investments consist primarily of highly
liquid investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three
months or less. We do not use derivative financial instruments
for speculative or trading purposes; however, this does not
preclude our adoption of specific hedging strategies in the
future.
Critical
accounting estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires that we make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Our more significant estimates include: the valuation of
goodwill and intangible assets; the impairment of long-lived
assets, allowances for doubtful accounts; foreign currency
translation; derivative financial instruments; reserves for
self-insured workers compensation and health benefits; and
deferred income tax valuation allowances. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
we believe to be reasonable. We evaluate our estimates and
assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ
significantly from these estimates under different assumptions
or conditions. There have been no material changes to these
estimates for the periods presented in this prospectus.
We believe that of our significant accounting policies, which
are described below and in Note 2 to our audited
consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus,
the following accounting policies involve a greater degree of
judgment and complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we
believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and
evaluating our financial condition and results of operations.
Accounts
receivable
Accounts receivable are stated net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts and sales allowances. Outstanding accounts receivable
balances are reviewed periodically, and allowances are provided
at such time as management believes it is probable that such
balances will not be collected within a reasonable period of
time. We extend credit to our customers based upon credit
evaluations in the normal course of business, primarily with
30-day
terms. Bad debts are provided on the allowance method based on
historical experience and managements evaluation of
outstanding accounts receivable. Accounts are written off when
they are deemed uncollectible.
Foreign currency
translation
The financial position and results of operations of our foreign
subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the
functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the foreign
subsidiaries are translated into the U.S. dollar at the
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and
expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the
year. Translation gains and losses not included in earnings are
reported in accumulated other comprehensive income within
stockholders equity. Foreign currency transaction gains
and losses are included in net income (loss), and were
$0.2 million in fiscal 2009 and not significant in fiscal
2008 and 2007.
68
Long-lived assets outside of the U.S. totaled
$11.1 million and $3.0 million as of May 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
Goodwill and
intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair market value of net assets of the acquired business at the
date of acquisition. We test for impairment annually in our
fiscal fourth quarter using a two-step process. The first step
identifies potential impairment by comparing the fair value of
our reporting units to their carrying value. If the fair value
is less than the carrying value, the second step measures the
amount of impairment, if any. The impairment loss is the amount
by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill. Intangible assets are recorded at
cost. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
Impairment of
long-lived assets
We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets on a
periodic basis in order to identify business conditions that may
indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential
impairment is based primarily on our ability to recover the
carrying value of our long-lived assets from expected future
undiscounted cash flows. If the total expected future
undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the
assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between fair
value (computed based upon the expected future discounted cash
flows) and the carrying value of the assets.
Derivative
financial instruments
We recognize our derivatives as either assets or liabilities,
and measure those instruments at fair value and recognize the
changes in fair value of the derivative in net income or other
comprehensive income, as appropriate. We hedge a portion of our
variable rate interest payments on debt using interest rate swap
contracts to convert variable payments into fixed payments. We
do not apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swap
contracts. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are
reported as a component of interest expense.
Income
taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred income tax
assets will not be realized.
Recent accounting
pronouncements
SFAS No. 141R. In December 2007, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141R) which replaces SFAS 141,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141). SFAS 141R
69
applies to all business combinations, including combinations
among mutual entities and combinations by contract alone.
SFAS 141R requires that all business combinations will be
accounted for by applying the acquisition method. This standard
will significantly change the accounting for business
combinations both during the period of the acquisition and in
subsequent periods. Among the more significant changes in the
accounting for acquisitions are the following:
|
|
|
In-process research and development (IPR&D) will be
accounted for as an asset, with the cost recognized as research
and development is realized or abandoned. IPR&D is
presently expensed at the time of the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired or liabilities assumed in a business combination
that arise from a contingency will be measured at fair value at
acquisition date if the fair value can be determined during the
measurement period.
|
|
|
|
Decreases in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax
assets will be recognized in operations. Such changes were
considered to be subsequent changes in consideration and were
recorded as decreases in goodwill.
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs will generally be expensed. Certain such costs
are presently treated as costs of the acquisition.
|
SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations
consummated in periods beginning on or after December 15,
2008. Early application is prohibited. We will adopt
SFAS 141R on June 1, 2009 and the effects will depend
on future acquisitions. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2009, we expensed $150 of direct costs related to business
combinations that were in process but not completed by the
effective date of SFAS 141R.
SFAS No. 160. In December 2007, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160), an
amendment of ARB No. 51, which will change the accounting
and reporting related to noncontrolling interests.
SFAS 160, which is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008, requires
that ownership interests in the subsidiaries held by parties
other than the parent be presented in the consolidated balance
sheet with equity and the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be
clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
income statement. Additionally, the statement requires that
changes in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary be
accounted for as an equity transaction. We will adopt
SFAS 160 on June 1, 2009 and, accordingly, minority
interest in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets will be
reclassified to equity. Earnings attributable to minority
interests will be included in net income although such earnings
will continue to be deducted to measure earnings per share.
SFAS No. 161. In March 2008, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161).
SFAS 161 is intended to help investors better understand
how derivative instruments and hedging activities affect an
entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows through enhanced disclosure requirements. SFAS 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
earlier adoption encouraged. We will adopt SFAS 161 on
June 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 165. In May 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
(SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events
that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued and is effective for
70
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We
do not anticipate the adoption of SFAS 165 on June 1,
2009 will have a material effect on our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
SFAS No. 167. In June 2009, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 167, Amendment to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167)
which amends Interpretation 46(R) to require an enterprise to
perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods that begin
after November 15, 2009. We do not expect adoption of
SFAS 167 in fiscal year 2010 to have a material effect on
our results of operations, financial position or cash flows as
we do not have any variable interest entities.
71
Business
Our
business
We are a leading global provider of technology-enabled asset
protection solutions used to evaluate the structural integrity
of critical energy, industrial and public infrastructure. We
combine industry-leading products and technologies, expertise in
mechanical integrity (MI) and non-destructive testing (NDT)
services and proprietary data analysis software to deliver a
comprehensive portfolio of customized solutions, ranging from
routine inspections to complex, plant-wide asset integrity
assessments and management. These mission critical solutions
enhance our customers ability to extend the useful life of
their assets, increase productivity, minimize repair costs,
comply with governmental safety and environmental regulations,
manage risk and avoid catastrophic disasters. Given the role our
services play in ensuring the safe and efficient operation of
infrastructure, we have historically provided a majority of our
services to our customers on a regular, recurring basis. We
serve a global customer base of companies with asset-intensive
infrastructure, including companies in the oil and gas, fossil
and nuclear power, public infrastructure, chemicals, aerospace
and defense, transportation, primary metals and metalworking,
pharmaceuticals and food processing industries. As of
August 1, 2009, we had approximately 2,000 employees,
including 29 Ph.D.s and more than 100 other degreed
engineers and highly-skilled, certified technicians, in 68
offices across 15 countries. We have established long-term
relationships as a critical solutions provider to many of the
leading companies in our target markets. The following chart
represents revenues we generated in certain of our end markets
for fiscal 2009.
Mistras revenues
by end market
(fiscal 2009)
72
Our asset protection solutions have evolved over time as we have
combined the disciplines of NDT, MI services and data analysis
software to provide value to our customers. The foundation of
our business is NDT, which is the examination of assets without
impacting the future usefulness or impairing the integrity of
these assets. The ability to inspect infrastructure assets and
not interfere with their operating performance makes NDT a
highly attractive alternative to many traditional intrusive
inspection techniques, which may require dismantling equipment
or shutting down a plant, refinery, mill or site. Our MI
services are a systematic engineering-based approach to
developing best practices for ensuring the on-going integrity
and safety of equipment and industrial facilities. MI services
involve conducting an inventory of infrastructure assets,
developing and implementing inspection and maintenance
procedures, training personnel in executing these procedures and
managing inspections, testing and assessments of customer
assets. By assisting customers in implementing MI programs we
enable them to identify gaps between existing and desired
practices, find and track deficiencies and degradations to be
corrected and establish quality assurance standards for
fabrication, engineering and installation of infrastructure
assets. We believe our MI services improve plant safety and
reliability and regulatory compliance, and in so doing reduce
maintenance costs. Our solutions also incorporate comprehensive
data analysis from our proprietary asset protection software to
provide customers with detailed, integrated and cost-effective
solutions that rate the risks of alternative maintenance
approaches and recommend actions in accordance with consensus
industry codes and standards.
As a global asset protection leader, we provide a comprehensive
range of solutions that includes:
|
|
|
traditional outsourced NDT services conducted by our
technicians, mechanical integrity assessments, above-ground
storage tank inspection and American Petroleum Institute visual
inspections and predictive maintenance program development;
|
|
|
|
advanced asset protection solutions, in most cases involving
proprietary AE, digital radiography, infrared, wireless
and/or
automated ultrasonic sensors, which are operated by our highly
trained technicians;
|
|
|
|
a proprietary and customized portfolio of software products for
testing and analyzing data captured in real-time by our
technicians and sensors, including advanced features such as
pattern recognition and neural networks;
|
|
|
|
enterprise software and relational databases to store and
analyze inspection data comparing to prior operations and
testing of similar assets, industrial standards and specific
risk conditions, such as use with highly flammable or corrosive
materials, and developing asset integrity management plans based
on risk-based inspection that specify an optimal schedule for
the testing, maintenance and retirement of assets; and
|
|
|
|
on-line monitoring systems that provide for secure web-based
remote or
on-site
asset inspection, real-time reports about and analysis of plant
or enterprise-wide structural integrity data, comparison of
integrity data to our library of historical inspection data and
analysis to better assess structural integrity and provide
alerts for and prioritize future inspections and maintenance.
|
We offer our customers either a customized package of services,
products and systems or our enterprise software and other niche
products on a stand-alone basis. For example, customers can
purchase most of our sensors and accompanying software to
integrate with their own
73
systems, or they can purchase a complete turn-key solution,
including our installation, monitoring and assessment services.
Importantly, however, we do not sell certain of our advanced and
proprietary software and other products as stand-alone
offerings; instead, we embed them in our comprehensive service
offerings to protect our investment in intellectual property
while providing a substantial source of recurring revenues.
We generated revenues of $209.1 million,
$152.3 million and $122.2 million and adjusted EBITDA
of $31.1 million, $28.1 million and $19.2 million
for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For fiscal 2009,
we generated over 80% of our revenues from our Services segment.
Our revenues are diversified, with our top 10 customers
accounting for 35.8%, 35.2% and 38.6% of our revenues during
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We provide our asset
protection solutions to multiple divisions, locations and
business units of major refineries across the globe. Our largest
such customer accounted for 17.1%, 16.8% and 16.5% of our
revenues for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. No other
customer accounted for more than 5.0% of our revenues during
fiscal 2009, 2008 or 2007.
Asset protection
industry overview
Asset protection is a large and rapidly growing industry that
consists of NDT inspection, MI services and inspection data
warehousing and analysis. NDT plays a crucial role in assuring
the operational and structural integrity of critical
infrastructure without compromising the usefulness of the tested
materials or equipment. The evolution of NDT services, in
combination with broader industry trends, including increased
asset utilization and aging of infrastructure, the desire by
companies to extend the useful life of their existing
infrastructure, new construction projects, enhanced government
regulation and the shortage of certified NDT professionals have
made NDT an integral and increasingly outsourced part of many
asset-intensive industries. Well-publicized industrial and
public infrastructure failures and accidents have also raised
the level of awareness of regulators, as well as owners and
operators, of the benefits that asset protection can provide.
Historically, NDT solutions predominantly used qualitative
testing methods aimed primarily at detecting defects in the
tested materials. This methodology, which we categorize as
traditional NDT, is typically labor intensive and,
as a result, considerably dependent upon the availability and
skill level of the engineers and scientists performing the
inspection services. The traditional NDT market is highly
fragmented, with a significant number of small vendors providing
inspection services to divisions of companies or local
governments situated in close proximity to the vendors
field inspection engineers and scientists. Today, we believe
that customers are increasingly looking for a single vendor
capable of providing a wider spectrum of asset protection
solutions for their global infrastructure. This shift in
underlying demand, which began in the early 1990s, has
contributed to a transition from traditional NDT solutions to
more advanced solutions that employ automated digital sensor
technologies and accompanying enterprise software, allowing for
the effective capture, storage, analysis and reporting of
inspection and engineering results electronically and in digital
formats. These advanced techniques, taken together with advances
in wired and wireless communication and information
technologies, have further enabled the development of remote
monitoring systems, asset-management and predictive maintenance
capabilities and other data analytics and management. We believe
that as advanced asset protection solutions continue to gain
acceptance among asset-intensive organizations, only those
vendors offering broad, complete and integrated solutions,
scalable operations and a global footprint will have a distinct
competitive advantage. Moreover, we believe that vendors that
are able to effectively deliver both advanced
74
solutions and data analytics, by virtue of their ownership of
customers data, develop a significant barrier to entry for
competitors, and so develop the capability to create significant
recurring revenues.
We believe the following represent key dynamics driving the
growth of the asset protection industry:
|
|
|
Extending the Useful Life of Aging
Infrastructure. The prohibitive cost and challenge of
building new infrastructure has resulted in the significant
aging of existing infrastructure and caused companies to seek
ways to extend the useful life of existing assets. For example,
due to the significant cost associated with constructing new
refineries, stringent environmental regulations which have
increased the costs of managing them and difficulty in finding
suitable locations on which to build them, no new refineries
have been constructed in the United States since 1976. Because
aging infrastructure requires relatively higher levels of
maintenance and repair in comparison to new infrastructure, as
well as more frequent, extensive and ongoing testing, companies
and public authorities are increasing spending to ensure the
operational and structural integrity of existing infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Outsourcing of Non-Core Activities and Technical Resource
Constraints. While some of our customers have
historically performed NDT services in-house, the increasing
sophistication and automation of NDT programs, together with a
decreasing supply of skilled professionals and stricter
governmental regulations, has led many companies and public
authorities to outsource NDT to providers that have the
necessary technical product portfolio, engineering expertise,
technical workforce and proven track record of results-oriented
performance to effectively meet their increasing requirements.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Asset and Capacity Utilization. Due to
high energy prices, high repair and replacement costs and the
limited construction of new infrastructure, existing
infrastructure in some of our target markets is being used at
higher capacities, causing increased stress and fatigue that
accelerate deterioration. These higher prices and costs also
motivate our customers to complete repairs, maintenance,
replacements and upgrades more quickly. For example, increasing
demand for refined petroleum products, combined with high plant
utilization rates routinely in excess of 85%, is driving
refineries to upgrade facilities to make them more efficient and
expand capacity. In order to sustain high capacity utilization
rates, customers are increasingly using asset protection
solutions to efficiently ensure the integrity and safety of
their assets. Implementation of asset protection solutions can
also lead to increased productivity as a result of reduced
maintenance-related downtime.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Corrosion from Low-Quality Inputs. High
commodities prices and increasing energy demands have led to the
use of lower grade inputs and feedstock, such as low-grade coal
or petroleum, in the refinery and power generation processes.
These lower grade inputs can rapidly corrode the infrastructure
they come into contact with, which in turn increases the need
for asset protection solutions to identify such corrosion and
enable infrastructure owners to proactively combat the problems
caused by such corrosion.
|
|
|
|
Increasing Use of Advanced Materials. Customers in
our target markets are increasingly utilizing advanced
materials, such as composites, and other unique technologies in
the manufacturing and construction of new infrastructure and
aerospace applications. As a result, they require advanced
testing, assessment and maintenance technologies to protect
these assets, since many of these advanced materials cannot be
tested using traditional NDT techniques. We believe that demand
for NDT solutions will increase as companies and public
|
75
|
|
|
authorities continue to use these advanced materials, not only
during the operating phase of the lifecycle of their assets, but
also during the design and construction phases by incorporating
technologies such as embedded sensors.
|
|
|
|
Meeting Safety Regulations. Owners and operators of
infrastructure assets increasingly face strict government
regulations and safety requirements. Failure to meet these
standards can result in significant financial liabilities,
increased scrutiny by OSHA and other regulators, higher
insurance premiums and tarnished corporate brand value. The
numerous failings in equipment, maintenance and inspection that
led to the Texas City refinery explosion in 2005 created
significant damage to the reputation of refineries and led OSHA
to strengthen process safety enforcement standards. As a result,
these owners and operators are seeking highly reliable asset
protection suppliers with a proven track record of providing
asset protection services, products and systems to assist them
in meeting these increasingly stringent regulations.
|
|
|
|
Expanding Addressable End-Markets. Advances in NDT
sensor technology and asset protection software systems, and the
continued emergence of new technologies, are creating increased
demand for asset protection solutions in applications where
existing techniques were previously ineffective. Further, we
expect increased demand in relatively new markets, such as the
pharmaceutical and food processing industries, where
infrastructure is only now aging to a point where significant
maintenance is required.
|
|
|
|
Expanding Addressable Geographies. We believe that a
substantial driver of incremental demand will come from
international markets, including Asia, Europe and Latin America.
Specifically, as companies and governments in these markets
build and maintain infrastructure and applications that require
the use of asset protection solutions, we believe demand for our
solutions will increase.
|
We believe that the market available to us will continue to grow
rapidly as a result of macro-market trends, including aging
infrastructure, use of more advanced materials, such as
composites, and the increasing outsourcing of asset protection
solutions by companies who historically performed these services
using internal resources.
Our target
markets
We focus our sales, marketing and product development efforts on
a range of infrastructure-intensive industries and governmental
authorities. With our portfolio of asset protection services,
products and systems, we can effectively serve our customer base
throughout the lifecycle of their assets, beginning at the
design stage, through the construction and maintenance phase
and, as necessary, through the decommissioning of their
infrastructure.
Our target markets include:
Oil and
gas
According to the United States Energy Information Administration
(EIA), in 2008 coal, oil and gas supplied approximately 80% of
global primary energy demand. In addition, there were
717 crude oil refineries in the world, with 149 of them in
North America. High energy prices are driving consistently high
utilization rates at these facilities. With aging infrastructure
and growing capacity constraints, asset protection continues to
grow as an indispensable tool in maintenance planning, quality
control and prevention of catastrophic failure in refineries and
76
petrochemical plants. Recent high oil and fossil fuel input
prices have placed additional pressure on industry participants
to increase capacity, focus on production efficiency and cost
reductions and shorten shut-down time or
turnarounds. Asset protection solutions are used for
both off-stream inspections, or inspection when the tested
infrastructure is shut-down, and increasingly, on-stream
inspections, or inspection when the tested infrastructure is
operating at normal levels. While we expect off-stream
inspection of vessels and piping during a plant shut-down or
turnaround to remain a routine practice by companies in these
industries, we expect the areas of greatest future growth to
occur as a result of on-stream inspections and monitoring of
facilities, such as offshore platforms, transport systems and
oil and gas transmission lines, because of the substantial
opportunity costs of shutting them down. On-stream inspection
enables companies to avoid the costs associated with shutdowns
during testing while enabling the economic and safety advantages
of advanced planning or predictive maintenance.
Traditional power
generation and transmission
Asset protection in the power industry has traditionally been
associated with the inspection of high-energy, critical steam
piping, boilers, rotating equipment, utility aerial man-lift
devices, large transformer testing and various other
applications for nuclear and fossil-fuel based power plants. We
believe that in recent years the use of asset protection
solutions have grown rapidly in this industry due to the aging
of critical power generation and transmission infrastructure.
For instance, the average age of a nuclear power plant in the
United States is over 30 years. Furthermore, global demand
for power generation and transmission has grown rapidly and is
expected to continue, primarily as a result of the energy needs
of emerging economies such as China and India. The chart below
is from the U.S. Government Energy Information
Administration and their estimate of this growth by kilowatt
hours.
|
|
|
Nuclear. For the year ended December 31, 2007,
U.S. commercial nuclear reactors operated at a capacity
utilization rate of approximately 92%. We believe that the need
to sustain these high utilization rates, while also maintaining
a high degree of safety, will result in increased spending on
testing, on-line monitoring and maintenance of these assets.
Industrial Information Resources projected that maintenance
spending on the North American reactor fleet will exceed
$800 million in 2008. The current U.S. administration
is proposing a reduction of
CO2
emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, with a further 80% reduction
by 2050. Meeting these aggressive goals while gradually
increasing the overall energy supply requires that all
non-emitting technologies must be advanced. A December 2008
Electric Power Research Institute
|
77
(EPRI) study called the PRISM analysis defines a possible
technology mix within the electricity sector that would help
achieve a comparable goal. In it, nuclear generation rises 20%
from current levels by 2020 and nearly 200% by 2050.
Globally, there were 436 nuclear reactors in operation as of
June 30, 2009 with 47 additional reactors under
construction. 55% of these reactors are more than 15 years
old. As of August 2009, there are currently 104 sites licensed
by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and since 2007,
there have been 22 applications for additional sites. We believe
it will be increasingly important to provide asset protection
solutions to the global nuclear power industry in order to
prevent potentially catastrophic events and help the nuclear
industry optimize availability and safety of their assets.
|
|
|
Fossil. The fossil fuel power generation market
consists of facilities that burn coal, natural gas or oil to
produce electricity. These facilities operate at high capacity
levels and can incur productivity loss if a shutdown is
required. As a result, there is a significant demand for
continual testing and maintenance of these facilities and their
assets. In addition, to meet growing electricity demand, fossil
power generation companies are increasing capital spending for
capacity expansions and new facility construction. In 2009, the
EIA reported that there are over 80 fossil power stations
proposed for construction in the United States.
|
|
|
|
Wind. Wind power has reached critical mass, with
wind installations in the United States alone increasing by
8.5MW, or 50%, in 2008. It is estimated that growth in 2009 will
continue to accelerate. There is significant demand for on-line
condition monitoring for wind turbines, because their three
critical components, or the main bearing, gearbox and generator,
need to be fully operational at all times for a turbine to work
efficiently and safely. Failure of a gearbox on a single wind
turbine rated at 1.5MW can cost up to $350,000 to replace, which
justifies the use of preventative maintenance monitoring and
services for units both in and out of warranty. Our asset
protection solutions are also being used in the research, design
and development of the composite based wind turbine blades to
improve their structural integrity and efficiency and are being
applied to inspect the structural integrity of the tower and
base.
|
Other Process
Industries
The process industries, or industries in which raw materials are
treated or prepared in a series of stages, include chemicals,
pharmaceuticals, food processing and paper and pulp. Three
process industries that we focus our efforts on are described
below.
|
|
|
Chemicals. As with oil and gas processing
facilities, chemical processing facilities require significant
spending on maintenance and monitoring. The average cost of
plant construction for chemical assets has increased
substantially (plant construction costs for processing of
certain chemical assets, such as ammonia, have doubled in the
past 10 years), which we believe creates a more
concentrated focus on asset protection solutions to limit
further capital costs. Additionally, growing chemical
end-markets continue to put strain on existing plants. Given
their aging infrastructure, growing capacity constraints and
increasing capital costs, we believe asset protection solutions
continue to grow in importance in maintenance planning, quality
and cost control and prevention of catastrophic failure in the
chemicals industry.
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals and food processing. Although the
pharmaceuticals and food processing industries have historically
not employed asset protection solutions as much as other
industries, we believe that in the future these industries will
increasingly use asset protection
|
78
|
|
|
solutions throughout their manufacturing and other processes.
Because these industries use equipment, structures, facilities
and other infrastructure similar to those of many of our other
target markets, and these assets have reached an age where
structural failures are becoming a significant risk we are
seeing an increasing demand from those companies looking to
protect their existing investments and avoid costly maintenance
repairs and revenue losses due to process or manufacturing line
shutdowns. In addition, advanced NDT is more effective than
traditional NDT solutions when testing the principal alloys and
materials used in these industries infrastructure assets.
|
Public
infrastructure
We believe that high profile infrastructure catastrophes, such
as the collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, have caused
public authorities to more actively seek ways to prevent similar
events from occurring. Public authorities tasked with the
construction of new, and maintenance of existing, public
infrastructure, including bridges and highways, increasingly use
asset protection solutions to test and inspect these assets.
Importantly, these authorities now employ asset protection
solutions throughout the life of these assets, from their
original design and construction, with the use of embedded
sensing devices to enable on-line monitoring, through ongoing
maintenance requirements.
Aerospace and
defense
The operational safety, reliability, structural integrity and
maintenance of aircraft and associated products is critical to
the aerospace and defense industries. Industry participants
increasingly use asset protection solutions to perform
inspections upon delivery, and also periodically employ asset
protection solutions during the operational service of aircraft,
using advanced ultrasonic immersion systems or digital
radiography in order to precisely detect structural defects.
Industry participants also use asset protection solutions for
the inspection of advanced composites found in new classes of
aircraft, ultrasonic fatigue testing of complete aircraft
structures, corrosion detection and on-board monitoring of
landing gear and other critical components. We expect increased
demand for our solutions from the aerospace industry to result
from wider use of advanced composites and distributed on-line
sensor networks and other embedded analytical applications built
into the structure of assets to enable real-time performance
monitoring and condition-based maintenance.
Transportation
The use of asset protection solutions within the transportation
industry is primarily focused in the automotive and rail
segments. Within the automotive segment, manufacturers use asset
protection solutions throughout the entire design and
development process, including the inspection of raw material
inputs, during in-process manufacturing and, finally, during
end-product testing and analysis. Although asset protection
technologies have been utilized in the automobile industry for a
number of decades, we believe growth in the segment will
increase as automobile manufacturers begin to outsource their
asset protection requirements and take advantage of new
technologies that enable them to more thoroughly inspect their
products throughout the manufacturing process, reduce costs and
shorten time to market. Within the rail segment, asset
protection solutions are used primarily to test rails and
passenger and tank cars.
79
Primary metals
and metalworking
The market for asset protection solutions for the primary
ferrous and nonferrous metal industries has grown rapidly in
recent years. The quality control requirements driven by the low
defect tolerance within automated, robotic intensive metalwork
industries, such as screw machining, serve as key drivers for
the recent growth of NDT technologies, such as ultrasonics and
radiography. We expect that increasingly stringent quality
control requirements and competitive forces will drive the
demand for more costly finishing and polishing which, in turn,
will promote greater use of NDT throughout the production
lifecycle.
Our competitive
strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths contribute to our
being a leading provider of asset protection solutions and will
allow us to further capitalize on growth opportunities in our
industry:
|
|
|
Single Source Provider for Asset Protection Solutions
Worldwide. We believe we are the only company with a
comprehensive portfolio of proprietary and integrated asset
protection solutions, including services, products and systems
worldwide, which positions us to be the leading single source
provider for a customers asset protection requirements.
Through our network of 68 offices and independent
representatives in 15 countries around the world, we offer an
extensive portfolio of solutions that enables our customers to
consolidate all their inspection requirements and the associated
data storage and analytics on a single system that spans the
customers entire enterprise. This allows our customers to
more effectively manage their asset portfolio, plan asset
maintenance based on predictive analytics rather than simple
scheduled routines and track their assets globally, thereby
enhancing asset productivity and utilization while minimizing
the administrative costs of having multiple vendors. In
addition, collaboration between our services teams and product
design engineers generates enhancements to our services,
products and systems, which provide a source of competitive
advantage compared to companies that provide only NDT services
or NDT products.
|
|
|
|
Long-Standing Trusted Provider to a Diversified and Growing
Customer Base. By providing critical and reliable NDT
services, products and systems for more than 30 years and
expanding our asset protection solutions, we have become a
trusted partner to a large and growing customer base across
numerous infrastructure-intensive industries globally. Our
customers include some of the largest and most well-recognized
firms in the oil and gas, chemical, fossil and nuclear power,
aerospace and defense industries as well as the largest public
authorities. Seven of our top 10 customers by fiscal 2009
revenues have used our solutions for at least 10 years. We
leverage our strong relationships to sell additional solutions
to our existing customers while also attracting new customers.
As asset protection is increasingly recognized by our customers
as a strategic advantage, we believe our reputation and history
of successful execution are key competitive differentiators.
|
|
|
|
Repository of Customer-Specific Inspection Data. Our
enterprise software solutions enable us to capture and store our
customers testing and inspection data in a centralized
database. As a result, we have accumulated large amounts of
proprietary information that allows us to provide our customers
with value-added services, such as benchmarking, predictive
maintenance, inspection scheduling, data analytics and
regulatory compliance. We believe our ability to provide these
customized products and services, along with the high cost of
switching to an alternative vendor, provide us with significant
competitive advantages.
|
80
|
|
|
Proprietary Products, Software and Technology
Packages. We have developed systems that have become
the cornerstone of several unique NDT applications, such as
those used for the testing of pressure vessels (the MONPAC
technology package) or above-ground storage tanks (the TANKPAC
technology package). These proprietary products allow us to
efficiently and effectively provide unique solutions to our
customers complex applications, resulting in a significant
competitive advantage. In addition to the proprietary products
and systems that we sell to customers on a stand-alone basis, we
also develop a range of proprietary sensors, instruments,
systems and software used exclusively by our Services segment.
|
|
|
|
Deep Domain Knowledge and Extensive Industry
Experience. We are an industry leader in developing
advanced asset protection solutions, including acoustic emission
(AE) testing for non-intrusive on-line monitoring of storage
tanks and pressure vessels, bridges and transformers, portable
corrosion mapping, ultrasonic testing (UT) systems, on-line
plant asset integrity management with sensor fusion, enterprise
software solutions for plant-wide and fleet-wide inspection data
archiving and management, advanced and thick composites
inspection and ultrasonic phased array inspection of thick wall
boilers. In addition, many of the members of our team have been
instrumental in developing the testing standards followed by
international standards-setting bodies, such as the American
Society of Non-Destructive Testing and comparable associations
in other countries. The scientists and engineers on our research
and development team developed many of the advanced NDT
technologies we use in our business, including portable
corrosion mapping UT systems, enterprise software solutions for
plant-wide and fleet-wide inspection data archiving and
management, and non-intrusive above-ground tank testing.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating with Our Customers. Our asset
protection solutions have historically been designed in response
to our customers unique performance specifications and are
supported by our proprietary technologies. Our sales and
engineering teams work closely with our customers research
and design staff during the design phase of our products in
order to incorporate our products into specified infrastructure
projects, as well as with facilities maintenance personnel to
ensure that we are able to provide the asset protection
solutions necessary to meet these customers changing
demands. As a result, we believe that our close, collaborative
relationships with our customers provide us a significant
competitive advantage.
|
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team. Our management team has
a track record of leadership in NDT, averaging over
20 years experience in the industry. These individuals also
have extensive experience in growing businesses organically and
in acquiring and integrating companies, which we believe is
important to facilitate future growth in the fragmented asset
protection industry. In addition, our senior managers are
supported by highly experienced project managers who are
responsible for delivering our solutions to customers.
|
Our growth
strategy
Our growth strategy emphasizes the following key elements:
|
|
|
Continue to Develop Technology-Enabled Asset Protection
Services, Products and Systems. We intend to maintain
and enhance our technological leadership by continuing to invest
in the internal development of new services, products and
systems. Our highly trained team of Ph.D.s, engineers and
highly-skilled, certified technicians have been instrumental in
developing numerous significant asset protection standards, and
we believe their knowledge base will
|
81
|
|
|
enable us to innovate a wide range of new asset protection
solutions more rapidly than our competition.
|
|
|
|
Increase Revenues from Our Existing Customers. Many
of our customers are multinational corporations with asset
protection requirements from multiple divisions at multiple
locations across the globe. Currently, we capture a relatively
small portion of their overall expenditures on these solutions.
We believe our superior services, products and systems, combined
with the trend of outsourcing asset protection solutions to a
small number of trusted service providers, positions us to
significantly expand both the number of divisions and locations
that we serve as well as the types of solutions we provide. We
strive to be the preferred global partner for our customers and
aim to become the single source provider for their asset
protection solution requirements.
|
|
|
|
Add New Customers in Existing Target Markets. Our
current customer base represents a small fraction of the total
number of companies in our target markets with asset protection
requirements. Our scale, scope of products and services and
expertise in creating technology-enabled solutions have allowed
us to build a reputation for high-quality and has increased
customer awareness about us and our asset protection solutions.
We intend to leverage our reputation and solutions offerings to
win new customers within our existing target markets, especially
as asset protection solutions are adopted internationally. We
intend to continue to leverage our competitive strengths to win
new business as customers in our existing target markets
continue to seek a single source and trusted provider of
advanced asset protection solutions.
|
|
|
|
Expand Our Customer Base into New End Markets. We
believe we have significant opportunities to rapidly expand our
customer base in relatively new end markets, including the
maritime shipping, wind turbine and other alternative energy and
natural gas transportation industries and the market for public
infrastructure, such as highways and bridges. The expansion of
our addressable markets is being driven by the increased
recognition and adoption of asset protection services, products
and systems, and new NDT technologies enabling further
applications in industries such as healthcare and compressed and
liquefied natural gas transportation, and the aging of
infrastructure, such as construction and loading cranes and
ports, to the point where visual inspection has proven
inadequate and new asset protection solutions are required. We
expect to continue to expand our global sales organization, grow
our inspection data management and data mining services and find
new high-value applications, such as embedding our sensor
technology in assembly lines for electronics and distributed
sensor networks for aerospace applications. As companies in
these emerging end markets realize the benefits of our asset
protection solutions, we expect to expand our leadership
position by addressing customer needs and winning new business.
|
|
|
|
Continue to Capitalize on Acquisitions. We intend to
continue employing a disciplined acquisition strategy to
broaden, complement and enhance our product and service
offerings, add new customers and certified personnel, expand our
sales channels, supplement our internal development efforts and
accelerate our expected growth. We believe the market for asset
protection solutions is highly fragmented with a large number of
potential acquisition opportunities. We have a proven ability to
integrate complementary businesses, as demonstrated by the
success of our past acquisitions, which have often contributed
entirely new products and services that have added significantly
to our revenues and profitability. In addition, we have begun to
offer and sell our advanced asset protection solutions to
customers of companies we acquired that had previously relied on
traditional NDT solutions.
|
82
|
|
|
Importantly, we believe we have improved the operational
performance and profitability of our acquired businesses by
successfully integrating and selling a comprehensive suite of
solutions to the customers of these acquired businesses.
|
Our
solutions
We provide comprehensive asset protection solutions to a diverse
customer base. We combine the strengths of our proprietary
products, industry expertise, a suite of software solutions and
our highly skilled and experienced technicians and engineers to
deliver a broad set of inspection, engineering and information
technology services that address the complex business challenges
faced by our customers. Depending on the requirements of our
customers, we can provide them our software and other products
on a stand-alone basis or as a complete end-to-end solution
consisting of sensor products, services and software.
Importantly, as part of our solutions, we are increasingly
providing on-line asset monitoring and management software
enabling our customers to have real-time access to and assess
the structural health of their infrastructure.
Our
services
We provide a range of testing and inspection services to a
diversified customer base across energy-related, industrial and
public infrastructure industries. We either deploy our services
directly at the customers location or through our own
extensive network of field testing facilities. Our global
footprint allows us to provide asset protection solutions
through local offices in close proximity to our customers,
permitting us to keep response time to a minimum, while
maximizing our ability to develop meaningful, collaborative
customer relationships. Examples of our comprehensive portfolio
of services include: testing components of new construction as
they are built or assembled, providing corrosion monitoring data
to help customers determine whether to repair or retire
infrastructure, providing material analysis to ensure the
integrity of infrastructure components and supplying
non-invasive on-stream techniques that enable our customers to
pinpoint potential problem areas prior to failure. In addition,
we also provide services to assist in the planning and
scheduling of resources for repairs and maintenance activities.
Our experienced inspection professionals perform these services,
which are supported by our advanced proprietary software and
hardware products.
Traditional
NDT services
Our certified personnel provide a range of traditional
inspection services. For example, our visual inspectors provide
comprehensive assessments of the condition of our
customers plant equipment during capital construction
projects and maintenance shutdowns. Of the broad set of
traditional NDT techniques that we provide, several lend
themselves to integration with our other offerings and often
serve as the initial entry point to more advanced customer
engagements. For example, we provide a comprehensive program for
the inspection of above-ground storage tanks designed to meet
stringent industry standards for the inspection, repair,
alteration and reconstruction of oil and petrochemical storage
tanks. This program includes magnetic flux exclusion for the
rapid detection of floor plate corrosion, advanced ultrasonic
systems and leak detection of floor defects, remote ultrasonic
crawlers for shell and roof inspections and trained, certified
inspectors for visual inspection and documentation.
83
Advanced NDT
services
In addition to traditional NDT services, we provide a broad
range of proprietary advanced NDT services that we offer on a
stand-alone basis or in combination with software solutions such
as our proprietary enterprise plant condition monitoring
software and systems (PCMS). We also provide on-line monitoring
capabilities and other solutions that enable the delivery of
accurate and real-time information to our customers. Our
advanced NDT services require more complex equipment and more
skilled inspection professionals to operate this equipment and
interpret test results. Some of the technologies they use
include:
|
|
|
Automated ultrasonic testing
|
|
Wireless data acquisition
|
Guided ultrasonic long wave testing
|
|
On-line plant asset integrity monitoring
|
Infrared thermography
|
|
Risk-based inspection
|
Phased array ultrasonic testing
|
|
Digital radiography
|
Acoustic emission testing
|
|
Sensor fusion
|
|
|
Examples of our advanced NDT techniques include the following:
|
|
|
Automated Ultrasonic Phased Array Inspection. We
primarily use this technique to inspect welded areas during
large capital construction and maintenance projects to determine
whether the welds can withstand anticipated operating
conditions, such as high pressures or temperatures. This
technique employs an automated mobile scanner to obtain
structural ultrasonic inspection data from multiple angles and
locations. The principal competing technique is radiographic
inspection, which generally impedes or requires the construction
or maintenance work to be halted during the inspection. By using
ultrasonic phased array inspection, our customers can continue
to weld while our inspections are taking place, which shortens
downtime during maintenance projects and accelerates the
completion of construction projects.
|
|
|
Guided Ultrasonic Long Wave Testing. We typically
use this technique to locate corrosion or metal loss in large
volumes of piping. It allows us to inspect a long continuous
section of piping from one location and follow up with further
inspections on problem areas, as compared to more costly and
time-intensive methods which require inspections at multiple
locations along the same section of pipe. It also allows us to
inspect the entire pipe body, enabling us to identify a larger
percentage of flaws as compared to traditional techniques that
inspect only a small portion of pipe walls.
|
|
|
Advanced Infrared Inspection. We generally employ
this technique in place of ultrasonic inspections of large
operating systems, such as boilers in industrial power plants,
which rely on scans of sample areas of the system to test their
integrity rather than a scan of the entire system. Traditional
infrared inspection locates unexpected temperature differences
to alert inspection personnel to potential problems with
insulation, process systems, electrical systems and proper
operating parameters. Our proprietary advanced infrared system
enables us to scan large areas using a robotic crawler and not
only examine temperature differences but also precisely measure
the thickness of objects or materials. Our proprietary infrared
scanning system examines the entirety of the tested structure to
supply more comprehensive inspection data to plant engineers,
providing them a higher level of confidence when deciding
whether to repair, replace or retire the structure.
|
|
|
|
Line Scanning Thermography (LST). LST in an
inspection method that uses infrared thermal imaging developed
to measure the thickness of boiler tubes. A unique
characteristic of this
|
84
|
|
|
system compared to other thermography methods is LSTs
ability to develop an image almost instantly as it scans a
boiler tube, while the other methods are significantly slower.
Boiler tube inspections are traditionally inspected for loss of
wall thickness using ultrasonic contact thickness gauges, which
is a very tedious and time consuming method. The LST system can
test a large area faster than other NDT methods and record the
inspection with a digital image. Another application for which
LST has shown promise is the inspection of composite materials
for porosity, delaminations and non-visible impact damage.
Inspection speed, sensitivity to defects, and the capability to
store digital images are the key selling points of LST.
|
Mechanical
Integrity services
We provide a broad range of MI services that enable our
customers to meet stringent regulatory requirements. These
services increase plant safety, minimize unscheduled downtime
and allow our customers to plan for, repair and replace critical
components and systems before failure occurs. Our services are
designed to complement a comprehensive predictive and
preventative inspection and maintenance program that we can
provide for our customers in addition to the MI services.
Customers of our MI services have, in many instances, also
licensed our PCMS software, which allows for the storage and
analysis of data captured by our testing and inspection products
and services, and implemented this solution to complement our
inspection services.
As a result of the information captured by PCMS and the our
risk-based inspection (RBI) software module we are able to
provide a professional service known as Mechanical
Integrity Gap Analysis for process facilities. Our
Mechanical Integrity Gap Analysis service offers insight into
the level of plant readiness, how best to manage and monitor the
integrity of process facility assets, and how to extend the
useful lives of such assets. Our Mechanical Integrity Gap
Analysis service also assists customers in benchmarking and
managing their infrastructure through key performance indicators
and metrics.
Our products and
systems
Our
software
Our software solutions are designed to meet the demands of our
customers data analysis and asset integrity management
requirements. Some of our key software solutions include:
PCMS Enterprise
software: asset protection and reliability
Our PCMS application is an enterprise software system that
allows for the storage and analysis of data as captured by our
testing and inspection products and services. PCMS allows our
customers to design and develop asset integrity management plans
that include:
|
|
|
optimal systematic testing schedules for their infrastructure
based on real-time data captured by our sensors;
|
|
|
alerts that notify customers when to perform special testing
services on suspect areas, enabling them to identify and resolve
flaws on a timely basis; and
|
|
|
schedules for the maintenance and retirement of assets.
|
These plans are based on information stored in PCMS, which
include results based upon the rates of deterioration shown by
existing test results, information based on our past experiences
85
in the operation and testing of similar structures and
standards and recommended practices of numerous industrial
standards-setting bodies, such as the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, the American Petroleum Institute and the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Using PCMS allows
our customers to demonstrate compliance with these standards and
practices, which typically helps them reduce their insurance
premiums and ensure asset, product and employee safety. PCMS
also offers significant advantages by allowing the information
it develops and stores to be organized, linked and synchronized
with enterprise software systems. We believe that as a result of
its superior functionality, PCMS is one of the more widely used
process condition management software systems in the world. For
instance, we believe approximately 37% of U.S. refineries
currently use PCMS.
In addition, our risk-based inspection (RBI) application enables
PCMS users to test and analyze their assets operating conditions
and other factors, such as operating temperature range and
contact with highly flammable or corrosive products. This allows
customers to classify or rank each asset according to the
probability and consequences of its structural failure and
schedule the appropriate frequency and types of testing for that
asset. We believe our RBI program allows our customers to
appropriately test their infrastructure in a more cost-effective
manner while reducing their overall risk profile, which
typically allows them to reduce their insurance premiums.
Application-based
software
We provide a comprehensive portfolio of application-specific
software products that covers a broad range of testing and
analysis methods, including neural networks, pattern
recognition, wavelet analysis and moment tensor analysis.
Some of the key software solutions we offer include:
|
|
|
Advanced Data Analysis Pattern Recognition & Neural
Networks Software (NOESIS): An advanced data analysis
and pattern recognition software package for AE applications.
NOESIS enables our AE experts to develop automated remote
monitoring systems for our customers.
|
|
|
|
AE Software Platform (AEwin and
AEwinPost): Windows-based real time applications
software for detection, processing and analysis of AE data. This
software locates the general location of flaws on or in our
customers structures.
|
|
|
|
Loose Parts Monitoring Software (LPMS): A software
program for monitoring, detecting and evaluating metallic loose
parts in nuclear reactor systems in accordance with strict
industry standards. LPMS alerts the operator on the plant floor
and central control room about potential loose parts, provides a
user-friendly interface for operators to differentiate between
noise and loose parts and identifies the location of the problem.
|
|
|
|
Automated UT and Imaging Analysis Software (UTwin and
UTIA): A complete software platform for analyzing
ultrasonic inspection data and visualizing and identifying the
location and size of potential flaws.
|
Technology
packages
In order to address some of the more common problems faced by
our customers, we have developed a number of robust technology
solutions. These packages generally allow more rapid and
effective testing of infrastructure because they minimize the
need for service professionals
86
to customize and integrate asset protection solutions with the
infrastructure and interpret test results. These packaged
solutions use proprietary and specialized testing procedures and
hardware, advanced pattern recognition, neural network software
and databases to compare test results against our prior testing
data or national and international structural integrity
standards. Some of our widely used technology packages in some
of our target markets are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package
|
|
Type
|
|
Description
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
TANKPAC
|
|
AE On-line Tank Floor Inspection
|
|
Tests to monitor for emissions resulting from active corrosion
of the tested infrastructure
|
|
Ability to perform tests on-stream
Non-intrusive testing
Quickly identify tanks that need
inspection and resolve associated problems
Leave good tanks operational and save
the shutdown and cleaning costs
|
MONPAC
|
|
AE Pressure Vessel Testing
|
|
An AE expert system that evaluates the condition of
metal pressure systems and tanks
|
|
Ability to perform tests on-stream
Rapid inspection capability
Global monitoring (100% inspection, including welds, repairs, base metal)
Reduction in inspection costs
Reduction in downtime resulting from improved information about plant condition
|
VPAC
|
|
Loss Control for Valves in Process Plants
|
|
Estimates valve leakage based on measurements made using our
inspection products
|
|
Cost savings from detection of valve leaks
Cost savings are achieved in maintenance planning, troubleshooting plant operations and monitoring of losses for environmental purposes
|
POWERPAC
|
|
AE On-line Power Transformer Monitoring
|
|
Through on-line monitoring, detects and locates partial
discharge in power transformers by utilizing AE
|
|
Non-intrusive testing
On-line testing identifies problems characterizing defects
Creates way to monitor problem transformers
|
|
|
87
Our other
products
AE
products
We are a leader in the design and manufacture of AE sensors,
instruments and turn-key systems used for the monitoring and
testing of materials, pressure components, processes and
structures. Though we principally sell our products as a system,
which includes a combination of sensors, an amplifier, signal
processing electronics, knowledge-based software and decision
and feedback electronics, we can also sell these as individual
components to certain customers that have the in-house expertise
to perform their own services. Our sensors listen to
structures and materials to detect real-time AE activity and to
determine the presence of structural flaws in the inspected
materials. Such materials include pressure vessels, storage
tanks, heat exchangers, piping, turbine blades and reactors.
In addition, we provide leak monitoring and detection systems
used in diverse applications, including the detection and
location of both gaseous and liquid leaks in valves, vessels,
pipelines and tanks. AE leak monitoring and detection, when
applied in a systematic preventive maintenance program, has
proven to substantially reduce costs by eliminating the need for
visual valve inspection and unscheduled down-time. In addition,
EPA requirements regarding fugitive emissions helps drive the
market for this leak detection equipment.
Our complete AE product line includes:
|
|
|
AE Sensors: We offer over 200 different types of
proprietary sensors, including a dual function sensor that is a
true accelerometer and an AE sensor that records low and high
frequencies simultaneously in one sensor body.
|
|
|
|
Multi-channel AE Systems: Multi-sensor parallel
processing systems capable of monitoring, detecting and locating
defects in large structures, such as vessels, pipelines and
platforms. These systems include our Sensor Highway II, which is
designed for on-line remote monitoring of bridges and large
transformers.
|
|
|
Hand-held Instruments: Portable AE systems easily
adaptable to OEM applications.
|
|
|
|
Wireless AE Systems: Our wireless sensors can
communicate with single base stations, or with base stations and
other sensors in geographically dispersed mesh
networks. Wireless capabilities are fully integrated into our
Sensor Highway II and Asset Condition Monitoring units.
|
|
|
|
Intrinsically Safe Products: Certified sensors and
AE systems to work in hazardous and potentially explosive
environments such as the petrochemical industry.
|
UT
technology
We design, manufacture and market ultrasonic equipment under our
NDT Automation brand name. While AE technology detects flaws and
pinpoints their location, our UT technology has the ability to
size defects in three-dimensional geometric representations. We
manufacture a complete line of UT scanners with automated or
manual capabilities, and design and fabricate custom scanners as
requested by customers.
88
Vibration sensors
and systems
We design, manufacture and market a broad portfolio of vibration
sensing products under our Vibra-Metrics brand name. These
include accelerometers, on-line condition-based management
systems, data delivery systems and a comprehensive assortment of
ancillary support products. Our patented Sensor Highway
monitoring systems offer fully automated, unattended remote data
acquisition and alarm reporting for rotating mechanical
equipment and machines, which enable us to provide real-time
predictive maintenance data to our customers.
On-line
monitoring
Our on-line monitoring offerings combine all of our asset
protection services, products and systems. We provide temporary,
periodic and continuous monitoring of static infrastructures
such as bridges, pipes, and transformers, as well as dynamic or
rotating assets such as pumps, motors, gearboxes, steam and gas
turbines. Temporary monitoring is typically used when there is a
known defect or problem and the condition needs to be monitored
until repaired or new equipment can be placed in service.
Periodic monitoring, or walk around monitoring, is
used as a preventative maintenance tool to take machine and
device readings, on a periodic basis, to observe any change in
the assets condition such as increased vibration or
unusual heat buildup and dissipation. Continuous monitoring is
applied 24/7 on critical assets to observe the
earliest onset of a defect and track its progression to avoid
catastrophic failure. Since 1988, we have provided these
solutions to over eighty projects for a variety of industries
and applications. Our monitoring systems can be accessed both
on-site and
remotely using state of the art wireless technology and can
interface with customer data via the internet or other
proprietary secured networks. These monitoring systems provide
browser -based hierarchical displays of critical information and
can include alarm and customer notification options using
messaging and email services. By simultaneously using different
sensing devices such as acoustic emission or sound, vibration,
temperature, strain or corrosion gauges, often referred to as
sensor fusion, we can monitor and correlate different sensor
results to provide more accurate fault detection and location
information while reducing or eliminating false alarms. The
information can also be used to correct operational procedures
that contributed to the failures.
We provide a range of custom outsourced monitoring services for
customers that do not have the resources to monitor their assets
or interpret sensor data. An example of a continuous monitoring
engagement involving static infrastructure is our monitoring of
aging bridges for factors of degradation. Wire breakage in
suspension bridges is usually the result of corrosion fatigue
which slowly degrades the integrity of the bridge. Since wire
breakage events are occasional and unpredictable, the most
effective way to track the extent of deterioration is by
continuous monitoring. Another example is offshore drilling
platforms, which often develop slight flaws in high stress
locations that can quickly and unpredictably expand into
catastrophic failures. In many circumstances, such flaws cannot
be reliably detected using conventional inspection techniques.
An example and prime candidate for our temporary on-line
monitoring solutions is a pressure vessel, such as a tank, in
which a crack has been identified, but that can still be safely
operated. In such cases, we are engaged to monitor the vessel
until the crack grows dangerous or until a planned maintenance
or shutdown occurs.
An example of continuous monitoring of dynamic or rotating
assets is our monitoring of wind turbines. Each wind turbine is
made up of a main bearing, gearbox and generator that combines
to form the drive train. A typical wind park engagement will
include around 50 wind turbines, each requiring drive train
monitoring for early detection of potential mechanical
89
faults, which in turn will allow for scheduling of maintenance
prior to the catastrophic failure of a component, and isolating
it to avoid damage to the other components in the drive train.
These components are difficult to replace since they are usually
installed on towers over 250 feet high, and replacement
components are costly and have long lead times.
Customers
During fiscal 2009, we provided our asset protection solutions
to approximately 4,500 different customers. The following table
lists some of our larger customers by revenues for fiscal 2009,
in each of our target markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas,
|
|
|
|
Composite and
|
|
|
Including
|
|
Nuclear and
|
|
part testing,
|
|
|
petrochemical
|
|
fossil power
|
|
Including aerospace
|
|
Chemicals
|
|
|
BP(1)
|
|
American Electric Power
|
|
Avcorp Industries, Inc.
|
|
Air Products
|
Chevron
|
|
Bechtel
|
|
Boeing
|
|
Aux Sable Liquid
|
Conoco
|
|
Dominion
|
|
Danner Corporation
|
|
Products
|
ExxonMobil
|
|
Entergy
|
|
Embraer
|
|
Bayer
|
Lyondell-Basell
|
|
Exelon
|
|
Hitco
|
|
Dow Chemical
|
Petrobras
|
|
Florida Power & Light
|
|
Kaiser Aluminum
|
|
DuPont
|
Shell
|
|
General Electric
|
|
Rio Tinto
|
|
INEOS
|
Valero
|
|
PP&L
|
|
Rolls Royce
|
|
PCS Nitrogen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
Primary metals
|
|
|
|
and food
|
|
Public
|
and metalworking
|
|
Transportation
|
|
processing
|
|
infrastructure
|
|
|
Doncasters
|
|
Dana Corporation
|
|
Anheuser-Busch
|
|
Bechtel
|
Eaton Corporation
|
|
Emergency One Inc.
|
|
ATS
|
|
Federal Highway Administration
|
Mid State Machine
|
|
Harley Davidson
|
|
Monsanto
|
|
High Steel Structures
|
Small Parts Incorporated
|
|
Sutphen Corporation
|
|
Pfizer
|
|
Parsons Engineering
|
Wollaston Alloys
|
|
|
|
Pilgrims Pride
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Various divisions or business units
of BP were responsible for 17.1%, 16.8% and 16.5% of our
revenues during fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Predominantly all of these revenues are included in our Services
segment.
|
During the last three fiscal years, we derived our revenues from
providing our asset protection solutions to customers in the
United States and over 60 countries around the world. Foreign
countries where we provided asset protection solutions
responsible for more than approximately 1% of our revenues in
fiscal 2009, listed in descending order of revenues, were:
Canada, France, Brazil, UK, Netherlands, Russia, Japan, Serbia
and China.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive, but fragmented, market. Our
primary competitors are divisions of large companies, and many
of our other competitors are small companies, limited to a
specific product or technology and focused on a niche market or
geographic region. We believe that none of our competitors
currently provides the full range of asset protection and NDT
products, enterprise software and the traditional and advanced
services solutions that we offer. Our major competitors with
respect to NDT services include the Acuren division of
90
Rockwood Service Corporation, SGS Group, the TCM division of
Team, Inc. and APPLUS RTD, which is majority-owned by The
Carlyle Group. Our major competitor with respect to our PCMS
software is UltraPIPE, a division of Siemens, and to a lesser
extent, Lloyds Register Capstone, Inc. Our major
competitors with respect to our ultrasonic products are GE
Inspection Technologies and Olympus NDT. In the traditional NDT
market, we believe the principal competitive factors are project
management, execution, price, reputation and quality. In the
advanced NDT market, reputation, quality and size are more
significant competitive factors than price. In light of several
characteristics of the NDT industry and obstacles facing
competitors, only a few of our existing competitors can compete
with us on a global basis, and we believe few new companies are
likely to enter the market. Some of the most significant of such
characteristics and obstacles include: (1) having to
acquire or develop advanced NDT services, products and systems
technologies, which in our case occurred over many years of
customer engagements and at significant internal research and
development expense, (2) complex regulations and safety
codes that require significant industry experience,
(3) license requirements and evolved quality and safety
programs, (4) costly and time-consuming certification
processes, (5) capital requirements and (6) emphasis
by large customers on size and critical mass, length of
relationship and past service record.
Sales and
marketing
We sell our asset protection solutions through all of our 68
offices worldwide. As of August 1, 2009, our world-wide
sales and marketing team, together with our center of
excellence managers, consisted of 63 employees. In
addition, our project and laboratory managers as well as our
management are trained on our solutions and often are the source
of sales leads and customer contacts. Our direct sales and
marketing teams work closely with our customers research
and design personnel, reliability engineers and facilities
maintenance engineers to demonstrate the benefits and
capabilities of our asset protection solutions, refine our asset
protection solutions based on changing customer needs and
identify potential sales opportunities. We provide our asset
protection solutions under well known, industry-recognized brand
names including Physical Acoustics Corporation and
Vibra-Metrics, as well as lesser-known regional, local or
product specific brand names. We have started to promote the
name Mistras using the tag line of Delivering Asset
Protection Solutions. We divide our sales and marketing
efforts into services sales, software and other products sales
and marketing.
Services
sales
In addition to our general and center of excellence managers and
executives, our dedicated Services sales group employs 14
regional and business development managers and professionals,
each of whom is responsible for educating our existing and
potential customers about our asset protection solutions for a
specific geographic region. The sales cycle for our more
significant services engagements is typically three to six
months. We generally provide our services under one- to
three-year contracts, but none of our services contracts legally
obligate our customers to purchase from us on a going-forward
basis. Historically, a majority of our total services revenues
have been recurring because of the length of certain of our
client relationships and the number of our technicians who work
for extended and predictable periods at our customer locations.
91
Products &
systems sales
Our Products and Systems sales group employs 16 corporate level
sales managers and professionals, each of whom is responsible
for educating our existing and potential customers about our
diverse portfolio of asset protection solutions in a geographic
region. This team is supported by experts and scientists who
work globally to provide design, installation and other sales
support for more specialized niche applications, as well as
customer support after purchase. The sales cycle for our
software and other products is typically three to
12 months. We generally provide our software under one-year
renewable license agreements.
International
sales
Our International sales group employs 11 sales managers and
professionals, each of whom is responsible for educating our
existing and potential customers about our asset protection
solutions in the geographical areas outside the United States
other than China and South Korea. The sales cycle for our asset
protection solutions and the agreements under which we provide
them in these areas are substantially similar to those of our
other segments.
Marketing
Our marketing group consists of four employees, and focuses
primarily on supporting purchase decisions by our existing and
potential customers facilities managers, design engineers
and research and development personnel by providing them product
demonstrations, product testing, displays, marketing collateral
and training programs. In addition, we support our brands
through a range of print advertising and dedicated websites. Our
websites have been designed to be a readily available source of
information about our asset protection solutions, assisting our
sales, marketing and customer service activities on a
24-hour
basis.
Manufacturing
Our hardware products are manufactured in our Princeton
Junction, New Jersey facility. This is a modern manufacturing
facility equipped with the latest surface mount manufacturing
equipment and automated test equipment. Our Princeton Junction
facility includes all the capabilities and personnel to fully
produce all of our AE products, NDT Automation ultrasonic
equipment and Vibra-Metrics vibration sensing products.
Intellectual
property
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and
protect our proprietary technology and to conduct our business
without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. We
utilize a combination of intellectual property safeguards,
including patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, as
well as employee and third-party confidentiality agreements, to
protect our intellectual property.
As of August 1, 2009, in the United States we held nine
patents, which will expire at various times between 2010 and
2023, and had no outstanding patent applications. Although we
believe our existing patents have significant value, we
currently do not principally rely on our patented technologies
to provide our proprietary asset protection solutions. We
periodically assess appropriate circumstances for seeking patent
protection for those aspects of our technologies, designs,
methodologies and processes that we believe provide significant
competitive
92
advantages. We have also licensed certain patent rights from
third parties for new NDT technologies involving thermography
and a method to measure wall thinning and geometric changes in
boiler tubes. However, we do not significantly rely upon these
licensed technologies in providing our asset protection
solutions and the royalties we pay for these licenses are not
material.
As of August 1, 2009, the primary trademarks and service
marks that we held in the United States included Mistras,
Physical Acoustics Corporation (PAC), and Controlled Vibrations
Inc. Other trademarks or service marks that we utilize in
localized markets or product advertising include PCMS, NOESIS,
AEwin, AEwinPost, UTwin, UTIA, LST, Vibra-Metrics, MONPAC,
PERFPAC, TANKPAC, VPAC, POWERPAC, Sensor Highway, Quality
Services Laboratories Inc. (QSL) and NDT Automation.
Many elements of our asset protection solutions involve
proprietary know-how, technology or data that are not covered by
patents or patent applications because they are not patentable,
or patents covering them would be difficult to enforce,
including technical processes, equipment designs, algorithms and
procedures. We believe that this proprietary know-how,
technology and data is the most important component of our
intellectual property assets used in our asset protection
solutions, and is a primary differentiator of our asset
protection solutions from those of our competitors. We rely on
various trade secret protection techniques and agreements with
our customers, service providers and vendors to protect these
assets. All of our employees in our Products and Systems segment
and certain of our other employees involved in the development
of our intellectual property have entered into confidentiality
and proprietary information agreements with us. These agreements
require our employees not to use or disclose our confidential
information, to assign to us all of the inventions, designs and
technologies they develop during the course of employment with
us, and otherwise address intellectual property protection
issues. We also seek confidentiality agreements from our
customers and business partners before we disclose any sensitive
aspects of our asset protection solutions technology or business
strategies. We are not currently involved in any material
intellectual property claims.
Research and
development
Our research and development is principally conducted by 28
engineers and scientists at our Princeton Junction, New Jersey
headquarters, and supplemented by other employees in the United
States and throughout the world, including France, Greece,
Japan, Russia and the United Kingdom, who have other primary
responsibilities. Our total professional staff includes
29 employees who hold Ph.D.s, and 67 employees
who hold Level III certification, or the highest level of
certification from the American Society of Non-Destructive
Testing.
We work with many of our customers on developing new products or
applications for our technology. Research and development
expenses are reflected on our consolidated statements of
operations as research and engineering expenses. Our
company-sponsored research and engineering expenses were
approximately $1.3 million, $1.0 million, and
$0.7 million for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
While we have historically funded most of our research and
development expenditures, we had customer-sponsored research and
development revenues of approximately $0.6 million,
$0.6 million and $0.8 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. In addition, in February 2009 the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) awarded us and our
university partners a $6.9 million research award under
their new Technology Innovation Program (TIP) for the
development and research of advanced technologies to enable
monitoring and inspection of the structural health of bridges,
roadways and water systems.
93
Employees
Providing our asset protection solutions requires a highly
skilled and technically proficient employee base. As of
August 1, 2009, we had approximately 2,000 employees
worldwide and approximately 1,750 of our employees were based
within the United States, of which approximately 80% were
hourly. Less than 10% of our employees in the United States are
unionized. We believe that we have good relations with our
employees.
Facilities
As of August 1, 2009, we operated 68 offices in 15
countries, with our corporate headquarters located in Princeton
Junction, New Jersey.
The locations of our operating properties are set forth below by
geographic region. As of August 1, 2009, we owned the
properties located in Olds, Alberta; Monroe, North Carolina;
Trainer, Pennsylvania; Houston and Pasadena, Texas; and
Gillette, Wyoming; and we occupied the other properties under
leases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic region
|
|
City and state or
country
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
Decatur, Alabama
|
|
Bloomfield, New Mexico
|
|
|
Theodore, Alabama
|
|
Bohemia, New York
|
|
|
Bakersfield, California
|
|
Monroe, North Carolina
|
|
|
Benicia (near San Francisco), California
|
|
Heath, Ohio
|
|
|
Signal Hill (near Los Angeles), California
|
|
Independence, Ohio
|
|
|
Torrance, California
|
|
Lima, Ohio
|
|
|
Denver, Colorado
|
|
Carnegie, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
East Granby, Connecticut
|
|
Manchester, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
Waterford, Connecticut
|
|
Trainer, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
Newark, Delaware
|
|
Roebuck, South Carolina
|
|
|
Chubbuck, Idaho
|
|
Granbury, Texas
|
|
|
Burr Ridge, Illinois
|
|
Clear Lake, Texas
|
|
|
Edwardsville, Illinois
|
|
Corpus Christi, Texas
|
|
|
South Holland, Illinois
|
|
Houston, Texas (2 locations)
|
|
|
Hobart, Indiana
|
|
Pasadena, Texas
|
|
|
Noblesville, Indiana
|
|
Texas City, Texas
|
|
|
Ashland, Kentucky
|
|
North Salt Lake, Utah
|
|
|
Louisville, Kentucky
|
|
Hampton, Virginia
|
|
|
Prairieville, Louisiana
|
|
Richmond, Virginia
|
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland
|
|
Bellingham, Washington
|
|
|
Auburn, Massachusetts
|
|
Kent, Washington
|
|
|
Springfield, Massachusetts
|
|
Evanston, Wyoming
|
|
|
Old Bridge, New Jersey
|
|
Gillette, Wyoming
|
|
|
Princeton Junction, New Jersey
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
Beijing, China
|
|
|
|
|
Thane, India
|
|
|
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
Grande Prairie, Alberta
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic region
|
|
City and state or
country
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olds, Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
Red Deer, Alberta
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
Cambridge, England
|
|
|
|
|
Sucy-en-Brie (near Paris), France
|
|
|
|
|
Vitrolles, France
|
|
|
|
|
Hamburg, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Athens, Greece
|
|
|
|
|
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
Moscow, Russia
|
|
|
|
|
Gothenburg, Sweden
|
|
|
Middle East
|
|
Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain
|
|
|
South America
|
|
Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
|
|
|
|
Bahia, Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
Macae, Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
São Paulo, Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
São Sebastiao, Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
matters
We are subject to numerous environmental, legal and regulatory
requirements related to our operations worldwide. In the United
States, these laws and regulations include, among others: the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act, the
Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the
Toxic Substances Control Act, the Atomic Energy Act, the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, and applicable state
regulations.
In addition to the federal laws and regulations, states and
other countries where we do business often have numerous
environmental, legal and regulatory requirements by which we
must abide. We evaluate and address the environmental impact of
our operations by assessing properties in order to avoid future
liabilities and comply with environmental, legal and regulatory
requirements. Thus far, we are not involved in specific
environmental litigation and claims, including the remediation
of properties we own or have operated, as well as efforts to
meet or correct compliance-related matters. We do not expect
costs related to environmental matters to have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated cash flows, financial
position or results of operations.
Legal
proceedings
We are subject to periodic lawsuits, investigations and claims
that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although we
cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of
lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, we do
not believe that any currently pending legal proceeding to which
we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition. The costs of defense and amounts that may be
recovered in such matters may be covered by insurance.
95
Management
Executive
officers and directors
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
our executive officers, directors and director nominee as of
August 1, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos(1)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Paul Peterik(1)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
Mark F. Carlos(1)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Products and Systems
|
Phillip T. Cole(1)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, International
|
Michael J. Lange(1)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Services, and Director
|
Ralph L. Genesi(1)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Marketing and Sales
|
Elizabeth Burgess(2)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Director
|
Daniel M. Dickinson(3)(4)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Director
|
James J. Forese(2)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
Director
|
Richard H. Glanton(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director nominee
|
Manuel N. Stamatakis(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of audit committee
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of compensation committee
|
|
(4)
|
|
Member of nominating and corporate
governance committee
|
|
(5)
|
|
Mr. Glanton will be nominated
and elected as a director effective upon completion of this
offering.
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos has served as our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer since he founded Mistras
in 1978 under the name Physical Acoustics Corp. Prior to joining
Mistras, Dr. Vahaviolos worked at AT&T Bell
Laboratories. Dr. Vahaviolos received a BS in Electrical
Engineering and graduated first in his class from Fairleigh
Dickinson University and received a Master of Science (EE),
Masters in Philosophy and a Ph.D.(EE) from the Columbia
University School of Engineering. During
Dr. Vahaviolos career in NDT, he has been elected
Fellow of The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
a member of The American Society for Nondestructive Testing
(ASNT) where he served as its President from
1992-1993
and its Chairman from
1993-1994, a
member of Acoustic Emission Working Group (AEWG) and an honorary
life member of the International Committee for Nondestructive
Testing. Additionally, he was the recipient of ASNTs Gold
Medal in 2001 and AEWGs Gold Medal in 2005. He was also
one of the six founders of NDT Academia International in 2008.
Paul Pete Peterik joined Mistras in May 2005
as our Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. Prior to joining
Mistras, Mr. Peterik was the Chief Financial Officer of
Integrated Leasing Corp., a leasing company serving the
electronic payment processing industry, from August 2003 until
the business was sold in January 2005. From November 2002 to
August 2003, Mr. Peterik operated his own financial
consulting business for
start-up and
mid-sized companies. From 1980 to 2002,
96
Mr. Peterik was employed as chief financial officer or
chief operating officer at various private and public companies.
Mr. Peterik was employed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
for nine years from 1971 to 1980, where he attained the position
of audit manager.
Mark F. Carlos is Group Executive Vice President
responsible for Products and Systems. Mr. Carlos
joined Mistras at its founding in 1978. Prior to joining
Mistras, Mr. Carlos worked at AT&T Bell Laboratories.
Mr. Carlos received a Masters in Business Administration
from Rider University and a Masters in Electrical Engineering
from Columbia University. Mr. Carlos is an elected Fellow
of ASNT and AEWG, and currently serves as the Vice Chairman of
the American Society for Testing and Materials NDT
Standards Writing Committee
E-3 and was
the recipient of its prestigious Charles W. Briggs Award in 2007.
Phillip T. Cole is Group Executive Vice President,
International, and Managing Director of Physical Acoustics
Limited (PAL). Mr. Cole founded Dunegan UK in 1983, which
was acquired by PAL in 1986. Mr. Cole obtained a
masters degree in physics and electronic engineering from
Loughborough University. Mr. Cole began his career at TI
Research in the U.K. where he focused on NDT
electromagnetic-acoustic devices.
Michael J. Lange is Group Executive Vice President
responsible for Services. He joined Mistras when it acquired
Quality Services Laboratories in November 2000. He was elected a
Director in 2003. Mr. Lange is a well recognized authority
in Radiography and has held an ASNT Level III Certificate
for almost 20 years. Mr. Lange received an Associate
of Science degree in NDT from the Spartan School of Aeronautics
in 1979.
Ralph L. Genesi is Group Executive Vice President,
Marketing & Sales. He joined Mistras in March of 2009
with more than 25 years of executive management experience
in marketing and sales as well as corporate profit and loss
responsibility. Prior to joining Mistras, Mr. Genesi was
President of Swantech, a division of the Curtiss Wright
Corporation. Previous he was Vice President and General Manager
for Siemens AG- Power Generation Information Technology Business
responsible for energy trading, fleet operations &
control solutions worldwide. He has also held positions as
President-Americas
Operations for Spectris Technologies Inc., a European holding
company and Director, Global Market & Sales
Development for Honeywell IAC. Mr. Genesi has an Electrical
Engineering degree from Fairleigh Dickinson University.
Elizabeth Burgess has served as a Director since October
2005. Ms. Burgess is a senior partner and co-founder of
Altus Capital Partners, a private equity fund launched in 2003,
and served as a Vice President of its predecessor fund, Max
Capital Partners, which she joined in 2000. She currently serves
on the board of directors for several private companies that are
part of the Altus Capital portfolio. Ms. Burgess received a
B.S. from the State University of New York at Plattsburgh and an
M.B.A. from Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
Daniel M. Dickinson has served as a Director since August
2003. Mr. Dickinson has been employed since 2001 by, and is
currently a Managing Partner of, Thayer | Hidden Creek, a
private investment firm located in Washington, D.C.
Mr. Dickinson serves as a director and a member of the
audit committee of Caterpillar, Inc. and as a director and a
member of the audit, governance and compensation committee of
IESI-BFC Ltd. as well as a director of several private
companies. Mr. Dickinson received a J.D. and M.B.A. from
the University of Chicago and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering
and Materials Science from Duke University.
James J. Forese has served as a Director since August
2003. Mr. Forese joined Thayer | Hidden Creek in July 2003
and currently serves as an Operating Partner and Chief Operating
Officer.
97
Prior to joining Thayer | Hidden Creek, Mr. Forese worked
at IKON Office Solutions, most recently as the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Forese serves as non-executive
Chairman of Spherion Corporation, a director and the audit
committee chair of IESI-BFC Ltd. and a director of several
private organizations. Mr. Forese served as a director, the
audit committee chair and member of the compensation committee
of Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc. Mr. Forese received a
B.E.E. in Electrical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute and an M.B.A. from Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.
Richard H. Glanton will become a member of our board of
directors upon the completion of this offering. Mr. Glanton
is Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Philadelphia
Television Network, a privately-held media company. From May
2003 to May 2007, Mr. Glanton served as the Senior Vice
President of Corporate Development for Exelon Corporation. From
1986 to 2003 he was a partner in the law firm of Reed Smith LLP
in Philadelphia. Mr. Glanton currently is a director of
Aqua America, Inc. and The CEO Group, Inc. and is a member of
the Board of Trustees of Lincoln University. Mr. Glanton
received a BA in English from West Georgia College and a J.D.
from University of Virginia School of Law.
Manuel N. Stamatakis has served as a Director since 2002.
Mr. Stamatakis is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of Capital Management Enterprises, Inc., a financial services
and employee benefits consulting company headquartered in Valley
Forge, Pennsylvania. Mr. Stamatakis currently serves as
Chairman of the Board of Drexel University College of Medicine,
the Philadelphia Shipyard Development Corporation, and the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Investment Advisory Board.
Mr. Stamatakis received a Bachelors of Science in
Industrial Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University in
1969 and received an honorary Doctorate of Business
Administration from Drexel University.
Our executive officers are elected by, and serve at the
discretion of, our board of directors. There are no family
relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
Board of
directors
Board
composition
Our board of directors currently consists of six members. Under
our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation
that will be in effect upon the completion of this offering, the
authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution
of the board of directors. At each annual meeting of
stockholders commencing with the meeting in 2009, the directors
will be elected to serve until the earlier of their death,
resignation or removal or until their successors have been
elected and qualified.
Director
independence
In June 2009, our board of directors undertook a review of the
independence of the directors and considered whether any
director has a relationship with us that precludes a
determination of independence within the meaning of the rules of
the New York Stock Exchange. As a result of this review, our
board of directors determined that Ms. Burgess and
Messrs. Dickinson, Forese, Glanton and Stamatakis,
representing five of the six directors we will have upon
completion of the offering, are independent
directors as defined under the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange, constituting a majority of independent directors of
our board of directors as required by the rules of the New York
Stock Exchange.
98
Committees of the
board of directors
Upon the completion of this offering, we will have an audit
committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and
corporate governance committee with the composition and
responsibilities described below.
Audit
committee
Our audit committee will be comprised of Messrs. Forese and
Stamatakis and Ms. Burgess, each of whom is a non-employee
member of our board of directors, with Mr. Forese serving
as the initial chairperson of our audit committee. Our board of
directors has determined that each member of our audit committee
meets the requirements for independence and financial literacy,
and that Mr. Forese qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert, under the applicable requirements of the New
York Stock Exchange and SEC rules and regulations. The audit
committee will be responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
selecting and hiring our independent auditors, and approving the
audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent
auditors;
|
|
|
evaluating the qualifications, performance and independence of
our independent auditors;
|
|
|
monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate
to financial statements or accounting matters;
|
|
|
reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control
policies and procedures;
|
|
|
discussing the scope and results of the audit with the
independent auditors and reviewing with management and the
independent auditors our interim and year-end operating
results; and
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report that the SEC requires in
our annual proxy statement.
|
Compensation
committee
Our compensation committee will be comprised of
Messrs. Dickinson, Glanton and Stamatakis, each of whom is
a non-employee member of our board of directors, with
Mr. Stamatakis serving as the initial chairperson of our
compensation committee. Our board of directors has determined
that each member of our compensation committee meets the
requirements for independence under the current requirements of
the New York Stock Exchange. The compensation committee will be
responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
reviewing and approving for our executive officers: annual base
salaries, annual incentive bonuses, including the specific goals
and amount, equity compensation, employment agreements,
severance arrangements and change in control arrangements and
any other benefits, compensation or arrangements;
|
|
|
reviewing the succession planning for our executive officers;
|
|
|
overseeing compensation goals and bonus and stock compensation
criteria for our employees;
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending compensation programs for outside
directors;
|
|
|
preparing the compensation discussion and analysis and
compensation committee report that the SEC requires in our
annual proxy statement; and
|
99
|
|
|
administering, reviewing and making recommendations with respect
to our equity compensation plans.
|
Nominating and
governance committee
Our nominating and governance committee will be comprised of
Messrs. Dickinson, Glanton and Stamatakis, each of whom is
a non-employee member of our board of directors, with
Mr. Glanton serving as the initial chairperson of our
nominating and governance committee. Our board of directors has
determined that each member of our nominating and governance
committee satisfies the requirements for independence under the
current rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The nominating and
governance committee will be responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
assisting our board of directors in identifying prospective
director nominees and recommending nominees for each annual
meeting of stockholders to the board of directors;
|
|
|
reviewing developments in corporate governance practices and
developing and recommending governance principles applicable to
our board of directors;
|
|
|
overseeing the evaluation of our board of directors and
management;
|
|
|
recommending members for each board committee to our board of
directors; and
|
|
|
reviewing and monitoring our code of ethics and actual and
potential conflicts of interest of members of our board of
directors and officers.
|
Code of
ethics
In connection with this offering our board of directors will
adopt a code of ethics for our principal executive and senior
financial officers. The code will apply to our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions. Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement
of which this prospectus forms a part, the full text of our code
of ethics will be posted on our website at
www.mistrasgroup.com. We intend to disclose future
amendments to certain provisions of our code of ethics, or
waivers of such provisions, applicable to any principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions as required by law or regulation. The inclusion of our
website address in this prospectus does not include or
incorporate by reference the information on our website into
this prospectus.
Compensation
committee interlocks and insider participation
None of the members of our compensation committee is an officer
or employee of our company. None of our executive officers
currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of
the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity
that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of
directors or compensation committee.
Limitations on
liability and indemnification matters
Our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws, each of which will be in effect
upon the completion of this offering, contain provisions
100
that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages
to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently,
our directors will not be personally liable to us or our
stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary
duties as directors, except liability for:
|
|
|
any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
|
|
|
any act or omission not in good faith or that involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law; or
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that we are
obligated to advance expenses incurred by a director or officer
in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding,
and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer,
director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out
of his or her actions in that capacity, regardless of whether we
would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under the
provisions of Delaware law. We have entered, and expect to
continue to enter, into agreements to indemnify our directors,
executive officers and other employees as determined by our
board of directors. With specified exceptions, these agreements
provide for indemnification for related expenses including,
among other things, attorneys fees, judgments, fines and
settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any
action or proceeding. We believe that these bylaw provisions and
indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain
qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain
directors and officers liability insurance.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from
bringing a lawsuit against our directors and officers for breach
of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the likelihood of
derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even
though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other
stockholders. Further, a stockholders investment may be
adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of
settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as
required by these indemnification provisions. At present, there
is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our
directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is
sought, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that
may result in claims for indemnification.
There is no currently pending material litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors or officers for which
indemnification is sought.
Director
compensation
We reimburse each member of our board of directors who is not an
employee for reasonable travel and other expenses in connection
with attending meetings of the board of directors or committees
thereof. Our directors received no other compensation for their
services as such in fiscal 2009.
101
Executive
compensation
Compensation
discussion and analysis
Our current compensation program for our named executive
officers (as defined under Summary
Compensation Table) was developed and implemented by our
board of directors while we were a private company. Therefore,
our current compensation program, and the process by which it
was developed, is less formal than that which we plan to follow
as a public company.
In connection with this offering, we will review our
compensation philosophy and expect to adopt compensation
policies and objectives that generally are more consistent with
those of a public, rather than private, company. To this end,
our compensation committee will undertake a review of director
and executive officer compensation trends at comparable
companies and provide recommendations to our board of directors
with respect to compensation arrangements following the
completion of this offering. We anticipate that individual
performance objectives will be identified in the future.
However, we cannot predict what the compensation
committees recommendations or such objectives will be.
We currently have no employment agreements with our named
executive officers. In connection with this offering, we
anticipate entering into employment agreements with our named
executive officers on terms to be agreed between us and the
executives. We have established the following primary objectives
in negotiating these employment agreements:
|
|
|
attracting, retaining and motivating executive officers with the
knowledge, skills and experience that are critical to our
success;
|
|
|
ensuring that executive compensation is aligned with our
corporate strategies and business objectives; and
|
|
|
promoting the achievement of key strategic and financial
performance measures by linking cash incentives to the
achievement of operating results.
|
After completion of this offering, our compensation committee
will oversee our executive compensation program. For more
information on our compensation committee after completion of
the offering, see Compensation Committee above.
Given the limited formal procedures we have employed as a
private company, we expect that our approach to executive
compensation as a public company, as developed and implemented
by our compensation committee, will vary significantly from our
historical practice. We expect that the compensation committee
will meet periodically to make recommendations for base
salaries, bonuses, stock option awards, long-term incentive
awards and other compensation and benefits to be paid, granted
or provided to our named executive officers. In making these
recommendations, we expect that the compensation committee will
consider (1) our historical and expected performance,
(2) the alignment of individual performance with our
operational objectives, (3) the anticipated level of
difficulty in replacing our named executive officers with
persons of comparable experience, skill and knowledge, and
(4) the recommendations of any external advisors that it
may engage.
Components of
executive compensation for fiscal 2009
The principal components of our current executive compensation
program are base salary and an annual performance bonus
principally based on our revenues and EBITDA (and in the case of
our named executive officers other than Dr. Vahaviolos and
Mr. Peterik, on the financial
102
performance of the group for which each such named executive
officer is responsible). In addition, we maintain certain
benefits and perquisites for our named executive officers, which
are dependent, in part, on the country in which the named
executive officer is located. Although each element of
compensation described below is considered separately, our
existing compensation committee takes into account the aggregate
compensation package for each individual in its determination of
each individual component of that package. The components of
executive compensation have been as follows:
|
|
|
Base salary. Base salary is a fixed compensation
amount paid during the course of the fiscal year. Each named
executive officers base salary is reviewed on an annual
basis by our existing compensation committee. Historically, we
have not applied specific formulas to set base salary or to
determine salary increases, nor have we sought to formally
benchmark base salary against similarly situated companies.
Generally, salary is determined by reference to the scope of
each named executive officers responsibilities and is
intended to provide a basic level of compensation for performing
the job expected of him. We believe that each named executive
officers base salary must be competitive in our industry
and with the market generally with respect to the knowledge,
skills and experience that are necessary for him to meet the
requirements of his position.
|
|
|
|
Annual cash incentives. Annual cash incentives are
intended to reward named executive officers for individual
performance. The named executive officers have the potential to
earn cash incentives up to a maximum of 100 percent of base
salary. In fiscal 2009, the cash incentives were principally
based on our revenues and EBITDA. We chose revenues as a metric
in order to incentivize and reward revenue growth and EBITDA
because we believe it is a useful measure of our profitability.
The targets set by our compensation committee for fiscal 2009
were revenues of $200 million (after intercompany
eliminations) and EBITDA of $35 million. In addition, the
cash incentives for our named executive officers were based in
part on other factors, such as new product introduction,
customer base growth, customer retention, completion of
acquisitions and successful integration of acquired companies or
assets and, solely with respect to our named executive officers
other than Dr. Vahaviolos and Mr. Peterik, on the
performance of the group for which each is responsible, although
we did not assign a target for any of these factors. Instead,
with respect to these factors, we used our own experience and
judgment to determine whether and to what extent each named
executive officers cash incentives should be adjusted as a
result of his or her performance with respect to such factors.
Due to the economy and several non-recurring events we did not
fully achieve our EBITDA and revenue targets and accordingly
reduced bonus payments. The cash incentives paid to our named
executive officers ranged from approximately 19% to 39% of our
named executive officers base salaries. We did not adhere
to a fixed formula for determining the aggregate cash incentives
since the applicable targets for EBITDA were not met; nor did we
assign a fixed weight to the other metrics on which such
incentives were based.
|
|
|
|
Benefits and perquisites. Our named executive
officers are eligible to receive the same benefits that are
generally available to all employees. We provide a qualified
matching contribution to each employee, including our named
executive officers, who participates in our 401(k) plan. This
matching policy provides that we match half of the first 6% of
compensation that our named executive officers contribute to the
plan. We also provide certain additional benefits to our named
executive officers located outside the United States, including
health and dental insurance and a car allowance, which we
believe are consistent with those offered by other companies and
specifically with those companies with
|
103
which we compete for these employees. We did not provide any
other personal benefits or pension, deferred compensation or
other retirement benefits to our named executive officers in
fiscal 2009.
Employment
agreements
We currently have no employment agreements with our named
executive officers. In connection with this offering, we
anticipate entering into employment agreements with our named
executive officers on terms to be agreed between us and the
executives.
Summary
compensation table for fiscal 2009(1)
The following table provides information regarding the
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and each of the next four most highly compensated
executive officers in fiscal 2009. We refer to these executive
officers as our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
awards
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and principal
position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
312,716
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,594
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
469,310
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Pete Peterik
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
219,527
|
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,586
|
(3)
|
|
|
322,113
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Lange
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
198,000
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,392
|
(4)
|
|
|
301,392
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark F. Carlos
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
149,775
|
|
|
|
28,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,729
|
(5)
|
|
|
190,904
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Software Products &
Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip T. Cole
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
162,215
|
|
|
|
58,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,051
|
(6)
|
|
|
249,942
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph L. Genesi
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
36,692
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,100
|
(7)
|
|
|
64,292
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Columns disclosing compensation
under the headings Stock Awards, Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation, and Change in Pension
Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings are
not included because no compensation in these categories was
awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers in
fiscal 2008.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes matching contributions
under our 401(k) Plan of $7,750 and vehicle allowances of
$14,712.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes matching contributions
under our 401(k) Plan of $8,313 and vehicle allowances of $7,800.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes matching contributions
under our 401(k) Plan of $4,854 and vehicle allowances of
$12,278.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes matching contributions
under our 401(k) Plan of $4,900 and vehicle allowances of $3,000.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes contributions for
retirement and health care insurance of $22,584 and vehicle
allowances of $6,467.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes vehicle allowances of
$1,000.
|
104
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
Represents the total compensation
expense for fiscal 2009, calculated in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R for the stock option grants received.
The annual valuation assumptions used in determined such amounts
are described elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
Grants of
plan-based awards
The following table provides information regarding grants of
plan-based awards to our named executive officers during fiscal
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
awards: number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant date fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of securities
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
value of stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
underlying
|
|
|
base price of
|
|
|
and option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
option awards
|
|
|
awards
|
|
Name
|
|
date
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($/sh)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph L. Genesi
|
|
|
4/9/09
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
130.00
|
|
|
$
|
601,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This option grant was received upon
joining Mistras in 2009 pursuant to our 2007 Stock Option Plan.
The options vest in four annual installments commencing on the
first anniversary of the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amount in this column
represents the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), of the stock options
granted to Mr. Genesi in fiscal 2009. No other named
executive officer was granted options in fiscal 2009.
|
Outstanding
equity awards at 2009 fiscal-year end
The following table provides information regarding equity awards
granted to our named executive officers that were outstanding as
of May 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
underlying
|
|
|
underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unexercised
|
|
|
unexercised
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
expiration
|
|
Name
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
unexercisable
|
|
|
($/share)
|
|
|
date
|
|
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Pete Peterik(1)
|
|
|
12,500
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
05/25/2010
|
|
Mark F. Carlos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip T. Cole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Lange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph L. Genesi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
(2)
|
|
|
130.00
|
|
|
|
04/09/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This option grant was received upon
joining Mistras in 2005 and is fully vested.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
This option grant was received upon
joining Mistras in 2009 and the options vest in four annual
installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of
grant.
|
Option exercises
during fiscal 2009
None of our named executive officers exercised stock options
during fiscal 2009.
105
Pension benefits
and non-qualified deferred compensation in fiscal 2009
We do not currently provide our named executive officers with
pension benefits or nonqualified deferred compensation.
Potential
payments upon termination of employment or a change of
control
The named executive officers are not entitled to receive any
benefits in connection with a termination of employment or a
change in control of us.
106
Principal and
selling stockholders
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock and the shares
beneficially owned by all selling stockholders as
of ,
2009, and as adjusted to reflect the sale of our common stock
offered by this prospectus by:
|
|
|
the executive officers named in the summary compensation table;
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
all of our current directors and executive officers as a group;
|
|
|
each stockholder known by us to own beneficially more than five
percent of our common stock; and
|
|
|
all selling stockholders.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect
to the securities. Shares of common stock that may be acquired
by an individual or group within 60 days
of ,
2009, pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants, are
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of such individual or group, but are not
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person shown in the table.
Percentage of ownership is based
on shares
of common stock outstanding
on ,
2009 which assumes the conversion of all outstanding shares of
our Class A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock,
Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
into shares
of common stock
and shares
of common stock outstanding after the completion of this
offering.
Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, we believe that
the stockholders named in this table have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of common stock
shown to be beneficially owned by them, based on information
provided to us by such stockholders. The address for the
directors and executive officers set forth below is 195
Clarksville Road, Princeton Junction, NJ 08550.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
owned after this
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
owned after this
|
|
|
offering, assuming
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
being sold
|
|
|
offering, assuming
|
|
|
full exercise of the
|
|
|
|
owned prior to
|
|
|
in this
|
|
|
no exercise of the
|
|
|
over-allotment
|
|
|
|
this offering
|
|
|
offering
|
|
|
over-allotment option
|
|
|
option
|
|
Beneficial owner
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
owned after this
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
owned after this
|
|
|
offering, assuming
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
being sold
|
|
|
offering, assuming
|
|
|
full exercise of the
|
|
|
|
owned prior to
|
|
|
in this
|
|
|
no exercise of the
|
|
|
over-allotment
|
|
|
|
this offering
|
|
|
offering
|
|
|
over-allotment option
|
|
|
option
|
|
Beneficial owner
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Peterik(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark F. Carlos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Software Products and
Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip T. Cole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Lange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President, Services, and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph L. Genesi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Executive Vice President , Marketing and Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth Burgess(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel M. Dickinson(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Forese(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard H. Glanton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manuel N. Stamatakis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
owned after this
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
owned after this
|
|
|
offering, assuming
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
being sold
|
|
|
offering, assuming
|
|
|
full exercise of the
|
|
|
|
owned prior to
|
|
|
in this
|
|
|
no exercise of the
|
|
|
over-allotment
|
|
|
|
this offering
|
|
|
offering
|
|
|
over-allotment option
|
|
|
option
|
|
Beneficial owner
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Five Percent
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds affiliated with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altus Capital Partners, Inc.(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Wright St., Suite 110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westport, CT 06880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC NDT Holdings, LLC(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1455 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C. 20004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Selling Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Carroll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward Lowenhar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Finlayson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel Ternowchek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedro Feres Filho
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Claude Lenain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shigenori Yuyama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herman Schoorlemmer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Gynane
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athanasia T. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athanasios Anastasopoulos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles J. Schulz Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alain Proust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian A. Pollock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Etienne De La Tullayec
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Indicates beneficial ownership of
less than 1% of the total outstanding common stock.
|
109
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists
of shares
of common stock
and shares
of Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Consists
of shares
of common stock Mr. Peterik has the right to acquire
pursuant to outstanding options which are or will be immediately
exercisable within 60 days
of ,
2009.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes shares
of Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock held by
Altus Capital Partners, SBIC, L.P.
and shares
of Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock held by
Altus-Mistras Co-Investment, LLC. The voting and disposition of
the shares held by Altus Capital Partners, SBIC, L.P. is
determined by an investment committee consisting of Russell
Greenberg, Gregory Greenberg and Elizabeth Burgess, a member of
our board of directors. The voting and disposition of the shares
held by Altus-Mistras Co-Investment, LLC is determined by
Russell Greenberg. Ms. Burgess disclaims beneficial
ownership of all of these shares except to the extent of her
pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists
of shares
of Class A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
and shares
of Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. Daniel
M. Dickinson and James J. Forese, each a member of our board of
directors, share voting and dispositive power over the shares
held by TC NDT Holdings, LLC with five other members of an
investment committee. Messrs. Dickinson and Forese disclaim
beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of
their pecuniary interest therein.
|
110
Certain
relationships and related transactions
The following is a description of the transactions we have
engaged in since June 1, 2006 with our directors and
officers and beneficial owners of more than five percent of our
voting securities and their affiliates.
Conversion of all
preferred stock upon completion of this offering
Each share of our Class A and Class B Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock is currently convertible into one
share of our common stock. The conversion rate for each series
of preferred stock is subject to (i) proportional
adjustments for, among other things, stock splits and dividends,
combinations, and recapitalizations, and
(ii) formula-weighted-average adjustments in the event that
we issue additional shares of common stock or securities
convertible into or exercisable for common stock at a purchase
price less than the price at which such series of preferred
stock was issued and sold by us, subject to certain customary
exceptions.
All shares of our Class A and Class B Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock will automatically convert into
shares of common stock upon completion of this offering. The
following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock
to be received by our officers, directors and security holders
who beneficially own more than five percent of any class of our
voting securities upon such conversion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Convertible
|
|
|
Class B Convertible
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Redeemable
|
|
|
Redeemable
|
|
|
Issuable upon
|
|
Name
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds affiliated with Altus Capital Partners, Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC NDT Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
298,701
|
|
|
|
14,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
298,701
|
|
|
|
221,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration
rights
In connection with our Class B Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock financing described above, we entered into an
amended and restated investor rights agreement with our
preferred stockholders, including Dr. Vahaviolos, our
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and entities
affiliated with Ms. Burgess, Mr. Dickinson and
Mr. Forese, our directors. Pursuant to this agreement, we
granted such stockholders certain registration rights with
respect to shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion
of the shares of the preferred stock held by them. For more
information regarding this agreement, please refer to the
section titled Description of Capital Stock
Registration Rights.
This is not a complete description of the amended and restated
investor rights agreement and is qualified by the full text of
the amended and restated investor rights agreement filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part.
111
Acquisition of
Envirocoustics A.B.E.E.
On April 25, 2007, our wholly owned subsidiary, Physical
Acoustics Ltd., acquired 99% of the outstanding shares of
Envirocoustics A.B.E.E., a company incorporated under the laws
of Greece, which was majority-owned by Dr. Vahaviolos, our
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. In
consideration for his shares of Envirocoustics A.B.E.E.,
Dr. Vahaviolos received approximately $400,000 in cash and
was issued 18,000 shares of our Class B Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock, which our board of directors
determined had an approximate fair market value of $50 per share.
On or about May 1, 2007, Envirocoustics A.B.E.E entered
into an employment agreement with the daughter of
Dr. Vahaviolos, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer., pursuant to which she serves as Vice President and
Managing Director of Envirocoustics A.B.E.E. The employment
agreement provides for a monthly salary in the amount of
approximately $8,900 and other compensation, including incentive
bonuses, plus travel and other expenses. During fiscal 2009,
Dr. Vahaviolos daughter received approximately
$143,000 in total compensation and benefits.
Leases
We lease our headquarters, located at 195 Clarksville Road,
Princeton Junction, New Jersey, from an entity majority owned by
Dr. Vahaviolos, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer. The lease currently provides for monthly payments of
$61,685 (which increases annually to a maximum of $71,882) and
terminates on October 31, 2014.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, Euro Physical Acoustics, leases
office space located at 27 Rue Magellan, Sucy-en-Brie, France,
which is partly owned by Dr. Vahaviolos, our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer. The lease provides for
monthly payments of $15,719 and terminates January 12, 2016.
Employment and
indemnification arrangements with our executive officers and
directors
We currently have no employment agreements with our named
executive officers, but we anticipate entering into employment
agreements with our named executive officers in connection with
this offering. In addition, we may also enter into
indemnification agreements with our directors and officers. The
indemnification agreements and our second amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
Policy for
approval of related person transactions
We have adopted a formal policy that our executive officers,
directors, and principal stockholders, including their immediate
family members and affiliates, are not permitted to enter into a
related party transaction with us without the prior consent of
our audit committee, or other independent members of our board
of directors in the case it is inappropriate for our audit
committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of
interest. Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an
executive officer, director, principal stockholder, or any of
such persons immediate family members or affiliates, in
which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, must first be
presented to our audit committee for review, consideration and
112
approval. All of our directors, executive officers and employees
are required to report to our audit committee any such related
party transaction. In approving or rejecting the proposed
agreement, our audit committee shall consider the relevant facts
and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the audit
committee, including, but not limited to, the risks, costs and
benefits to us, the terms of the transaction, the availability
of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if
applicable, the impact on a directors independence. Our
audit committee shall approve only those agreements that, in
light of known circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent
with, our best interests, as our audit committee determines in
the good faith exercise of its discretion. All of the
transactions described above were entered into prior to the
adoption of this policy. Upon completion of this offering, we
will post this related party transaction policy on our website.
113
Description of
capital stock
Under our second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation that will be in effect upon the completion of this
offering, our authorized capital stock will consist
of shares
of common stock, $0.01 par value per share,
and shares
of authorized but undesignated preferred stock, $0.01 par
value per share. The following description summarizes the most
important terms of our capital stock. Because it is only a
summary, it does not contain all the information that may be
important to you. For a complete description you should refer to
our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws, effective upon completion of this
offering, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, and
to the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation
Law.
Common
stock
As
of ,
2009, we
had shares
of common stock issued and outstanding, held
by
stockholders of record, and there were outstanding options to
purchase shares
of common stock.
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share
held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the
stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. Subject
to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding shares
of preferred stock, holders of common stock are entitled to
receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from
time to time by our board of directors out of funds legally
available for dividend payments. All outstanding shares of
common stock are fully paid and nonassessable, and the shares of
common stock to be issued upon completion of this offering will
be fully paid and nonassessable. The holders of common stock
have no preferences or rights of conversion, exchange,
pre-emption or other subscription rights. There are no
redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common
stock. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of our affairs, holders of common stock will be entitled to
share ratably in our assets that are remaining after payment or
provision for payment of all of our debts and obligations and
after liquidation payments to holders of outstanding shares of
preferred stock, if any.
Preferred
stock
After giving effect to this offering, we will have no shares of
preferred stock outstanding.
Preferred stock, if issued, would have priority over the common
stock with respect to dividends and other distributions,
including the distribution of assets upon liquidation. Our board
of directors has the authority, without further stockholder
authorization, to issue from time to time shares of preferred
stock in one or more series and to fix the terms, limitations,
relative rights and preferences, and variations of each series.
Although we have no present plans to issue any shares of
preferred stock, the issuance of shares of preferred stock, or
the issuance of rights to purchase such shares, could decrease
the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to
the holders of common stock, could adversely affect the rights
and powers, including voting rights, of the common stock, and
could have the effect of delaying, deterring, or preventing a
change of control of us or an unsolicited acquisition proposal.
114
Registration
rights
The holders
of shares
of our common stock issued upon conversion of the preferred
stock outstanding prior to the completion of this offering, or
their permitted transferees, are entitled to rights with respect
to the registration of these shares under the Securities Act.
These rights are provided under the terms of an amended and
restated registration rights agreement between us and the
holders of these shares, and include demand registration rights,
short form registration rights and piggyback registration
rights. We are generally required to pay all expenses incurred
in connection with registrations effected in connection with the
following rights, including expenses of counsel to the
registering security holders up to $35,000. All underwriting
discounts and selling commissions will be borne by the holders
of the shares being registered.
Demand registration rights. Subject to specified
limitations, the holders a majority of these registrable
securities may require that we register all or a portion of
these securities for sale under the Securities Act, if the
anticipated gross receipts from the sale of such securities are
at least $2.5 million. Stockholders with these registration
rights who are not part of an initial registration demand are
entitled to notice and are entitled to include their shares of
common stock in the registration. We are required to effect only
two registrations pursuant to this provision of the registration
agreement. We are not required to effect a demand registration
prior to 90 days after the completion of this offering.
Short form registration rights. If we become
eligible to file registration statements on
Form S-3,
subject to specified limitations, the holders of not less than
25% of these registrable securities can require us to register
all or a portion of its registrable securities on
Form S-3,
if the anticipated aggregate offering price of such securities
is at least $500,000. We may not be required to effect more than
two such registrations in any
12-month
period. Stockholders with these registration rights who are not
part of an initial registration demand are entitled to notice
and are entitled to include their shares of common stock in the
registration.
Piggyback registration rights. If at any time we
propose to register any of our equity securities under the
Securities Act, other than in connection with (i) a demand
registration described above, (ii) a registration relating
solely to our stock option plans or other employee benefit plans
or (iii) a registration relating solely to a business
combination or merger involving us, the holders of these
registrable securities are entitled to notice of such
registration and are entitled to include their shares of capital
stock in the registration. The underwriters, if any, may limit
the number of shares included in the underwritten offering if
they believe that including these shares would adversely affect
the offering. These piggyback registration rights are subject to
the limitations set forth in the
lock-up
agreements entered into by substantially all of the holders of
these registrable securities in connection with this offering,
as described below in the section entitled Shares Eligible
for Future Sale.
Compliance with
governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange
The New York Stock Exchange has adopted rules that provide that
listed companies of which more than 50% of the voting power is
held by a single person or a group of persons are not required
to comply with certain corporate governance rules and
requirements. In particular, such a controlled
company may elect to be exempt from certain rules that
require a majority of the board of directors of companies listed
on the New York Stock Exchange to be independent, as defined by
these rules, and which mandate independent director
representation on certain
115
committees of the board of directors. In addition, for listed
companies other than controlled companies, the New
York Stock Exchange requires:
|
|
|
that a company listed on that market must have an audit
committee comprised of at least three members all of whom are
independent under the rules of the applicable exchange and that
is otherwise in compliance with the rules established for audit
committees of public companies under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended;
|
|
|
that director nominees must be selected, or recommended to the
board of directors for selection, by a majority of directors who
are independent under the rules of the applicable exchange, or a
nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors
with a written charter or board resolution addressing the
nomination process; and
|
|
|
that compensation for executive officers must be determined, or
recommended to the board of directors for determination, by a
majority of independent directors or a nominations committee
comprised solely of independent directors.
|
Upon the completion of this offering, we do not expect to avail
ourselves of the controlled company exceptions.
Anti-takeover
effects of our second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws and of Delaware law
Certain provisions of Delaware law, our second amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain
provisions that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or
discouraging another party from acquiring control of us. These
provisions, which are summarized below, may have the effect of
discouraging coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover
bids. These provisions are also designed, in part, to encourage
persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with
our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of
increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with
an unfriendly or unsolicited acquiror outweigh the disadvantages
of discouraging a proposal to acquire us because negotiation of
these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Undesignated Preferred Stock. As discussed above,
our board of directors has the ability to issue preferred stock
with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the
success of any attempt to change control of us. These and other
provisions may have the effect of deferring hostile takeovers or
delaying changes in control or management of our company.
Inability of Stockholders to Act by Written
Consent. We have provided in our second amended and
restated certificate of incorporation that our stockholders may
not act by written consent. This limit on the ability of our
stockholders to act by written consent may lengthen the amount
of time required to take stockholder actions. As a result, a
holder controlling a majority of our capital stock would not be
able to amend our bylaws or remove directors without holding a
meeting of our stockholders called in accordance with our bylaws.
Calling of Special Meetings of Stockholders. Our
bylaws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be
called by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer
or by the board of directors acting pursuant to a resolution
adopted by a majority of the members. Additionally, our bylaws
provide that only stockholders entitled to cast not less than
35% of all the votes entitled to be cast at a special meeting of
stockholders can require the Secretary to call such a special
meeting, subject to the satisfaction of certain procedural and
informational
116
requirements. These provisions may impair or prevent smaller
stockholders from forcing consideration of a proposal, including
the removal of directors.
Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder
Nominations and Proposals. Our bylaws establish
advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals
and the nomination of candidates for election as directors,
other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board
of directors or a committee of the board of directors. However,
our bylaws may have the effect of precluding the conduct of
certain business at a meeting if the proper procedures are not
followed. Any proposed business other than the nomination of
persons for election to our board of directors must constitute a
proper matter for stockholder action pursuant to the notice of
meeting delivered to us. For notice to be timely, it must be
received by our secretary not later than 90 nor earlier than 120
calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the previous
years annual meeting (or if the date of the annual meeting
is advanced more than 30 calendar days or delayed by more than
60 calendar days from such anniversary date, not later than 90
nor earlier than 120 calendar days prior to such meeting or the
10th calendar day after public disclosure of the date of
such meeting is first made). These provisions may also
discourage or deter a potential acquiror from conducting a
solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirors own slate
of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our
company.
Board Vacancies Filled Only by Majority of Directors Then in
Office. Vacancies and newly created seats on our board
may be filled only by our board of directors. Only our board of
directors may determine the number of directors on our board.
The inability of stockholders to determine the number of
directors or to fill vacancies or newly created seats on the
board makes it more difficult to change the composition of our
board of directors.
No Cumulative Voting. The Delaware General
Corporation Law provides that stockholders are not entitled to
the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless
our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation
provides otherwise. Our second amended and restated certificate
of incorporation expressly prohibits cumulative voting.
Directors Removed Only for Cause. Our second amended
and restated certificate of incorporation provides that
directors may be removed by stockholders only for cause.
Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute. We are subject to
the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law regulating corporate takeovers. In general,
Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation
from engaging, under certain circumstances, in a business
combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years following the date on which the person became an
interested stockholder unless:
|
|
|
Prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of
the corporation approved either the business combination or the
transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder;
|
|
|
Upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced,
excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock
outstanding, but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the
interested stockholder, (1) shares owned by persons who are
directors and also officers and (2) shares owned by
employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have
the right to determine confidentially whether shares held
subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange
offer; or
|
117
|
|
|
On or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business
combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized
at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by
written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Generally, a business combination includes a merger, asset or
stock sale or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit
to the interested stockholder. An interested stockholder is a
person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns or,
within three years prior to the determination of interested
stockholder status, did own 15% or more of a corporations
outstanding voting stock. We expect the existence of this
provision to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to
transactions our board of directors does not approve in advance.
We also anticipate that Section 203 may also discourage
attempts that might result in a premium over the market price
for the shares of common stock held by stockholders.
The provisions of Delaware law, our second amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws
could have the effect of discouraging others from attempting
hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may also inhibit
temporary fluctuations in the market price of our common stock
that often result from actual or rumored hostile takeover
attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of
preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these
provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish
transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their
best interests.
Listing
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol MG.
Transfer agent
and registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company. The transfer
agents postal address is 59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level, New
York, NY 10038 and its telephone numbers for stockholder
services are
(800) 937-5449
and
(718) 921-8124.
118
Shares eligible
for future sale
Prior to this offering, there was no market for our common
stock. We can make no predictions as to the effect, if any, that
sales of shares or the availability of shares for sale will have
on the market price prevailing from time to time. Nevertheless,
sales of significant amounts of our common stock in the public
market, or the perception that those sales may occur, could
adversely affect prevailing market prices and impair our future
ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity at a
time and price we deem appropriate.
Upon completion of this
offering, shares
of common stock will be outstanding, based
on shares
outstanding as of May 31, 2009 and the issuance
of shares
of common stock upon the automatic conversion of all of the
outstanding shares of our preferred stock upon the completion of
this offering. The number of shares of common stock to be
outstanding upon completion of this offering:
|
|
|
gives effect to
a -for-
stock split of our common stock, which will be effective
immediately prior to this offering;
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
outstanding as of May 31, 2009 at a weighted average
exercise price of $ per share;
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock reserved for future grants or awards from time
to time under our 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their option to
purchase up
to
additional shares of common stock from us.
|
Of these shares, shares (or in the event the underwriters
option to purchase additional shares is exercised in full,
shares) of our common stock sold in this offering will be freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act, except
for any shares of our common stock purchased by our
affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act, which would be subject to the
limitations and restrictions described below. The
remaining shares
of our common stock outstanding upon completion of this offering
are deemed restricted securities, as that term is
defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act.
Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if
registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration
under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, which rules are
described below.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a
person, or persons whose shares must be aggregated, who is
deemed to be our affiliate under Rule 144 and who has
beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock for at
least six months (or one year if at such time 90 days or
less have passed since the date of this prospectus) is entitled
to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that
does not exceed the greater of the following:
|
|
|
one percent of the number of shares of common stock then
outstanding, which will equal
approximately shares
immediately after this offering, or
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange during the four calendar weeks preceding the
date of filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the
sale.
|
119
Sales by our affiliates are also generally subject to certain
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
A person, or persons whose shares must be aggregated, who is not
deemed to be our affiliate under Rule 144 and who has
beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock for at
least six months (or one year if at such time 90 days or
less have passed since the date of this prospectus) is entitled
to sell an unlimited number of shares, subject to the
availability of current public information about us. A person
who is not deemed to be our affiliate and who has beneficially
owned restricted shares of our common stock for at least one
year is entitled to sell an unlimited number of shares without
complying with the current public information or any other
requirements of Rule 144.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701 as currently in effect, any of
our employees, consultants or advisors who purchase shares from
us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or
other written agreement in a transaction before the effective
date of this offering that was completed in reliance on
Rule 701 and complied with the requirements of
Rule 701 will, subject to the
lock-up
restrictions described below, be eligible to resell such shares
90 days after the effective date of this offering in
reliance on Rule 144, but without compliance with certain
restrictions, including the holding period, contained in
Rule 144.
Lock-up
agreements
Our officers and directors,
and ,
who will collectively hold after this
offering shares
of common stock, have agreed that they will not offer, sell,
contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have
the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other
arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the
economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether
any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our
common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or
publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge
or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or
other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written
consent of the representatives of the underwriters for a period
of 180 days after the date of this prospectus subject to
extension under certain circumstances.
Registration of
shares in connection with equity incentive plans
We intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering shares of common stock to be
issued pursuant to our 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Based on
the number of shares reserved for issuance under these plans,
the registration statement would cover
approximately shares
in total. The registration statement will become effective upon
filing. Accordingly, shares of common stock registered under the
registration statement on
Form S-8
will be available for sale in the open market immediately,
subject to complying with Rule 144 volume limitations
applicable to affiliates, applicable
lock-up
agreements and the vesting requirements and restrictions on
transfer affecting any shares that are subject to restricted
stock awards.
120
Certain material
U.S. federal tax consequences for
non-U.S.
holders of common stock
Each prospective purchaser of common stock is advised to consult
a tax advisor with respect to current and possible future tax
consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our common
stock as well as any tax consequences that may arise under the
laws of any U.S. state, municipality or other taxing
jurisdiction.
The following discussion is a general summary of the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock applicable to
Non-U.S. Holders.
As used herein, a
Non-U.S. Holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is neither a
U.S. person nor a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, and that will hold shares of our common stock as
capital assets. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a
U.S. person includes:
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
a corporation (or other business entity treated as a corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized
in the United States or under the laws of the United States, any
state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is includible in gross income
regardless of source; or
|
|
|
a trust that (A) is subject to the primary supervision of a
court within the United States and the control of one or more
U.S. persons, or (B) otherwise has validly elected to
be treated as a U.S. domestic trust for U.S. federal
income tax purposes.
|
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our
common stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of each
partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership and the partner. Partnerships
acquiring our common stock, and partners in such partnerships,
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock.
This summary does not consider specific facts and circumstances
that may be relevant to a particular
Non-U.S. Holders
tax position and does not consider U.S. state and local or
non-U.S. tax
consequences. It also does not consider
Non-U.S. Holders
subject to special tax treatment under the U.S. federal
income tax laws (including partnerships or other pass-through
entities, banks and insurance companies, dealers in securities,
holders of our common stock held as part of a
straddle, hedge, conversion
transaction or other risk-reduction transaction,
controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment
companies, companies that accumulate earnings to avoid
U.S. federal income tax, foreign tax-exempt organizations,
former U.S. citizens or residents, persons who hold or
receive common stock as compensation and persons subject to the
alternative minimum tax). This summary is based on provisions of
the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), applicable final, temporary and proposed Treasury
regulations, administrative pronouncements of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and judicial decisions,
all as in effect on the date hereof, and all of which are
subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis, and
different interpretations.
This summary is included herein as general information only.
Accordingly, each prospective
Non-U.S. Holder
is urged to consult its own tax advisor with respect to the
U.S. federal, state,
121
local and
non-U.S. income,
estate and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of our
common stock.
U.S. Trade or
Business Income
For purposes of this discussion, dividend income and gain on the
sale or other taxable disposition of our common stock will be
considered to be U.S. trade or business income
if such income or gain is (i) effectively connected with
the conduct by a
Non-U.S. Holder
of a trade or business within the United States and (ii) in
the case of a
Non-U.S. Holder
that is eligible for the benefits of an income tax treaty with
the United States, attributable to a permanent establishment
(or, for an individual, a fixed base) maintained by the
Non-U.S. Holder
in the United States. Generally, U.S. trade or business
income is not subject to U.S. federal withholding tax
(provided the
Non-U.S. Holder
complies with applicable certification and disclosure
requirements); instead, U.S. trade or business income is
subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at
regular U.S. federal income tax rates in the same manner as
a U.S. person, unless an applicable income tax treaty
provides otherwise. Any U.S. trade or business income
received by a corporate
Non-U.S. holder
may be subject to an additional branch profits tax
at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty.
Dividends
Distributions of cash or property that we pay will constitute
dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the
extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits
(as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). A
Non-U.S. Holder
generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax
at a 30% rate, or, if the
Non-U.S. Holder
is eligible, at a reduced rate prescribed by an applicable
income tax treaty, on any dividends received in respect of our
common stock. If the amount of a distribution exceeds our
current and accumulated earnings and profits, such excess first
will be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of
the
Non-U.S. Holders
tax basis in our common stock (with a corresponding reduction in
such
Non-U.S. Holders
tax basis in our common stock), and thereafter will be treated
as capital gain. In order to obtain a reduced rate of
U.S. federal withholding tax under an applicable income tax
treaty, a
Non-U.S. Holder
will be required to provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
certifying under penalties of perjury its entitlement to
benefits under the treaty. Special certification requirements
and other requirements apply to certain
Non-U.S. Holders
that are entities rather than individuals. A
Non-U.S. Holder
of our common stock that is eligible for a reduced rate of
U.S. federal withholding tax under an income tax treaty may
obtain a refund or credit of any excess amounts withheld by
filing an appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS on a
timely basis. A
Non-U.S. Holder
should consult its own tax advisor regarding its possible
entitlement to benefits under an income tax treaty and the
filing of a U.S. tax return for claiming a refund of
U.S. federal withholding tax.
The U.S. federal withholding tax does not apply to
dividends that are U.S. trade or business income, as
defined and discussed above, of a
Non-U.S. Holder
who provides a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI,
certifying under penalties of perjury that the dividends are
effectively connected with the
Non-U.S. Holders
conduct of a trade or business within the United States.
122
Dispositions of
Our Common Stock
A
Non-U.S. Holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or
withholding tax in respect of any gain on a sale or other
disposition of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
the gain is U.S. trade or business income, as defined and
discussed above;
|
|
|
the
Non-U.S. Holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 or
more days in the taxable year of the disposition and meets other
conditions; or
|
|
|
we are or have been a U.S. real property holding
corporation (a USRPHC) under section 897
of the Code at any time during the shorter of the five-year
period ending on the date of disposition and the
Non-U.S. Holders
holding period for our common stock.
|
In general, a corporation is a USRPHC if the fair market value
of its U.S. real property interests (as defined
in the Code and applicable Treasury regulations) equals or
exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide
real property interests and its other assets used or held for
use in a trade or business. If we are determined to be a USRPHC,
the U.S. federal income and withholding taxes relating to
interests in USRPHCs nevertheless will not apply to gains
derived from the sale or other disposition of our common stock
by a
Non-U.S. Holder
whose shareholdings, actual and constructive, at all times
during the applicable period, amount to 5% or less of our common
stock, provided that our common stock is regularly traded on an
established securities market, within the meaning of the
applicable Treasury regulations. We are not currently a USRPHC,
and we do not anticipate becoming a USRPHC in the future.
However, no assurance can be given that we will not be a USRPHC,
or that our common stock will be considered regularly traded on
an established securities market, when a
Non-U.S. Holder
sells its shares of our common stock.
Federal Estate
Tax
If you are an individual, common stock held at the time of your
death will be included in your gross estate for
U.S. federal estate tax purposes, and may be subject to
U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable estate tax
treaty provides otherwise.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax
We must annually report to the IRS and to each
Non-U.S. Holder
any dividend income that is subject to U.S. federal
withholding tax, or that is exempt from such withholding tax
pursuant to an income tax treaty. Copies of these information
returns also may be made available under the provisions of a
specific treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the
country in which the
Non-U.S. Holder
resides. Under certain circumstances, the Code imposes a backup
withholding obligation (currently at a rate of 28%) on certain
reportable payments. Dividends paid to a
Non-U.S. Holder
of our common stock generally will be exempt from backup
withholding if the
Non-U.S. Holder
provides a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
or otherwise establishes an exemption.
The payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our common
stock to or through the U.S. office of any broker,
U.S. or foreign, will be subject to information reporting
and possible backup withholding unless the holder certifies as
to its
non-U.S. status
under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an
exemption, provided that the broker does not have actual
knowledge or reason to know that the holder is a
U.S. person or that the conditions of any
123
other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied. The payment of the
proceeds from the disposition of our common stock to or through
a
non-U.S. office
of a
non-U.S. broker
is one that will not be subject to information reporting or
backup withholding unless the
non-U.S. broker
has certain types of relationships with the United States (a
U.S. related person). In the case of the
payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our common stock
to or through a non-U.S. office of a broker that is either a
U.S. person or a U.S. related person, the Treasury
regulations require information reporting (but not backup
withholding) on the payment unless the broker has documentary
evidence in its files that the holder is a
Non-U.S. Holder
and the broker has no knowledge to the contrary.
Non-U.S. Holders
should consult their own tax advisors on the application of
information reporting and backup withholding to them in their
particular circumstances (including upon their disposition of
our common stock).
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
Non-U.S. Holder
will be refunded or credited against the
Non-U.S. Holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, if the
Non-U.S. Holder
provides the required information to the IRS on a timely basis.
Non-U.S. Holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the filing of a
U.S. tax return for claiming a refund of such backup
withholding.
124
Underwriting
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement
dated ,
2009, we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the
underwriters named below, for whom J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated are acting as
representatives, the following respective numbers of shares of
common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
of shares
|
|
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Baird & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in the
offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered
by the over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or the offering may be terminated.
We and the selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters
a 30-day
option to purchase on a pro rata basis up
to
additional shares from us and an aggregate
of
additional shares from the selling stockholders at the initial
public offering price less the underwriting discounts and
commissions. The option may be exercised only to cover any
over-allotments of common stock.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a
selling concession of $ per share.
The underwriters and selling group members may allow a discount
of $ per share on sales to other
broker/dealers. After the initial public offering, the
representatives may change the public offering price and
concession and discount to broker/dealers.
125
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated
expenses we and the selling stockholders will pay:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
|
over-
|
|
|
over-
|
|
|
over-
|
|
|
over-
|
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Expenses payable by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by selling
stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Expenses payable by the selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The representatives have informed us that they do not expect
sales to accounts over which they have discretionary authority
to exceed 5% of the shares of common stock being offered.
We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file
with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act
relating to, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to make
any offer, sale, pledge, disposition or filing, without the
prior written consent of the representatives for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus. However, in the
event that either (1) during the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in either case the expiration of the
lock-up
will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless the representatives waive, in writing, such
an extension.
Our officers and directors and existing stockholders have agreed
that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or
otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our
common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or
exercisable for any shares of our common stock, enter into a
transaction that would have the same effect, or enter into any
swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in
part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our
common stock, whether any of these transactions are to be
settled by delivery of our common stock or other securities, in
cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the intention to make
any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any
transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement, without, in each
case, the prior written consent of the representatives for a
period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus.
However, in the event that either (1) during the last
17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in either case the expiration of the
lock-up
will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless the representatives waive, in writing, such
an extension.
126
The underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial public
offering price up
to shares
of common stock for employees, directors and other persons
associated with us who have expressed an interest in purchasing
common stock in the offering. The number of shares available for
sale to the general public in the offering will be reduced to
the extent these persons purchase the reserved shares. Any
reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the
underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the
other shares.
When determining whether to release any of our shares of common
stock from
lock-up
agreements or whether to consent to any waiver of transfer
restrictions, the representatives will consider, among other
factors, the holders reasons for requesting the waiver,
the number of shares of common stock for which the release is
being requested and market conditions at the time.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or
contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to
make in that respect.
We intend to apply to list the shares of common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange.
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates have
from time to time performed, and may in the future perform,
various financial advisory, commercial banking and investment
banking services for us and for our affiliates in the ordinary
course of business for which they have received and would
receive customary compensation. Bank of America, N.A., an
affiliate of Banc of America Securities LLC, is the
administrative agent, a lender and lead arranger under our
credit agreement and has received customary compensation in such
capacities. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., an affiliate of
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., is a lender and co-lead
arranger under our credit agreement and has received customary
compensation in such capacities.
Prior to the offering, there has been no market for our common
stock. The initial public offering price will be determined by
negotiation between us and the underwriters and will not
necessarily reflect the market price of the common stock
following the offering. The principal factors that will be
considered in determining the public offering price will include:
|
|
|
the information presented in this prospectus and otherwise
available to the underwriters;
|
|
|
the history of and the prospects for the industry in which we
will compete;
|
|
|
the ability of our management;
|
|
|
the prospects for our future earnings;
|
|
|
the present state of our development and our current financial
condition;
|
|
|
the recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly traded
common stock of generally comparable companies; and
|
|
|
the general condition of the securities markets at the time of
the offering.
|
We offer no assurances that the initial public offering price
will correspond to the price at which the common stock will
trade in the public market subsequent to this offering or that
an active trading market for the common stock will develop and
continue after the offering.
127
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with
Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act).
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short
position may be either a covered short position or a naked short
position. In a covered short position, the number of shares
over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number
of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option.
In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is
greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position by
either exercising their over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market.
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over-allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering.
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
websites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or
selling group members, if any, participating in this offering
and one or more of the underwriters participating in this
offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The
representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online
brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that
will make internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
European Economic
Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
Relevant Member State), with effect from and
including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is
implemented in that Relevant Member State (the Relevant
128
Implementation Date) an offer of the shares of
common stock to the public may not be made in that Relevant
Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in
relation to the shares of common stock which has been approved
by the competent authority in that Relevant Member State or,
where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and
notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except
that an offer to the public in that Relevant Member State of any
shares of common stock may be made at any time under the
following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive if they have
been implemented in the Relevant Member State:
|
|
|
to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
|
|
|
to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000,
and (3) an annual net turnover of more than
50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or consolidated
accounts;
|
|
|
to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified
investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive) subject to
obtaining the prior consent of the manager for any such
offer; or
|
|
|
in any other circumstances which do not require the publication
by the Issuer of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
Prospectus Directive.
|
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of Shares to the public in relation to any
shares of the common stock in any Relevant Member State means
the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and the shares of common
stock to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to
purchase or subscribe the shares of common stock, as the same
may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing
the Prospectus Directive in that Member State, and the
expression Prospectus Directive means
Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing
measure in each Relevant Member State.
Notice to
investors in the United Kingdom
Our shares of common stock may not be offered or sold and will
not be offered or sold to any persons in the United Kingdom
other than persons whose ordinary activities involve them in
acquiring, holding, managing or disposing of investments (as
principal or as agent) for the purposes of their businesses and
in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) with respect to
anything done in relation to our common stock in, from or
otherwise involving the United Kingdom.
In addition:
|
|
|
an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services
and Markets Act 20000) has only been communicated or caused
to be communicated and will only be communicated or caused to be
communicated in connection with the issue or sale of the shares
of common stock in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of
the FSMA does not apply to us; and
|
|
|
all applicable provisions of the FSMA have been complied with
and will be complied with, with respect to anything done in
relation to the shares of common stock in, from or otherwise
involving the United Kingdom.
|
129
Notice to
residents of Germany
Each person who is in possession of this prospectus is aware of
the fact that no German sales prospectus (Verkaufsprospekt)
within the meaning of the Securities Sales Prospectus Act
(Wertpapier-Verkaufsprospektgesetz, the Act) of the
Federal Republic of Germany has been or will be published with
respect to our shares of common stock. In particular, each
underwriter has represented that it has not engaged and has
agreed that it will not engage in a public offering
(öffentliches Angebot) within the meaning of the Act with
respect to any of our shares of common stock otherwise than in
accordance with the Act and all other applicable legal and
regulatory requirements.
Notice to
prospective investors in Switzerland
This document as well as any other material relating to the
shares which are the subject of the offering contemplated by
this Prospectus (the Shares) do not constitute an
issue prospectus pursuant to Article 652a of the Swiss Code
of Obligations. The Shares will not be listed on the SWX Swiss
Exchange and, therefore, the documents relating to the Shares,
including, but not limited to, this document, do not claim to
comply with the disclosure standards of the listing rules of SWX
Swiss Exchange and corresponding prospectus schemes annexed to
the listing rules of the SWX Swiss Exchange.
The Shares are being offered in Switzerland by way of a private
placement, i.e., to a small number of selected investors only,
without any public offer and only to investors who do not
purchase the Shares with the intention to distribute them to the
public. The investors will be individually approached by the
Issuer from time to time.
This document as well as any other material relating to the
Shares is personal and confidential and do not constitute an
offer to any other person. This document may only be used by
those investors to whom it has been handed out in connection
with the offering described herein and may neither directly nor
indirectly be distributed or made available to other persons
without express consent of the Issuer. It may not be used in
connection with any other offer and shall in particular not be
copied
and/or
distributed to the public in (or from) Switzerland.
Notice to
prospective investors in the Dubai International Financial
Centre
This document relates to an exempt offer in accordance with the
Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services
Authority. This document is intended for distribution only to
persons of a type specified in those rules. It must not be
delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The Dubai
Financial Services Authority has no responsibility for reviewing
or verifying any documents in connection with exempt offers. The
Dubai Financial Services Authority has not approved this
document nor taken steps to verify the information set out in
it, and has no responsibility for it. The Shares may be illiquid
and/or
subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers
of the Shares offered should conduct their own due diligence on
the Shares. If you do not understand the contents of this
document you should consult an authorised financial adviser.
130
Notice to
Canadian residents
The distribution of the shares of common stock in Canada is
being made only on a private placement basis exempt from the
requirement that we and the selling stockholders prepare and
file a prospectus with the securities regulatory authorities in
each province where trades of the shares of common stock are
made. Any resale of the shares of common stock in Canada must be
made under applicable securities laws which will vary depending
on the relevant jurisdiction, and which may require resales to
be made under available statutory exemptions or under a
discretionary exemption granted by the applicable Canadian
securities regulatory authority. Purchasers are advised to seek
legal advice prior to any resale of the shares of common stock.
Representations
of purchasers
By purchasing the shares of common stock in Canada and accepting
a purchase confirmation, a purchaser is representing to us and
the selling stockholders and the dealer from whom the purchase
confirmation is received that:
|
|
|
the purchaser is entitled under applicable provincial securities
laws to purchase the shares of common stock without the benefit
of a prospectus qualified under those securities laws,
|
|
|
where required by law, that the purchaser is purchasing as
principal and not as agent,
|
|
|
the purchaser has reviewed the text above under Resale
Restrictions, and
|
|
|
the purchaser acknowledges and consents to the provision of
specified information concerning its purchase of the shares of
common stock to the regulatory authority that by law is entitled
to collect the information.
|
Further details concerning the legal authority for this
information is available on request.
Rights of
action Ontario purchasers only
Under Ontario securities legislation, certain purchasers who
purchase a security offered by this prospectus during the period
of distribution will have a statutory right of action for
damages, or while still the owner of the shares of common stock,
for rescission against us and the selling stockholders in the
event that this prospectus contains a misrepresentation without
regard to whether the purchaser relied on the misrepresentation.
The right of action for damages is exercisable not later than
the earlier of 180 days from the date the purchaser first
had knowledge of the facts giving rise to the cause of action
and three years from the date on which payment is made for the
shares of common stock. The right of action for rescission is
exercisable not later than 180 days from the date on which
payment is made for the shares of common stock. If a purchaser
elects to exercise the right of action for rescission, the
purchaser will have no right of action for damages against us or
the selling stockholders. In no case will the amount recoverable
in any action exceed the price at which the shares of common
stock were offered to the purchaser and if the purchaser is
shown to have purchased the securities with knowledge of the
misrepresentation, we and the selling stockholders will have no
liability. In the case of an action for damages, we and the
selling stockholders will not be liable for all or any portion
of the damages that are proven to not represent the depreciation
in value of the shares of common stock as a result of the
misrepresentation relied upon. These rights are in addition to,
and without derogation from, any other rights or remedies
available at law to an
131
Ontario purchaser. The foregoing is a summary of the rights
available to an Ontario purchaser. Ontario purchasers should
refer to the complete text of the relevant statutory provisions.
Enforcement of
legal rights
All of our directors and officers as well as the experts named
herein and the selling stockholders may be located outside of
Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible for Canadian
purchasers to effect service of process within Canada upon us or
those persons. All or a substantial portion of our assets and
the assets of those persons may be located outside of Canada
and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy a judgment
against us or those persons in Canada or to enforce a judgment
obtained in Canadian courts against us or those persons outside
of Canada.
Taxation and
eligibility for investment
Canadian purchasers of the shares of common stock should consult
their own legal and tax advisors with respect to the tax
consequences of an investment in the shares of common stock in
their particular circumstances and about the eligibility of the
shares of common stock for investment by the purchaser under
relevant Canadian legislation.
132
Legal
matters
The validity of the issuance of the common stock to be sold in
this offering will be passed upon for us by
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., New York, New York. The
underwriters have been represented by Cravath,
Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, New York.
Experts
The audited financial statements as of May 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 and for the years then ended included in this
prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of such firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
Where you can
find more information
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act, with respect to the common stock
offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which is part of
the registration statement, omits certain information, exhibits,
schedules, and undertakings set forth in the registration
statement. For further information pertaining to us and our
common stock, reference is made to the registration statement
and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement.
Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents or
provisions of any documents referred to in this prospectus are
not necessarily complete, and in each instance where a copy of
the document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement, reference is made to the exhibit for a more complete
description of the matters involved.
You may read and copy all or any portion of the registration
statement without charge at the public reference room of the SEC
at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Copies of the registration statement may be obtained from the
SEC at prescribed rates from the public reference room of the
SEC at such address. You may obtain information regarding the
operation of the public reference room by calling
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, registration statements and certain other filings
made with the SEC electronically are publicly available through
the SECs website at www.sec.gov. The registration
statement, including all exhibits and amendments to the
registration statement, has been filed electronically with the
SEC.
Upon completion of this offering, we will become subject to the
information and periodic reporting requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act and, accordingly, will file annual
reports containing financial statements audited by an
independent public accounting firm, quarterly reports containing
unaudited financial data, current reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. You will be able to inspect and
copy such periodic reports, proxy statements, and other
information at the SECs public reference room, and the
website of the SEC referred to above.
133
Report of
independent registered public accounting firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mistras Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Mistras Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
at May 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for uncertain tax positions beginning on June 1, 2007.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, NJ
August 24, 2009
F-2
Mistras Group,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
as of
May 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except for share and per share information)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,668
|
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
39,153
|
|
|
|
32,772
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
11,509
|
|
|
|
10,644
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
5,747
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
63,670
|
|
|
|
49,341
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
33,592
|
|
|
|
26,511
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
11,552
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
38,642
|
|
|
|
28,627
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,421
|
|
|
|
3,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
151,274
|
|
|
$
|
119,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT)
EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
14,390
|
|
|
$
|
7,469
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
4,981
|
|
|
|
3,932
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
4,774
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
18,340
|
|
|
|
12,413
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
44,108
|
|
|
|
30,396
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
51,861
|
|
|
|
40,801
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, net of current portion
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
7,910
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
107,958
|
|
|
|
80,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 11, 13, 14 and 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value, 221,205 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
38,710
|
|
|
|
12,810
|
|
Class A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value, 298,701 shares, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
52,273
|
|
|
|
51,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock
|
|
|
90,983
|
|
|
|
63,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized, 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings
|
|
|
(47,376
|
)
|
|
|
(25,728
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(1,583
|
)
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(47,912
|
)
|
|
|
(24,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, preferred stock and stockholders
(deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
151,274
|
|
|
$
|
119,822
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
years ended
May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except for share
and per share information)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
190,637
|
|
|
$
|
134,183
|
|
|
$
|
107,245
|
|
Products
|
|
|
18,496
|
|
|
|
18,085
|
|
|
|
14,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
209,133
|
|
|
|
152,268
|
|
|
|
122,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services revenues
|
|
|
123,336
|
|
|
|
83,623
|
|
|
|
69,731
|
|
Cost of products revenues
|
|
|
7,831
|
|
|
|
6,967
|
|
|
|
5,971
|
|
Depreciation of services
|
|
|
7,860
|
|
|
|
6,167
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
Depreciation of products
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
139,867
|
|
|
|
97,437
|
|
|
|
80,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
69,266
|
|
|
|
54,831
|
|
|
|
41,873
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
47,150
|
|
|
|
32,943
|
|
|
|
26,408
|
|
Research and engineering
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
14,825
|
|
|
|
16,358
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
10,211
|
|
|
|
12,827
|
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,466
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
(27,114
|
)
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
Mistras Group,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
years ended
May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
(accumulated
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
(in thousands, except for share and per share information)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
deficit)
|
|
|
income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2006
|
|
|
978,500
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
|
$
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
$
|
(247
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
21,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
5,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of accounting pronouncement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
(25,728
|
)
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(24,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,466
|
|
|
$
|
5,466
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
1,037
|
|
|
$
|
(47,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,583
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,485
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
years ended
May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,466
|
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12,636
|
|
|
|
11,423
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets disposed
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash interest rate swap
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency (gain) loss
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(8,849
|
)
|
|
|
(9,226
|
)
|
|
|
(2,259
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
(1,802
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,119
|
)
|
|
|
(1,997
|
)
|
|
|
473
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
(990
|
)
|
|
|
(1,034
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,225
|
)
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
4,135
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
12,661
|
|
|
|
12,851
|
|
|
|
14,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(5,367
|
)
|
|
|
(3,718
|
)
|
|
|
(2,561
|
)
|
Payment for purchase of intangible asset
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses
|
|
|
(10,464
|
)
|
|
|
(15,535
|
)
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(15,888
|
)
|
|
|
(19,446
|
)
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(4,825
|
)
|
|
|
(3,605
|
)
|
|
|
(2,381
|
)
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(12,332
|
)
|
|
|
(3,219
|
)
|
|
|
(23,374
|
)
|
Net borrowings from (payments) revolver
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
13,144
|
|
|
|
(8,142
|
)
|
Borrowings from long-term debt
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
|
|
3,767
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
5,668
|
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
4,031
|
|
|
$
|
2,974
|
|
|
$
|
4,170
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
6,510
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
Noncash investing and financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment acquired through capital lease obligations
|
|
|
7,485
|
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
4,557
|
|
Issuance of notes payable and other debt obligations primarily
related to acquisitions
|
|
|
9,289
|
|
|
|
12,463
|
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock in acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-6
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements
years ended May 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007
(in thousands, except per
share data)
1. Description
of business and basis of presentation
Description of
business
Mistras Group, Inc. (formerly Mistras Holdings Corp.) and
subsidiaries (the Company) is a leading global
provider of proprietary, technology-enabled, asset protection
solutions, which combine the skill and experience of certified
technicians, engineers and scientists with non-destructive
testing (NDT), mechanical integrity services, and plant
conditioning monitoring software and systems (PCMS), to evaluate
the structural integrity of critical energy, industrial and
public infrastructure. The Company serves a global customer
base, including companies in the oil and gas, power generation
and transmission, public infrastructure, chemicals, aerospace
and defense, transportation, primary metals and metalworking,
pharmaceuticals and food processing industries.
Principles of
consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Mistras Group, Inc. and its wholly or majority-owned
subsidiaries: Quality Service Laboratories, Inc., CONAM
Inspection & Engineering Services, Inc.
(Conam) (merged into Mistras Group, Inc. on
May 31, 2009), Cismis Springfield Corp., Euro Physical
Acoustics, S.A., Nippon Physical Acoustics Ltd., Physical
Acoustics South America, Diapac Company, Mistras Canada, Inc.
and Physical Acoustics Ltd. and its wholly or majority-owned
subsidiaries, Physical Acoustics India Private Ltd., Physical
Acoustics B.V. and Envirocoustics A.B.E.E. (Envac).
Where the Companys ownership interest is less than 100%,
the minority ownership interests are reported in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The minority ownership
interest in net income, net of tax, is classified separately in
the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
On April 25, 2007, Physical Acoustics Ltd. acquired 99% of
the outstanding shares of Envac. Prior to this acquisition and
for the year ended May 31, 2007, the Company was the
primary beneficiary of Envac, which qualified as an implied
variable interest entity under FIN 46R. Accordingly, the
revenues and expenses of Envac have been included in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations beginning in
fiscal 2007 and the assets and liabilities are included in the
consolidated balance sheets.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. All foreign subsidiaries
reporting year ends are April 30, while Mistras Group and
the domestic subsidiaries year ends are May 31. The effect
of this difference in timing of reporting foreign operations on
the consolidated results of operations and consolidated
financial position is not significant.
F-7
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Reclassification
Certain amounts previously reported for prior periods have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. Such
reclassifications had no effect on the results of operations as
previously reported.
2. Summary
of significant accounting policies
Revenue
recognition
Revenue recognition policies for the various sources of revenues
are as follows:
Services
The Company predominantly derives revenues by providing its
services on a time and material basis and recognizes revenues
when services are rendered. At the end of any reporting period,
there may be earned but unbilled revenues that are accrued.
Payments received in advance of revenue recognition are
reflected as deferred revenues.
Software
Revenues from the sale of perpetual licenses are recognized upon
the delivery and acceptance of the software. Revenues from term
licenses are recognized ratably over the period of the license.
Revenues from maintenance, unspecified upgrades and technical
support are recognized ratably over the period such items are
delivered. For multiple-element arrangement software contracts
that include non-software elements, and where the software is
essential to the functionality of the non-software elements
(collectively referred to as software multiple-element
arrangements), the Company applies the rules as noted below.
Products
Revenues from product sales are recognized when risk of loss and
title passes to the customer, which is generally upon product
delivery. The exceptions to this accounting treatment would be
for multiple-element arrangements (defined below) or those
situations where specialized installation or customer acceptance
is required. Payments received in advance of revenue recognition
are reflected as deferred revenues.
Multiple-element
arrangements
The Company occasionally enters into transactions that represent
multiple-element arrangements, which may include any combination
of services, software, hardware and financing. Vendor-specific
objective evidence is utilized to determine whether they can be
separated into more than one unit of accounting. A
multiple-element arrangement is separated into more than one
unit of accounting if: (1) the delivered item has value on
a standalone basis; and (2) there is objective and reliable
evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items if the
delivery or performance of the undelivered items is probable and
in the control of the Company.
F-8
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
If these criteria are not met, then revenues are deferred until
such criteria are met or until the period(s) over which the last
undelivered element is delivered. If there is objective and
reliable evidence of fair value for all units of accounting in
an arrangement, the arrangement consideration is allocated to
the separate units of accounting based on each units
relative fair value.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. The more
significant estimates include valuation of goodwill and
intangible assets, useful lives of long-lived assets, allowances
for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, reserves for
self-insured workers compensation and health benefits and
provision for income taxes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Cash and cash
equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents.
Accounts
receivable
Accounts receivable are stated net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts and sales allowances. Outstanding accounts receivable
balances are reviewed periodically, and allowances are provided
at such time that management believes it is probable that such
balances will not be collected within a reasonable period of
time. The Company extends credit to its customers based upon
credit evaluations in the normal course of business, primarily
with 30-day
terms. Bad debts are provided on the allowance method based on
historical experience and managements evaluation of
outstanding accounts receivable. Accounts are written off when
they are deemed uncollectible.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, as determined by
using the
first-in,
first-out method, or market. Work in process and finished goods
inventory include material, direct labor, variable costs and
overhead.
Software
costs
Costs that are related to the conceptual formulation and design
of licensed programs are expensed as research and engineering.
For licensed programs, the Company capitalizes costs that are
incurred to produce the finished product after technological
feasibility has been established. The capitalized amounts are
amortized using the straight-line basis over three years, which
is the estimated life of the related software. The Company
performs periodic reviews to
F-9
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
ensure that unamortized program costs remain recoverable from
future revenues. Costs to support or service licensed programs
are expensed as the costs are incurred.
The Company capitalizes certain costs that are incurred to
purchase or to create and implement internal-use software, which
includes software coding, installation, testing and data
conversion. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line
basis over three years.
Property, plant
and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation
of property, plant and equipment is computed utilizing the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed
utilizing the straight-line method over the shorter of the
remaining lease term or estimated useful life. The cost and
accumulated depreciation and amortization applicable to assets
retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the asset
accounts and any gain or loss is included in the consolidated
statement of operations. Repairs and maintenance costs are
expensed as incurred.
Goodwill and
intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
fair market value of net assets of the acquired business at the
date of acquisition. The Company tests for impairment annually,
in its fiscal fourth quarter, using a two-step process. The
first step identifies potential impairment by comparing the fair
value of the Companys reporting units to its carrying
value. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the
second step measures the amount of impairment, if any. The
impairment loss is the amount by which the carrying amount of
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill. There
was no impairment of goodwill for the years ended May 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007.
Intangible assets are recorded at cost. Intangible assets with
finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives.
Impairment of
long-lived assets
The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets
on a periodic basis in order to identify business conditions
which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for
potential impairment is based primarily on the Companys
ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets
from expected future undiscounted cash flows. If the total
expected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the
carrying amount of the assets, a loss is recognized for the
difference between fair value (computed based upon the expected
future discounted cash flows) and the carrying value of the
assets.
Shipping and
Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenues.
F-10
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Taxed collected
from customers
Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental
authorities are presented in the consolidated statement of
operations on a net basis.
Research and
engineering
Research and product development costs are expensed as incurred.
Advertising,
promotions and marketing
The costs for advertising, promotion and marketing programs are
expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. Advertising expense was $470, $307 and
$209 and for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Fair value of
financial instruments
SFAS No. 107, Disclosure about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair value
information about financial instruments, whether or not
recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to
estimate that fair value. The carrying amounts of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other
current assets and liabilities approximate fair value based on
the short-term nature of the accounts. The fair value of the
Companys debt obligations at May 31, 2009 was
approximately $2,200 lower than carrying value. The Company
estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis using
pricing for similar debt arrangements in an active market.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurement (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value within generally accepted accounting principles and
establishes a hierarchy that categorizes and prioritizes the
inputs to be used to estimate fair value. SFAS 157 also
expands financial statement disclosures about fair value
measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position (FSP)
157-2,
Effective Date of Statement No. 157, which delays
the effective date of SFAS 157 for one year for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). As of
May 31, 2009, the Company does not have any nonfinancial
asset or nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 and
FSP 157-2
are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted
FAS 157 on June 1, 2008.
SFAS 157 describes the following three levels of inputs
that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2Inputs other than Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or
other
F-11
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are supported
by little or no market activity and that are significant to the
fair value of the assets or liabilities.
See Note 12 for financial instruments that were accounted
for at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2009.
Foreign currency
translation
The financial position and results of operations of the
Companys foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local
currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of
the foreign subsidiaries are translated into the
U.S. dollar at the exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date. Income and expenses are translated at the average
exchange rate during the year. Translation gains and losses are
not included in earnings and are reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income within stockholders equity. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are included in net income
(loss) and were $188 in fiscal 2009 and not significant in
fiscal 2008 and 2007.
Derivative
financial instruments
The Company recognizes its derivatives as either assets or
liabilities, measures those instruments at fair value and
recognizes the changes in fair value of the derivative in net
income or other comprehensive income, as appropriate. The
Company hedges a portion of the variable rate interest payments
on debt using interest rate swap contracts to convert variable
payments into fixed payments. The Company does not apply hedge
accounting to its interest rate swap contracts. Changes in the
fair value of these instruments are reported as a component of
interest expense.
Concentration of
credit risks
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and
accounts receivable. At times, cash deposits may exceed the
limits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The
Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit
risk or the nonperformance of the financial institutions.
The Company sells primarily to large companies, extends
reasonably short collection terms, performs credit evaluations
and does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves
for potential credit losses.
The Company has one major customer with multiple business units
that accounted for 17.1%, 16.8% and 16.5% of revenues for fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Accounts receivable from this
customer were $7,228 and $3,183 at May 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
F-12
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Self
insurance
A wholly-owned subsidiary is self -insured for certain losses
relating to workers compensation and health benefits claims. The
Company maintains third-party excess insurance coverage for all
workers compensation claims in excess of $250 and for its health
benefit claims in excess of $150 to reduce its exposure from
such claims. Self-insured losses are accrued when it is probable
that an uninsured claim has been incurred but not reported and
the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated at the
balance sheet date. Management monitors and reviews all claims
and their related liabilities on an ongoing basis.
Stock-based
compensation
Effective June 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Share Based
Payment (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R
addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in
which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for
(a) equity instruments of the enterprise or
(b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the
enterprises equity instruments or that may be settled by
the issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS 123R
eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation
transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25), and instead generally
requires that such transactions be accounted for using a
fair-value based method. The Company elected the prospective
transition method as permitted by SFAS 123R and,
accordingly, prior periods were not restated to reflect the
impact of FAS 123R. The prospective transition method
requires that stock-based compensation expense be recorded for
all new restricted stock and restricted stock units that are
ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered
beginning on June 1, 2006. All unvested options outstanding
as of May 31, 2006 that had been previously measured but
had not yet recognized compensation expense will continue to be
accounted for under the provisions of APB 25 and related
interpretations until they are settled.
Prior to June 1, 2006, employee stock awards under the
Companys compensation plans were accounted for in
accordance with the provisions of APB 25, and related
interpretations. The Company provided the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123), and
related interpretations. Stock-based awards to nonemployees were
accounted for under the provisions of SFAS No. 123.
Under SFAS No. 123, the fair value for the stock
options was estimated at the date of grant using the minimum
value method. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions. The Company used 3% to
41/2%
as the risk-free interest rate, zero dividend yield and an
expected life of four years for the valuation of stock options.
All stock awards issued prior to June 1, 2006 and accounted
for in accordance with APB 25 were fully vested as of
May 31, 2008. The pro forma effect on the net income of the
Company for
F-13
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
fiscal years 2008 and 2007 had the fair value recognition
principles of SFAS No. 123 been utilized is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,439
|
|
|
$
|
5,388
|
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair
value method, net of income taxes
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma net income
|
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
|
$
|
5,180
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred income tax
asset will not be realized.
Effective June 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan
interpretation of FASB No. 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
FIN 48 requires a determination of whether the uncertain
tax positions are more likely than not of being sustained upon
audit based on the technical merits of the tax position. For tax
positions that are more likely than not of being sustained upon
audit, the largest amount of the benefit that is more likely
than not of being sustained is recognized in the consolidated
financial statements. For tax positions that are not more likely
than not of being sustained upon audit, none of the benefit is
recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The
provisions of FIN 48 also provide guidance on
de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, and disclosure.
The cumulative effect of the adoption of the recognition and
measurement provisions of FIN 48 resulted in a $564
reduction to the June 1, 2007 balance of stockholders
equity. The Companys policy for interest and penalties
related to income tax exposures was not impacted as a result of
the adoption of the recognition and measurement provisions of
FIN 48. Therefore, interest and penalties will continue to
be recognized as incurred within provision for income
taxes in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. with
federal and state jurisdictions as well as various foreign
jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company was not subject
to U.S. federal,
F-14
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
state and local or
non-U.S. income
tax examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years prior to
fiscal year 2005.
Comprehensive
Income
The Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 130,
Reporting Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive income is
defined to include all changes in equity, except those resulting
from investments by stockholders and distribution to
stockholders, and is reported in the statement of
stockholders equity (deficit). Included in the
Companys comprehensive income are net income and foreign
currency translation adjustments.
Recent accounting
pronouncements
SFAS No. 141R. In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations (SFAS 141R), which
replaces SFAS 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141). SFAS 141R applies to all business
combinations, including combinations among mutual entities and
combinations by contract alone. SFAS 141R requires that all
business combinations will be accounted for by applying the
acquisition method. This standard will significantly change the
accounting for business combinations both during the period of
the acquisition and in subsequent periods. Among the more
significant changes in the accounting for acquisitions are the
following:
|
|
|
In-process research and development (IPR&D)
will be accounted for as an asset, with the cost recognized as
research and development is realized or abandoned. IPR&D is
presently expensed at the time of the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired or liabilities assumed in a business combination
that arise from a contingency will be measured at fair value at
acquisition date if the fair value can be determined during the
measurement period.
|
|
|
|
Decreases in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax
assets will be recognized in operations. Such changes were
considered to be subsequent changes in consideration and were
recorded as decreases in goodwill.
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs will generally be expensed. Such costs are
presently treated as costs of the acquisition.
|
SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations
consummated in periods beginning on or after December 15,
2008. Early application is prohibited. The Company will adopt
SFAS 141R on June 1, 2009 and the effects will depend
on future acquisitions. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2009, the Company expensed $150 of transaction costs related to
business combinations that were in process but not completed by
the effective date of SFAS 141R.
SFAS No. 160. In December 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements
(SFAS 160), an amendment of ARB
No. 51, which will change the accounting and reporting
related to noncontrolling interests. SFAS 160, which is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, requires
F-15
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
that ownership interests in the subsidiaries held by parties
other than the parent be presented in the consolidated balance
sheet within equity and the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be
clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
income statement. Additionally, the statement requires that
changes in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary be
accounted for as an equity transaction. The Company will adopt
SFAS 160 on June 1, 2009. Accordingly, minority
interest in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets will be
reclassified to equity. Earnings attributable to minority
interests will be included in net income although such earnings
will continue to be deducted to measure earnings per share. The
presentation and disclosure requirements of SFAS 160 will
be applied retrospectively for all periods presented.
SFAS No. 161. In March 2008, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is intended to
help investors better understand how derivative instruments and
hedging activities affect an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows through enhanced disclosure
requirements. SFAS 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption encouraged.
The Company will adopt SFAS 161 on June 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 165. In May 2009, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
(SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events
that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued and is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not
anticipate the adoption of SFAS 165 on June 1, 2009
will have a material effect on its results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
SFAS No. 167. In June 2009, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendment to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167)
which amends Interpretation 46(R) to require an enterprise to
perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods that begin
after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect
adoption of SFAS 167 in fiscal year 2010 to have a material
effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash
flows as the Company does not have any variable interest
entities.
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by
the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net
income by the sum of (1) the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the period, and
(2) the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of stock
options using the treasury stock method. There is no difference,
for any of the periods presented, in the amount of net income
(numerator) used in the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share. With respect to the number of
weighted-average shares outstanding (denominator), diluted
shares reflects only the exercise of options to acquire common
stock to the extent that the options exercise prices are
less than the average market price of common shares during the
period.
F-16
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and
diluted (loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(21,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
991,348
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,007,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(21.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
The following weighted-average common shares and equivalents
related to options outstanding under the Companys stock
option plans and the conversion of its outstanding preferred
stock conversion were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings (loss) per share as the effect would have been
anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock equivalents of outstanding stock options
|
|
|
42,755
|
|
|
|
26,520
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
Common stock equivalents of conversion of preferred shares
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
519,906
|
|
|
|
503,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
562,661
|
|
|
|
546,426
|
|
|
|
520,284
|
|
|
|
F-17
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
4. Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided against accounts
receivable for amounts management believes may be uncollectible.
Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are represented
by the following at May 31 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
$
|
1,242
|
|
Increase due to acquisitions
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
Foreign exchange valuation
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
3,303
|
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
In January 2009, a customer voluntarily filed to reorganize
under Chapter 11 of the U.S Bankruptcy Code. Total
pre-petition accounts receivable from this customer as of
May 31, 2009 were $2,323 all of which are greater than
90 days old. Based on managements estimates, the
Company recorded a 67% or $1,556 reserve on the pre-petition
accounts receivable.
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following at May 31, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
2,832
|
|
|
$
|
2,796
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
4,260
|
|
|
|
3,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,509
|
|
|
$
|
10,644
|
|
|
|
Inventories are net of reserves for slow-moving and obsolete
inventory of $584 and $577 at May 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
F-18
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
6. Property,
plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at
May 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful life in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
|
$
|
865
|
|
Buildings and improvement
|
|
|
30-40
|
|
|
|
9,836
|
|
|
|
8,835
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
5-8
|
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
5-7
|
|
|
|
51,943
|
|
|
|
38,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,698
|
|
|
|
50,827
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,106
|
|
|
|
24,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,592
|
|
|
$
|
26,511
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense was $8,823, $7,323 and
$5,066 for the years ended May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
In 2007, the Company reduced its estimated useful lives on
certain equipment from seven years to five years, resulting in
an incremental charge to depreciation expense of $1,068. This
change in estimate was based on the Companys evaluation of
the useful lives of its equipment.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, substantially
all of which relates to our Services segment (Note 20), at
May 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
$
|
28,627
|
|
|
$
|
14,704
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the year
|
|
|
10,830
|
|
|
|
13,735
|
|
Post-acquisition adjustment
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
Foreign exchange valuation
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
38,642
|
|
|
$
|
28,627
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions are accounted for in accordance with SFAS 141,
Business Combinations. The total purchase price is
allocated to the assets and liabilities based on their fair
values at the acquisition date. The results of operations for
each of the entities have been included in the consolidated
financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.
All of the acquisitions were for strategic market expansion,
including the addition of trained technical personnel. No pro
forma information is presented for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007
because the pro forma impact of acquisitions, both individually
and in the aggregate, during these periods was immaterial.
F-19
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Number of entities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
$
|
10,464
|
|
|
$
|
15,535
|
|
|
$
|
2,031
|
|
Subordinated notes issued
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
|
8,137
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Other consideration, primarily obligations under covenants not
to compete
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Preferred stock (18,000 shares) issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,753
|
|
|
$
|
27,998
|
|
|
$
|
4,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets acquired
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
$
|
2,052
|
|
|
$
|
1,310
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
Intangibles, primarily customer lists
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
8,842
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
10,830
|
|
|
|
13,735
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,753
|
|
|
$
|
27,998
|
|
|
$
|
4,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future conditional consideration at May 31
|
|
$
|
3,991
|
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
The conditional consideration is contingent on the acquired
entity achieving certain revenue and profit targets during
calendar and fiscal years ending 2009 thru 2011. If earned, the
earliest the fiscal 2008 earn-out payments will be made is
February 2010 and the earliest the fiscal 2009 earn-out payments
will be made is within 90 days subsequent to May 31,
2010. In addition, the Company entered into certain finite
at-will employment, or consulting agreements with the owners or
managers of these companies.
In addition to the above, the Company acquired a patent in 2008
that will be used in developing new product sales as well as be
used by the Services segment. The purchase price for the patent
and certain related inventory and equipment was $712. In
connection with this patent purchase, the Company is obligated
for royalty payments on sales generated by the technology
developed or licensed for six years until November 2013. No such
payments were made in 2009 or 2008.
F-20
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
9. Intangible
assets
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of
intangible assets at May 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
life in
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
|
|
Software
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5,230
|
|
|
$
|
4,334
|
|
|
$
|
896
|
|
|
$
|
4,874
|
|
|
$
|
3,661
|
|
|
$
|
1,213
|
|
Customers lists
|
|
|
5-7
|
|
|
|
19,541
|
|
|
|
11,869
|
|
|
|
7,672
|
|
|
|
16,225
|
|
|
|
10,232
|
|
|
|
5,993
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
|
2-5
|
|
|
|
6,471
|
|
|
|
4,425
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
3,181
|
|
|
|
2,966
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2-5
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,554
|
|
|
$
|
22,605
|
|
|
$
|
11,949
|
|
|
$
|
30,074
|
|
|
$
|
18,522
|
|
|
$
|
11,552
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the years ended May 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 was $3,813, $4,100 and $3,625, respectively, including
amortization of software for the years ended May 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 of $672, $660, and $614, respectively.
The following is the approximate amount of amortization expense
in each of the years ending subsequent to May 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,393
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
F-21
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
10. Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the
following at May 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and related employee benefits
|
|
$
|
5,992
|
|
|
$
|
4,885
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
6,111
|
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
Accrued worker compensation and health benefits
|
|
|
4,823
|
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,340
|
|
|
$
|
12,413
|
|
|
|
11. Long-term
debt
Long-term debt consists of the following at May 31, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolver
|
|
$
|
15,505
|
|
|
$
|
13,145
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
36,319
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
12,113
|
|
|
|
9,138
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,251
|
|
|
|
48,270
|
|
Less: Current maturities
|
|
|
14,390
|
|
|
|
7,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
$
|
51,861
|
|
|
$
|
40,801
|
|
|
|
Senior credit
facility
On October 31, 2006, as subsequently amended April 23,
2007, December 14, 2007, May 30, 2008, July 1,
2008, January 7, 2009 and July 22, 2009, the Company
entered into a $40,000 Credit Agreement (Credit
Agreement) with Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. (the Lenders). The Credit Agreement
provides for a $15,000 revolver (Revolver) maturing
on October 31, 2012 and a $25,000 term loan (2007
Term Loan). On July 1, 2008, the Company amended its
credit agreement and entered into an additional term loan in the
amount of $20,000 (2008 Term Loan) to fund, among
other things, the fiscal year 2009 acquisitions described in the
acquisitions footnote. The 2007 Term Loan has quarterly
principal payments of $938 increasing to $1,250 and $1,875 in
January 2010 and January 2012, respectively, with final payment
on October 31, 2012. The 2008 Term Loan has equal monthly
principal payments of $278 with final payment on June 27,
2014. The maximum revolver was increased from $15,000 to $20,000
on January 7, 2009. At May 31, 2009, the available
additional borrowing capacity was $4,495. There is a provision
in the Credit Agreement that requires the Company to repay 25%
of
F-22
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
the immediately preceding fiscal years free cash
flow if its ratio of funded debt to EBITDA is
less than a fixed amount on or before October 1 each year.
Free cash flow means the sum of EBITDA minus all
taxes paid or payable in cash, minus cash interest paid, minus
all capital expenditures made in cash, minus all scheduled and
nonscheduled principal payments on funded debt made in the
period, minus acquisition costs and plus or minus changes in
working capital. Funded debt means all outstanding
liabilities for borrowed money and other interest-bearing
liabilities. The Company does not expect to be required to make
payments under this provision. Interest rates under the facility
are based on either the prime rate (3.25% and 5.0% at
May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively) or 30 day LIBOR
rate (0.32% and 2.46% at May 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively) plus an applicable margin of 1.5% to 2.3% as
defined in the Credit Agreement. All loans under the Credit
Agreement are collateralized by a security interest in all of
the assets of the Company.
The proceeds from the Senior Credit Facility were used to repay
the outstanding indebtedness under the Companys
(i) amended and restated revolving credit, term loan and
security agreement dated August 8, 2003, and (ii) Term
Loan Agreements with Gladstone Bank dated August 8, 2003.
The transaction resulted in a loss of $460 recognized in fiscal
2007.
The Credit Agreement contains financial and other covenants
limiting the Companys ability to, among other things,
create liens, make investments and certain capital expenditures,
incur more indebtedness, merge or consolidate, acquire other
companies, make dispositions of property, pay dividends and make
distributions to stockholders, enter into a new line of
business, enter into transactions with affiliates and enter into
burdensome agreements.
The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants that
require the Company to maintain compliance with specified
financial ratios. In addition, the Company is required to
furnish the agent for the Lenders, within specified time
periods, (i) after the end of each fiscal year, a
consolidated balance sheet as at the end of such fiscal year and
the related consolidated statements of income or operations,
shareholders equity and cash flows for such fiscal year,
to be audited and accompanied by a report and opinion of the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm,
(ii) after the end of each fiscal quarter, a consolidated
balance sheet as at the end of such fiscal quarter and the
related consolidated statements of income or operations,
shareholders equity and cash flows for such fiscal
quarter, and (iii) before the end of each fiscal year, a
forecast prepared by management of the consolidated balance
sheets and statements of income or operations for the next
fiscal year.
On July 22, 2009, the Credit Agreement was amended to
adjust two covenants retroactive to prior periods. The debt
service coverage ratio, as defined, was amended as of
May 31, 2009 and permitted additional indebtedness, as
defined, was amended for all reporting periods after
August 31, 2007.
Notes payable
and other
In connection with its acquisitions from 2007 to 2009, the
Company issued subordinated notes payable to the sellers and
assumed certain other notes payable. These notes generally
mature three years from the date of acquisition with interest
rates ranging from 3% to 7%. The
F-23
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Company has discounted these obligations to reflect a 5.5%
imputed interest. Unamortized discount on the notes is $175 as
of May 31, 2009. Amortization is recorded as interest
expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Payments
under these various acquisition obligations are made either
monthly or quarterly.
Scheduled principal payments due under all borrowing agreements
in each of the five years and thereafter subsequent to
May 31, 2009 are as follows (See Note 21, Subsequent
events, for a description of the fiscal 2010 refinancing and new
payment schedule):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
14,390
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
2012
|
|
|
10,834
|
|
2013
|
|
|
23,438
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
66,251
|
|
|
|
12. Financial
Instruments
The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate
exposure. In 2007, the Company entered into two interest rate
swap contracts whereby the Company would receive or pay an
amount equal to the difference between a fixed rate and the
quoted
90-day LIBOR
rate on a quarterly basis. Amounts related to the derivatives
are recognized as quarterly payments become due. Credit loss
from counterparty nonperformance is not anticipated. All gains
and losses are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense
in the consolidated statement of operations and the combined
fair values are recorded in other liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets. The following outlines the
significant terms of the contracts at May 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
At May 31,
|
|
Contract date
|
|
Term
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
November 20, 2006
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
5.17%
|
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
$
|
(321
|
)
|
November 30, 2006
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
5.05%
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(716
|
)
|
|
$
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
F-24
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
As noted above, the interest rate swaps are accounted for at
fair value on a recurring basis. The following table outlines
the fair value of the interest rate swaps within the fair value
hierarchy in accordance with SFAS 157:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements at May 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets for
|
|
|
Significant other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
identical assets
|
|
|
observable inputs
|
|
|
unobservable inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
$
|
716
|
|
|
$
|
716
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
13. Obligations
under capital leases
The Company leases certain office space, including its
headquarters, and service equipment under capital leases,
requiring monthly payments ranging from $1 to $62, including
effective interest rates that range from 0.3% to 22.5% expiring
through October 2014. The net book value of assets under capital
lease obligations is $15,577 and $10,720 at May 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
Scheduled future minimum lease payments subsequent to
May 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
5,773
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
2014
|
|
|
963
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
16,269
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(1,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
|
14,525
|
|
Less: Current portion of obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
(4,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
F-25
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
|
|
14.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Operating
leases
The Company is party to various noncancelable lease agreements,
primarily for its international and domestic office and lab
space. Minimum future lease payments under noncancelable
operating leases in each of the five years subsequent to
May 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,113
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
2013
|
|
|
958
|
|
2014
|
|
|
637
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,736
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense for the Company was $3,103, $2,408 and $1,453
for the years ended May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Litigation
The Company is subject to periodic lawsuits, investigations and
claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although
the Company cannot predict with certainty the ultimate
resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted
against it, the Company does not believe that any currently
pending legal proceeding to which the Company is a party will
have a material adverse effect on its business, results of
operations, cash flows or financial condition. The costs of
defense and amounts that may be recovered in such matters may be
covered by insurance. The Company records any liability in
accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies.
On September 25, 2007, two former employees, individually
and on behalf of a purported class consisting of all current and
former employees who work or worked as
on-site
construction workers, testing technicians and inspectors for
Conam in the State of California at any time from September 2003
through the date of judgment in this action, filed an action
against Conam in the United States District Court, Northern
District of California. The Complaint alleged, among other
things, that Conam violated the California Labor Code. The case
was mediated on October 13, 2008 and a settlement was
reached on all class claims. The class settlement is in the
process of being administered. As a result, the Company accrued
$2,100 in fiscal year 2009 which represents the settlement and
legal and administrative fees, net of insurance reimbursements
received and accrued. Approximately $1,750 has been paid in the
first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Acquisition
related
The Company is liable for contingent consideration in connection
with its acquisitions (See Note 8).
F-26
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
|
|
15.
|
Employee benefit
plans
|
The Company provides a 401(k) salary savings plan for eligible
U.S. based employees. Employee contributions are
discretionary up to the IRS limits each year and catch up is
allowed. Under the 401(k) plan, employees become eligible to
participate on the 1st of the month after six months of
continuous service. Under this plan, the Company matches 50% of
the employees contributions up to the first 6% of the
employees contributions. There is a five-year vesting
schedule for the Company match. The Companys contribution
to the plan aggregated $1,040, $758 and $569 for the years ended
May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company participates with other employers in contributing to
a union plan, which covers certain U.S. based union
employees. The plan is not administered by the Company and
contributions are determined in accordance with provisions of a
collective bargaining agreement. The Companys
contributions to the plan aggregated $283, $71 and $75 for the
years ended May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
Company has benefit plans covering certain employees in selected
foreign countries. Amounts charged to expense under these plans
were not significant in any year.
Income before provision for income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. operations
|
|
$
|
6,426
|
|
|
$
|
11,399
|
|
|
$
|
4,809
|
|
Foreign operations
|
|
|
3,785
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$
|
10,211
|
|
|
$
|
12,827
|
|
|
$
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
F-27
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
2,079
|
|
|
$
|
4,088
|
|
|
$
|
1,123
|
|
States and local
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Reserve for uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
532
|
|
States and local
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
Net change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
4,558
|
|
|
$
|
5,380
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed
by applying the statutory federal tax rate to income tax as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Federal tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
34.0%
|
|
|
$
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
35.0%
|
|
|
$
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
34.0%
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
5.5%
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
3.7%
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
4.2%
|
|
Foreign tax at lower rates
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4%
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9%
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1%
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
|
(35.0%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
44.6%
|
|
|
$
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
41.9%
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
3.6%
|
|
|
|
F-28
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Deferred income tax attributes resulting from differences
between financial accounting amounts and income tax basis of
assets and liabilities at May 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
1,074
|
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
3,064
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Capital lease obligation
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
Other
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
7,469
|
|
|
|
6,317
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
7,269
|
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(3,419
|
)
|
|
|
(2,629
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(2,658
|
)
|
|
|
(2,003
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
(6,865
|
)
|
|
|
(5,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
At May 31, 2009, the Company has recorded a valuation
allowance against certain state deferred income tax assets based
on its assessment that the respective state deferred income tax
assets would not be realized as a result of losses incurred in
2009 and certain prior years. As of May 31, 2009, the
Company has available state net operating losses of $2,646
expiring starting in 2011.
F-29
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Effective June 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of
unrecognized tax benefits since adoption is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
Additions for tax positions related to fiscal 2008
|
|
|
90
|
|
Additions for tax positions related to prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to the expiration of statutes of limitations
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2008
|
|
|
639
|
|
Additions for tax positions related to fiscal 2009
|
|
|
276
|
|
Additions for tax positions related to prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to the expiration of statutes of limitations
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
|
The Company has recorded the unrecognized tax benefits in Other
Long-Term Liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets as of
May 31, 2009 and 2008. All of the Companys
unrecognized tax benefits at May 31, 2009, if recognized,
would favorably affect the effective tax rate. Interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in
income tax expense and not significant for the years ended
May 31, 2009 and 2008.
The Company has not recognized U.S. tax expense on its
undistributed international earnings of $2,534 and $1,044 for
fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, since it intends to reinvest
the earnings outside the United States for the foreseeable
future. Any additional U.S. income taxes incurred would be
reduced by available foreign tax credits. If the earnings of
such foreign subsidiaries were not indefinitely reinvested, a
deferred tax liability would have been required.
The Company has authorized 3,000,000 shares of capital
stock, comprised of 2,000,000 shares of common stock
(Common) and 1,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock (Preferred Stock), of which
298,701 shares have been designated as Class A
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
(Class A) and 221,205 shares have been
designated as Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred
Stock (Class B). All authorized shares of
Common and Preferred stock have a par value of $0.01 per share.
Dividends
Should the Company declare or pay dividends to the holders of
its capital stock, no dividends shall be declared or paid to the
holders of the Common shares or other securities ranking junior
to the Preferred shares unless equivalent dividends, on an
as-converted basis, are declared and paid concurrently to the
Preferred shareholders.
F-30
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Voting
rights
The Common and Preferred shareholders are entitled to one vote
per share for all matters subject to vote. The Preferred
shareholders are entitled to the number of votes equal to the
number of whole shares of Common into which the shares of
Preferred are convertible to at the time of the vote.
Conversion of
preferred stock
Holders of shares of preferred stock have the right to convert
their shares, at any time, into shares of common stock. The
current conversion rate for each series of preferred stock is
one for one. The conversion rate for each series of preferred
stock is subject (i) to proportional adjustments for stock
splits and dividends, combinations, recapitalizations, etc. and
(ii) to formula-weighted-average adjustments in the event
that the Company issues additional shares of common stock or
securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock at a
purchase price less than the applicable conversion price for
such series of preferred series of preferred stock then in
effect, subject to certain customary exceptions. All shares of
preferred stock will automatically be converted into shares of
common stock upon the closing of the sale of shares of our
common stock in a firm commitment underwritten public offering,
pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act of 1933, in which the gross proceeds to the
Company and the valuation of the Company immediately prior to
the offering based on the offering price exceed certain minimum
amounts. Each series of preferred stock also converts to common
stock at the election of the holders of a majority of the then
outstanding shares of such series of preferred stock.
Class B
redemption rights
The majority holders of Class B preferred shares have the
right, but not the obligation, to require redemption of the
Class B shares upon the earlier occurrence of (i) an
Event of Noncompliance, as defined below, (ii) redemption
of the Class A shares or (iii) at their option. The
Company has the right to redeem all the Class B shares at
any time after the fifth anniversary of the Class B closing
date (October 26, 2010).
The redemption price of the Class B shares shall be equal
to (i) prior to the third anniversary, the original
issuance price plus 15% per annum from the original issue date
to the redemption date (referred to as the Class B
IRR Amount), and (ii) on or after October 26,
2008, the greater of (a) the Class B IRR Amount or
(b) the fair market value of Class B shares. Accretion
has been based on the fair market value from October 27,
2008 through May 31, 2009. In connection with the closing
of an initial public offering of the Companys common
stock, the Class B shares will convert into common stock at
a ratio of 1-to-1 (subject to (i) proportional adjustments
for stock splits and dividends, combinations, recapitalizations
and similar events and (ii) formula-weighted-average
adjustments in the event that the Company issues additional
shares of common stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for common stock at a purchase price less than the
price at which such series of preferred stock was originally
issued and sold, subject to certain customary exceptions) and
all accretion recorded through this redemption price formula
will be credited to the Companys retained earnings.
F-31
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Class A
redemption rights
The majority holders of Class A preferred shares have the
right, but not the obligation, to require redemption of the
Class A shares upon the earlier occurrence of (i) an
Event of Noncompliance, (ii) redemption of the Class B
shares or (iii) at their option. The Company has the right
to redeem all the Class A shares at any time after
August 1, 2008.
The redemption price of the Class A shares shall be equal
to (i) prior to August 11, 2007, the original issuance
price plus 15% per annum from the original issue date to the
redemption date (referred to as the Class A IRR
Amount), and (ii) on or after August 11, 2007,
the greater of (a) the Class A IRR Amount or
(b) the fair market value of Class A shares. Accretion
has been based on the Class A IRR Amount through
August 11, 2007 and the fair market value of Class A
shares thereafter. The fair market value of the Class A
shares was determined by the Board of Directors by reference to
the valuation of comparable companies using several methods. In
connection with the closing of an initial public offering of the
Companys common stock, the Class A shares will
convert into common stock at a ratio of 1-to-1 (subject to
(i) proportional adjustments for stock splits and
dividends, combinations, recapitalizations and similar events
and (ii) formula-weighted-average adjustments in the event
that the Company issues additional shares of common stock or
securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock at a
purchase price less than the price at which such series of
preferred stock was originally issued and sold, subject to
certain customary exceptions) and all accretion recorded through
this redemption price formula will be credited to the
Companys retained earnings.
Preferred
stock accretion
The accretion for the preferred stock was determined in
accordance with the Companys amended and restated
certificate of incorporation, which provides as follows:
Class A. 15% through August 11, 2007 and the higher of
15% or fair market value thereafter. Because the accretion based
on fair market value was greater than 15%, accretion was based
on fair market value for periods beginning on August 12,
2007 and later periods.
Class B. 15% through October 26, 2008 and the higher
of 15% or fair market value thereafter. Because the accretion
based on fair market value was greater than 15%, accretion was
based on fair market value for periods beginning on
October 27, 2008 and later periods.
The fair market value of the common stock was determined using
market comparables and multiple averages of various peer groups.
Event of
noncompliance
An Event of Noncompliance is defined as:
|
|
|
a sale of the Company or any of its material subsidiaries or any
other change of control of the Company (including without
limitation (i) the merger, reorganization or consolidation
of the Company into or with another corporation or other similar
transaction or series of related transactions in which 50% or
more of the voting power of the Company is disposed of or in
|
F-32
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
|
|
|
which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such
merger, reorganization or consolidation own less than 50% of the
Companys or its successors voting power immediately
after; or (ii) the sale of all or substantially all the
assets of the Company in one or a series of transactions),
|
|
|
|
a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar event affecting the Company
or any of its material subsidiaries,
|
|
|
|
a departure from the Company of Dr. Sotirios Vahaviolos,
the Companys Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
and a member of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
a reduction in the role of Dr. Sotirios Vahaviolos with the
Company to less than full-time employment for a period of 90
consecutive days or more than 120 days during any
twelve-month period,
|
|
|
|
a default under any loan, credit or financing agreement of the
Company that is not cured within the applicable cure period
provided for in said agreement;
|
|
|
the removal, hiring or promoting of any person for or to the job
or duties of Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating
Officer or Chief Financial Officer of the Company without the
consent of the holders of at least a majority of the then
outstanding shares of preferred stock of the Company, consenting
or voting, as the case may be, separately by series, or
|
|
|
a violation of any material right of any holder of shares of
preferred stock contained in the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation of the Company or in any agreement
among the Company and any holder of shares of preferred stock
(which violation, if reasonably curable within 30 days
after the Company knew or should have known of such occurrence,
is not so cured within 30 days after the Company knew or
should have known of such occurrence) or the taking of, or
agreement to take, any action which requires the approval of the
holders of shares of a series of or all preferred stock under
the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of the
Company or such agreements without such written consent.
|
Liquidation
preferences
In the event of liquidation, all Common and Class A
shareholders shall rank junior to the Class B shareholders.
The payment of the liquidation preferences is as follows:
(i) the Class B shareholders are entitled to receive
an amount per share equal to the original purchase price,
provided remaining assets are available; (ii) the
Class A shareholders are entitled to receive an amount per
share equal to the sum of the original purchase price plus an
annual rate of return equal to fifteen percent 15% per
annum (15% IRR) from the original issue date through
the date of the first sale of the Class B shares; provided
remaining assets are available; (iii) the Class A
holders are entitled to receive an amount per share equal to the
greater of (a) 15% IRR for the period between the
Class B closing date and the date of liquidation or
(b) the Class A net fair market value as of the date
of liquidation; provided remaining assets are available;
(iv) the Class B holders are entitled to receive
amount per share equal to the greater of (a) 15% IRR from
the original purchase date through the date of liquidation or
(b) the Class B net fair value
F-33
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
as of the date of liquidation; and (v) provided assets are
remaining, the remainder shall be distributed to all the Common
and other Preferred shareholders on an as-if
converted basis.
Since both Class A and B preferred shareholders have the
right but not the obligation to require redemption, the Company
has classified Class A and B preferred stock to temporary
equity.
In April 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved
the Mistras Group, Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan (the
Plan) terminating the further use of the 1995
Incentive Stock Plan except for the 19,000 options outstanding
at May 31, 2007. The Companys Chairman and majority
shareholder was also delegated the discretion to grant and
execute new options for up to 56,974 shares pursuant to the
2007 Plan, with an option exercise price equal to the fair
market value of the underlying shares at the date of grant.
Under the 2007 Plan, options were granted for periods not
exceeding 10 years and exercisable four years after the
date of grant at an exercise price of not less than 100% of the
fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The
fair market value of the common stock was determined by the
Companys board of directors. (The prior plans
options granted had five-year terms and vest and become fully
exercisable over a four-year period.)
The Companys stock option compensation expense consists of
options granted during fiscal 2008 and 2009 that are still
outstanding and are currently vesting. For stock options, the
Company determines the fair value of each option at the grant
date using a Black-Scholes model, with the following average
assumptions used for grants made:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
Volatility factor of the expected market price of the
Companys common stock
|
|
|
41.0%
|
|
|
|
38.0%
|
|
Expected dividend yield percentage
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Weighted average expected life
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
Average vesting period
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized share-based compensation expense for
options granted of $192 and $318 for the years ended
May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Unamortized
share-based compensation with respect to unvested stock options
at May 31, 2009 that vest over a four-year period from the
date of grant amounted to $1,935.
F-34
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
A summary of the Companys common stock option activity,
and related information for the years ended May 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2006
|
|
|
40,500
|
|
|
|
21,150
|
|
|
$
|
2.76
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(21,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2007 (prior plan)
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84.88
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2008
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
16,313
|
|
|
|
44.67
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
34,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135.92
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, May 31, 2009
|
|
|
72,300
|
|
|
|
25,688
|
|
|
|
88.59
|
|
|
|
The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options
outstanding at May 31, 2009 was approximately nine years.
The intrinsic weighted-average value of the options granted
during the year ended May 31, 2009 was $39.97 per share.
|
|
19.
|
Related party
transactions
|
The Company leases its headquarters under a capital lease
(Note 13) from a shareholder and officer of the
Company requiring monthly payments through October 2014. The
current payment is $62 which increases annually to a maximum of
$72.
The Company leases office space located in France, which is
partly owned by a shareholder and officer. The lease provides
for monthly payments of $16 and terminates January 12, 2016.
The Companys three segments are:
|
|
|
Services. This segment provides asset protection
solutions in North and Central America with the largest
concentration in the United States.
|
F-35
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
|
|
|
Products and Systems. This segment designs,
manufactures, sells, installs and services the Companys
asset protection products and systems, including equipment and
instrumentation, predominantly in the United States.
|
|
|
|
International. This segment offers services,
products and systems similar to those of our other segments to
global markets, principally in Europe, the Middle East, Africa,
Asia and South America, but not to customers in China and South
Korea, which are served by our Products and Systems segment.
|
General corporate services, including accounting, audit, and
contract management, are provided to the segments which are
reported as intersegment transactions within corporate and
eliminations. Sales to the International segment from the
Products and Systems segment and subsequent sales by the
International segment of the same items are recorded and
reflected in the operating performance of both segments.
Additionally, engineering charges and royalty fees charged to
the Services and International segments by the Products and
Systems segment are reflected in the operating performance of
each segment. All such intersegment transactions are eliminated
in corporate and eliminations.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same
as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies in Note 2. Segment income from operations is
determined based on internal performance measures used by the
Chief Executive Officer, the chief operating decision maker, to
assess the performance of each business in a given period and to
make decisions as to resource allocations. In connection with
that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer may exclude items
such as charges for stock-based compensation and certain other
acquisition-related charges and balances, technology and product
development costs, certain gains and losses from dispositions,
and litigation settlements or other charges. Certain general and
administrative costs such as human resources, information
technology and training are allocated to the segments. Segment
income from operations also excludes interest and other
financial charges and income taxes. Corporate and other assets
are comprised principally of cash, deposits, property, plant and
equipment, domestic deferred taxes, deferred charges and other
assets. Corporate loss from operations consists of depreciation
on the corporate office facilities and equipment, administrative
charges related to corporate personnel and other charges that
cannot be readily identified for allocation to a particular
segment.
F-36
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Selected consolidated financial information by segment for the
periods shown was as follows:
Revenues by operating segment includes intercompany
transactions, which are eliminated in corporate and eliminations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
167,543
|
|
|
$
|
116,027
|
|
|
$
|
90,867
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
17,310
|
|
|
|
16,675
|
|
|
|
14,916
|
|
International
|
|
|
29,165
|
|
|
|
23,727
|
|
|
|
20,935
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(4,885
|
)
|
|
|
(4,161
|
)
|
|
|
(4,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,133
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
|
Operating income by operating segment includes intercompany
transactions, which are eliminated in corporate and eliminations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
13,681
|
|
|
$
|
14,649
|
|
|
$
|
8,299
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
International
|
|
|
4,091
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(4,611
|
)
|
|
|
(3,422
|
)
|
|
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,825
|
|
|
$
|
16,358
|
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
10,603
|
|
|
$
|
9,529
|
|
|
$
|
7,101
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
International
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,636
|
|
|
$
|
11,423
|
|
|
$
|
8,691
|
|
|
|
F-37
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
9,686
|
|
|
$
|
9,841
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
International
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,949
|
|
|
$
|
11,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
37,355
|
|
|
$
|
28,841
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,642
|
|
|
$
|
28,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
75,197
|
|
|
$
|
60,785
|
|
Products and Systems
|
|
|
4,553
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
International
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,604
|
|
|
$
|
70,481
|
|
|
|
F-38
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Results by
geographic area
Net revenues by geographic area for the fiscal years ended
May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended May 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
162,815
|
|
|
$
|
118,316
|
|
|
$
|
92,229
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
16,293
|
|
|
|
6,641
|
|
|
|
5,434
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
20,692
|
|
|
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
15,380
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
9,333
|
|
|
|
10,397
|
|
|
|
9,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,133
|
|
|
$
|
152,268
|
|
|
$
|
122,241
|
|
|
|
No individual foreign countrys revenues or long-lived
assets were material for disclosure purposes.
Credit
agreement
On July 22, 2009, the Company refinanced its existing term
loan and revolver with a new credit facility comprised of a
$25,000 term loan and $55,000 revolver, a portion of which
($2,000 U.S. dollar equivalent) will be available to be
borrowed in Canadian dollars. The interest rate is LIBOR or Base
Rate, at the Companys option, plus a margin ranging from
0% to 3.25%, dependent upon the Companys Funded Debt
Ratio, as defined. Quarterly principal payments of $1,500 will
begin October 31, 2009 and increase to $2,000 and $2,750 on
October 31, 2010 and October 31, 2011, respectively.
The new facility contains certain financial and nonfinancial
covenants that are consistent with the Companys existing
loans. Proceeds will be used to pay down the Companys
current term loan and revolver and to fund acquisitions and
working capital.
F-39
Mistras Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to
consolidated financial statements(continued)
Scheduled principal payments under all of the Companys
borrowings after giving effect to the revised term loan payments
in each of the five years and thereafter subsequent to
May 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
11,181
|
|
2011
|
|
|
12,288
|
|
2012
|
|
|
11,501
|
|
2013
|
|
|
30,425
|
|
2014
|
|
|
184
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
66,251
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
Concurrent with the refinancing, the Company acquired two
unrelated entities to continue its strategic efforts in market
expansion. The total cost of the acquisitions was $19,500 of
which $14,000 was paid in cash and the balance by the issuance
of subordinated seller notes of $3,000 and other liabilities of
$2,500. The notes are payable over four years and bear interest
at 4.0%. In addition, one acquisition has an additional
contingent purchase price of $650 to $1,350 based on the
acquired entity achieving certain revenue and profitability
thresholds. The Company is in the process of completing the
preliminary purchase price allocation. In connection with the
acquisitions, the Company has also entered into finite
at-will
consulting and employment agreements with certain sellers. In
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company expensed
$150 of direct costs related to the acquisitions as they were in
process but not completed by the effective date of
SFAS 141R.
These acquisitions were not, individually or in the aggregate,
significant.
F-40
Examples of
customer solutions that use asset protection services, products
and systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry
|
|
Technologies used
|
|
Situation or what we
did
|
|
Customer benefit
|
|
|
Fossil Power Utility
|
|
Ultrasonic Phased Array and Digital Radiography
|
|
New concept endorsed by an insurance
company and the Electric Power Research Institute
Minimized radiation exclusion zones,
allowing for increased construction activity
Examined 150 boiler header welds and
14,000 boiler tube welds
|
|
Shortened their normal maintenance period by 15 full days at a
total cost savings of nearly $15 million.
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
Guided Wave Ultrasonic Long Range Inspection
|
|
Used advanced technology that:
rapidly inspects 100% of large sections
of piping with minimal insulation removal
identifies localized damage
inspects previously inaccessible areas
where consequences and likelihood of failure are high
|
|
Obtained reliability correlation factor of 99% and customer can
accelerate its testing of miles of pipeline.
|
Refineries and Petrochemical
|
|
Touch Point Corrosion Inspection
|
|
Our Services segment together with our Products and Systems
segment developed an inspection methodology that quickly
determines the integrity of a piping system by paying special
attention to concerns when a pipe rests on a metal or wooden
object resulting in the potential creation of a corrosion cell.
|
|
Customers now have a way to test these inaccessible areas
without lifting the pipe and can avoid other problems such as
dislodging environmentally sensitive materials or potentially
causing additional damage to the piping system.
|
Ammonia Processing Tank
|
|
AE Sensors
|
|
96 sensors were placed under the insulation and cabled to a
connection box. The vessel was filled and we evaluated the data.
|
|
Customer removed the vessel from service and repaired over
2,000 feet of weld that was defective from the original
manufacture.
|
|
|
A-1
Part II
Information not
required in prospectus
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other expenses
of issuance and distribution.
|
The following table sets forth the various expenses, other than
underwriting discounts and commissions, payable by the
registrant in connection with the sale of common stock being
registered. All of the amounts shown are estimated except the
SEC registration fee, the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (FINRA) filing fee and the New York Stock Exchange
listing fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount to
|
|
|
|
be paid
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
9,625.50
|
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
|
17,750
|
|
New York Stock Exchange listing fee*
|
|
|
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses*
|
|
|
|
|
Legal fees and expenses*
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses*
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees*
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous fees and expenses*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total*
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
To be completed by amendment.
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of directors and officers.
|
Section 145(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law
(DGCL) provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any
person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party
to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the
corporation) by reason of the fact that the person is or was a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is
or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise,
against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by the person in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the
person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal
action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the
persons conduct was unlawful.
Section 145(b) of the DGCL provides that a Delaware
corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation
to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that
such person acted in any of the capacities set forth above,
against expenses (including attorneys fees) actually and
reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit if the person acted under
standards similar to those discussed above, except that no
indemnification may be made in respect of any
II-1
claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been
adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the
extent that the court in which such action or suit was brought
shall determine that despite the adjudication of liability, such
person is fairly and reasonably entitled to be indemnified for
such expenses which the court shall deem proper.
Section 145 further provides that to the extent a director
or officer of a corporation has been successful in the defense
of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in
subsections (a) and (b) or in the defense of any claim,
issue or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified
against expenses (including attorneys fees) actually and
reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith; that
indemnification provided for by Section 145 shall not be
deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the indemnified
party may be entitled; and that the corporation may purchase and
maintain insurance on behalf of a director or officer of the
corporation against any liability asserted against such person
or incurred by such person in any such capacity or arising out
of such persons status as such whether or not the
corporation would have the power to indemnify such person
against such liabilities under Section 145.
The registrants amended and restated bylaws provide that
the registrant shall indemnify any director or officer of the
corporation, and may indemnify any other person, who
(a) was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party
to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the
corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was
serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines, and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in
good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe his conduct was unlawful, and (b) was or
is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the
right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by
reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer,
employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at
the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee
or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture,
trust or other enterprise against expenses (including
attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit
if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed
to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation
and except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of
any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have
been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to
the extent that the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in
which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon
application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in
view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly
and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the
Delaware Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a certificate
of incorporation may contain a provision eliminating or limiting
the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director, provided that such provision shall not eliminate
or limit the liability of a director: (i) for any breach of
the directors duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith
or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation
of law; (iii) under Section 174 of
II-2
the DGCL; or (iv) for any transaction from which the
director derived an improper personal benefit.
The registrants second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by
the DGCL, as the same exists or hereafter may be amended, a
director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to
the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for the
breach of any fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability
(i) for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty
to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or
omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under
Section 174 of the DGCL, as the same exists or hereafter
may be amended, or (iv) for any transaction from which the
director derived an improper personal benefit.
In addition, the registrant has entered into indemnification
agreements, in the forms attached as Exhibits 10.3 and 10.4
hereto, with its directors and executive officers which require
the registrant, among other things, to indemnify them against
certain liabilities which may arise by reason of their status.
The registrant maintains directors and officers
liability insurance for its officers and directors.
The underwriting agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this
Registration Statement contains provisions indemnifying officers
and directors of the registrant against liabilities arising
under the Securities Act or otherwise.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent sales
of unregistered securities.
|
In the three years preceding the filing of this registration
statement, the registrant has issued the following securities
that were not registered under the Securities Act:
Between August 15, 2006 and August 15, 2009, the
registrant issued and sold an aggregate of 21,500 shares of
common stock upon the exercise of options issued to certain
employees, directors and officers under the registrants
1995 Stock Plan at exercise prices ranging from $0.50 to $1.50
per share, for an aggregate consideration of $16,750.
On April 25, 2007, the registrant issued 18,000 shares
of its Class B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock to
Dr. Vahaviolos in connection with the purchase from him of
substantially all of the capital stock of Envirocoustics ABEE, a
Metamorhosi, Attica Greece corporation by one of our
subsidiaries, Physical Acoustics Limited, an English limited
company. This transaction did not involve any underwriter or a
public offering.
The issuance of securities described above were deemed to be
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in
reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Regulation D promulgated thereunder as transactions by an
issuer not involving any public offering. The recipients of
securities in each such transaction represented their intention
to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a
view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof
and appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates
and other instruments issued in such transactions. The sales of
these securities were made without general solicitation or
advertising.
II-3
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits and
financial statement schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits.
The information required by this item is set forth on the
exhibit index that follows the signature page of this
Registration Statement.
(b) Financial statement schedules.
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are
inapplicable, not required or the information is indicated
elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or the notes
thereto.
A. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under
the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers, and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the provisions described above in Item 14, or otherwise,
the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted against the registrant by such director,
officer or controlling person in connection with the securities
being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of
its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the
question of whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed
by the final adjudication of such issue.
B. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide
to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
C. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
1. For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act
shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of
the time it was declared effective.
2. For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-4
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Princeton Junction,
New Jersey, on August 24, 2009.
MISTRAS GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
|
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
II-5
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) and Director
|
|
August 24,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul
Peterik
Paul
Peterik
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) and Secretary
|
|
August 24,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 24,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 24,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 24,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 24,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
August 24,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
Sotirios
J. Vahaviolos
As Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
II-6
Exhibit index
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
no.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
|
|
3
|
.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws.
|
|
4
|
.1*
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate.
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers.
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended.
|
|
10
|
.3*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
July 22, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
21
|
.1**
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. (included in
Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
|
|
24
|
.1**
|
|
Power of Attorney (on signature page).
|
|
99
|
.1**
|
|
Consent of Richard H. Glanton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
To be filed by amendment.
|
|
**
|
|
Previously filed.
|
II-7
exv23w2
Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated
August 24, 2009, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Mistras
Group, Inc. which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us
under the headings Experts and Selected Financial Data in such Registration Statement.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, NJ
August 24, 2009
cover
FULBRIGHT
& JAWORSKI L.L.P.
A
REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
666 FIFTH AVENUE, 31ST FLOOR
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10103-3198
WWW.FULBRIGHT.COM
|
|
|
JDANIELS@FULBRIGHT.COM
DIRECT DIAL: (212) 318-3322
|
|
TELEPHONE: (212) 318-3000
FACSIMILE: (212) 318-3400 |
August 24, 2009
VIA EDGAR AND FEDEX
Ms. Jennifer Hardy
Branch Chief
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Mail Stop 7010
Washington, D.C. 20549-3561
|
|
|
Re:
|
|
Mistras Group, Inc.
Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed June 10, 2008
File No. 333-151559 |
Dear Ms. Hardy:
On behalf of Mistras Group, Inc. (the Registrant), we hereby submit to you Amendment No. 3
(Amendment No. 3) to the Registrants above-referenced Registration Statement on Form S-1. We
have marked the enclosed Amendment No. 3 to show changes from the prior amendment.
If you have any questions or need any further assistance in connection with this filing,
please feel free to contact Sheldon Nussbaum at (212) 318-3254 or
the undersigned at (212) 318-3322.
|
|
|
|
|
Very truly yours,
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph F. Daniels
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph F. Daniels
|
Enclosures
|
|
|
cc:
|
|
Mindy Hooker, Staff Accountant
Anne McConnell, Staff Accountant
Craig Slivka, Staff Attorney
Sotirios J. Vahaviolos, Mistras Group, Inc.
Pete Peterik, Mistras Group, Inc.
Andrew C. Freedman, Esq., Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
Sheldon G. Nussbaum, Esq., Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
Donald G. Ainscow, Esq., Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. |